Evidence-Based Policy at the Cabinet Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Six Countries Programme Workshop May 2006 Shaping the future through learning from the past – Evaluation and Foresight Dr. Mari Hjelt Gaia Consulting.
Advertisements

Leveraging inter-sectoral action to address the social determinants of health: view from the health system Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town; London.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Enhancing evidence-based policy making through Country-Led M&E Systems* Marco Segone, Regional Chief, Monitoring and Evaluation, UNICEF CEE/CIS, and former.
Enhancing evidence-based policy making through Country-Led M&E Systems* Marco Segone, Regional Chief, Monitoring and Evaluation, UNICEF CEE/CIS, and former.
Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.
Government Social Research Unit Evidenced Based Policy: The Role of Randomised Controlled Trials Ricky Taylor Government.
Scoring Goals or Changing the Game: What Impacts Should We Measure? Jonathan Lomas Canadian Health Services Research Foundation Presentation to ESRC Symposium:
Linking research to policy in Vietnam: how can complexity concepts help?
Day 2. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Outline of the Workshop Day 1 General Introductions Theory - Research Policy.
The Analytical Framework
ESRC Symposium: New approaches to assessing the impact of social science research Grafton Hotel, London, May 12-13, 2005 Impact of Social Research – a.
A Practical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, An Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
KRDS BENEFITS FRAMEWORK, VALUE- CHAIN AND BENEFIT ANALYSIS TOOLS: UK DATA ARCHIVE CASE STUDY …………………………………………
Michael G. Wilson Doctoral Candidate, Health Research Methodology Programme McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster University 18.
Nomad making moves towards mobile and flexible working Embedding Mobile Working David Cramond Atos Consulting 6 April, local e-gov EXPO 2006.
Prime Ministers Strategy Unit Rapid Evidence Assessments Philip Davies PhD Government Chief Social Researchers Office Prime Ministers Strategy Unit Cabinet.
A MERICAN I NSTITUTES FOR R ESEARCH An Analysis of the Research and Impact of ICT in Education in Developing Country Contexts Nitika Tolani-Brown, PhD.
From Research to Advocacy
Getting evidence into policy and practice: a framework for KT&E Rebecca Armstrong Cochrane Health Promotion & Public Health Field.
Maximising the impact of research: experience from ODI’s RAPID Programme John Young Overseas Development Institute
Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.
Dr. Dave O’Brien, Leeds Metropolitan University and ESRC/AHRC Placement Fellow at DCMS Cultural policy and measurement: context, challenge and change.
Government Social Research Unit Philip Davies PhD Government Social Research Unit HM Treasury London SW1A 2HQ What Can Social.
Philip Davies The Challenges Ahead for Impact Evaluation Studies in Poland Using Mixed Methods of Evaluation for Policy Making Purposes.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Valuing evaluation beyond programme boundaries: Communicating evaluations to enhance development effectiveness globally Anna Downie
Philip Davies International Initiative for Impact Evaluation [3ie] Getting Evidence Into Policy 3ie-LIDC Seminar Series 'What Works In.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Using Evidence in Your Work* From Evidence to Action A CIHR Funded Project *Based on a presentation for the National RAI Forum: "Making the Most of It“:
Module 1: Key concepts in data demand & use
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
How to write a publishable qualitative article
Creating Research proposal. What is a Marketing or Business Research Proposal? “A plan that offers ideas for conducting research”. “A marketing research.
Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.
Philip Davies Making Evidence Accessible and Relevant for Policy and Practice Philip Davies International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
Impact assessment framework
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
‘What Works’ The role of evidence based policy and research in Britain’s welfare to work policies Professor Dan Finn University of Portsmouth.
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
Cost-effectiveness of adaptation options within the Integrated Assessment Platform Climate change integrated assessment methodology for cross-sectoral.
Dalton et al. New Politics in Advanced Democracies.
Evaluations at the EC (the IP context) Kamil Kiljański Geneva, 6 October 2011.
Tools for Civil Society to Understand and Use Development Data: Improving MDG Policymaking and Monitoring Module 3: MDGs and the Policy Cycle.
Potential Roles for Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Opportunities and Challenges for an Effective Health Technology Assessment Practice at the Meso.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
Prof. Michelle Brady and Lindsay Tedds1 Please sit in your Scoping Review Groups.
Workshop on VHL and HEN, Sao Paulo, April 2006 Workshop on VHL and HEN Sao Paulo, April 2006 Anca Dumitrescu, M.D. WHO Regional Office for.
1 Government Social Research Unit Randomised Controlled Trials Conference University of York, September 2006 Why Governments Need.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
Philip Davies What Is Evidence, and How Can It Improve Decision Making? Philip Davies International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
Chapter Fourteen Communicating the Research Results and Managing Marketing Research Chapter Fourteen.
Question-led mixed methods research synthesis Centre launch 21 June 2005 David Gough and Sandy Oliver Institute of Education, University of London.
Guide to Options Comparison Revision of the SAFEGROUNDS Guidance James Penfold, Quintessa SAFESPUR, 4 October 2007.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
From Knowledge to Action: Building Research and Evaluation Capacity in the RI Medicaid Program Susan M. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Deputy Director.
How to measure the impact of R&D on SD ? Laurence Esterle, MD, PhD Cermes and Ifris France Cyprus, 16 – 17 October L. ESTERLE Linking science and.
What is convincing evidence? Naved Chowdhury & Enrique Mendizabal Objective of the session: –To arrive at a definition of CONVINCING evidence –what makes.
Dr. Shahram Yazdani 1 Policy Support Function Dr. Shahram Yazdani Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences School of Medical Education Strategic.
Implementation Science: Finding Common Ground and Perspectives Laura Reichenbach, Evidence Project, Population Council International Conference on Family.
4 December 2015, CSaP professional development policy workshop
How to write a publishable qualitative article
Why Government Education Initiatives Work - or Don’t
DUET.
Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute
The Use and Impact of FTA
Presentation transcript:

Evidence-Based Policy at the Cabinet Office Government Social Research Unit Impact and Insight Seminar Overseas Development Institute 17 October 2005 Evidence-Based Policy at the Cabinet Office Philip Davies PhD Government Social Research Unit Cabinet Office London SW1A 2WH www.gsr.gov.uk

Making Public Policy More Evidence-Based Government Social Research Unit Impact and Insight Seminar Overseas Development Institute 17 October 2005 Making Public Policy More Evidence-Based Philip Davies PhD Government Social Research Unit Cabinet Office London SW1A 2WH www.gsr.gov.uk

Outline Why evidence-based policy? Factors other the evidence Different types of evidence Some Problems Some solutions

Why Make Public Policy More Evidenced-Based? Effectiveness - ensure we do more good than harm Efficiency - use scarce public resources to maximum effect Service Orientation - meet citizen’s needs/expectations Accountability - transparency of what is done and why Democracy - enhance the democratic process Trust - help ensure/restore trust in government and public services

What is Evidence-Based Policy? “Evidence-based policy helps people make well-informed decisions about policies, programmes and projects by putting the best available evidence from research at the heart of policy development and implementation” (Davies, P.T., 1999a)

Factors Influencing Policy Making Experience & Expertise Pragmatics & Contingencies Judgement Lobbyists & Pressure Groups Evidence Resources Values and Policy Context Habits & Tradition

Different Types of Evidence for Policy Experimental Quasi-Experimental Counterfactual Experimental Quasi-Experimental Qualitative Theories of Change Social Ethics Public Consultation Surveys Admin Data Comparative Qualitative Implementation Evidence Ethical Evidence Descriptive Analytical Evidence Cost-Benefit Cost-Effectiveness Cost-Utility Econometrics Impact Evidence Surveys Qualitative Economic and Econometric Evidence Attitudinal Evidence Statistical Modelling Multivariate Analysis

Evidence-Based Policy Opinion-Based Policy Evidence-Based Policy Increasing Pressure (Time) Adapted from: Muir Gray 1997

Problem 1 - Social Scientific Knowledge Not all research is of sufficient quality Unclear objectives Poor research design Methodological weaknesses Inadequate data reporting Selective use of data Unsupported conclusions Uncertainty of scientific knowledge Different status of different fields of knowledge

Evidence-Based Policy Opinion-Based Policy Evidence-Based Policy Increasing Pressure (Time) Adapted from: Muir Gray 1997

Problem 2 - Different Notions of Evidence Policy Makers’ Evidence Researchers’ Evidence Colloquial (Contextual) Anything that seems reasonable Policy relevant Timely Clear Message ‘Scientific’ (Context free) Proven empirically Theoretically driven As long as it takes Caveats and qualifications

Problem 2 – UK Policy Makers’ Types of Evidence Quantitative and statistical evidence Economic evidence Qualitative evidence Surveys and attitudinal evidence Consultation evidence Behavioural evidence Anecdotal evidence Hard and soft evidence International evidence Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Evidence Systematic review/meta-analytical evidence X X

Problem 3 - Getting Research Into the Evidence Chain

Problem 4 – Uncertain Policy Logic/Theory of Change Theories of Change - A Policy Logic Model ‘Scared Straight’ Programmes Programme Theory Programme Evidence

Problem 5 – Inaccessibility of Evidence For Policymakers Research Evidence Is Too: Long Verbose Detailed Dense Impenetrable Jargonesque Methodological Untimely Non-relevant/irrelevant

Some Solutions Integrate and plan research into policy strategically (CRAG) Establish incentives to use evidence (PSG initiative) Establish ownership of the evidence Clarify the policy/practice issues with users ex ante Establish users’ theory of change/logic model Establish answerable questions Establish the policy/practice timetable Knowledge translation (establish key messages clearly) Use appropriate formats for presentation (e.g. 1:3:25) Persistence and Opportunism (Matthew Taylor, 2005)

Contact phil.davies@cabinet-office.x.gsi.gov.uk Government Social Research Unit Cabinet Office Admiralty Arch The Mall London SW1A 2WH England Tel: +44 (0)20 7276 1862 Fax: +44 (0)20 7276 1450 http://www.policyhub.gov.uk