National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Group Projects:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data - Frequency Tables and Line Plots Joseph Williams Modified by Charlotte Stripling M7D1.b Construct frequency Distributions Objective: Create and interpret.
Advertisements

Planet Formation Topic: Formation of gas giant planets Lecture by: C.P. Dullemond.
Natural Selection Simulation Learning objectives Students are expected to be proficient with either Microsoft PowerPoint or Google Docs Presentation tool.
Extra-Solar Planets Topics in this lecture: Review of planet formation The Habitable Zone Basic properties of discovered exoplanets Hot Jupiters Super-Earths.
STScI May Symposium 2005 Migration Phil Armitage (University of Colorado) Ken Rice (UC Riverside) Dimitri Veras (Colorado)  Migration regimes  Time scale.
Theories and Models SNC2D. Theories and Models: Daily Learning Goal The student will be able to differentiate between scientific laws and scientific theories.
Investigating the structure of transiting planets, from hot Jupiters to Kepler super Earths Jonathan Fortney University of California, Santa Cruz Thanks.
The Scientific Method.
Statistical Techniques I EXST7005 Lets go Power and Types of Errors.
Recap: How People learn Classical conditioning Natural responses Natural responses Operant conditioning Reward based (non-natural) Reward based (non-natural)
Extra-Solar Planets Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 24.
Physics and Astronomy University of Utah Extreme Solar Systems II Fall 2011 The Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks and the Diversity of Giant Planets Diversity.
Cal State Northridge  320 Ainsworth Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing.
Nuno C. Santos Cool Stars 13 - Hamburg, Germany - July2004 Spectroscopic characteristics of planet-host stars and their planets Nuno C. Santos (Observatory.
Ge/Ay133 What effects do 1-10 M Earth cores & Jovian planets have on the surrounding disk? Or, … Migration & Gaps.
Extra-Solar Planets Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 24.
Eccentric Extrasolar Planets: The Jumping Jupiter Model HD217107b as imagined by Lynette Cook Stacy Teng TERPS Conference Dec. 9, 2004.
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Major Points An example Sampling distribution Hypothesis testing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Extrasolar Planetary Systems.
Exoplanets Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006 Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006.
Ge/Ay133 What effects do 1-10 M Earth cores have on the surrounding disk? Today = Gaps Wednesday = Migration (included here)
Hypothesis Testing:.
Pg 1 of xx AGI Orbit Lifetime Prediction Jim Woodburn.
10/3/20151 PUAF 610 TA Session 4. 10/3/20152 Some words My –Things to be discussed in TA –Questions on the course and.
1 The Precision Radial Velocity Spectrometer Science Case.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Scales & Intervals Bar & Line Graphs.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Sagan Summer.
1 Statistical Distribution Fitting Dr. Jason Merrick.
Lecture Outline Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Investigating the structure of transiting planets, from hot Jupiters to Kepler super Earths Jonathan Fortney University of California, Santa Cruz Thanks.

CoRoT-BrazilPierre BARGE Exoplanet Working Groups CoRoT Brazil Workshop Natal 2004 : oct 29th – nov 2th.
David Nesvorny (Southwest Research Institute) David Nesvorny (Southwest Research Institute) Capture of Irregular Satellites during Planetary Encounters.
Gravity and Orbits   Newton’s Law of Gravitation   The attractive force of gravity between two particles   G = 6.67 x Nm 2 /kg 2 Why is this.
ETA CARINAE – NATURE’S OWN HADRON COLLIDER We still do not know one thousandth of one percent of what nature has revealed to us. - Albert Einstein -
= 5 = 2 = 4 = 3 How could I make 13 from these shapes? How could I make 19 from these shapes? STARTER.
Scientific Method Chapter 1-1. What is Science?  Science – organized way of gathering and analyzing evidence about the natural world  Described as a.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Kepler Estimate #3: An Analysis and Implications of Kepler’s Photometric Uncertainties Wesley.
Read Sections 3.6 and 3.7 before viewing the slide show.
Sarah, Ellie, Adan and Sruthy. The Transit Method.
2003 UB313: The 10th Planet?. Extra-Solar or Exoplanets Planets around stars other than the Sun Difficult to observe Hundreds discovered (> 2000 so far)
Color Distribution A block BrownYellowOrangeRedGreenBlue GreenYellowOrangeRedPurple M&M Skittles.
The Nature of Science. Observing You have two beakers, each containing a clear liquid and an ice cube. What do you observe?
Graphs How to set up successful graphs in science class!
Lecture Outline Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds.
Lecture Outlines Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15.
Extrasolar planets - exoplanets Planets have been discovered orbiting other stars. The list of confirmed exoplanets has over 1900.list Evidence comes from.
Planet Formation in a disk with a Dead Zone Soko Matsumura (Northwestern University) Ralph Pudritz (McMaster University) Edward Thommes (Northwestern University)
Spitzer Space Telescope Mww-1 Warm Spitzer and Astrobiology Presented to NASA Astrobiology Institute Planetary System Formation Focus Group Michael Werner.
Operations with Fractions
Exoplanets: The New Science of Distant Worlds
M7Plus Unit-10: Statistics CMAPP Days (Compacted Days 1 – 5 )
Coronagraph for NRO-WFIRST: A Way Forward
The Moon.
Gerald Dyer, Jr., MPH October 20, 2016
Interferogram Filtering vs Interferogram Subtraction
Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006
Dust Evolution & Planet Traps: Effects on Planet Populations
Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006
Population synthesis of exoplanets
Section 1.1: Why Study Chemistry?
What Color is it?.
Where We Are…. As of November 21, 2016, over 3400 confirmed exoplanets had been found, with over 4500 additional candidate exoplanets. We can look at these.
Chi-squared tests Goodness of fit: Does the actual frequency distribution of some data agree with an assumption? Test of Independence: Are two characteristics.
Population synthesis of exoplanets
Test 2 Covers Topics 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 14, 19 and 20 Skipping Topics 11 and 15.
Chapter 14.1 Goodness of Fit Test.
Shapes.
Exo-planets.
Presentation transcript:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Group Projects: Exploring Planet Formation 2015 Sagan Summer Workshop “Exoplanetary System Demographics: Theory and Observations” July 27, 20151Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute What is this group project about? July 27,  Explore planetary system formation by comparing models against observations  Hands-on sessions will introduce the tools needed for this research project GlobalPFE: population synthesis model archiveComparison: download & plot real data  Choose one of eight different science questions  You will sign up for a group on the sheets provided, and start working towards your 7-10 min presentation to be given on Friday afternoon.  Deadline to sign up is the mid-afternoon break tomorrow (3:30 Tuesday) Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Which group should I choose? July 27, Group 1: Metallicity Question: How does the gas-to-dust ratio of the parent protoplanetary disk affect the results from a core accretion population synthesis? Group 2: Initial Disk Mass Question: What happens to the number of planets and planet masses if you change the initial mass of a protoplanetary disk? Group 3: Initial Disk Distribution Question: How is the distribution of planet orbits related to the original distribution of the parent disk? Does a steeper disk surface density slope result in more short-period planets? How small does the disk have to be for most gap-opening planets to move outward, rather than inward? Group 4: Gas Accretion Question: How does the assumed physics for runaway gas accretion (e.g. atmosphere opacity) affect the mass distribution for gas giant planets? Do changes in the gas accretion indirectly affect the frequency of gap formation and Type II orbital migration? Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Which group should I choose? July 27, Group 5: Embedded-Planet Migration Question: How does the migration speed of embedded planets affect their orbital distribution? What is the ideal amount of migration to create short-period planets, but not have them all fall into their central star? Group 6: Gap Formation Question: How does gap formation affect the mass of gas giant planets? How does it affect their orbital distribution, by slowing their migration rate? Group 7: Disk Lifetime Question: How does the disk lifetime affect planet formation? Is there a minimum lifetime required to form Jupiter-like planets? Is there a maximum lifetime to avoid planets all migrating into the star? Group 8: Disk Viscosity Question: Does planet formation depend on the unknown disk viscosity? Can the orbital migration of gap-forming planets be slowed down by adopting a lower disk viscosity? Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute What Questions Should I Answer? July 27, What question(s) are you trying to answer? 2.What are your hypotheses? 3.What methodology did you use to test your hypotheses? 4.What did you find? 5.What are the implications of your findings? a.Comparison with real data b.Most interesting/surprising result? 6.What conclusions can you draw? 7.What, if any, future work is needed? DON’T BE AFRAID TO BE CREATIVE!! Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

Example Template Group Project Slides July 27, 20156Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color (names and affiliations) July 27, 20157Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color Project Goal: Understand how planetary systems form and evolve Objective: Use population synthesis models to determine what physics is needed to explain exoplanet observations Science Questions: How does planet formation depend on the disk color? July 27, 20158Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color Hypothesis (before numerical tests): A redder disk will produce redder planets. Small planets are redder, so these should be favored. Methodology: Vary disk color above and below the nominal value (yellow); try red, orange, green, blue. While disk color is the primary variable of interest, we will also considered some related variables such as disk lightness and saturation, with the ultimate goal of finding the best match to observations. July 27, 20159Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color Results: We find that the reddest disks do indeed produce the reddest planets. The increase in red planets, however, is not as large as expected. Analysis: In order to compare the simulation against observations of planets detected by radial-velocity surveys, we filter the simulated population with a K=1 m/s filter. We also compared against the Kepler dataset after adding a transit- survey filter. July 27, Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color Statistical Comparison: As a simple attempt to quantify the success of each model, we performed a K-S comparing the model and observed distributions of semi-major axis and mass. The table below shows log10 values from this test. Low values mean there is a low probability that the two distributions are the same. July 27, Sagan Summer Workshop 2015 Disk Color semi-major axisplanet massnotes red orange yellow (standard value) green blue

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color The simulated distributions never match the observed distribution very well. Still, we find that the simulations of orange disks produce the planet distribution most similar to the observed distribution, particular for the planet orbits (semi-major axis). July 27, Sagan Summer Workshop 2015

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color This agrees with our visual assessment of the simulation data (with RV selection effect added) plotted against RV-discovered planets. July 27, Sagan Summer Workshop 2015 Standard ModelBest Model

Understanding Planet Formation: Disk Color Conclusion: Inclusion of new physics into standard models of planet formation – disk color effects – allows for a better match to exoplanet observations. In particular, the semi-major axis distributions are now consistent with each other. While this new model offers a solution for the formation of red and blue sub-Jupiters, there is still no good theoretical explanation for the distribution of brown super-Neptunes detected by microimaging. Future work: Variation of disk shape (square, triangle) may help to explain some of the remaining discrepancies, such as the lack of purple short-period exoplanets within the models. July 27, Sagan Summer Workshop 2015