Earthquake Emergency Response LT Byron Lee LT K. Beth Jasper LT Greg Bauer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lee Eubanks Joseph A. Snel. Intro/Backstory Problem Assumptions Graph Elements Questions Formulation Results Relativity Follow-Up Outline.
Advertisements

Outline LP formulation of minimal cost flow problem
James Montgomery & Karen Teague. Background  Williams Tank Lines is one of the largest for-hire bulk petroleum carriers in California (Fuel Transport.
Waikiki Tsunami Preparedness Major Trisha Cobb, USA LT Hamadi Bouaicha, Tunisia Navy OA 4202 Team Project Network Flows and Graphs.
Modeling Alabama Tornado Emergency Relief (MATER) Joe Cordell Spencer Timmons Michael Fleischmann.
Management Science 461 Lecture 6 – Network Flow Problems October 21, 2008.
UCLA 2012 Commencement Ceremonies So Young Kim. Order of Presentation I.Introduction II.Mathematical Modeling III.Network System 3.1. Overall Data Description.
Management Science 461 Lecture 2b – Shortest Paths September 16, 2008.
Modeling Rich Vehicle Routing Problems TIEJ601 Postgraduate Seminar Tuukka Puranen October 19 th 2009.
National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign MAEviz: Seismic Risk Assessment System October 31, 2008.
San Francisco Geological Study By Emily Williams Victoria Hogg.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Math443/543 Mathematical Modeling and Optimization
Network Optimization Models: Maximum Flow Problems In this handout: The problem statement Solving by linear programming Augmenting path algorithm.
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
Network Flow Models Chapter 7.
MNG221 - Management Science
Nuclear Fuel Delivery By: Adam Gable Christian Seymour Jesse Nesbitt.
US Amtrak Network Major Josiah Pickett Captain Philip Zlatsin Lieutenant Brett Robblee 1.
Earthquakes 8 th Grade Science Earthquakes - What are they? -Vibrations in the ground- result from movement along breaks in Earth’s lithosphere. -Faults.
Afghanistan Illegal Drug Trade LT Dan Ryan Capt Steve Felts Capt Bethany Kauffman.
and 6.855J The Capacity Scaling Algorithm.
Networks and the Shortest Path Problem.  Physical Networks  Road Networks  Railway Networks  Airline traffic Networks  Electrical networks, e.g.,
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
San Quentin Prison Break LT Matt Mooshegian Capt Bryan Jadro.
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Modeling Attacks to Chesapeake Bay Shipping LT Sarah Watson LT Matt Yokeley.
© Nuffield Foundation 2011 Nuffield Free-Standing Mathematics Activity Chinese postman problems What route can I take to avoid going along the same street.
Bay Area Earthquake Impacts and Earthquake Impacts on Utilities and Transportation Systems Infrastructure Interdependencies Workshop I – Utilities and.
 LCDR Hui Lee  LCDR Ashwin Anupdev  03 Nov 2011.
REDUCING DISASTER RISK THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF EARTH OBSERVATIONS Helen M. Wood Chair, U.S. Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction August.
Traffic Flow Jerusalem to Tel Aviv Kiong Teo Yuval Nevo Steve Hunt.
Network-Based Optimization Models Charles E. Noon, Ph.D. The University of Tennessee.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Zack Bick Erin Riggs Alicia Helton Cara Dickerson Presentation by:
Route Planning Texas Transfer Corp (TTC) Case 1. Linear programming Example: Woodcarving, Inc. Manufactures two types of wooden toys  Soldiers sell for.
Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues JEANNE PERKINS Consultant, ABAG Earthquake and Hazards.
1 1 Slide © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Models in I.E. Lectures Introduction to Optimization Models: Shortest Paths.
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Sea Level Rise: Infrastructure Analysis Tools.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
Joe Ashpari John Crain. 2 U.S. Potato Transport 3 Background Johnny Joe’s Inc  An emerging potato chip conglomerate  Potato chip plants in several.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
Lecture 5 – Integration of Network Flow Programming Models Topics Min-cost flow problem (general model) Mathematical formulation and problem characteristics.
8/14/04J. Bard and J. W. Barnes Operations Research Models and Methods Copyright All rights reserved Lecture 5 – Integration of Network Flow Programming.
Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
San Francisco Earthquake 1989 Loma Prieta. What happened? October 17 th pm 20 seconds duration Magnitude 7 Intensity IX Enormous amounts of damage.
Network Problems A D O B T E C
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Union City A SSOCIATION OF B AY A REA G OVERNMENTS.
Introduction to Spatial Computing CSE 5ISC
St. Edward’s University
Network Simplex Animations
DISASTER RESILIENCY CENTER and Advanced Practices Training and Research Institute For The Greater Silicon Valley Robert J Dolci Chief, Protective Services.
Lecture 5 – Integration of Network Flow Programming Models
Lecture 5 – Integration of Network Flow Programming Models
Presentation to Coachella’s City Council October 8, 2014
Instructor: Shengyu Zhang
Transportation, Assignment and Network Models
Introduction Basic formulations Applications
EMIS 8374 Arc-Path Formulation Updated 2 April 2008
Chapter 5 Transportation, Assignment, and Transshipment Problems
Chapter 6 Network Flow Models.
Successive Shortest Path Algorithm
Successive Shortest Path Algorithm
15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J Visualizations
Lecture 12 Network Models.
Presentation transcript:

Earthquake Emergency Response LT Byron Lee LT K. Beth Jasper LT Greg Bauer

Problem Statement Analyze Monterey County’s transportation network in the event of a 7.9 magnitude earthquake or greater along the San Andreas fault, with emphasis on transporting displaced personnel to shelters – What are the optimal routes to get people to shelters in the event of numerous road closures? – How many road closures need to exist before it isn’t possible to get people to shelters?

Monterey County Fault Lines

Mathematically Modeling the Real World Measures of Effectiveness for our network: – 11,500 people anticipated to need shelter receive it. – Those that are denied shelter, are still provided relief services Framework behind our model: – In the event of an earthquake, is there sufficient redundancy in the main road network to accomplish the evacuation plan set out by Bay Area Urban Area Security (BAUAS) Initiative? – Based on the data available, can we answer specific questions concerning the performance of the BAUAS plan: Do those in need receive the care as planned? What major roads are critical to the successful completion of the plan?

Operator’s Problem Decisions the Operator makes when operating in the network – Interdictions (i.e. road outages) were based on data provided by the United States Geological Society (USGS) e.g. Shake maps and liquefaction data – As an operator on the network, which path would be optimal (i.e. shortest path) from the evacuation pick-up sites to a shelter that has availability; with and without various levels of interdiction

Start Service Shelter No Service Generalized Shelter Node in the vicinity of EVAC sites End Service Shelter No Service Generalized Shelter Node more distant from EVAC sites -n n Where: d ij = distance on arc cij = penalty for no service f ij = penalty for service w/ no shelter Uij = upper capacity of shelter (Service / Sheltering) C ij > f ij EVAC 2 EVAC 3 EVAC 4 EVAC 5 EVAC 1 EVAC 6 EVAC 7

Operators Resilience Curve

Open Analysis Directions Look at secondary quakes that could be triggered by a large earthquake on the San Andreas Expand the model to include Handicapped accessibility facilities and bathrooms at facilities Add precision to the model to use it to direct remote sensing collections Adding fuel constraints to the min-cost model (min-cost constrained)

Summary Conclusions The bridges that had the highest probability of being damaged did not prevent the flow of personnel to shelters, however the cost did go up in terms of distance The combined damage to buildings and bridges increased the cost in distance traveled and people not sheltered Monterey County has ample shelter facilities to provide servicing and housing under this scenario

Min Cost Network Flow Data: