+ Project 4: Systems Thinking Created by Sofia Levchak NJCU Educational Technology Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Directors Conference Sept 2007 Carol Diedrichsen Gwen Pollock Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum for English.
Advertisements

Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
Elko County School District CCSS Math Professional Development Module 3, Week 2 Digging into the CCSS, part 1.
Bringing it all together!
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support 2012 Mathematical Practice 3: Construct Viable Arguments and Critique the Reasoning of Others Mathematics.
MYP (Middle Years Programme).  m7oU.
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
The Challenge of Managing Organizational Change: Exploring the Relationship of Re-engineering, Developing Learning Organizations and Total Quality Management.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
The Cultural Contexts of Teaching and Learning Stuart Greene Associate Professor of English Director of Education, Schooling, and Society Co-founder of.
The Core Disciplines Kenneth M. York School of Business Administration Oakland University.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Ryann Kramer EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 1, Session 2. Participants will: review STEM Standards of Practice student proficiencies. analyze the STEM Standards.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
A Framework for K-12 Science Education Changes, Challenges, and Charges Summary created by: Fred Ende Regional Science Coordinator Putnam/Northern Westchester.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Overview of the Fifth Discipline
Background Information The CCSSM were a result of a state-led initiative in June 2009 by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
Rigorous Curriculum Design
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Common Core State Standards
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
DIFFERENTIATION OF INSTRUCTION Dr. Dan Bertrand. What we know Classrooms have always included students who:  Learn at different rates  Have varying.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Jacqueline J. Brayman, Ed.D. Maureen A. Grey Michael A. Stearns, Ed.D. Putting It All Together A Leader’s Guide to System’s Thinking AASA National Conference.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
Examining Student Work and Data Professional Learning Community Action Teams PUSD Instructional Services-PLC Action Team Training Fall 2008.
EDTC 625 Dr. Shamburg Charlene Mason August 20, 2014.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Peter Senge’s Learning Organizations By Michelle Meyer Ngai & Katherine Davis.
Jashapara, Knowledge Management: An Integrated Approach, 2 nd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011 Slide 6.1 THE LEARNING ORGANISATION.
Johns Hopkins University School of Professional Studies in Business and Education 2006 Summary of Key Points from: The Fifth Discipline − The Art and Practice.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Building Learning Organizations in Dementia Care December 2010 Kelly Papa MSN, RN.
Overview What do we mean by a Learning Organisation? Why did we develop a People Development Framework? What was the process involved in building the.
UDL: Sharing Ideas, Building Resources Julie Luton Walden University Sherry Lamberston EDUC 6714: Reaching and Engaging All Learner Through Technology.
WHERE IN THE WORLD ARE THE ARTS IN THE NEW COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS? MATI 3013 Susan Denvir
2. The Learning Community Sociological and Psychological Nature of Groups Sociological and Psychological Nature of Groups Reciprocity Cohort Model Interaction.
The Fifth Discipline Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
National Research Council Of the National Academies
THE ART & PRACTICE OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION The Fifth Discipline.
Shared Vision Sandra Kreps, Andrea Paul & Yvonne Taylor.
Peter Senge’s Learning Organizations Peter Senge’s vision of a learning organization as a group of people who are continually enhancing their capabilities.
Learning Organizations. Think of an Organization Where: You can experiment It was ok to make (and admit) a mistake Furthering your education / development.
The Learning Organization. continuously transforming itself continuously transforming itself able to be nimble, flexible, adaptive to a constantly changing.
WHATEVER IT TAKES  “It should be clear that schools will never realize the fundamental purpose of helping all students achieve at high levels if the.
Introduction My class is a 7 th grade Science class which consist of 20 students total, 11 females-9 males, 4students are special needs and.
Community Event Bonita Burton-Washington Educator EDU 620 Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Patricia Neely 8/17/15.
Amy Drummond Daniel Paniccia Jennifer Smith.  Student in center of learning process.  Role of instructor changes. ◦ From expert to facilitator  Focus.
Community Event: Why Technology Matters Fiona Jeppson EDU 620: Meeting Individual Student Needs with Technology Instructor Chenne Gilbert Community Representative.
Fund our Future Community Center Representative Sheila Johnson EDU 620 Deborah Naughton May 15, 2016.
Oceanside Community Event Cristin Castiglia - District Educator EDU 620 – Meeting Individual Student Needs Through Technology Instructor Adriane Wheat.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Middle Years Programme (MYP)
NATIONAL PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
Personal Mastery (Senge’s Five Disciplines)
Senge’s Five Disciplines
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Presentation transcript:

+ Project 4: Systems Thinking Created by Sofia Levchak NJCU Educational Technology Department

+ What is “systems thinking”? Systems thinking is a term coined by Peter Senge (1990). It is one of the five disciplines identified by Senge in The Fifth Discipline. It is a framework for the following: Seeing the inter-relationships between complex problems and interactions as a web, rather than a simplistic chain- reaction Encourages teams to seek underlying problems, before they surface and become even greater problems Analyzing problems/solutions, events, possible cause/effects to find better solutions

+ Systems Thinking Model

+ The previous slide models how “Systems Thinking” encompasses the other four disciplines described by Senge: Personal Mastery Mental Models Building Shared Vision Team Learning It is essential for these four disciplines to be present for the systems thinking model to be complete.

+ Think Different Interconnectivity – YES! Linear Thinking – NO!

+ Personal Mastery Continuously deepening and clarifying our own personal vision Self-awareness of ourselves and how our actions impact others Recognizing areas of needed growth Constant state of learning– the individual is never finished Seeing reality through an objective lens Harnessing and focusing our energy

+ Mental Models Deeply ingrained assumptions that shape how we understand individuals, the world, and our interaction with others Learning to unearth the way we look at others from within ourselves and hold them to rigorous scrutiny A balance between inquiry and advocacy when conversing with others in an effort to learn more about an individual or organization Thinking must be “open” to the influence of others Being closed minded would not contribute to growing in this discipline

+ Shared Vision A genuine vision shared by all stakeholders for the future they wish to create Increased clarity, enthusiasm, and commitment encourage others and helps the vision grow in strength As people talk, the vision gets stronger Commitment vs. compliance: Commitment is defined as truly buying into the vision Compliance is defined as going along with the vision because it is what is required of someone

+ Team Learning The process of aligning and developing the capacities of a team to create the results its members truly desire Individuals must be able to act together Teams who learn together not only experience good results, but individual members will grow more rapidly as a result of the other members Dialogue is essential. Should be genuine conversation that leads to addressing/solving problems before they become too complex.

+ Comparisons The following slides will strive to compare Peter Senge’s systems thinking model with the 3 concepts: Universal design for learning (UDL) Constructivist Technology Curriculum Flipped Classroom We will begin by defining the 3 aforenamed concepts and giving examples.

+ Universal Design for Learning (UDL) What is UDL? Universal design for learning is an educational framework that gives learners multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. The overall goal of UDL is to make the material presented in the lesson accessible to all learners by making minor modifications that benefit all students. Examples of UDL: Classroom videos: Allow student access so they can pause, rewind, take notes, or use subtitles The use of digital photography to document the steps of a lab experiment Flexible grouping to allow students to learn from each other

+ Constructivist Technology Proposal What is constructivist technology curriculum? This is a curriculum anchored in Papert’s concept of “powerful ideas.” Powerful ideas are described by Papert as “new ways of thinking, new ways of putting knowledge to use, and new ways of making personal and epistemological connections with other domains of knowledge” (as cited in Bers, 2007, p. 23). Examples: Use of the following mediums to enhance curriculum: Video editing Audio editing Green screen Digital photography Robotics Legos

+ Flipped Classroom What is the flipped classroom? The flipped classroom is a method of instruction developed by two teachers, Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams. The model generally requires that students watch an instructional video as homework before class along for class time to be dedicated to hands-on learning and a high degree of student- instructor interaction. A prime example of videos used in this form of instruction is Khan Academy. Examples: 4 th grade math – Multiplying two-digit factors 5 th grade science – Lab safety 6 th grade ELA – Grammar lesson on compound sentences 7 th grade science – Ecological succession story board 10 th grade ELA – Listen to “The Raven” by Edgar Allen Poe

+ Systems Thinking and UDL Project Description: A 6 th grade “UDLified lesson” that challenges students to compare and contrast the experience of reading a story to the experience of viewing a story in video form. Correlation to the Five Disciplines: The predominant correlating disciplines are systems thinking and team learning. Systems thinking is evident, because the teacher is producing lesson plans and classroom assignments by viewing the classroom as an ecosystem. While one student or group of students benefit from differentiated instruction, other students are benefiting as well.

+ Systems Thinking and UDL (cont’d) Team Learning is evident in UDL, because students are working in groups and learning from one another. Personal mastery, mental models, and shared vision are not necessarily represented in UDL. The argument could be made that these disciplines are evident during the planning stage of a lesson (i.e. the teacher needs to be open minded to UDL principals or if UDL is being implemented school wide, there needs to be shared vision), but they are not necessarily evident during the implementation of the lesson.

+ Systems Thinking and Constructivist Technology Proposal Project Description: A curriculum proposal to integrate the use of video editing into the district’s 8 th grade English Language Arts classrooms. Video editing will serve as a tool that will aid students in demonstrating that they have reached the grade level CCCS objective. Correlation to the Five Disciplines: The predominant correlating disciplines are systems thinking, personal mastery, shared vision, and team learning. Mental models is not necessarily present in constructivist curriculum. Systems thinking is present, because students are learning the concept of interconnectivity. For example, if students are learning with Legos, they are learning about problem solving, planning, three dimensional thinking, critical thinking, math, geometry, and engineering (the list could certainly go on).

+ Systems Thinking and Constructivist Technology Proposal (cont’d) Personal mastery is present, because students engaged in a constructivist-rich curriculum have the motivation to learn and build on their previously acquired skills (whether they realize it or not). Shared vision is present among the students and teachers. Returning to the example of the Legos, when students and teachers are working together on a project, there is a common vision that is slightly shaped by each individual members. Team Learning is probably the clearest of the five disciplines that is present. Students work together and learn from each other. “Expert” students take the lead in particular areas allowing students to learn from each other.

+ Systems Thinking and Flipped Classroom Project Description: A series of instructional videos developed with the intentions of being used in a middle school level ESL class. Correlation to the Five Disciplines: The disciplines that are most predominant are systems thinking and personal mastery. While students participate in the flipped classroom, it is a model that requires the most dedication from instructor, not necessarily the student. Personal mastery is clearly evident, because the instructor has made a commitment to making a change in his or her classroom that is not common in most classrooms. They have looked within themselves and have made a change for the benefit of their students.

+ Systems Thinking and Flipped Classroom (cont’d) Systems thinking is a major component to the flipped classroom. By having students engage in the lesson outside of class, and put the skills acquired to use during class, the interconnectivity of the classroom is improving. There is engagement and interaction, as opposed to single-sided teacher-directed instruction. Team learning is also part of the flipped classroom, but in a sense, it is the bi-product of model. The amount of class time conserved by students watching the lesson outside of the class allows for flexibility during class. As a result, students can engage in more hands-on learning, which has the potential to create an environment that fosters team learning.

+ References Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class everyday. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Comindwork.com. (n.d.). Systems thinking [image]. Retrieved from discipline-by-peter-senge-is-systems-thinking Bers, M. (2007). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Senge, P.M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday. Comindwork.com. (n.d.). Systems thinking [image]. Retrieved from discipline-by-peter-senge-is-systems-thinking