EHealth Exchange Transition Update October 2, 2012 Mariann Yeager Interim Executive Director Healtheway, Inc. 703-623-1924 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
| Implications for Health Information Exchange – MetroChicago January 2011.
Advertisements

HISPC-Illinois II The Public-Private Partnership Moves Forward on Privacy and Security.
Update on Recent Health Reform Activities in Minnesota.
Florida’s Health Information Exchange and Electronic Health Record Incentive Program CHIPRA Part C Meeting January 18 and 24, 2012 Carolyn Turner and Pam.
On the Path to Secure, Interoperable HIE Everywhere March 5, 2013 Mariann Yeager Executive Director 1.
National Health Policy Forum William Winkenwerder, Jr., M.D. Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) January 28, 2004.
ConnectVirginia: Cybersecurity and Health Information Exchange Presented To: Health and Human Resources Sub-Panel, Governor’s Secure Commonwealth Initiative.
Cracking the Code on Nationwide Interoperability DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily.
Texas Approach to Supporting Statewide Health Information Exchange January 2013.
NC Health Information Technology (HIT) Collaborative NC Health Information Technology (HIT) Collaborative Moving North Carolina Forward September 3, 2009.
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Minnesota Law and Health Information Exchange Oversight Activities James I. Golden, PhD State Government Health IT Coordinator Director, Health Policy.
Building Tools for Trust for Nationwide Health Information Exchange Copyright All Rights Reserved. 1.
Georgia Department of Community Health Georgia Health Information Exchange Network HomeTown Health Event September 25, 2012.
1 Community Betterment through HIE Public and Private Health Data Integration in a State-wide HIE: The Nebraska Story Chris Henkenius © Bass & Associates,
Navigating the Maze How to sell to the public sector Adrian Farley Chief Deputy CIO State of California
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
THE SEQUOIA PROJECT Trusted Convener of Industry & Government to Address Health IT Interoperability 1 © 2015 The Sequoia Project. All Rights Reserved.
Achieving Interoperability Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD, FACMI Director, Office of Standards & Interoperability, ONC 1.
1 Northern Ontario e-Health Information and Communication Technology Tactical Plan October 25, 2007.
Learn. Lead. Connect. AHRMM Delivers the Tools to Bridge the Gap.
1 VistA-Office EHR CAPT Cynthia Wark Deputy Director, Information Systems Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.
An Integrated Healthcare System’s Approach to ACOs Chuck Baumgart, M.D., Chief Medical Officer Presbyterian Health Plan David Arredondo, M.D., Executive.
1 DoD-VA Partnership Status 22 February DoD/VA Partnership DoD/VA Mission, Vision, Authority DoD/VA Council Structure Joint Strategic Plan Current.
0 Presentation to: Health IT HIPPA Workshop Presented by: Stacey Harris, Director of Health IT Innovation September 26, 2014 Division of Health Information.
AHIMA & PHDSC A Transformational Alliance. CONFIDENTIAL AHIMA Background  Professional association founded in 1928 as the Association of Record Librarians.
1 Collaboration and Concept Exploration Nationwide Health Information Organization (NHIO) Gateway March 28, 2007.
1 Manatt Health Solutions NYS Office of Health Information Technology Transformation Academy Health State Health Research and Policy Interest Group 2008.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
Health Information Technology The Texas Landscape Presentation to TASSCC 2010 Nora Belcher Texas e-Health Alliance August 3, 2010.
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) Regina.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
Initiative Overview Santa Cruz – Community Chronic Care Network Stage 4 Project Summary and Objectives: The Santa Cruz County Diabetes Mellitus Registry.
State HIE Cooperative Agreement Program: Michigan’s Response Beth Nagel, HIT Coordinator Michigan Department of Community Health October 15,
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
SCCA BACKGROUND Recognition throughout the 90s of the need to build a partnership to develop strategies to address cancer. DHEC.
South Carolina Health Information Partners October 13,2012 South Carolina Primary Health Care Association 2012 Annual Conference.
Health Information Technology Policy and The States State Coverage Initiatives Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico Ree Sailors NGA, Center for Best Practices.
1 HIT: So, What’s Happening? Or…Getting Comfortable With Ambiguity State Network Council December 7, 2009.
Issues in State-Wide Regional Healthcare Information Organizations Paul Macielak, Esq. New York Health Plan Association June 28, 2005.
Regional Behavioral Health Boards Chapter 31, Title 39 Idaho Code.
A L T A R U M P R E S E N T A T I O N Altarum and Planning Grant Overview Stakeholder Kick Off Meeting – September 27, 2007.
Governance Charter Continuum Membership Participation Opportunities.
Altarum Institute integrates independent research and client-centered consulting to deliver comprehensive, systems-based solutions that improve health.
Health Information Exchange Roadmap: The Landscape and a Path Forward Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration Program Grantee.
Mariann Yeager, NHIN Policy and Governance Lead (Contractor) Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT David Riley, CONNECT Lead (Contractor) Federal.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
Prepared by Commission staff for presentation purposes only. These slides should not be considered an official summary of the order or an official Commission.
Moving the National Health Information Technology Agenda Forward The Fourth Health Information Technology Summit March 28, 2007 Robert M. Kolodner, MD.
How Including HIPAA Transaction Sets in RHIO Architecture can Help Fund Clinical Information Exchange Fred Richards, CTO/Co-Founder April 10, 2006.
State Alliance for e-Health Michelle Lim Warner, MPH Senior Policy Analyst NGA Center for Best Practices
The State of Florida’s Advances in Supporting the Use of Health IT 2015 HIT Days State Capitol January 26, 2015 Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary.
1 An Overview of Process and Procedures for Health IT Collaboration GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications Intergovernmental Solutions Division.
Health IT for Post Acute Care (HITPAC) Stratis Health Special Innovation Project Candy Hanson, BSN, PHN December 5, 2012.
HIMSS – Chicago – April, 2009 New Jersey - Health Information Technology – NJ HIT Act – Office for Health Information Technology Development - Recovery.
1 David C. Kibbe, MD MBA DirectTrust Collaborating to Build the Security and Trust Framework for Direct Exchange June 20, 2013.
1 CDC Health Information Exchange (HIE) Accelerating State-wide Public Health Situational Awareness in New York Through Health Information Exchanges August.
Pennsylvania Health Information Exchange NJHIMSS - DVHIMSS Enabling Healthcare Transformation Through Information Technology September, 2010.
Health Information Exchange: Alaska’s Health Pipeline Alaska Bar Association Health Law Section February 2, 2012 Carolyn Heyman-Layne.
Putting people first, with the goal of helping all Michiganders lead healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1.
HIE Landscape in California
Arizona Health-e Connection Leadership from Governor Napolitano
Interoperability of Data Systems Administration for Children & Families Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation Robert (Bob) Garcia Regional Administrator,
Regional Health Information Exchange: Getting There
Strategic Boards Toolkit
State and Regional Demonstrations of Health IT
Presentation transcript:

eHealth Exchange Transition Update October 2, 2012 Mariann Yeager Interim Executive Director Healtheway, Inc

Discussion Topics Context eHealth Exchange eHealth Exchange Strategic Road Map State engagement Transition Strategy Healtheway eHealth Exchange Anchor Participants Healtheway Members Cross-industry Collaborative Initiatives Harmonized testing program with HER HIE Interoperability Workgroup Q&A 2

Context Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN): A set of standards, services and policies deemed by ONC as NwHIN. eHealth Exchange: A community of exchange partners who, via a contractual relationship, share information using NwHIN or other standards, services and policies. Started as an NwHIN program initiative in 2007 Transitioning to public-private partnership in 2012 Rebranded as eHealth Exchange Healtheway assuming operational support, starting Oct 2012 Healtheway: non-profit organization chartered to support the eHealth Exchange 3

eHealth Exchange Strategic Road Map Initial Rollout (2009 – 2011) Mature, Grow, Scale Sustainability 2014 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Early adopters Federal business cases Shared infrastructure Early lessons learned Success / viability ONC program pilot concludes Production ramps up Transition to public- private model Grow participation and transactions Refine and scale Expand value cases Align with NwHIN governance Implement sustainability model Continued growth in participant and transactions Revenue model sustains operations Nationwide deployment Interoperable exchange among private entities 4

eHealth Exchange Vision / Mission Vision To serve as a critical element of the nationwide health information infrastructure; and To improve the health and welfare of all Americans through health information exchange that is trusted, that scales, and enhances quality of care and health outcomes by supporting comprehensive longitudinal health records. Mission To expand trusted, secure and interoperable exchange of health information across the nation by providing shared governance and necessary shared service to public and private organizations who wish to interconnect as a network of networks. 5

eHealth Exchange Participants and Technology Partners eHealth Exchange Participants: Rapidly growing community of exchange partners Facilitate and govern exchange, meet eligibility criteria and successfully complete production readiness testing of Exchange- Ready system 34 organizations in production, representing hundreds of hospitals, thousands of providers and millions of patients Another two dozen organizations in the pipeline Dramatic growth, primarily in private sector Technology Partners Provide Exchange-Ready technology solutions to eHealth Exchange Participants Approximately 20 solutions support participants, with rapid growth 6

eHealth Exchange Participants* Alabama One Health Record Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Childrens’ Hospital of Dallas Community Health Information Collaborative (CHIC) Conemaugh Health System Department of Defense (DOD) Department of Veterans Affairs Dignity Health Douglas County Individual Practice Association (DCIPA) Eastern Tennessee Health Information Network (etHIN) EHR Doctors HealthBridge HEALTHeLINK (Western New York) Idaho Health Data Exchange Inland Northwest Health Services (INHS) Kaiser Permanente Lancaster General Health Marshfield Clinic Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) MedVirginia MultiCare Health System National Renal Administrators Association (NRAA) New Mexico Health Information Collaborative (NMHIC) North Carolina Healthcare Information and Communications Alliance, Inc. (NCHICA) OCHIN Quality Health Network Regenstrief Institute Social Security Administration (SSA) South Carolina Health Information Exchange (SCHIEx) South East Michigan Health Information Exchange (SEMHIE) Strategic Health Intelligence University of California, San Diego Utah Health Information Network (UHIN) Wright State University 7 * 6 others in activation stage

State Engagement in eHealth Exchange Current status 4 in production 1 in activation 2 engaging in pilot of new testing program 11 others in the pipeline Approaches Coordinated with state: States connect to eHealth Exchange as a participant (e.g. SC) States refer regional HIEs to join eHealth Exchange (e.g. NY) Complimentary Regional HIO joins Exchange since states focus on other types of exchange modalities (TN) Bridge Health System joins Exchange until state is in production (e.g. HI) Independent Health systems or regional HIOs join Exchange independent of state effort 8

Technology Solution Providers* ApeniMED Aurion Axolotl CareEvolution CGI Cogon CONNECT CSC Epic Harris K Force MEDecision MedFX Medicity Mirth MobileMD Northrop Grumman OneHealthPort Orion Health SAIC Talis Thompson Vangent Wright State Research Institute 9 * Plus other vendors engaged EHR HIE Interoperability Workgroup

National Return on Investment Efficiencies and cost savings realized to date through multi-party trust agreement, shared infrastructure and governance Significant potential savings by lessening the burden of testing prior to exchanging with a new partner Expands coverage throughout the US, reaching hundreds of hospitals, thousands of providers and millions of patients Incremental costs per participant decrease as participation grows, lowering the costs to HIE, while enabling HIE to scale nationwide Value to clinical decision making and cost savings increase exponentially with utilization 10

eHealth Exchange Benefits 11 Value Proposition Implement once, exchange with many Recognition as part of trusted community Expanded connectivity Cost effective and efficient Enforced compliance and accountability Functional and scalable shared services

TRANSITION STRATEGY 12

Transition Goals and Objectives Remain aligned with the national strategy Facilitate a smooth transition from ONC to a non-profit public- private endeavor, while assuring continued growth and continuity of eHealth Exchange operational support Double participation in the eHealth Exchange and increase utilization by 50%, with ability to support a full rollout in

Current – Future State Current ONC NwHIN initiative - NwHIN Exchange Coordinating Committee* DURSA* Onboarding & testing facilitated by ONC Operations supported / funded by ONC Services provided to participants for free Future Public-private initiative - eHealth Exchange Coordinating Committee* DURSA* Testing facilitated by testing body designated by CC Operations supported/ funded by Healtheway Participants begin paying for services in future 14 * Unchanged

Exchange Trust Framework Unchanged DURSA remains in full force and effect Coordinating Committee retains all authorities as specified in the DURSA Healtheway board does not have any oversight responsibilities with respect to eHealth Exchange, but will operate under an agreement with the Coordinating Committee 15

Exchange – Healtheway Interactions 16 Exchange Coordinating Committee Healtheway Community Collaboration Program May wish to join as members Industry Eligible for CC Representation Federal Participants State Participants Private Participants eHealth Exchange Healtheway Join Select Healtheway to run Exchange / CC operations Exchange / CC Operations Support Program Staff, legal support Certificates Service Registry Exchange Testing Body Select Contract eHealth Exchange Participation Fees

17 Exchange CC – Healtheway Board Functions Federal Participants State Participants Private Participants eHealth Exchange Coordinating Committee Exec Director Healtheway Board 3 CC Reps Up to 9 Elected Members Oversee eHealth Exchange participation Approve specs, test guides, policies Enforce DURSA Handle disputes / breaches Approve changes to DURSA Designate Healtheway to support eHealth Exchange operations Assure corporation is effectively supporting and providing value to its customers (e.g. Exchange, etc.) Make financial decisions (e.g. annual budget, membership program, funding, etc.) Engage & oversee Executive Director / staff Guide business strategy and oversee business (e.g. programs, marketing, partnerships, etc.) Set strategic direction Appoint Any organization that wishes to be a part of Healtheway community collaboration (e.g. HIE, vendor, payer, non-profit, academic institution, etc.) Governm ental Liaisons

HEALTHEWAY 18

Healtheway Mission To provide the infrastructure to support the safe and secure exchange of data which eHealth Exchange Participants use to further their respective missions to: Improve clinical decision making and coordination, quality and affordability of care; Support meaningful use; Enhance disease surveillance, support preparedness and routine public health missions to improve public health; and Realize efficiencies and expedite provision of funding and services to individuals to support their care and well-being. To provide services and programs to Healtheway Members to advance implementation of HIE. 19

eHealth Exchange Participation Fees & Deliverables Annual Participation Fees: subscription fees that Participants, as defined in the Data Use and Reciprocal Support Agreement (DURSA), pay an annual basis to: Continue use of shared eHealth Exchange infrastructure – use of digital certificate and service registry to discover exchange partners Reliance on shared testing process The right to exchange with other Participants Reliance on Coordinating Committee (CC) oversight mechanisms established in the DURSA (e.g. breach notification, dispute resolution, etc.) Eligible for representation on the Coordinating Committee 20

eHealth Exchange Anchor Participant Program eHealth Exchange Participants who pay subscription fees for the first two years (FY 2012 and FY 2013) will qualify for the program. eHealth Exchange will begin charging all Participants subscription fees, starting in FY Anchor program benefits Significantly discounted fees Recognition and added visibility and promotion Priority for pilots Featured in profiles, webinars, etc. 21

22 Non-Federal Participant Tier Anchor Participant < $1M$ 4,750 $ 3,300 $1 - $10 M$ 9,950 $ 7,000 More than $10 M$ 19,000 $ 14,500 Other Participant < $1M$ -$ 4,750 $1 - $10 M$ -$ 9,950 More than $10 M$ -$ 19,900 Fiscal Year: May 1 st of current year through April 30 th of following year * Average annual savings to Anchor Participants, starting FY 2014 – 30% Exchange: Anchor Participant Fee Schedule

Healtheway Member Benefits Eligible for voting seat on Healtheway board of directors, with ability to help shape the future of Healtheway and HIE implementation Right to select up to 9 members to serve on board Voting rights at annual member meetings Input on strategic direction Input on strategy and joint work products with other initiatives Voice in cross-industry collaborative efforts, with unique opportunity to foster the future of the largest public and private exchange community of its kind in the US Promotion in member list, web site, communications and annual report Recognition of organizational commitment to cross-industry collaboration to unify industry 23

Founding Members Members who join by December 31, 2012 and commit to two- years of membership Founding Member status, with a unique logo Priority consideration for participating in Exchange pilots Members who join by early September Visible role in launch of Healtheway Eligible for board representation at its formation (September 2012) 24

Healtheway Membership Dues 25 Annual Revenue* Annual Membership Fee >$50 Million$50,000 $25-$50 Million$30,000 $10–$25 Million$18,000 $5–$10 Million$8,000 <$5 Million$5,000 * NOTES Annual revenue shall be based upon annual healthcare revenue when organizations operate in different industry sectors. For governmental agencies, professional associations and academic institutions, the tiers are based upon annual budget in lieu of annual revenue.

For more information Mariann Yeager Interim Executive Director O: C: