Exploring Interactive Computer Marked Assessments for Logic Constructs in Level 1 Computing Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science, Computing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Design Materials designed with low reading levels but high interest level. More, shorter assignments (20min) Organized with checklists Quick easy.
Advertisements

QUIZ-A QUICK PROGRESS CHECK ON YOUR UNDERSTANDING.
Report Writing.
Supporting students in prison – Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science, Computing and Technology (COLMSCT) Centre for Excellence in Teaching.
Programming TBE 540 Farah Fisher. Objectives After viewing this presentation, the learner will be able to… Given a task, create pseudocode Given pseudocode,
M. George Physics Dept. Southwestern College
Assignment Marking via Online Self Assess Margot Schuhmacher, Lecturer Higher Education Development Unit, Centre for Learning and Teaching Support, Monash.
Do you suffer from judgement creep? A group moderation session will soon put you right!
Investigating the use of short answer free-text questions in online interactive assessment Sally Jordan 17 th January 2008 Centre for Open Learning of.
©Trimtab Slide 1 Qualitative data  Purpose is to understand rather than measure or prove  Accommodates the emergent properties of real world situations.
IB Diploma Program Exams – Semester Report Cards
ASSESSMENT OF ENGINEERING UK- SPEC TRANSFERABLE SKILLS LEARNING OUTCOMES ON BEng ENGINEERING DISTANCE LEARNING DEGREE K.L.McGRAW Centre for Open Learning.
Enhancing Student Learning Through Error Analysis
© Curriculum Foundation1 Section 2 The nature of the assessment task Section 2 The nature of the assessment task There are three key questions: What are.
Mixed-level English classrooms What my paper is about: Basically my paper is about confirming with my research that the use of technology in the classroom.
The draft NSW English K-10 syllabus Version 2 February, 2012.
Interactive online assessment with teaching feedback – for open learners Valda Stevens and Sally Jordan Student Feedback and Assessment Meeting, 10 th.
Intro to Discrete Structures
Exploring the Normal Distribution Rick Luttrell James Price South Iredell High School.
DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF TRANSVERSAL KEY COMPETENCES IN THE DEGREE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY M.D. Rivero-Pérez*, M.L. González-SanJosé, P. Muñíz,
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
Effective Teaching of Health Reporting: Lectures and More Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University Train the Trainer Workshop: Health Reporting for.
How to Administer Constructive and Effective Feedback to Online Students Denielle R. Vazquez, M.S.Ed – 2014 Teaching and Learning.
Continuing Professional Development An Introduction to Academic Writing Sue Faragher Senior Lecturer CPD.
Programming Logic and Design Sixth Edition
Robert W. Arts, Ph.D.* Professor of Education & Physics University of Pikeville Pikeville, KY Using a Universal Qualitative Analysis Writing Assignment.
Computer Assisted Learning (CAL) Tutorials Special needs pupils; Spelling programs which have an interactive component testing student with games, quizzes.
ICMAs for Computing Courses Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science, Computing and Technology (COLMSCT) Centre for Excellence in Teaching and.
Science Project Type your project title here Your name Mueller Park Junior High You are welcome to choose any design style for your project!
Making the Technology Fit the Pedagogy – Learning Objects Bill Tait Associate Teaching Fellow Centre for Open Learning in Mathematics, Science, Computing.
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
BTEC Quality Assurance BTEC Foundation Level – Level 3 including Workskills The quality assurance includes three processes: Lead Internal Verifier.
Improving Academic Feedback - Turning the ship around with the power of 1000 students David Hope
Dr. Sande Caton. Assessments Why do we assess our students? Individually, write at least three ideas you have about assessments With one or two colleagues.
1 Boolean Expressions to Make Comparisons Boolean expression –Represents only one of two states –Expression evaluates to either true or false Expressions.
CPSC 121: Models of Computation Unit 0 Introduction George Tsiknis Based on slides by Patrice Belleville and Steve Wolfman.
An Introduction to Programming with C++ Sixth Edition Chapter 7 The Repetition Structure.
Developing online activities for postgraduate students in computing Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science, Computing and Technology (COLMSCT)
An Object-Oriented Approach to Programming Logic and Design Fourth Edition Chapter 4 Looping.
1 Compiler Design (40-414)  Main Text Book: Compilers: Principles, Techniques & Tools, 2 nd ed., Aho, Lam, Sethi, and Ullman, 2007  Evaluation:  Midterm.
CETL-MSOR 2009 The use of synchronous online tutorials to provide numeracy support for technology students Frances Chetwynd, Helen Donelan, Hazel Heath,
EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF USING FEEDBACK CARDS IN ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR INSET ELAINE PANG SUPERVISOR : PROFESSOR DAVID WRAY 28 October.
AS Biology Completing your your coursework. Planning  This has already been completed.  Must be a clearly defined section of your final report – write.
Use Flowchart modeling to design and create an interactive quiz to be run on Powerpoint. Start Question Click to start the quiz Correct Incorrect, try.
National 5 Biology Assignment
Formative Quizzes and their Contribution to the Understanding of Computer Programming by Level One Students Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science,
In-Service Teacher Training Assessment in IGCSE Mathematics 0580/0581 Session 3: Mark schemes, Examiner Reports and other resources.
DESIGNING AN ARTICLE Effective Writing 3. Objectives Raising awareness of the format, requirements and features of scientific articles Sharing information.
1 Evaluating the User Experience in CAA Environments: What affects User Satisfaction? Gavin Sim Janet C Read Phil Holifield.
Help students evaluate their own learning ~ Using constructive feedback in library instruction Jill Nathanson Mei Ling Lo.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
Toolkit for spelling, punctuation and grammar.. Overview  Background of the SPaG toolkit.  The SPaG toolkit.  Select and try a marking code.  Discussion.
E-assessment for learning? Short-answer free-text questions with tailored feedback Sally Jordan ENAC Potsdam August 2008 Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics,
Programming Logic and Design Fourth Edition, Comprehensive Chapter 5 Making Decisions.
Peer feedback on a draft TMA answer: Is it usable? Is it used? Mirabelle Walker Department of Communication and Systems.
Professional studies 25/11/15. evidenceintopractice.wordpress.com/coaching-topics/assessment-for-learning/
In-Service Teacher Training Assessment in IGCSE Biology 0610 Session 2: Question papers and mark schemes.
Objectives of session By the end of today’s session you should be able to: Define and explain pragmatics and prosody Draw links between teaching strategies.
Introduction to programming in java Lecture 11 Boolean Expressions and Assignment no. 2.
Fundamental Programming Fundamental Programming Data Processing and Expressions.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
Evan Jones. A Quick Background First year economics has a historically high failure rate of approximately 50%. Unlike accounting, statistics, mathematics.
Control Structures I Chapter 3
Understanding Standards Event Fashion & Textile Technology
Course Design Materials designed with low reading levels but high interest level. More, shorter assignments (20min) Organized with checklists Quick easy.
Phil Denton and David McIlroy, Faculty of Science
Science Fair Project Title of Project Student Name(s) Teacher
General Rules and Reminders
Helen Jefferis, Soraya Kouadri & Elaine Thomas
Boolean Expressions to Make Comparisons
Presentation transcript:

Exploring Interactive Computer Marked Assessments for Logic Constructs in Level 1 Computing Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science, Computing and Technology (COLMSCT) Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC ), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC ). Michael Isherwood Associate Teaching Fellow, COLMSCT

Presentation Summary Project Aims and Background The Quizzes Logical OR Analyses Results and Student Views

Project Aims - summary Support students in their understanding of new and difficult parts of M150 (in effect, Block 2) Confirm understanding prior to tma feedback Investigate extension to other computing courses Through better understanding, aid retention

Background Students find getting to grips with programming difficult This leads to frustration and dropping out of M150 (and therefore further computing courses)

Background - TMA02/03 Marks

On-Line Quizzes 6 Quizzes on 2008J and 2009B presentations – Structured English – Conditions, truth and trace tables – Basic JavaScript – Selection - the if statement – Repetition - the while statement – Repetition - the for statement Results following are from 2008J up to March

Example Question Quiz 4 Q2 71% correct at 1 st attempt Only 4% wrong after 3 rd attempt Note Feedback after 1 st attempt After 2 nd attempt the correct answers remain, so student concentrates on incorrect answer(s)

Logical OR CP5D A person with body temperature outside the range 35 o C to 37 o C is viewed as requiring medical attention. Within this range the temperature is considered normal. Write a compound condition that evaluates to true for requiring medical attention, using temp for temperature (in o C) (temp 37) 24% correct 1 st attempt and 43% after 3 rd attempt Some learning as earlier logical AND only 29% after 3 rd attempt

Analysis of OR On 1 st Attempt AND and && & OR or || ¦¦ unit % 70% correct in principle with 56% absolutely correct 28% incorrectly go for AND etc 12% of responses included unit (g mm nm o C) Again an improvement on earlier logical AND question where 62% and 19% are comparative results No improvement in omitting unit (10% in logical AND) and no difference between unit depending on familiarity or difficulty (temp 37)

Comparison Operator Analysis The 5 variants are : (age =60)(WL =700) (mass =63) (temp 37) (len =221) 49% chose < when correct but only 14% chose <= when correct 69% chose > when correct but only 28% chose >= when correct Some 3% chose = Interpreting boundary value operators (and values) creates an issue when having to apply from text – “with body temperature outside the range 35 o C to 37 o C”

JavaScript Logical OR Example SY6D A shop waives address evidence on credit card sales when the customer's status is that of existing customer or when the purchase amount is under £40. In the following compound statement expressing this situation drag in the symbols required. >= != AND OR & && || ( amount 40 ) ( status 'existing' ) ( amount < 40 ) || ( status == 'existing' ) Note that in JavaScript (as in other programming languages) many symbols differ from the pseudocode symbols eg || for OR and == for =

JavaScript Logical OR Conclusions This was the last question in this JavaScript quiz and all JavaScript symbols had featured in earlier questions 74% chose “OR” with 65% correct with || and 4% with ¦¦ not a great improvement on 70% earlier 25% chose && (and) thus virtually everyone used a logical operator < selected by 94% == correctly selected by 71% but 22% selected = which is the assignment operator

Are the Quizzes valuable for Learning? Student Feedback says yes Many students attempted more than once – Quiz 2: 304 attempts by 211 students – Quiz 4: 195 attempts by 171 students As indicated there is improvement as students progress through question tries and through quizzes Ultimate proof in retention and throughput to further computing courses

Student Responses – Pilot 1 96% of students found the quiz enjoyable 91% found the quiz useful The majority of students didn’t suggest improvements or make any other comment, however some useful suggestions and observations were made and one or two errors were identified

Student Views – feedback sample makes it clear where to use capitals and put spaces in compound statements Excellent..quite short, but long enough to see if I had principles sorted Very useful especially with the trace tables It seemed to work very well Question 7 does not work Make question 3 less ambiguous Should include more difficult questions – stage 1 and stage 2 Questions about repetition and selection could be less ambiguous

if construct – Q2 cont

if constructs – Q3 75% of responses correct at 1 st attempt 3% wrong after 3 rd attempt. After a 2nd attempt, the correct answers were retained, as shown, for the final attempt. The majority of the errors were at the boundary, as here, though several students reversed

if constructs – Q6 On 1st attempt the number of wrong answers is given along with a reminder of the OR (||) operator's effect. The 2nd attempt has feedback as above and the 3rd attempt starts with all the correct responses retained.

A Vision for Student Studies Section Does Quiz Next Section “Pod” + Ppt (IC) Tutor Advice Special Session