Texas Clean Rivers Program 2006 - 2007 Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Clean Estuary Partnership and the RMP Comparing two stakeholder programs producing science in support of policy James M. Kelly, Chair Bay Area Clean.
Advertisements

Overview of Water Quality in Copano Bay Watershed Kevin Wagner, PhD Texas Water Resources Institute.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Copyright © 2005 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved.
Management Plan: An Overview
Texas Stream Team: Citizen Science Water Quality Monitoring and TMDLs Travis Tidwell The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment – Texas State University.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Steering Committee Meetings Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens March.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
WaterSMART Basin Study Program. SECURE Water Act Section 9503 Directs the Secretary to establish a climate change adaptation program which includes –Assess.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
2011 Lower Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
2015 Environmental Trade Fair and Conference Jill Csekitz Technical Specialist TCEQ Monitoring & Assessment Section Devils River State Natural Area Image.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
1 The Rise of Regionalism in Water Resources John K. Woodling California Department of Water Resources North Bay Watershed Association Conference April.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
By Mary Waters, Texas Stream Team. Outline  About the Arroyo Colorado  Basic information (geography)  History  Major uses  Water quality summary.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Great Lakes Perspective Samuel W. Speck Chair, Water Management Working Group Council of Great Lakes Governors Chair, Great Lakes Commission Director,
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
2011 Upper Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
James W. Beever III Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Avenue Fort Myers, FL ( , ext 224)
An overview of the MARPA Shared Services Best Practices Guidebook and Regionalization Best Practices Website BEST PRACTICES for SHARED SERVICES Merrimack.
The Meadows Center Texas Stream Team Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. EPA. The preparation of this presentation.
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
1 Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) Overview.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
CLEAN WATER ACT Section 319 Grant Funds Robin F. “Rob” Rung Contracts / Grants Officer Water Quality Planning Bureau Department of Environmental Quality.
WATER RESOURCES ORSANCO Technical Committee October 9-10, 2012.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
NATIONAL ACTION PLAN: Priorities for Managing Freshwater Resources in a Changing Climate June
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
B-WET Arroyo Colorado Professional Development Workshop for Teachers Funded by NOAA.
GALVESTON BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM A CATALYST FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION Sarah Bernhardt, Ph.D. Lower Rio Grande Valley 18 th Annual Water Quality Management.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Lower Rio Grande Valley Low Impact Development (LID) Implementation and Education by Brianna Saenz,MS, EIT AUGUSTO SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, M.S, CFM. Institute.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Mulberry River Watershed
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Vessel Removal Operations in the South Texas Coastal Zone
Lower Laguna Madre Water Quality
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Surface Water Quality Monitoring in Texas and the Clean Rivers Program
FISCAL YEAR Discussion on Mid-Year Budget Adjustment:
2018 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Revision
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN
Presentation transcript:

Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens

30,500 square miles 3 Basins 23 Watersheds 45 Segments CRP Area of Responsibility

Overview of the Clean Rivers Program  Program Goal and Objectives Maintain and improve the quality of water within each river basin in Texas through an ongoing partnership involving TCEQ, river authorities, other agencies, regional entities, local governments, industry, and citizens. The program's watershed management approach will identify and evaluate water quality issues, establish priorities for corrective action, work to implement those actions, and adapt to changing priorities. 1. Provide Quality-Assured Data to the Commission for Use in Water Quality Decision-Making 2. Identify and Evaluate Water Quality Issues 3. Promote Cooperative Watershed Planning 4. Inform and Engage Stakeholders 5. Maintain Efficient Use of Public Funds 6. Adapt Program to Emerging Water Quality Issues

Overview of the Clean Rivers Program  Funding and Allocation of Resources State fee-funded $9 Million State-Wide for 2 years NRA: $548,272 23% - Project Administration 46% - Water Quality Monitoring and Quality Assurance 11% - Data Management 8% - Data Analysis and Reporting 12 % - Stakeholder Participation and Public Outreach

Overview of the Clean Rivers Program  Role of the Steering Committee and Stakeholders Objective 4: Inform and Engage Stakeholders 1. Give stakeholders the opportunity to contribute their ideas and concerns through steering committee meetings, public meetings, and/or other forums 2. Participate in public information and education activities to increase stakeholder involvement in the program and interest in water quality issues 3. Communicate information on water quality issues to stakeholders so that priorities may be set considering local, regional, state, and federal needs 4. Support stakeholders, volunteers, and other programs in addressing water quality issues 5. Provide information requested by interested parties and disseminate information via the Internet

Overview of the Clean Rivers Program  Water Quality Assessment 2004 – March 1, 1998 – February 28, – December 1, 1999 – November 30, 2004  Water Quality Inventory Concerns – 305(b) list Impairments – 303(d) list

FY 2007 Monitoring Sites  Nueces Basin NRA NRA 18 sites18 sites TCEQ TCEQ 16 sites16 sites

FY 2007 Monitoring Sites  San Antonio – Nueces Coastal Basin NRA NRA 11 sites11 sites TCEQ TCEQ 12 sites12 sites

FY 2007 Monitoring Sites  Nueces – Rio Grande Coastal Basin NRA NRA 2 sites2 sites 2 24-DO sites on2 24-DO sites on Arroyo Colorado Arroyo Colorado TCEQ TCEQ 33 sites33 sites

Use Assessment & Monitoring Parameters   Aquatic Life Dissolved Oxygen   Public Water Supply Chloride Sulfate TDS   Contact Recreation Bacteria   General Use Water Temperature pH Ammonia Nitrogen Phosphorus   Fish Consumption Fish Tissue

Deliverables  Quality Assured Data  Basin Highlights Report  Basin Summary Report (every 5 th year)  Data Accessibility via Website

Concerns and Impairments  Summary Handout  Bacteria Task Force examining approaches that other states use to develop and implement bacteria TMDLs; examining approaches that other states use to develop and implement bacteria TMDLs; recommending cost-effective and time-efficient methods for developing TMDLs; recommending cost-effective and time-efficient methods for developing TMDLs; recommending effective approaches for developing implementation plans; recommending effective approaches for developing implementation plans; evaluating the variety of models and bacteria-source-tracking methods available for developing TMDLs and implementation plans, and recommending under what conditions certain methods are more appropriate; evaluating the variety of models and bacteria-source-tracking methods available for developing TMDLs and implementation plans, and recommending under what conditions certain methods are more appropriate; developing a roadmap for further scientific research needed to reduce uncertainty about how bacteria behave under different water conditions in Texas. developing a roadmap for further scientific research needed to reduce uncertainty about how bacteria behave under different water conditions in Texas.

Headwater Stewardship Project  Litter Prevention Campaign  Basin Watershed Model  Land Stewardship

Non-point Source Demonstrations

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Lower Sabinal River – Segment 2110 Lower Sabinal River – Segment 2110 Nitrate+Nitrite ImpairmentNitrate+Nitrite Impairment New WWTP for City ofNew WWTP for City of Sabinal Sabinal Construction to beginConstruction to begin Nov – Dec ‘07 Nov – Dec ‘07

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach South Central Texas Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen South Central Texas Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen 2104 – Nueces River Above Above Frio River2104 – Nueces River Above Above Frio River 2107 – Atascosa River2107 – Atascosa River 2113 – Upper Frio River2113 – Upper Frio River

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach 2104 – Nueces River Above Frio River 2104 – Nueces River Above Frio River Depressed DO - 25 miles surrounding SH 16Depressed DO - 25 miles surrounding SH 16 Means of average and Means of average and minimum values met standard minimum values met standard 3 individual average values 3 individual average values did not meet standard did not meet standard 2 individual minimum values 2 individual minimum values did not meet standard did not meet standard Final Report – RemediationFinal Report – Remediation not recommended not recommended

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach 2107 – Atascosa River 2107 – Atascosa River Bacteria - lower 25 miles andBacteria - lower 25 miles and 25 miles surrounding US miles surrounding US 281 Depressed DO - 25 miles surrounding US 281Depressed DO - 25 miles surrounding US 281 Remains on 303(d) listRemains on 303(d) list

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach 2113 – Upper Frio River 2113 – Upper Frio River Depressed DO – 25 miles surrounding SH 127Depressed DO – 25 miles surrounding SH 127 Final Report – Appears to be meeting exceptional aquatic live useFinal Report – Appears to be meeting exceptional aquatic live use Should be removed from 303(d) listShould be removed from 303(d) list

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Segment 2472 – Copano Bay Bacteria Segment 2472 – Copano Bay Bacteria Includes tidal segments of Mission and Aransas RiversIncludes tidal segments of Mission and Aransas Rivers

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Segment 2482 – Nueces Bay Zinc Segment 2482 – Nueces Bay Zinc Includes tidal segment of Nueces RiverIncludes tidal segment of Nueces River

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Segments 2485, 2485A – Oso Bay /Oso Creek Bacteria Segments 2485, 2485A – Oso Bay /Oso Creek Bacteria

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Segment 2204 – Petronila Creek Above Tidal Segment 2204 – Petronila Creek Above Tidal Chloride, Sulfate and TDS Chloride, Sulfate and TDS

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Segments 2485, 2491 – Oso Bay and Laguna Madre Depressed Dissolved Oxygen Segments 2485, 2491 – Oso Bay and Laguna Madre Depressed Dissolved Oxygen

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Segments 2201, 2202 – Arroyo Colorado Segments 2201, 2202 – Arroyo Colorado bacteria, depressed DO bacteria, depressed DO

Water Quality Priorities TMDLs, Related Projects, Targeted Outreach Bacteria in Oyster Waters Bacteria in Oyster Waters 2462 – San Antonio Bay / Hynes Bay / Guadalupe Bay2462 – San Antonio Bay / Hynes Bay / Guadalupe Bay 2472 – Copano Bay2472 – Copano Bay 2481 – Corpus Christi Bay2481 – Corpus Christi Bay

2007 Basin Highlights Report Draft available for review Draft available for review Comments by April 30 Comments by April 30 Comments to Rocky Freund Comments to Rocky Freund Fax: Fax: Mail: Nueces River Authority Mail: Nueces River Authority 6300 Ocean Drive – Unit 5865 Corpus Christi, TX

2008 – 2009 Contract Period April 2007 – Coordinated Monitoring Meeting for FY 2008 April 2007 – Coordinated Monitoring Meeting for FY 2008 June 2007 – Final Workplan Due June 2007 – Final Workplan Due

Contact Information Sky Lewey: Rocky Freund: