An Introduction to Intensive Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Center Director October 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Planning Function-Based Interventions for Students With Intensive Behavior Needs Lori Newcomer, Joseph Wehby, and Gail Chan University of Missouri, Vanderbilt.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Providing Intensive Intervention using Data-Based Individualization (DBI) in Academics Rebecca Zumeta, Ph.D. TA&D Coordinator November 2012.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
Response to Intervention
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Improving Results for All: The Role of Intensive Intervention in Federal Education Policy Allison Gandhi, Ed.D., National Center on Intensive Intervention.
Who, What, When, Where, Why, & How of Intensive Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D., Center Director Joe Wehby, Ph.D., Senior Advisor Rebecca Zumeta, Ph.D.,
Evaluating Implementation of Intensive Intervention with NCII’s The DBI Implementation Rubric Rebecca O. Zumeta, Ph.D. Deputy Director, NCII
Getting Ready to Implement Intensive Intervention Infrastructure for Data-Based Individualization Presenter’s Name Position Month 20XX.
SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
CENTENNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL RtI 101 Slides adapted from the NE RtI Consortium.
Response to Intervention
Strand A: How Can We Make Intensive Intervention Happen? Considerations for Knowledge Development, Implementation, and Policy Session 3: From Know-How.
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Secondary Interventions: Setting the Foundation for Intensive Support The National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) This document was produced under.
Strand A: How Can We Make Intensive Intervention Happen? Considerations for Knowledge Development, Implementation, and Policy Session 2: Practical Solutions—Using.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Spicewood, IB World School Response to Intervention.
Providing Intensive Intervention Using Data-Based Individualization in Behavior Joseph Wehby, Ph.D. NCII Senior Advisor Vanderbilt University January 2013.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.
1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.
Response to Intervention: Introduction Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Chapter 5: Structures that Work. Early Intervention The Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program (Part C) of IDEA: Enhance development of infants.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
National Center on Intensive Intervention Overview and Resources April 8, 2014 This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of.
Strengthening Intensive Intervention: Assessing and Improving Implementation of Data- Based Individualization Laura Berry Kuchle, Christopher Lemons, T.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
Is Intensive Intervention Special Education
Session Overview Need for Ongoing, Sensitive Assessment to Inform Intervention Why Progress Monitoring? Selecting Assessments Aggregating for Program.
Intensive Intervention: What it is, Who It’s for, and Why it’s Important October 17, 2016 This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education,
OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk
Engaging Families within Intensive Intervention
Strand G, Session 2 Boots on the Ground
Hello. Welcome to “What Does it Really Take
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
Council for Exceptional Children Conference – 2018 Sharon Vaughn, PhD
Model Demonstration Projects
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
From “Talking the Talk” to “Walking the Walk:” RI’s Engagement Story
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to Intensive Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Center Director October 2012

2 2 In this session, we will discuss… Why intensive intervention? Who are the students that require intensive intervention? Where and when should intensive intervention take place? What is NCII’s approach to intensive intervention? How is intensive intervention different from secondary level supports or special education?

3 3 Why Intensive Intervention?

4 4  1 out of 3 students with disabilities have a discipline problem (NLTS-2).  4 out of 5 are either unemployed or work in low-paying jobs as young adults (NLTS-2).  Although the dropout rate has declined significantly over the past 10 years, students with learning disabilities continue to drop out of school at a much higher rate than their non- disabled peers (Cortiella, 2011).  Many tiered intervention initiatives have not sufficiently addressed students with the most intensive needs. Source: Cortiella, 2011

5 5 NAEP: 4 th Grade Reading, Students with Disabilities (2011: 68% below basic)

6 6 NAEP 4 th Grade Math, Students with Disabilities (2011: 45% below basic)

7 7 Who Requires and Delivers Intensive Intervention?

8 8 Who Requires Intensive Intervention? Students with disabilities are not making adequate progress in their current instructional program Students with disabilities who present with very low academic achievement, and/or intense behavior problems Students in a tiered intervention program who have not responded to secondary intervention programs delivered with fidelity

9 9 Who Requires Intensive Intervention? Based on analysis of student responsiveness data from multi-level studies (e.g., Al Otaiba & Fuchs, 2006; L. Fuchs et al., 2008; McMaster, Fuchs, Fuchs & Compton, 2005; Wanzek & Vaughn, 2009, Conduct Prevention Problems Research Group, 2002), we estimate that approximately:  2.5 million students (5% of the general school population) require intensive academic interventions  1.5 million students (3% of the general school population) require intensive behavioral interventions

10 Who delivers intensive intervention? Skilled teachers who have expertise delivering interventions to struggling students (e.g., special education teacher, reading, math, or behavior specialist) Students with the most significant needs should work with the most qualified available staff

11 Where and when should intensive intervention take place?

12 Where and when should intensive intervention take place? Accessing the general education curriculum is about what we want students to know, not where instruction takes place. Student need should drive placement decisions Instructional time should be increased, and should supplement core instruction when possible In some cases, supplanted instruction may be necessary. This decision should be team-based, data-driven, and evaluated regularly

13 What is NCII’s approach to intensive intervention ?

14 Data-Based Individualization (DBI) What is DBI?  DBI is a systematic method for using data to determine when and how to intensify and intervention.  DBI occurs after high quality secondary interventions have been delivered with fidelity and a student has not made sufficient progress - In rare cases, students who present with extremely low achievement or high intensity behavior problems where secondary level supports are unlikely to be sufficient may also be referred for DBI.

15 Data-Based Individualization (DBI) Pre-conditions for DBI:  Core instruction and secondary intervention platforms  Progress monitoring systems  Systems and procedures for reviewing data Center’s Approach:  NCII provides technical assistance to districts and schools to train and support interventionists to implement DBI.

16 Secondary Intervention and DBI Process

17 How is intensive intervention different from secondary interventions? -Use intervention platform with fidelity - Teachers trained to use intervention platform with fidelity - Frequency: As prescribed by the intervention program -Setting: Supplemental to core instruction - Intensify intervention platform based on individual needs - Teachers trained in the process of using data to individualize and intensify interventions - Frequency and Setting: Individualized, based on data and team decision-making process Evidence- based Intervention Platform Small group Explicit Instruction Secondary Intervention Intensive Intervention

18 How is intensive intervention different from secondary intervention? When delivered in isolation, differences between secondary and intensive intervention may not always be apparent as both involve small group, explicit instruction. Thus, it is important to consider:  Qualitative and quantitative intensifications that have been made to the original intervention platform (e.g. time, duration vs. type of instruction delivered)  The systematic process and data analysis that was used to make these adaptations  Departure from the standard platform that may occur at the intensive level

19 References Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who Are the Young Children for Whom Best Practices in Reading Are Ineffective? An Experimental and Longitudinal Study. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), Cortiella, C. (2011). The State of Learning Disabilities. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Leadership Training Inst. for Special Education, M. n. (1977). Data-Based Program Modification: A Manual. Evaluation of the first 3 years of the fast track prevention trial with children at high risk for adolescent conduct problems. (2002). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(1), Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive Intervention for Students with Mathematics Disabilities: Seven Principles of Effective Practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods. Exceptional Children, 71(4), National Center for Education Statistics, (2011). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES National Center For Education Statistics. National Center for Education Statistics, (2011). The Nation's Report Card: Reading Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES National Center For Education Statistics.

20 References Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(3), doi: /j x Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & SRI International, M. A. (2005). Changes over Time in the Early Postschool Outcomes of Youth with Disabilities. A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Online Submission.

21 Lou Danielson, Ph.D Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC General Information: Website:

22 While permission to redistribute this webinar is not necessary, the citation should be: National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2012). An Introduction to Intensive Intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Intensive Intervention. 22

National Center on Intensive Intervention This webinar was produced under the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H326Q Celia Rosenquist serves as the project officer. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this presentation is intended or should be inferred.

24 Thank you for participating in this NCII Webinar! We are very interested in your experience and would like to ensure that future webinars are presented effectively. Please take a moment to fill out the survey that will appear in your internet browser following this webinar. The survey will take 5 minutes.