Ensuring Quality in the Contact Center Joseph Dumont Product Manager Contact Center Services Empirix, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IP Cablecom and MEDIACOM 2004 Prediction and Monitoring of Quality for VoIP services Quality for VoIP services Vincent Barriac – France Télécom R&D SG12.
Advertisements

Unified. Simplified. Unified Communications Launch 2007.
SG2001_VIP.ppt Page 1 PLANET Technology Corp. Product Guide 2001 VoIP Products Your Voice over Internet By Product Department.
Planning Ahead for Optimal Contact Center Deployment Phil Odence, VP Contact Center Business, Empirix.
The Technology Behind Distance Working. ® Overview The modern enterprise may well have: –A data centre with multiple branch offices –Mobile workers.
Fault and Performance Management for Next Generation IP Communication Alan Clark, Telchemy Fault and Performance Management for Next Generation IP Communication.
11 TROUBLESHOOTING Chapter 12. Chapter 12: TROUBLESHOOTING2 OVERVIEW  Determine whether a network communications problem is related to TCP/IP.  Understand.
Introduction to Network Analysis and Sniffer Pro
© Ipswitch, Inc. WhatsUp Gold VoIP Monitor Product Overview.
QoS Solutions Confidential 2010 NetQuality Analyzer and QPerf.
International Telecommunication Union Workshop on End-to-End Quality of Service.What is it? How do we get it? Geneva, 1-3 October 2003 Common VoIP Metrics.
Application layer (continued) Week 4 – Lecture 2.
1 Deploying & Maintaining VoIP A WildPackets Web Seminar 11 am PDT August 3, 2006 Toll free: +1 (800) Toll: +1 (719)
1 © 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public IP Telephony Introduction to Packet Voice Technologies Cisco Networking Academy Program.
1 E-Model & MOS Speaker: Cheng-lin Tsai Adviser: Quincy Wu Date:2009/07/02.
Monitoring Voice Deployments with Microsoft Lync.
A Study on Quality of Service Issues in Internet Telephony  IP Telephony – Applications and Services  Advantages and benefits of Voice over IP  Technical.
1 Media Gateway Benoit Bégué 2006 Study for EE department. EE526 with Professor Dan Keun Sung.
Performance Management (Best Practices) REF: Document ID
Copyright Telchemy Inc 2001 Embedded Passive Monitoring of Voice over IP Service Quality Alan Clark Telchemy, Inc Atlanta, GA
Voice over IP Fundamentals M. Arvai NEC Senior Technical Eng. 1.
1 © 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public IP Telephony Introduction to VoIP Cisco Networking Academy Program.
Tools and Processes for Testing VoIP Chris Bajorek, Director CT Labs
QoE Assurance Division Solutions for ToIP – VoIP service assurance and service performance.
© Copyright 2013 TONE SOFTWARE CORPORATION Presented by: Powered with: ReliaTel Capability Quick Reference 2013.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Frame Header Based Speech Quality Analysis Method in a Circuit-Switched Media Gateway Master’s Thesis.
© Copyright 2013 TONE SOFTWARE CORPORATION. Confidential and Proprietary. All rights reserved. ® Operator Training – Release Voice Quality Dashboard.
VoIP Packets In the Air and Over the Wire J. Scott Haugdahl CTO
1 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. Course Number Presentation_ID Voice Data Integration Cisco do Brasil Jonio Cavalcanti VoIP Network Design.
Voice QoS LANtel Telecommunication Corp. Senior Product Manager Jeremy Chan.
Analyze Assure Accelerate Network Model for Evaluating Multimedia Transmission Performance Over Internet Protocol PN Will become TIA/EIA-921 Jack.
1 Automated Fault diagnosis in VoIP 31st March,2006 Vishal Kumar Singh and Henning Schulzrinne.
1 Root-Cause Network Troubleshooting Optimizing the Process Tim Titus CTO, PathSolutions.
1 © 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number 11911_11_2005 Managing Cisco Unified Communications Reducing costs and improving resilience.
Stuart Walsh Engineering Manager EMEA Tel: How to test/monitor new/existing SIP deployments Customer Experience.
SIP Interoperability Testing Alan Percy Director of Business Development AudioCodes, Inc. Booth #822.
1 VoIP – Voice over Internet Protocol Patrick Hügenell, Andreas Vetter – TIM01AGR – 2003 VoIP Voice over IP.
Applied Communications Technology Voice Over IP (VOIP) nas1, April 2012 How does VOIP work? Why are we interested? What components does it have? What standards.
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Copyright © 2006 Heathkit Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Presentation 3 – VoIP: An Overview.
© 2002, Cisco Systems, Ic. All rights reserved Who? What? When? Where?
Colombia, September 2013 The importance of models and procedures for planning, monitoring and control in the provision of communications services.
Existing PBX Existing Phone Handsets Numbering Plan to digit Internal extensions 9 for an outside line 3 digits.
Assuring Performance of Carrier-Class Networks and Enterprise Contact Centers SP-11: Ensuring Service Quality While Increasing Revenue February 4, 2009.
Version : 11 December 2008 Workshop on “Monitoring Quality of Service and Quality of Experience of Multimedia Services in Broadband/Internet Networks”
Network Instruments VoIP Analysis. VoIP Basics  What is VoIP?  Packetized voice traffic sent over an IP network  Competes with other traffic on the.
© 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. IT412 Voice and Data Integration : Unit 8 Slide 1 Unit 8 Voice Over IP Network Fundamentals.
Voice over IP by Rahul varikuti course instructor: Vicky Hsu.
Department of Communication and Electronic Engineering University of Plymouth, U.K. Lingfen Sun Emmanuel Ifeachor New Methods for Voice Quality Evaluation.
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
Voice Quality (Special Topic) ISSUE1.0 Fixed Network Technical Support Dept.
Changing the Dynamics of Network Analysis J. Scott Haugdahl CTO, WildPackets, Inc.
LOG Objectives  Describe some of the VoIP implementation challenges such as Delay/Latency, Jitter, Echo, and Packet Loss  Describe the voice encoding.
August 3-4, 2004 San Jose, CA VoIP Quality and Network Performance Mike Moldovan Director of Engineering, Telephony,
1 Root-Cause VoIP Troubleshooting Optimizing the Process Tim Titus CTO, PathSolutions.
Service Level Monitoring. Measuring Network Delay, Jitter, and Packet-loss  Multi-media applications are sensitive to transmission characteristics of.
Dave Martin Vice President, Product Management
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
PART2: VOIP AND CRITICAL PARAMETERS FOR A VOIP DEPLOYMENT Voice Performance Measurement and related technologies 1.
Alan Clark Telchemy Modeling the effects of Burst Packet Loss and Recency on Subjective Voice Quality Alan Clark Telchemy
2/07/03 Telchemy QoS for VoIP: Measuring its Effectiveness Bob Massad Telchemy ®, Inc
Quality of Service – State of the Market Alan Percy Director of Business Development AudioCodes, Inc. Booth #822.
Quality of Service for Real-Time Network Management Debbie Greenstreet Product Management Director Texas Instruments.
1 Video and Voice over IP performance over a Satellite link Bob Dixon, Ohio State University/OARnet Prasad Calyam, OARnet Joint Techs Workshops, Columbus,
© 2014 Level 3 Communications, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary and Confidential. Simple, End-to-End Performance Management Application Performance.
A Brief Look at VoIP QoS. Why is VoIP QoS important? PSTNs have played the first role in voice communications for a long time. But future is going to.
1 Root-Cause Network Troubleshooting Optimizing the Process Tim Titus CTO PathSolutions.
سمینار تخصصی What is PSTN ? (public switched telephone network) تیرماه 1395.
Voice Performance Measurement and related technologies
3 | Analyzing Server, Network, and Client Health
Can 4G video quality be trusted?
Presentation transcript:

Ensuring Quality in the Contact Center Joseph Dumont Product Manager Contact Center Services Empirix, Inc.

Abstract: This presentation will focus on assuring IP telephony voice quality in the contact center and the enterprise. The presenters will address concepts such as active call monitoring and multilayer monitoring, and discuss how these strategies can be used to determine when a failure has occurred or is about to occur in an IP telephony network. The conversation will include a discussion of how performance management reporting can be used to assure that service level objectives are met and how recurring failures can be identified and prevented in real-time. Proactive multi-channel testing and monitoring of contact center and communication solutions and their role in improving performance and customer experience will also be addressed. This is a shared session with IQ Services. You will each have time for a 20 minute presentation, with a 5 minute Q&A at the end.

How do I know I have a problem? –Is the voice quality on my network acceptable? –Is everything working properly? What’s wrong & how do I fix it? –Is increased traffic effecting voice quality? –Is something broken? What is it? –Did something change that effects voice quality? –How do I get to the source of the problem? How do I detect trends and know when my next problem will occur? –Are things trending toward degrading quality? –Do I have recurring problems? Every Monday morning? Some other event? Assuring IPT Voice Quality

Lifecycle Assurance Initial Baseline New Business Initiatives (ie: CTI, Speech Rec)

Identifying a Problem

What Could Possibly Go Wrong? User Acoustic echo; handset speaker to microphone Hybrid echo; impedance mismatching (handset or local loop) Distortion; hybrid analog-to-digital conversion and compression Network Network faults Over capacity Circuit noise; switching External noise; crosstalk Signaling protocol mis-matches Transcoding; compression Echo suppression Delay (Latency); packet, speech Jitter; packet, speech Out of order packets Loss of packets Duplicate packets

IPT Infrastructure Management Management System UC App Servers http access SNMP Monitoring CDRs/CMRs Backend Systems Gateway Stats PSTN

Troubleshooting

Passive Monitoring What is it? Insert Network Probe –Locate probes around the network –Probes “listen” to all calls and report call quality Solution types –Protocol Analyzers –VoIP specific monitoring probes Pros See “real” calls, trace problems to specific endpoints Possible to monitor every call Reactive - must wait for a “bad” call to detect a problem Difficult troubleshooting - hard to determine what caused the problem Expensive – need lots of probes to cover large networks Cons

Active Monitoring What is it? Place monitoring calls and measure call statistics –On and off the network Pros Simulates a real call, follows actual call path Accurate measurements Proactive – detect problems early Extensive testing, IVRs, CTI, etc. Cannot see every call Takes resources ­Bandwidth ­Directory Numbers Cons

Infrastructure Monitoring What is it? Collect call statistics from switches and gateways –CDRs, CMRs –Phone Stats –RTCP collectors Pros Inexpensive Collect information as seen by the infrastructure – consistent reporting Reactive - must wait for calls to all locations Difficult to determine what caused the problem Limited diagnostic capabilities Cons

Troubleshooting What do I need to test and monitor? Infrastructure –Switch / Media Gateway handoffs –Media Gateway echo insertion / loss –Agent “Presence” or registrations –Voice quality over WAN / Toll-bypass links –Conference Bridge Link Voice Quality Application –IP IVR embedded CTI –Speech Voice activity detection (VAD) impact on Speech enabled applications –DTMF Acceptance parameters (In-band vs. Out-of-band signaling)

Performance Management

Performance Reporting What Are the Trends? Voice quality getting worse? Recurring problems? Poor VQ correlated with other factors?

Summary Identify a problem –Passive Monitoring –Active Monitoring Troubleshoot to find the cause of the problem Performance management –Find trends –Identify trouble periods

Supplementary Slides

Ways to Detect Problems Users complain Customers complain CEO complains Much Better Not Good Test before deployment Passive monitoring Gather information from the infrastructure Active monitoring

Measuring Voice Quality Specified by ITU-T P.830 in 1996 Range of results: 1 to 5 Absolute Category Rating (ACR) is: ­5 is excellent ­4 is good ­3 is fair ­2 is poor ­1 is bad Mean Opinion Score (MOS) Individuals provide an ACR score Resultant MOS is an average of the scores Panel of Human Listeners Expensive to set up Cumbersome maintenance Inconsistent results Not practical or scalable for live networks or frequent regression testing Problems MOS = ( )/4 = 3.75

IP Voice Quality Factors Impacting Quality GatewayGateway/Phone Lost Packets CODEC -introduces some distortion Jitter Late packets are discarded by jitter buffer Round trip delay

Passive, Non-reference-Based E-model GatewayGateway/Phone Lost Packets CODEC -introduces some distortion Jitter Late packets are discarded by jitter buffer Round trip delay E-model R Factor

Active, Reference-based PESQ FFT Perceptually weighted Objective score Test (speech) file Sent thru’ network 500 MIPS processor PESQ algorithm (ITU P.862) based on and replaces previous (ITU P.861 PSQM, BT PAMS) algorithms VoIP Service Voice Quality Tester