Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients SHINYA OKUDA, M.D., etc… Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
British Spinal Registry British Association of Spine Surgeons Middlesbrough February 2007 John O’Dowd Nicky Courtier.
Advertisements

Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine
The different types of patients with Sciatica from a lumbar disc Manoj Krishna. Spinal Surgeon
Infection After ACL Reconstruction H. Makhmalbaf MD Consultant Orth.& Knee Surgeon Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
“A Controlled Randomized Outcome Study of Femoral Ring Allograft versus BAK Instrumentation in Anterior Interbody Fusion” Dr. Donald W. Kucharzyk Dr. Michael.
Lumbar Spine Surgery: Indications & Outcomes Nelson Saldua, LCDR, MC, USN Eric Harris, CDR, MC, USN Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.
Causes of Stenosis Degenerative spondylo-listhesis Facet subluxation and hypertrophy Pagets disease Tumour Facet joint cyst Congenital- achondroplasia.
GLATA 2010 EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL BACK CANDIDATE Hank Feuer, MD, FACS Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine Methodist Sports Medicine Center Hank Feuer,
Department of Neurosurgery, Mokpo Hankook Hospital, Mokpo-city.
Complications of Spinal Surgery
Lumbar Spine Pathologies and Treatments Physician Name Physician Institution Date.
ARTIFICIAL DISC VERSUS FUSION A prospective randomised study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Daniel Boedeker, MD Spinal Hardware Extraction.  Spinal instrumentation has been utilized since the 1940s  Pedicle screws became increasingly popular.
Degenerative Disease of the Spine
35 and 45 years age Risk factor – Smoking sedentary work motor vehicle driving Sciatica, characterized by pain radiating down the leg in.
Sacroiliac pain after PLIF and/or posterolateral lumbar fusion; anesthetic joint blocks with corticosteroids R. Hart, R. Bárta, F. Okál, M. Komzák Dept.
Decompression Surgery
Cervical Spine Pathologies and Treatments Physician Name Physician Institution Date.
Correlating Clinical and MRI Scan Findings in Low Back Pain Jim Messerly D.O.
Posterolateral versus Posterior Interbody Fusion in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Introduction Spondylolisthesis is a heterogeneous disorder characterised.
InFUSE ™ Bone Graft / LT-CAGE ™ Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device IDE Clinical Results G Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia.
Lumbar Surgery Audit Period 1 st Jan st Dec 2007 Presented at Britspine teaching Hospital consultants 2 District General Hospitals.
Basic Diseases That Affect The Vertebral Column And Management.
Back Pain Christopher D. Sturm, M.D., F.A.C.S Medical Director Mercy Institute of Neuroscience & Mercy Regional Neurosurgery Center.
IPSILATERAL RADICULAR PAIN FOLLOWING DISCECTOMY K. Liaropoulos, P. Spyropoulou, P. Korovesis, Th. Maraziotis, N. Papadakis.
MedPix Medical Image Database COW - Case of the Week Case Contributor: Neuroradiology Learning File - © ACR Affiliation: ACR Learning File®
Seeking Patients for Back Pain Study DIAM ™ Spinal Stabilization System vs. Conservative Care Therapies Wayne Cheng, MD Caution: Investigational device,
Dr.Moallemy Lumbar Facet Pain (pain Originating from the Lumbar Facet Joints)
Neurological Surgery Department Translaminar facet screw fixation in ithsmic lumbar spondylolisthesis. Angel J. Lacerda MD PhD, Daisy Abreu MD, Julio A.
A New Monolaterally Inserted Interspinous Device in the Mini- Invasive Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation associated with Lumbar Canal Stenosis.
Analysis of Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Byung-Joon Shin, Jae Chul Lee, Hae-Dong Chang, Su-Jin Yun, Yon-Il.
Continuous Loop Double Endobutton Reconstruction for AC Joint Dislocation Steven Struhl, MD 1, Theodore Wolfson, MD 1 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Treatment goals of treatment relieve pain, prevent or reduce stress on the discs, and maintain normal function ranges from conservative therapies to surgical.
Sciatica Causes and 4 case presentations Manoj Krishna Spinal Surgeon.
Examination and Treatment of the Lumbar Spine William L. Tontz, Jr., MD.
In the name of God H. Moin M.D, F. R.C.S Oct
Cervical Radiculopathy. Normal Anatomy Cervical spinal nerves exit via the intervertebral foramen Intervertebral foramen is the gap between the facet.
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis. Normal Anatomy Pars interarticularis – Part of vertebra between inferior and superior articular process of the facet.
Rui Shi Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University.
SURGERIES IN BACK PAIN MANAGEMENT Chaloupka R., Repko M. University Hospital Brno, Orthopaedic Dept Brno-Bohunice.
Decompressing spinal cord by Laminotomy. Laminotomy is a surgical procedure that helps in decompressing the spinal cord and spinal nerves emerging from.
Spinal cord compression in spine tumours and injuries Chaloupka, R., Grosman, R., Repko, M., Tichý, V. Ortopedická klinika, FN Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625.
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden Preoperative simulation reduces surgical time and radiation exposure for.
Professor Kenneth Cheung Jessie Ho Professor in Spine Surgery Head of Department British Journal of Surgery 1956 Duchess of Kent 1970s Complications of.
Herniated Disc Surgery. Anatomy A herniated disc most often occurs in the lumbar region (low back). This is because the lumbar spine carries most of the.
POSTERIOR SUBTOTAL VERTEBRECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF THORACIC OSTEOMYELITIS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS Meric ENERCAN, MD Cagatay OZTURK, MD Mehmet AYDOGAN, MD.
OUTCOME OF SPINE SURGERY IN ELDORET
Degenerative disease of Lumbar spine
Introduction In the last years several interspinous prostheses have been used for the treatment of several degenerative disc diseases involving the lumbosacralregion;
Physician determines eligibility
Neurosurgical Updates 2016 Brain & Spine Symposium:
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Pediatric orthopedic surgeon – Ramallah - Palestine
One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients
Neurosurgical Updates 2016 Brain & Spine Symposium:
Matthew D Hepler, MD* Matthew T Walker, MD Eugene Lautenschlager, PhD
Symptomatic progression of degenerative scoliosis after decompression and limited fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis  John K. Houten, Rani Nasser 
Follow up CT scan on 20 year old male with back pain
Florence Nightingale Hospital
MIS Techniques Applied to Deformity:
Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia
Kyphosis with osteoporotic compression fracture
Lumbar stenosis case (MT-ULBD)
Percutaneous screw and rod placement
Lumbar spondylolisthesis (MISS TLIF)
Garrido E†, Bermejo F†, Tucker SK†‡, Noordeen HNN†‡, Morley TR‡
Scoliosis surgery with hybrid system in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI)
Presentation transcript:

Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients SHINYA OKUDA, M.D., etc… Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka; and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo, Japan J Neurosurg Spine 4:304–309, 2006 JOURNAL READING 2006, 4,11 PRESENTED BY P.E.HUNG

Introduction-- To treat degenerative lumbar disorders with segmental instability, it is essential to decompress all involved neural elements and stabilize the affected segment.

The PLIF provides wide posterior visualization and circumferential decompression of the neural elements

Introduction-- Although PLIF with pedicle screw fixation (TPS) has produced satisfactory clinical results, it is associated with surgical complications.

Introduction-- Several reports indicate lumbar arthrodesis have substantially higher complication rates than decompression alone. Previous studies of surgical complications are of limited value due to variation in instrumentation and fusion techniques.

Purpose and Methods-- To examine intraoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative complication rates of PLIF Using a large number of cases with uniform instrumentation and a uniform fusion technique. Reviewed the records of 251 patients who underwent PLIF for degenerative lumbar disorders between 1996 ~ 2002 and who could be followed for at least 2 years.

Clinical Material-- F/U rate 88%. Mean age at surgery :61 Y/O Mean F/U period: 50 months Diagnosis: Most(154) of the patients degenerative spondylolisthesis 53 isthmic spondylolisthesis 23 lumbar canal stenosis 21 disc herniation Exclude infection, fracture– dislocation, rheumatoid arthritis, or destructive spinal arthropathy. The vertebral levels of the PLIF segments were as follows: L1–2 in 2 cases L2–3 in 5, L3–4 in 18 L4–5 in 162 L5–6 in 12, and L5–S1 in 39 In 13 patients, two levels were fused: L2–4 in 2, L3–5 in 10, and L4–S1 in 1.

Clinical Material— Indications: Severe, disabling low-back pain and lower-extremity pain that were unresponsive to conservative treatment such as medication and epidural steroid injection. Spondylolisthesis with slippage greater than 3 mm and a posterior opening greater than 5° on flexion– extension lateral radiographs. Lumbar canal stenosis, or disc herniation requiring wide decompression and discectomy.

Clinical Material— Procedures & Technique: By five surgeons, each had more than 10 years of experience in orthopedic surgery. Using the Steffee variable screw placement system and local bone grafting with Brantigan interbody fusion cages. Total facetectomy was performed to prevent excessive retraction of neural elements during discectomy and bone grafting.

Clinical Material— Procedures & Technique: Autografting was performed using local lamina bone. Neither fluoroscopic guidance nor computer navigation was used during the pedicle screw insertion. Posterolateral fusion was not added at any level.

Clinical Material— Assessments: JOA scoring system(29 to -6). Timimg: before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 15,18, and 24 months post-op. Early postoperative-- occurring less than or equal to 1 month. Late postoperative--greater than 1 month. Excluded complications that were not specific for spine surgery and did not affect recovery(for example, urinary tract infection, anemia, and confusion) Spine-specific complications (such as pedicle screw malpositions) were included even if they did not affect postoperative clinical results.

JOA scoring system(29 to -6)

Investigation-- Intraoperative complications dural tearing, nerve injury (for example, cauda equina and/or nerve root damage); pedicle screw malposition(penetration of the medial or lateral pedicle cortex by more than half the diameter of the screw or penetration of the anterior vertebral cortex by more than 5 mm of the screw tip) Early postoperative complications pulmonary, cardiac, and cerebrovascular morbidity; infection; hardware failure; and neurological complications classified into three categories: ( leg pain/severe/slight motor loss) Late postoperative complications late infection, hardware failure, nonunion, and adjacent-segment degeneration.(defined as a condition in which additional surgery was required) If solid fusion was not detected 6 months after surgery, a conventional and reconstruction CT study was performed every 3 months to confirm bone continuity between bone graft and vertebra.

Summary of the results--

Clinical issue-- Intraoperative complications Intraoperative complications did not affect the postoperative clinical results. One (1/7) patient with irritation of the nerve root due to medial penetration of the pedicle screw underwent revision surgery, then s/s improved. No other patient had symptoms due to pedicle screw malposition.

Clinical issue-- Early postoperative complications One case with brain infarction was observed 2 days after surgery, successfully treated with conservative therapy One case, CRF due to DM under H/D, deep wound infection was noted about 1 week after surgery, debridement three times, improved without hardware removal. 8 p’t with slight motor loss or radicular pain alone, their symptoms improved within 6 weeks. 9 p’t showed severe motor loss such as foot drop; compression of neural elements was not detected on image; 5/9 agreed to receive 2 nd op( average period 9 days ; 2/5 expansion of hemostatic agents; 1/5 epidural hematoma; 1/5 inadequate decompression around the nerve root; 1/5 unknown) JOA(before first op and after 2 nd op)=10  21 JOA(not revision surgery)=10  12(with permanent motor loss)

Clinical issue-- Late postoperative complications All 3 patients with hardware failure exhibited pedicle screw breakage, but none of them had complaints, bone fusion was detected in all. Nonunion, 2/3 had severe low-back pain that was unresponsive to conservative treatment for more than 1 year and was treated with a 2 nd op, average period 17 months

Postoperative progression of adjacent-segment degeneration It was observed at the cranial segment in 9/11 cases and at the caudal segment in 2/11 cases. The average JOA (before first op/before 2 nd op/max. after 2 nd op)  13/14/25 2 nd OP-- 6 laminotomy, 4 PLIF, 1 discectomy. All 11 p’t had improvement of neurological symptoms. The average period: 24 months

Discussion-- Intraoperative complications Dura-related complications are often considered of little consequence to the final outcome, as was the case in the present series. The incidence of pedicle screw malposition should be reduced by development of computer navigation systems.

Discussion-- Early postoperative complications Total facetectomy can provide more space for PLIF maneuvering and can facilitate retraction of nerve roots to prevent nerve injury. In the current series, all patients with severe motor loss exhibited neurological deficits for a few days after surgery. Therefore, we conclude that intraoperative nerve injury was not the cause of these neurological deficits. In cases severe motor loss occurs a few days after PLIF, surgical intervention should be performed to confirm decompression of the nerve roots, even if it is not detected on postoperative neuroimages.

Discussion-- Late postoperative complications Hardware failure was likely to increase if more fusion levels are involved, but it did not affect clinical results. The causes of these nonunions were not indicated by the patient’s history or laboratory data. We achieve an extensive bone graft area in the disc space by total facetectomy and extensive discectomy at the lateral border. Such techniques increased the fusion rate to 99% in the present series.

Discussion-- Late postoperative complications Adjacent-segment degeneration It tended to occur at the cranial segment, producing the same conditions(7/11 had the same Dx) as those seen at the first operation. Although progression of this degeneration can be considered part of the normal aging and deterioration process, this phenomenon appears to be at least partly influenced by the alteration of stresses. Risk factors: addition of instrumentation, injury to the adjacent facet joint, fusion length, and sagittal alignment, coexistence of facet tropism and lamina horizontalization adjacent to the fusion segment.

Related article Radiologic Evaluation of Adjacent Superior Segment Facet Joint Violation Following Transpedicular Instrumentation of the Lumbar Spine. Spine. 28(3): , February 1, Abstract: Study Design. The location of pedicle screws in relation to adjacent superior segment facet joints in 106 patients after lumbar spinal fusion was assessed using computed tomography and plain radiographs. Conclusion. Facet joint violation occurred in just >30% of the patients and 20% of the screws in this study. This, therefore, raises the theoretical possibility of long-term deterioration in the clinical results following the use of transpedicular instrumentation.

Related article Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature. Spine. 29(17): , September 1, Definition, etiology, incidence, and risk factors, potential treatment options. Conclusion-- Biomechanical alterations likely play a primary role Radiographically common but does not correlate with functional outcomes. Potentially modifiable risk factors include fusion without instrumentation, protecting the facet joint of the adjacent segment during placement of pedicle screws,fusion length, and sagittal balance. Surgical management, when indicated, consists of decompression of neural elements and extension of fusion. Outcomes are modest.

Conclusions-- Of the 251 patients whose cases we reviewed, 62 (25%) exhibited one or more complications, and 20 (8%) underwent a 2 nd op. There was no relationship between complications and a specific cause such as the size of the cage, age, diagnosis, or a specific surgeon. In the present study, the most serious complications of PLIF were postoperative severe neurological complications and adjacent-segment degeneration. Prevention and management of such complications are necessary for obtaining good long-term clinical results.

~Thanks~