International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the 21 st Century February 27, 2009

Application Model 1. Knowledge in one discipline 2. Application within discipline 3. Application across disciplines 4. Application to real-world predictable situations 5. Application to real-world unpredictable situations

Challenges Globalization

Wal Mart Source: The Post-American World Largest Corporation 8 times Size of Microsoft 2 % of GDP 1.4 Million Employees More Employees than: GM, Ford, G.E. and IBM Combined

“China today exports in a single day more than exported in all of 1978.” Source: The Rise of India and China...

Savings Rate 1. India -- 25% 2. Japan -- 28% 3. Korea -- 30% 4. China -- 50% 5. United States -- (-4%)

U.S. – 2 nd Half of 20 th Century Only Superpower Highest per Capita Income 1 st in Economic Growth 5% of Population > 24% of Consumption Source: National Academy of Science

Challenges Globalization Technology

Information Technology Processing Processing Communications Communications

1983 – A Nation at Risk Web pages Google iPODs Laptops Digital cameras Doppler radar Cell phones

Blogs Wikis Tagging Text messaging MySpace Podcasts PDAs 2000

Content Creation & Social Media Facebook MySpace Flickr YouTube Blogs Personal Web Pages

SPOT MicrosoftMicrosoft –Citizen –Fossil –Suunco

SPOT Integrated ProjectionIntegrated Projection Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard

Projection Keyboard

Projection Keyboard and Projector

Language Translation

Translation Goggles

Emotiv 16 embedded sensors Detect facial expressions and emotions Push, pull, lift, and drop

Bio Technology Biological Science Biological Science Practical Application Practical Application

Nano Technology Atom Up Atom Up

Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2000

Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2009

Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2012

Elementary Schools 6 Years Integrated Science Biology / ChemistryGrade 7 Biology / PhysicsGrade 8 Physics / ChemistryGrade 9 Integrated ScienceGrades Source: Ed Week 6/6/07 Chinese Science

Challenges Technology Globalization Demographics

Start Working End Working Longevity

Retirement 55 is not an economically sustainable policy

/ 100 Demographics / Economic / / 100

Population of the US (in millions) 68 % 5 8 % 13 % 24 % 14 % 49 %

Medicare % % %

Challenges Technology Globalization Demographics Work

Employment 1970’s High Skill Low Skill

Employment 1990’s High Skill Low Skill Semi Skill

Employment 2010 High Skill Low Skill Semi Skill

1970’s 1990’s 2010

Industrial Base American Cotton Oil American Steel American Sugar Continental Tobacco Federal Steel General Electric National Lead Pacific Mail People’s Gas Tennessee Coal and Iron 1900

Industrial Base General Motors Wal-Mart Exxon Ford General Electric IBM Citigroup AT & T Phillip Morris Boeing 1998

Industrial Base Software Aerospace Genomics Bioinformatics Nanotechnology Photonics Micro Material Finance IT Robotics 2010

Lexile Framework ® for Reading Study Summary of Text Lexile Measures Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

Expectations have Changed 20 th Century21st Century 1 – 2 Jobs 10 – 15 Jobs Flexibility And Adaptability Life Long Learners Mastery of One Field Subject Matter Mastery # of Jobs Job Requirements Teaching Model

U.S. % of World Scientists / Engineers

We need to do what workers abroad cannot do equally well for less money… Forging relationships, tackling novel challenges, synthesizing big picture.

Foreign owned companies and foreign- born inventors account for nearly half of U.S. patents (Japan, Korea and Taiwan more than one-fourth) “Innovate America,” Council on Competitiveness Business Reality

Workplace Trends Unskilled Unskilled Work to Worker Work to Worker Large to Small Large to Small

16 Career Clusters Department of Education

Reading Requirements Findings Entry-level Entry-level Highest in 6/16 Highest in 6/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Consistent Across Country Consistent Across Country

Human Services

Construction

Manufacturing

Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Wisconsin 83 % Texas 81 % Iowa 77 % Florida 71 % Massachusetts 48 % California 48 % South Carolina 35 %

Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Wisconsin 83 %189 Texas 81 %190 Iowa 77 %197 Florida 71 %202 Massachusetts 48 %234 California 48 %210 South Carolina 35 %228

Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 % Wisconsin 86 % Iowa 72 % Florida 44 % California 39 % South Carolina 30 %

Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 %217 Wisconsin 86 %229 Iowa 72 %250 Florida 44 %265 California 39 %262 South Carolina 30 %276

Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 91 % Texas 82 % Wisconsin 74 % Michigan 73 % Florida 63 % California 51 % South Carolina 39 % Massachusetts 39 %

Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 91 %203 Texas 82 %219 Wisconsin 74 %225 Michigan 73 %222 Florida 63 %230 California 51 %231 South Carolina 39 %246 Massachusetts 39 %255

Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 84 % Iowa 76 % Wisconsin 75 % Michigan 61 % Florida 58 % Massachusetts 42 % South Carolina 24 %

Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 84 %247 Iowa 76 %262 Wisconsin 75 %263 Michigan 61 %269 Florida 58 %269 Massachusetts 42 %301 South Carolina 24 %305

Improving Student Performance in Times of Declining Resources

Bases of ICLE Position International Center with Nation’s most Successful Schools Funding Student Learning – Report States –Florida –New Jersey

Framework Vs. Index

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB High Cost High Performance Low Cost High Performance Low Cost Low Performance High Cost Low Performance

Example Class Size –25 to 24 –4 % increase –Payroll Equals 80 % –Total Cost = 3.2 % of Budget Professional Development

Ohio English Language Arts Learning Standards Tested

Levels CDCDABABCDCDABAB Bloom’s Application

Gold Seal Lessons

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Focused Professional Development Reduce Class Size

Empower Staff

1. Team of teachers

Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students

Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance

Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance 4. Give total budget (fixed and variable)

Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance 4. Give total budget (fixed and variable) 5. Give % of savings if student performance improves

Successful Examples 1.Teachers in teams with a group of students --- They get 50% of reduced cost if students maintain student performance. If they dramatically improve student performance they get 80% of reduced cost

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Teacher-Designed Program X X Existing Program

Examples 1. Department Chairs

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Interdisciplinary Chairs

Examples 1. Department Chairs 2.Looping

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Looping

Examples 1. Department Chairs 2.Looping 3.Electives to 9 th Grade

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Electives to 9 th Grade

Technology

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance I CAN Learn

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance READ 180

Examples Coordinate Professional Development with Graduate Degrees

Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)

Cost of Graduate Programs 1.Temple University -$573 per credit hour ($837 out of state) 2. State University of New York at Albany -$338 per credit hour ($573 out of state) 3.RPI - $1,285 per credit hour

Online and Best Practices course 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of $450 = $60 per day compared to: - $1,014 - $3,855 per course for Graduate Credit - Cost of Professional Development Day $36,000 per year/180 days = $200 per day

Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices

Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities

Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities No travel

Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities No travel Cost savings to teachers and district PLUS best practices tied to district priorities

Relevant and Cost Effective for Teachers Relevant and Cost Effective for District

Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Online Graduate Course X X Traditional Professional Development

WHY - WHAT - HOW

1587 Route 146 Rexford, NY Phone (518) Fax (518) International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc.