Session 12: Receiving a Production LBSC 708X/INFM 718X Seminar on E-Discovery Jason R. Baron Adjunct Faculty University of Maryland April 12, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) and In re Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation Lina Carreras.
Advertisements

Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
What is so special about ediscovery? By Jennifer Tomlin Sanchez.
1 As of April 2014 Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
E-Discovery in Government Investigations Jeane Thomas, Crowell & Moring LLP February 9, 2009.
William P. Butterfield February 16, Part 1: Why Can’t We Cooperate?
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
Defending Complaints at the Lancaster County/ Pennsylvania HRC Presented by: David R. Keller Barley Snyder LLC 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA
E-Discovery for System Administrators Russell M. Shumway.
W W W. D I N S L A W. C O M E-Discovery and Document Retention Patrick W. Michael, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY
1 Best Practices in Legal Holds Effectively Managing the e-Discovery Process and Associated Costs.
Decided May 13, 2003 By the United States Court for the Southern District of New York.
17th Annual ARMA Metro Maryland Spring Seminar Confidentiality, Access, and Use of Electronic Records.
1 ELECTRONIC DATA & DISCRIMINATION INVESTIGATIONS Peter J. Constantine U.S. Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
Electronic Communication “ Litigation Holds” Steven Raskovich University Counsel California State University PSSOA Conference – March 23, 2006.
1 E-Discovery Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Concerning Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Effective Date: 12/01/2006 October,
Ronald J. Hedges No Judge Left Behind: A Report Card on the E- Discovery Rules April 24, 2007 Austin, Texas National.
Information Technology & Computer Science E-Discovery Lab Identification and Collection Seminar on E-Discovery, February 9th, 2012, College of Information.
Get Off of My I-Cloud: Role of Technology in Construction Practice Sanjay Kurian, Esq. Trent Walton, CTO U.S. Legal Support.
* 07/16/96 The production of ESI continues to present challenges in the discovery process even though specific rules have been drafted, commented on, redrafted.
In class exercise You have been appointed Records Officer for a large cabinet Department in the Obama Administration. A lawsuit against the Department.
©2011 Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley E-DISCOVERY Hélène Kazanjian Anne Sterman Trial Division.
Aguilar v. ICE Division of Homeland Security 255, F.R.D. 350 (S.D.N.Y 2008)
The Sedona Principles 1-7
EDISCOVERY: ARE YOU PREPARED? Dennis P. Ogden Belin McCormick, P.C. 666 Walnut Street, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone: (515) Facsimile:
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
Rewriting the Law in the Digital Age
E-Discovery: Understanding the 2006 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments, continuing complaints, and speculation about more rule changes to come.
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
E-discovery
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial. Introduction to Law, 4 th Edition Hames and Ekern © 2010 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc. 224 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007) By: Sara Alsaleh Case starts on page 136 of the book!
1 Record Management, Electronic Discovery, and the Changing Legal Landscape Dino Tsibouris (614)
Session 7: Early Case Assessment LBSC 708X/INFM 718X Seminar on E-Discovery Jason R. Baron Adjunct Faculty University of Maryland March 8, 2012.
E-Discovery – Practical Experience from an Agency Perspective Robert Wright Former Chief, Plans and Program Management Unit FBI.
Records Management for Paper and ESI Document Retention Policies addressing creation, management and disposition Minimize the risk and exposure Information.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN ON E-DISCOVERY Gene Blanton.
Primary Changes To The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 2015 Presented By Shuman, McCuskey, & Slicer, PLLC.
March 4, 2011 Civil Procedure.
The Sedona Principles November 16, Background- What is The Sedona Conference The Sedona Conference is an educational institute, established in 1997,
In Re Seroquel Products Liability Litigation United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2007.
E-Discovery And why it matters to a SSA. What is E-Discovery? E-Discovery is the process during litigation of discovering information relevant to litigation.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
1 PRESERVATION: E-Discovery Marketfare Annunciation, LLC, et al. v. United Fire &Casualty Insurance Co.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Proposed and Recent Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines FRCP 26(f) mandates that parties “meaningfully meet and confer” to consider the nature of their respective claims and defenses.
E-Discovery Copyright 2008 Thomas F. Goldman. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO US NOW? OH NO, NOT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!! Overview.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial
Leveraging the Data Map – A Case Study November 15, 2016
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION
‘Make in India’ series Emerging Trends - International Arbitration: (i) E- discovery (ii) Hot tubbing.
Federal Rules Update Effective Dec. 1, 2015.
Civil Litigation: Before The Trial
The Future of Discovery Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Get the Data that Cures Your Headache
I. Hypothetical A. Case Background: Relator, a former employee of Defendant, brought a case in federal court against a large defense contractor (Relator’s.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pretrial Practice
Class III Objectives Subject Matter:
Class IV Objectives Subject Matter:
Weird Al- “Sue Ya”
Presentation transcript:

Session 12: Receiving a Production LBSC 708X/INFM 718X Seminar on E-Discovery Jason R. Baron Adjunct Faculty University of Maryland April 12, 2012

War Stories 1.“Data Dumps” circa U.S. v. Philip Morris (2002) -- precedent for “open discovery” and Fed R. Evi. 502

What do requestors want, and how do they obtain it? Revisiting Complaints and the discovery process Demanding preservation: sending hold letters and appearing at meet and confers Vehicles for delivery allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Forms of questions Legit and illegit goals of discovery: costs, burden, settlement

Kinds of questions the requestor should ask of himself/herself 1.Do I understand what ESI types are involved in this case, and what I need to prove up factual allegations? 2.Is metadata going to be important? Do I need deleted ESI? 3.Will backup tapes be relevant? 4.Do I need the production to be in an electronic format? What kind of format?

Attempting to limit costs & burdens Narrowing the subject matter of the request to specific ‘claims’ or ‘defenses’ of the case. Limiting discovery to specific individuals or components of organizations Limiting search protocol to specific file types, custodians, timeframes. On site inspections vs. receiving data dumps Agreeement with opposing side on what consists of inaccessible ESI; deduping, etc.

Designing a better “requestor” process Employing project management Use of experts Changing the forms of questions posed Cooperation re search protocols Using advanced search tools and technologies