CLOSING DISCUSSION Advances and challenges in Protein-RNA: recognition, regulation, and prediction Discussion facilitator: Manny Ares Banff International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Microarray statistical validation and functional annotation
Advertisements

Lecture 8 Transcription Initiation Prokaryotic Eukaryotic Reading: Chapter 4 ( ) Chapter 11 Molecular Biology syllabus web siteweb site.
Introduction to molecular biology. Subjects overview Investigate how cells organize their DNA within the cell nucleus, and replicate it during cell division.
PREDetector : Prokaryotic Regulatory Element Detector Samuel Hiard 1, Sébastien Rigali 2, Séverine Colson 2, Raphaël Marée 1 and Louis Wehenkel 1 1 Bioinformatics.
A Genomic Code for Nucleosome Positioning Authors: Segal E., Fondufe-Mittendorfe Y., Chen L., Thastrom A., Field Y., Moore I. K., Wang J.-P. Z., Widom.
Lecture 4: DNA transcription
20,000 GENES IN HUMAN GENOME; WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF ALL THESE GENES WERE EXPRESSED IN EVERY CELL IN YOUR BODY? WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THEY WERE EXPRESSED.
CAVEAT 1 MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS ARE EXPENSIVE AND COMPLICATED. MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS ARE THE STARTING POINT FOR RESEARCH. MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS CANNOT.
Computational Modelling of Biological Pathways Kumar Selvarajoo
CHAPTER 8 Metabolic Respiration Overview of Regulation Most genes encode proteins, and most proteins are enzymes. The expression of such a gene can be.
A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors By Sebastian J. Maerkl Stephen R. Quake.
Genome-wide prediction and characterization of interactions between transcription factors in S. cerevisiae Speaker: Chunhui Cai.
. Class 1: Introduction. The Tree of Life Source: Alberts et al.
Microarrays and Cancer Segal et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
Predicting protein functions from redundancies in large-scale protein interaction networks Speaker: Chun-hui CAI
BACKGROUND E. coli is a free living, gram negative bacterium which colonizes the lower gut of animals. Since it is a model organism, a lot of experimental.
A System Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors Authors: Sebastian J. et. al Presenter: Hongliang Fei.
Fuzzy K means.
The Hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems Maria I. Arnone and Eric H. Davidson.
1 Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence Michael A. Beer and Saeed Tavazoie Cell 117, (16 April 2004)
Protein-Protein Interaction Screens. Bacterial Two-Hybrid System selectable marker RNA polymerase DNA binding protein bait target sequence target.
More regulating gene expression. Fig 16.1 Gene Expression is controlled at all of these steps: DNA packaging Transcription RNA processing and transport.
DNA and Chromosome Structure. Chromosomal Structure of the Genetic Material.
DNA Technology Chapter 12. Applications of Biotechnology Biotechnology: The use of organisms to perform practical tasks for human use. – DNA Technology:
A systems biology approach to the identification and analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks in osteocytes Angela K. Dean, Stephen E. Harris, Jianhua.
Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data N. Friedman, M. Linial, I. Nachman, D. Hebrew University.
The Yeast nRNAP II Has 12 subunits, based on traditional enzyme purification and epitope tagging. Gene knockouts indicate that 10 subunits are essential,
Welcome to AP Biology Mr. Levine Ext. # 2317.
Multiple Alignment and Phylogenetic Trees Csc 487/687 Computing for Bioinformatics.
Finish up array applications Move on to proteomics Protein microarrays.
Predicting in vivo binding sites of RNA-binding proteins using mRNA secondary structure Naimul Arif( ), Tanvir Ahmed( ) Department of Computer.
NUTRITION AND GENE EXPRESSION February 19, 2016 PROMOTER MUTATIONS Mutations in the REGULATORY part of the gene (usually called the PROMOTER) show us the.
Small RNAs and their regulatory roles. Presented by: Chirag Nepal.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Biology: An Australian focus 3e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and Saint 11-1 Chapter 11: Gene expression.
Function first: a powerful approach to post-genomic drug discovery Stephen F. Betz, Susan M. Baxter and Jacquelyn S. Fetrow GeneFormatics Presented by.
AP Biology Control of Eukaryotic Genes.
CS5263 Bioinformatics Lecture 20 Practical issues in motif finding Final project.
Comparative genomics analysis of NtcA regulons in cyanobacteria: Regulation of nitrogen assimilation and its coupling to photosynthesis Wen-Ting Huang.
Ontology based analyses methods ++ develop a grammar for making productions using mf, bp, cl: –derive a higher level grammar for next level of productions.
Biological Signal Detection for Protein Function Prediction Investigators: Yang Dai Prime Grant Support: NSF Problem Statement and Motivation Technical.
Overview of Bioinformatics 1 Module Denis Manley..
AP Biology Control of Eukaryotic Genes.
Bioinformatics MEDC601 Lecture by Brad Windle Ph# Office: Massey Cancer Center, Goodwin Labs Room 319 Web site for lecture:
Anita Nguyen & Harriet Gliddon.  A good characterisation for a part is: “The minimum amount of information someone needs to reuse the part without any.
Reverse Interactomics
Statistical Testing with Genes Saurabh Sinha CS 466.
Stephanie J. Culler, Kevin G. Hoff, Christina D. Smolke
The Cognate interaction Genomic arrays A new era for modeling the immune response Benoit Morel.
 Developed Struct-SVM classifier that takes into account domain knowledge to improve identification of protein-RNA interface residues  Results show that.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING (3 CREDIT HOURS) LECTURE 13 ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSCRIPTOME.
Review of statistical modeling and probability theory Alan Moses ML4bio.
Molecular Cell Biology Logic and Approaches to Research Cooper.
Knowledge prior to this research? Questions addressed? Experimental approaches used? and what outcome? Impact of these findings? Future experiments? Research.
Enhancers and 3D genomics Noam Bar RESEARCH METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY.
Additional high-throughput sequencing techniques (finding all functional elements of genome) June 15, 2017.
Long Noncoding RNAs: Cellular Address Codes in Development and Disease
The Transcriptional Landscape of the Mammalian Genome
Molecular techniques for the study of the interaction between……..
Statistical Testing with Genes
binding sites 58 of the 473 unambiguously assigned phosphorylation sites are predicted by Scansite to be sites for binding. 50 of these correspond.
A PASport to Cellular Proliferation
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Long Noncoding RNAs: Cellular Address Codes in Development and Disease
Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence
Deep Learning in Bioinformatics
Statistical Testing with Genes
Schematics of mechanisms behind compartmentalization of RBPs on microtubules. Schematics of mechanisms behind compartmentalization of RBPs on microtubules.
The Genetics of Transcription Factor DNA Binding Variation
Presentation transcript:

CLOSING DISCUSSION Advances and challenges in Protein-RNA: recognition, regulation, and prediction Discussion facilitator: Manny Ares Banff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and Discovery

34 half hour presentations over ~3.5 days Equivalent to 17 hours of instruction -> nearly half of a university course; Normally this might be spread over a two month period. What have we experienced?

Overarching problems we would all like to see solved: What are the rules of engagement that govern meetings between the protein world and the RNA world? And then how does the quality of these meetings influence the success or failure of the biological phenomena that depend on them? 34 half hour presentations over ~3.5 days Equivalent to 17 hours of instruction -> nearly half of a university course; Normally this might be spread over a two month period. What have we experienced?

34 half hour presentations over ~3.5 days Equivalent to 17 hours of instruction -> nearly half of a university course; Normally this might be spread over a two month period. What have we experienced? Overarching problems we would all like to see solved: What are the rules of engagement that govern meetings between the protein world and the RNA world? If we could predict this,we might be able to predict this And then how does the quality of these meetings influence the success or failure of the biological phenomena that depend on them?

34 half hour presentations over ~3.5 days Equivalent to 17 hours of instruction -> nearly half of a university course; Normally this might be spread over a two month period. What have we experienced? Overarching problems we would all like to see solved: What are the rules of engagement that govern meetings between the protein world and the RNA world? If we could predict this,we might be able to predict this And then how does the quality of these meetings influence the success or failure of the biological phenomena that depend on them? Ultimate goal; systems level understanding of post-transcriptional gene control, and the power to do intelligent engineering.

Several distinct approaches to solving these two problems Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Comprehensive assignment of binding motifs to known sequence specific RBPs (the Periodic Table of the [ribo]Elements) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Solving structures of RNAs and proteins, and RNP complexes Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events In vivo In vitro In silico Prediction methods, classifiers, modeling, redesign, engineer

Several distinct approaches to solving these two problems Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Comprehensive assignment of binding motifs to known sequence specific RBPs (the Periodic Table of the [ribo]Elements) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Solving structures of RNAs and proteins, and RNP complexes Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events In vivo In vitro In silico Prediction methods, classifiers, modeling, redesign, engineer

Several distinct approaches to solving these two problems Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Comprehensive assignment of binding motifs to known sequence specific RBPs (the Periodic Table of the [ribo]Elements) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Solving structures of RNAs and proteins, and RNP complexes Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events In vivo In vitro In silico Prediction methods, classifiers, modeling, redesign, engineer

Several distinct approaches to solving these two problems Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Comprehensive assignment of binding motifs to known sequence specific RBPs (the Periodic Table of the [ribo]Elements) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Solving structures of RNAs and proteins, and RNP complexes Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events In vivo In vitro In silico Prediction methods, classifiers, modeling, redesign, engineer

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events False negatives, Sensitivity is transcript abundance dependent Expression space is very sparsely represented Doing good on HEK293! Overexpression phenomena may drive false positive rate

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events False negatives, Sensitivity is transcript abundance dependent Expression space is very sparsely represented Doing good on HEK293! Overexpression phenomena may drive false positive rate Really interesting right now since we don’t know too much. Need to see motifs? Where on the protein is the RNA binding? Can we add these to the periodic table?

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Global capture of protein- RNA binding sites in vivo (RIPs & CLIPs) Capture of noncannonical RNA binding proteins in vivo Observations on impact of RBP expression and function on downstream gene expression events False negatives, Sensitivity is transcript abundance dependent Expression space is very sparsely represented Doing good on HEK293! Overexpression phenomena may drive false positive rate Really interesting right now since we don’t know too much. Need to see motifs? Where on the protein is the RNA binding? Can we add these to the periodic table? Still quite idiosyncratic, very cell type dependent, and systems where interesting things are observed may not have complete data from CLIP

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Comprehensive assignment of binding motifs to known sequence specific RBPs (the Periodic Table of the [ribo]Elements) Solving structures of RNAs and proteins, and RNP complexes

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Comprehensive assignment of binding motifs to known sequence specific RBPs (the Periodic Table of the [ribo]Elements) Solving structures of RNAs and proteins, and RNP complexes First pass assignments with single domain constructs, but wondering about multiple domain effects. Motifs derived from near equilibrium conditions so probably represent off-rates when kinetics may be more important in vivo Otherwise this is an essential look up tool!

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Comprehensive assignment of binding motifs to known sequence specific RBPs (the Periodic Table of the [ribo]Elements) Solving structures of RNAs and proteins, and RNP complexes First pass assignments with single domain constructs, but wondering about multiple domain effects. Motifs derived from near equilibrium conditions so probably represent off-rates when kinetics may be more important in vivo Otherwise this is an essential look up tool! Yes we need more structures! More structures with multiple domains that have significant impact on binding and specificity -> getting at combinatorics. Molecular dynamics is becoming increasingly important for understanding binding, in particular from “variable” regions in the basic fold.

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Prediction methods, classifiers, modeling, redesign, engineer

Some future challenges associated with these distinct approaches Prediction methods, classifiers, modeling, redesign, engineer Rich set of very imaginative approaches! Standards for accepting that a prediction is good seem high. Problem: a lack of structures -> the deeper the true set the better the learning. Problem for some approaches: lack of good negative examples for some classifier approaches.

Something I still have questions about What’s the deal with these unstructured regions? Kato et al Cell 149:753 They seem to form gels and strange aggregates. They have specificity of some kind including homotypic interactions and heterotypic interactions of various types. These interactions are mediated by residues in the unstructured regions, including through phosphorylation. RNA is also trapped (?) bound (?) in these gels. There are some cellular bodies that seem to represent a manifestation of this: P-bodies, P-granules, stress granules, plaques. Associated with normal function and disease.

THANKS!! YAEL, GABRIELE & BIRS