SPS Mis-operation – DRAFT Proposal for ERCOT procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WECC Board of Directors April 21-23, 2004 Seattle, Washington WECC Procedure for Reporting of System Events Disturbance Reports Rod Maslowski OC Vice Chairperson.
Advertisements

1 MSRATF Update to TSS (Modeling SPS and RAS Ad Hoc Task Force) Scope of Work Approval January 25, 2013 Joe Seabrook Puget Sound Energy.
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
1. Four LLs were published in February Transmission Relaying – Undesired Blocking 2.Lack of Separation for Critical Control Power Supply Leads.
Transmission Operator Protection System Misoperations 2014 ERCOT Transmission Protections System Misoperations Data – 138kV and 345kV Combined (Not including.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5AStandards & Certification Project Management.
Timeliness, Effectiveness, Quality and the IETF Aaron Falk
2014 System Operator Conference 1 Protection System Misoperations: Why Should a System Operator Give a Hoot? April 17 & May 1, 2014 – Charlotte, NC September.
EQUIPMENT VALIDATION.
Microprocessor-Based Relays: Implementation, Conflicts, and Corrective Actions Steven V. Deases AEP – Station Engineer.
Documenting Disciplinary Issues
DUCK RIVER EMC Lockout/Tagout Procedures For Overhead and Underground Line Work (De-energizing Lines and Equipment for Employee Protection)
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
ERCOT PUBLIC 10/21/ RTP Scope and Process Review October 21, 2014.
Department of Human Resources. Progressive Process A progressive discipline system gives employees ample warning of misconduct or work-related problems;
Job Action Guidelines Staff Training, HR Staff Training, Etc.
ERCOT Compliance Audits Robert Potts Sr. Reliability Analyst March 23, 2005.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
Other Binding Documents Ann Boren ERCOT TAC/TAC Subcommittee Structural and Procedural Review ERCOT Public August 27, 2014.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
TOS Operating Committee Report Al Badella Technical Operations Subcommittee Chair July 14th, 2015 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Update On The ERO Transition Activities To Comply With The 2005 EPAC ERCOT TAC Meeting March 9, 2006 Sam Jones, COO.
NERC Event Analysis Update Member Representatives Committee Meeting October 28, 2008 Robert W. Cummings NERC Director of Event Analysis & Information Exchange.
Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout ERCOT Board Of Directors Meeting April 20, 2004 Sam Jones, COO.
1. 2 NERC Bulk Electric System (BES) Definition (NERC Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards) FERC Order 693 FRCC Handbook Review Task Force.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
February 26, 2013 Board of Directors Meeting 2012 ERCOT Region Reliability Update.
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
© Property of ERCOT /06/20041 Overview of SPS in ERCOT February 5, 2004.
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
Curtis Crews, Reliability Services Texas Reliability Entity, Inc. Changes in Relay Misoperations Reporting.
Breach reporting to the REC Catherine Blewett, HRA Improvement & Liaison Manager.
v6ops, Ole Trøan
Summary Rich Bauer, Senior Reliability Engineer Event Analysis Subcommittee – LL Update March 04, 2014.
MNM Fatal Other (Drowning) Other (Drowning) December 10, 2013 (Kentucky) December 10, 2013 (Kentucky) Sand & Gravel Mine Sand & Gravel Mine Dredge.
Processing Exempt Submissions 1-page Reference Guides.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
EAS Lessons Learned Summary Lessons Learned Published in June 2014.
1 RMS TAC Update April 3, Test Plan Flight Dates It is the practice of RMS to approved the dates for future testing flights. This enables new.
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Electrical Buses – 2Texas Nodal Electrical Bus Definition as Proposed in NPRR 63 Electrical Bus A physical transmission element.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Enterprise Data Warehouse Section 8 – Performance Monitoring.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
ERCOT ROS Planning Working Group (PLWG) Scope Approved at ROS Meeting.
State Estimator Redaction Task Force Progress Report to WMS/ROS 5/11/2011.
WECC-0100 Scope, Content & Status Update Rikin Shah, PAC Orlando Ciniglio, IPC WECC TSS Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT January ,
Doc.: IEEE /224r3 Submission May 2001 Tom Siep, TMS ConsultantsSlide 1 TG3 Review Procedure Proposal NOTE: All of these recommendations do not.
Writing Bylaws. Bylaws are written rules that control the internal affairs of an organization.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Loop-Sectionalizing Automation Scheme Colin Hawthorne 4/26/2016.
TPTF Update Trip Doggett TAC March 9, TPTF Update Meetings February 6 & 7, February 20 Attendance approximately 40 Completed review of ERCOT’s clarification.
Paula Feuerbacher Strategic Projects Senior Advisor Tab 5.2: Recommendation Regarding Proposed 2013 ERCOT Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Human Resources.
Remedial Action Scheme Workshop RAS Workshop May 9, 2016.
 The figure below shows a protection system for a transmission line, consisting of a CT, PT, a relay and its associated circuit breaker.
Power System Protective Relaying-Part One
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Somerset ISD Online Acceptable Use Policy. Somerset Independent School District Electronic Resources Acceptable Use Policy The purpose of this training.
NERC Published Lessons Learned Summary
TASOR TF Report to TAC Dec. 4, 2008.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Summary Rich Bauer, Senior Reliability Engineer
What is an Operation and Misoperation
Motions Related to the Selection Procedure
Background Information on Hurricane Matthew Event No.1 Event No.2
Prime Contractor Performance
TG3 Review Procedure Proposal
What is an Operation and Misoperation
Presentation transcript:

SPS Mis-operation – DRAFT Proposal for ERCOT procedures

Discussion of SPS Mis-Operation SPS Mis-operation is not explicitly defined in the ERCOT Protocols or Operating Guides, but is described as the operation of an SPS when the conditions of the SPS have not been met, or the lack of operation of an SPS when the conditions have been met. The ERCOT Operating Guides section does list several events that could describe an SPS mis-operation. These events are listed below: Failure to Trip – Any failure of a protective relay system to initiate a trip to the appropriate terminal when a fault is within the intended zone of protection of the device. Slow Trip – A correct operation of a protective relay system for a fault in the intended zone of protection where the relay system initiates tripping slower than the system design intends. Unnecessary Trip During a Fault – Any relay initiated operation of a circuit breaker during a fault when the fault is outside the intended zone of protection.

SPS Mis-operation - continued Employee action that directly initiates a trip is not included in this category. It is the intent of this reporting process to identify mis-operations of the relay system as it interrelates with the electrical system, not as it interrelates to personnel involved with the relay system. With this in mind, if an individual directly initiates an operation, it is not counted as a mis-operation (i.e., unintentional operation during tests). On the other hand, if a technician leaves trip test switches or cut-off switches in an inappropriate position and a system fault or condition causes a mis-operation, this would be counted as a relay system mis-operation Failure to Reclose – Any failure of a protective relay system to automatically reclose following a fault if that is the design intent.

Responsibilities for Investigation When an SPS mis-operation occurs, the TO shall provide to ERCOT the same written documentation outlined by the Operating Guides, stating what the cause of the mis-operation was and outline what steps have been made to ensure that this same misoperation will not happen in the future within 5 business days (ERCOT Operating Guides, section ). Again, ERCOT System Operations shall make the final determination as to whether or not the SPS mis-operated. ERCOT Operations shall make the final determination whether or not that SPS had mis-operated, following the process outlined below:

Investigation- continued ERCOT System Operations and Transmission Services shall independently review the report filed by the TO. ERCOT System Operations and Transmission Services shall meet and discuss the results of their review. Any remaining questions or comments remaining shall be sent to the TO. ERCOT System Operations and Transmission Services shall review the replies from the TO, if any, and decide whether or not the SPS has mis-operated. The final decision shall then be sent to the Director of System Operations and the Director of Transmission Services for final approval of the decision, which will then be sent out to the TO and to all relevant working groups, task forces, and subcommittees. Should an SPS mis-operate 2 times or more within the 5 year period of the SPS, ERCOT may request that the SPS be disabled until further review of the SPS and its mis- operations can be made.