1 Programming period 2007-13 Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
EN Regional Policy - Finance & Budget EUROPEAN COMMISSION Annual Meeting with managing authorities of crossborder programmes Brussels - 25 Octobre 2011.
Title INNOVATION PERFORMANCE. The Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs and EU regional policy DG REGIO.
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
EN DG Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11 October 2007 Management and control arrangements OPEN DAYS 2007 Financial Control : New.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION The new European Regional Development Fund Brussels, 12 October 2006 Committee of the Regions N. De Michelis,
Commission européenne The European Social Fund Investing in your Future.
Planning and use of funding instruments
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
Final Report Anton Schrag REGIO D1
Regional Policy Cohesion Policy Legal Package State of play Porto, 29th April 2013 Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ Deputy Head of Unit DG REGIO.D.1 Transnational.
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Closure of Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund interventions European Commission Bernard LANGE, DG Regional Policy Laurent SENS, DG Employment,
The new European Regional Development Fund DG REGIO.
Click to edit Master title style 1 In the run-up to closure Main tasks for managing authorities, paying authorities and winding-up bodies European Commission.
Performance Framework
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 15 July 2004.
Expert group meeting on models, draft templates and guidance for the Partnership Agreement and operational/cooperation programmes under cohesion policy.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Key features of the draft cohesion policy and ETC regulations
Regional Policy The future of EU funding - proposals from the Commission Guy Flament European Commission, DG REGIO Cardiff, 19 April 2013.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
Hungarian Delegation Lisbon, 28 October 2008 Financial Institute for Regional Development.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Managing authorities working with cities Regions for Economic Change 17 th February 2009 Peter Ramsden Pole Manager.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
The new EU cohesion policy ( ) EASPD Project Development Workshop May 10th – Sofia (BG) Jelle Reynaert – Policy Officer.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Main elements of the templates for the Partnership Contract and the operational programme.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) Zsolt SZOKOLAI European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 9 June 2009 “ Cohesion policy: response to the economic crisis” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying.
EUROPEAN FISHERIES FUND (EFF) Axis 4: Sustainable Development of Fisheries Areas Christine FALTER DG Fisheries Unit C1 – General Aspects of Structural.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Evaluation : goals and principles
Performance Framework
Performance framework review and reserve
Purpose of the presentation
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 4:Trans-national co-operation DG Regional Policy Brussels, 22.
Preparation of Member States’ Strategic Reports 2009 European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities Brussels, 9 June 2009 John.
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
Implementing act on the model for the annual and final implementation report under the European Territorial Cooperation goal 12th Meeting of the Expert.
The National Strategic Reference Framework and NDP
Presentation transcript:

1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3

2 National Strategic Reference Frameworks (NSRFs) NSRFs describe how the Objectives - Convergence and Competitiveness & Employment - contribute to the Integrated Guidelines on Growth and Jobs, including –the setting of national and Operational Programme targets –by making an additional effort in terms of Lisbon-related expenditure in relation to the baselines NSRFs should include: –priority actions identified in National Reform Programmes –the 4 priority actions in the Annual Progress Report (Lisbon Strategy) –coordination mechanisms between Lisbon and cohesion processes at national and regional level

3 Architecture of the OPs MonoFund OPsMonoFund OPs - Monofund rule laid down in Art 34(1) - Exception for ERDF and Cohesion Fund : compulsory joint programming (Art 34 (3)) - Crossfinancing between ESF- and ERDF- type actions (Art 34 (2))

4 Mono objective OPs (Art 32 (1)) Reasons for the rule: - Intervention of the Funds differentiated by Objective - Financial perspectives defined by Objective Exception « when otherwise agreed between the Commission and the Member State »

5 Geographical coverage Convergence objective (Art 35 (1)) - ERDF OP : NUTS level 2 - CF (and ERDF) OP: National level Regional competitiveness and employment objective (Art 35 (2)): NUTS level 1 or 2 European territorial cooperation objective (Art 35 (3)): NUTS level 3 + derogations

6 Content of the OP 1Analysis of the area or sector and justification of the priorities chosen 2 Priority axes 3 Categorisation 4 Financing plans 5 Implementing provisions 6 Indicative list of major projects

7 1 Analysis of the area or sector and justification of the priorities chosen -Analysis of the situation of the area or sector -Strategy chosen to respond to the strengths and weaknesses of the area or sector - Approach towards the sustainable urban development, shall be encouraged + Justification of the concentration on the priorities for OPs under the Regional competitiveness and employment objective.

8 2 Priority axes The OP shall be detailed by priority axis not by measure. The priority axis shall define targets and indicators Elements helping to define the number of priority axes: - A priority axis = a priority of the strategy - Containing operations which are related and have specific measurable goals (Art 2(2)) - One priority axis – one fund – one objective - Financial management at the level of the priority axis

9 3 Categorisation - Ex ante categorisation : previsions on the programmed use of the funds - At the level of the Operationnal programme and not by priority axis - Three tables to fill in: Priority themes Forme of finance Territory For information purpose only

10 4 Financing plans Two tables: At the level of the OP the total financial appropriation envisaged for the contribution of the fund broken down by year (not by priority axis)At the level of the OP the total financial appropriation envisaged for the contribution of the fund broken down by year (not by priority axis) At the level of the priority axis the amount of the total financial appropriation of the community contribution, the national counterpart and the rate of contribution of the funds for the whole programming period (not by year)At the level of the priority axis the amount of the total financial appropriation of the community contribution, the national counterpart and the rate of contribution of the funds for the whole programming period (not by year) = Shall simplify the financial management

11 5 Implementing provisions - Designation of the authorities and bodies: MA, CA, AA, body responsible for making the payments to the beneficiaires and body responsible for receiving the payments from the Commission - Designation of the authorities and bodies: MA, CA, AA, body responsible for making the payments to the beneficiaires and body responsible for receiving the payments from the Commission - Description of the monitoring and evaluation system - Definition of the procedures for mobilisation and circulation of the financial flows - Elements concerning information and publicity - Description of the procedures agreed for the exchange of computerised data.

12 6 Indicative list of major projects - In the perspective of the programming and not of the financial management of major projects - Indicative: no need to amend the list whenever a new major project is added

13 Eligibility period (art 56) - Starting date: the earliest date between the date of submission of the OP and 1 January 2007; - Starting date for the eligibility of the expenditure for all operations; - Expenditure paid by the beneficiary in implementing the operation (art 78); - End date: 31 December 2015 laid down in the general Regulation.

14 Preparation of the OP - Partnership in the preparation of the OP: (Art 32 (2) and 11) - Deadline: Submission as soon as possible and no later than 5 months from the adoption of the CSG - Submission to the Commission of the OP containing all elements mentionned in Article 37.

15 Appraisal and adoption of the OP by the Commission Appraisal of the OPs: - Consistency with the CSG and NSRF -Quality check of the content Adoption of the OPs: - Deadline: 4 months following the formal submision of the OP by the MS and not before 1 January 2007 (art 32 (5)) - Adoption by habilitation except OPs under the European territorial cooperation objective

16 Modification of OPs Modifications shall be done at the request of the MS or at the initiative of the Commission Reasons for modifying the OP: -Significant socio-economic changes -To take greater account of major changes in Community, national or regional priorities -Drawing lessons from on going evaluations -Implementing difficulties Modifications of the OP without modification of the decision approving the NSRF