Resource Description and Access for Students Christee Pascale Associate Head, Metadata & Cataloging North Carolina State University Libraries

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on LC Preparations for RDA CEAL Committee on Technical Processing Meeting : Session 4 March 14, 2012 Tom Yee LC Policy & Standards Division.
Advertisements

Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
PCC RDA BIBCO Standard Record (BSR) Metadata Application Profile PCC Participants Meeting ALA Midwinter Seattle, Washington January 27, 2013.
The US RDA Test: Status & Next Steps For the Authority Control Interest Group, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, January 9, 2011 Presented.
Christee Pascale Associate Head, Acquisitions & Discovery North Carolina State University Libraries North Carolina Serials Conference.
The US RDA Test For the European RDA Interest Group/JSC Seminar Copenhagen, Denmark, August 8, 2010 Presented by Beacher Wiggins Director for Acquisitions.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... Library of Congress RDA Seminar, University of Florence, May 29-June 2, 2011.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Revising AACR: RDA Stuart Hunt CILIP/BL Committee on AACR/RDA Oslo, January 2006.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA) Presentation for ALA Annual, Chicago July 11, 2009 Barbara Bushman Assistant Head, Cataloging Section National.
RDA For Sheet Maps in MARC Coding Weiping Zhang Government Documents Librarian With the help of Stacey Ahle June 29, 2011.
Preparing for RDA Testing at The University of Chicago Continuing Resources Cataloging Committee Update Forum, June 28, 2010 Renette Davis With thanks.
Recommendations from the RDA Test: Where do we go from here? Barbara Bushman National Library of Medicine, NIH, DHHS Regina Romano Reynolds Library of.
RDA: A Practitioner’s Approach to Staff Training and Testing Erin Stalberg Head, Metadata & Cataloging NCSU Libraries LYRASIS Ideas.
Booth 917 ALA Booth 917 RDA Conversion Service. Booth 917 ALA Booth 917 What is Resource Description and Access? RDA is the standard for cataloging that.
Module 5 Key differences from AACR2 Recording Data Adapted from: Teaching RDA: Train-the-trainer course RDA: Resource description and access presented.
US RDA Test and Implementation or Not Barbara Tillett For the Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Planning for RDA: An Early Adopter’s View on Training and Management Christee Pascale Associate Head, Metadata & Cataloging North Carolina State University.
RDA: Your “Recommended Daily Allowance” of Cataloging Christee Pascale Associate Head, Metadata & Cataloging Erin Stalberg Head, Metadata & Cataloging.
RDA Copy Cataloging Training East Carolina University August 29, 2013.
Library systems and RDA RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
Preparing Copy Catalogers for RDA: Beyond Guidelines and Procedures Erin Stalberg Head, Metadata & Cataloging NCSU Libraries American.
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for Georgia Cataloging Summit Aug. 9-10, 2011.
1 August 1, 2011 ALCTS Continuing Education Committee Webinar Aiming for a Robust Metadata Infrastructure for the Future: RDA Component Beacher Wiggins,
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display Rob Walls Director Database Services Libraries Australia.
RDA: A Practitioner’s Approach to Staff Training and Testing Erin Stalberg Head, Metadata & Cataloging NCSU Libraries LYRASIS Ideas.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
Cataloguing integrating resources with RDA OLA Preconference workshop, January 29, 2014 Emma Cross Cataloguing Librarian, Carleton University Library.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
 Why do we catalog?  Why do we classify?  What aspects are important?  What aspects can we let go of?
Linked Data by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress For Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
11 ALCTS RDA Forum American Library Association Annual Conference Anaheim, California, June 23, 2012 U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee Update Beacher.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
The physical parts of a computer are called hardware.
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards Melanie Wacker Metadata Coordinator Columbia University Libraries Jan. 21, 2012 ALA Midwinter.
Resource Description and Access (RDA) information session Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee.
1 RDA Day 2: Using the RDA Toolkit
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
RDA Implementation. Implementation factors Publication of RDA International evaluation Changes in MARC Implementation in library systems.
Why Should I Care? RDA and Your Library DR. SONIA ARCHER-CAPUZZO, CATALOGER, LECTURER, LIBRARIAN OCTOBER 23, 2015 NCLA CONFERENCE, GREENSBORO, NC.
Jeanne Piascik Principal Cataloger University of Central Florida Technical Services Member Group FLA 2014 Annual Conference.
1 Overview of the U.S. RDA Test by Tina Shrader Cataloging Section Head and CONSER Coordinator National Agricultural Library June 28, 2010.
The ___ is a global network of computer networks Internet.
OCLC and RDA Karen Calhoun Jean Godby Ted Fons Glenn Patton October 2009 Webinar.
6/10/2016 Cataloging ETDs in RDA USETDA Conference September 24-26, 2014 Sevim McCutcheon Catalog Librarian; Associate Professor Kent State University,
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
RDA Resource Description and Access : a brief overview of the new bibliographic cataloging standard Billy Chi-hing Kwan Assistant Library Director Philadelphia.
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards
Professional development training on cataloging at the University Wisconsin-Madison Memorial Library, USA 14th October -24th October, 2016 Aigerim Shurshenova.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA ...
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

Resource Description and Access for Students Christee Pascale Associate Head, Metadata & Cataloging North Carolina State University Libraries North Carolina Central University School of Library and Information Sciences LSIS 5425 Organization of Information October 12, 2011

Presentation Overview The Road to Resource Description and Access (RDA) Cataloging at NCSU The U.S. RDA Test What’s New in an RDA Record and RDA Record Examples

THE ROAD TO RESOURCE DESCRIPTION & ACCESS (RDA)

What is RDA? Resource Description & Access, the successor to the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2) –new content standard –not an encoding standard (MARC is an encoding standard) –intended to be independent of MARC, and hoped to be used beyond the MARC community

Why a new standard? Work started out in 2004 on AACR3 –simplify rules –encourage use as a content standard for metadata schema –encourage international applicability –address current problems with AACR2 –principle-based –build on cataloger’s judgment After an initial draft, it was decided to take a new approach and call the effort Resource Description & Access.

Format Standards (MARC/MODS/DC) Content Standards (AACR2/RDA) Encoding Syntaxes (MARC/XML) Controlled Vocabularies (LCSH/MARC Code Lists) Indexing Display

FRBR & FRAD Underlying RDA are the conceptual models FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) and FRAD (Functional Requirements for Authority Data). Not a set of rules Uses an entity relationship model FRBR tasks: Find/Identify/Select/Obtain FRAD tasks: Find/Identify/Contextualize/Justify

Content standard v. Encoding standard AACR2/RDA For the title proper of a book, use the title page (or image thereof) as the preferred source of information. If a married person is identified only by a partner’s name, treat a term of address as an integral part of the name. –Davis, Maxwell, Mrs. –Strauss, Johann, Frau MARC MARC 245 tag = title proper MARC 246 tag = varying form of title $a The many faces of special education $a The many faces of special educators MARC 100 tag = personal name, primary access point MARC 700 tag = personal name, additional access point MARC 600 tag = personal name, subject 100 1/ $a Strauss, Johann, ǂ c Frau, ǂ d / $a Strauss, Johann, ǂ c Frau, ǂ d $a Strauss, Johann, ǂ c Frau, ǂ d

CATALOGING AT NCSU LIBRARIES

Metadata & NCSU 18 Metadata & Cataloging staff: –5 in Monographs –6 in Serials & Continuing Resources –3 in Metadata & Data Quality –1 Technology Support for Technical Services Highly centralized cataloging output –60,568 physical & electronic titles (MARC) –50,504 physical volumes (MARC) –12,909 digital image assets (non-MARC) –779 digital text assets (non-MARC) – linear feet of manuscript materials (non-MARC) –2,943 faculty citations (non-MARC)

Metadata & NCSU ~5% of NCSU MARC cataloging is original Much of that is new editions and/or electronic derived from print NCSU is not a participant in the PCC MLS holding librarians are doing (next to) no cataloging Support staff are doing all copy AND original cataloging and both MARC and non-MARC cataloging

THE U.S. RDA TEST

U.S. RDA Test Goals Response to concerns about RDA raised by the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control (2008 report) To assure the operational, technical, and economic feasibility of RDA Includes the three national libraries and the broader U.S. library community

U.S. RDA Test Participants Library of Congress National Agricultural Library National Library of Medicine Backstage Library Works Brigham Young University Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Clark Art Institute Library University of Chicago College Center for Library Automation (Florida) Columbia University Douglas County Libraries, Colorado Emory University GSLIS Group Minnesota Historical Society Morgan Library and Museum Music Library Association/Online Audiovisual Catalogers, Inc. North Carolina State University Libraries University of North Dakota North East Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas Northeastern University OCLC Metadata Contract Services Ohio State University Libraries State Library of Pennsylvania Quality Books Stanford University Libraries George Washington University

Why did NCSU choose to participate? To force ourselves to learn Copy-heavy institution Support-staff-heavy institution Trying to re-invigorate our training program How do records of various types co-exist happily? Assessment/usability & cost/value

U.S. RDA Test Timeline U.S. RDA Test Participant Preparation Jul-Sep 2010 U.S. RDA Test Oct-Dec 2010 Data analysis Jan-Mar 2011 Final report to LC, NAL, NLM senior management US National Library RDA decision May – Jun 2011 Requirements Common Original & Copy Set Extra Set Surveys: –Record by Record –Record Creator Profile –Record Use –Institutional

NCSU U.S. RDA Test Statistics Common set original: 25 Common set copy: –met NCSU criteria for upgrade: 4 –did not meet NCSU criteria for upgrade: 1 Extra set with surveys: 462 –MARC Original: 390 (includes 201 ETDs) –MARC Copy: 62 –MODS: 10 NCSU was the 5 th highest record creator

U.S. RDA Test Record Creation Findings Report & Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee 26 minutesAverage original record creation time for professionals and paraprofessionals 53 minutesAverage time to create an original RDA records for records minutesAverage copy cataloging record time for professionals and paraprofessionals

NCSU RDA Test Record Creation Findings Record creation times at the end of the test period: minutes for original book cataloging 5-20 minutes for copy book cataloging These times match NCSU’s existing local data for AACR2 book record creation time. 75% of NCSU catalogers showed increased rapidity in record creation over the course of the test. Average time per record decreased 40% by the end of the test. For books, ebooks and ejournals we noted a steady decrease in record creation time The majority of print serials were cataloged by 3 individuals and despite repeat cataloging, time to catalog did not decrease much over time. We have no idea why.

RDA Implementation U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee Final report issued to public on May 9, 2011 U.S. National Libraries RDA implementation no sooner than January 2013 Implementation contingent on satisfactory process/completion of report tasks & action items, two of which are: –Reword RDA instructions in clear, unambiguous, plain English –Demonstrate credible progress towards a replacement for MARC

WHAT’S NEW IN AN RDA RECORD

Fewer Abbreviations AACR2 xiv, 324 p. : ill., ports. ; 23 cm. RDA xiv, 324 pages : illustrations, portraits ; 23 cm AACR2 [S.l. : s.n., 2004]. RDA [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], [2004].

Transcription: “Take What You See” Edition statement on piece: second edition AACR2:2 nd ed. RDA:Second edition. Title on piece: Melallization of polymers AACR2:title proper: Melallization [i.e. Metallization] of polymers RDA: title proper: Melallization of polymers variant title: Corrected title: Metallization of polymers

General Material Designation (GMD) AACR2 used GMD in title field –[videorecording], [electronic resource], [kit] … RDA replaces GMD with 3 new elements: –Content type text, two-dimension moving image, computer program … –Media type computer, video, unmediated … –Carrier type videodisc, online resource, audio disc, volume …

Q&A SESSION

Documentation & Resources NCSU – Library of Congress –Resource Description and Access: –Testing Resource Description and Access: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of RDA – University of Chicago – RDA-L – Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) Provider Neutral E- Monograph Guide –