2010 Travel Behavior Inventory Mn/DOT TDMCC- Jonathan Ehrlich October 14, 2010.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.

Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.

Steve Wilson SRF Consulting Group, Inc. MnDOT Collar County Travel Demand Model.

Surveying and Modeling Long Distance Trips Stacey Bricka, TTI Erik Sabina, DRCOG Catherine Durso, University of Denver Julie Paasche, PTV NuStats Presented.

On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.

Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.

GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.

NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.

Presented to Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Feng Liu, John (Jay) Evans, Tom Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 8, 2011.

Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07

The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.

Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.

Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.

Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks

PRESENTED TO: CTP 2040 POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTED BY: RON WEST, CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS CTP 2040 Scenario Strategies and Analysis Framework November.

Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.

11 Travel Behavior Panel Surveys: Measuring the Impacts of Road Pricing in Seattle and Atlanta Travel Survey Methods Committee Meeting January 25, 2012.

KY 4/22 Module 1b Chapter 3 in the TS Manual Main Survey Types.

1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,

Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.

Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Innovative Approach to Transit On-board Data Collection.

National Household Travel Survey Data User Tools Adella Santos FHWA-OFFICE OF HIGHWAY POLICY INFORMATION APDU 2008 ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 25, 2008.

 Focus Model Application to Colfax Ave  Initial Contact with FTA  Evaluation Process and Results  Next Steps.

Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.

June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling

Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.

January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.

Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by Scott Seeburger, Myung Sung, Dave Schmitt & Peter Haliburton November 20, Tri-Rail On-Board Survey.

A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.

National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.

 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.

1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.

MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.

Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.

I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Preliminary Findings March 23, 2006 Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Mary Ross, P.E./Myung Sung. 2 3 Lower Atlantic Regular Gas Price HIGH: $4.03- July 2008 LOW: $1.60- Dec 2008.

Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.

RTC DVRPC Household Travel Survey TMIP Peer-Review October 29, 2014 Ben Gruswitz, AICP Office of Modeling & Analysis Sarah Moran Office of Modeling.

TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.

NHTS Update and Data Analysis Plans presented to Florida Model Task Force presented by Krishnan Viswanathan November 10, 2009.

OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.

Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.

David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.

1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.

David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.

Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.

Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.

How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.

CE 341 Transportation Planning

Best Practices Met Council Household Travel Survey (HTS) May

1 Palm Tran Transit Survey Coordination Meeting November 18 th, 2008.

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.

Conducted on behalf of: Conducted by: In Association With: PTV DataSource GeoStats PB Chandra Bhat Mark Bradley Mary Kay Christopher Keith Lawton Survey.

Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.

The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.

Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Attitudinal Evaluation Overview and Update Johanna Zmud / NuStats October 28, 2004 MnPass Copyright WSDOT © 2002.

Title Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro Investigating options for improved bus service between.

2007 Household Travel Survey

Travel patterns in a city

Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update

Travel Behavior Inventory: Household Travel Survey

Travel patterns in a city

Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07

MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program

Presentation transcript:

2010 Travel Behavior Inventory Mn/DOT TDMCC- Jonathan Ehrlich October 14, 2010

TBI Purpose >Provide complete picture of travel in the Twin Cities >New facilities and modes built since 2000 >Changes in society >Economic situation and fuel price volatility >Update regional travel models >Air quality conformity/planning >Transportation policy scenario analysis >Forecasts for project development

Study Area

Survey Components >Home Interview Survey >Transit On-Board Survey >External Origin - Destination Survey >MnPASS Mode Survey >Special Generator Studies >U of M >MSP Airport >Mall of America >Speed Survey

Consultant Team >Cambridge Systematics- lead, model development >AECOM- local management, model development, external station and speed studies >Abt SRBI- Household survey >Dikita Enterprises- Transit on-board survey >PlanTrans Ply- GPS sub-survey >Moshe Ben-Akiva, Frank Koppelman, Peter Stopher- advisors

Home Interview Survey- Sample Plan >12,200 households (400 7-day GPS sample) >Address-based random sample, stratified by household size and auto ownership >Some oversamples (bicycle travelers, University, MnPASS corridors, other smaller populations) >Recruit and retrieval by phone, mail, or web

Home Interview Survey- Survey Instrument >Recruit- Household and Person Data >HH Composition >Number of people, age/sex/relationships, student/employment status, income, disability >Housing Data >Housing type, tenure, rent/own, cost >Transportation Data >Typical commute, licensed driver, MnPASS, transit pass/subsidy, work from home, vehicle availability, bicycle availability

Home Interview Survey- Survey Instrument >Diary- Trip Data >24 Hours- 3AM – 3AM >Location Data >Time of arrival/departure, address, activity >Trip Data >Type of transportation >Amount paid (parking cost, toll, transit fare) and how it was paid (subsidized parking, monthly payment for parking/transit) >Mode, accompanying travelers

Home Interview Survey- Schedule >Pre-test (internal) >September 2010 >Pilot Survey (~1000 households) >November 2010-February 2011 >Full Survey (~11,000 households) >March 2011-June 2011

Transit On-Board Survey- Survey Instrument >Boarding/alighting and origin/destination >Mode of access >Trip Purpose, auto availability, age, household size, income >Available in English, Spanish, Hmong, Somali >GPS barcode for validation, short trips >Mailback option

Transit On-Board Survey- Sample Plan >Partial survey, focusing on Northstar, Hiawatha, current and potential New Starts and Arterial BRT corridors >Proportional sample >Targeting 108 routes, representing 80% of daily ridership >10,000-15,000 completed surveys >Combine with 2005 survey data

Transit On-Board Survey- Schedule >Pre-test in Aug/Sept 2010 >Survey began on Sept 27, 2010 >End date Nov 19, 2010

Regional Model Development- Policy Issues >Highway >Operations, ramp metering, HOV lanes, bus shoulders, peak spreading, pricing, managed lanes, minor arterials/collectors >Transit >Operations, pricing, BRT, impact of parking policies/pricing

Regional Model Development- Tour-based model >Simplifying assumptions: >No linkages between tours >No interaction between household members (other than joint trips) >Stop and Tour allocation fixed among HH members >Preliminary Tour Structure (based on 2000 TBI data) >3 daily tours >1 HBW tour >1 One WB tour >Up to 1 HBNW tour for people with work tour >Up to 3 HBNW tours for non- workers

Regional Model Development- Policy Issues >Validation and Application to lower-level facilities (minor arterials, BRT) >New TAZ system (2600 zones in 7-county area) >New networks >Lower level, conflated, and consistent

2010 Travel Behavior Inventory For more information, contact: Jonathan Ehrlich (TBI Project Manager) (651)