China Debate Education Network: Constructing Arguments Presented by Li Yong, Guangxi University Chen Ying, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Formulating and Addressing Counterarguments Daniel Lupton (with help from UNC’s Writing Center)
Advertisements

GMAT CRITICAL REASONING Spring GETTING STARTED 1. Read the question 1. Read the question 2. Identify the type of question 2. Identify the type of.
Refutation China Debate Education Network:. Definition of Refutation Refutation involves one debater directly responding to an argument of an opposing.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Standardizing Arguments Premise 1: New Mexico offers many outdoor activities. Premise 2: New Mexico has rich history of Native Americans and of Spanish.
Basic Forensics. * Our audience and purpose help determine our writing mode. * Writers manipulate style and voice to influence meaning and persuade audiences.
Writing the Persuasive Essay Terms to know- 1.Anticipate Audience: consider how readers will respond, find offensive, confusing, or important. 2. Claim.
Chris Girouard, Mississippi House of Representatives Refutation 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette University.
James A. Herrick Chapter 2
Stephen E. Lucas C H A P T E R McGraw-Hill© 2004 Stephen E. Lucas. All rights reserved. Methods of Persuasion 16.
Forms of Supporting Arguments: Values. Values… A guiding influence made of our life experiences and truths A guiding influence made of our life experiences.
Art of Qualifying Claims Prasad M. Jayaweera
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Basics of Argumentation 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette University.
Writing level 3 essays An initial guide. Key principles The key principles of essay writing still apply: Understanding the topic Plan your response Structure.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
By Jeremy Phan. Palestinian Perspective Israel is illegally occupying the land of the Palestinian people. Israelis continuously build settlements to push.
Chapter 15: Allyn and Bacon Textbook
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Developing Business Practice –302LON Using data in your studies Unit: 5 Knowledgecast: 2.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Basics of Argumentation Victoria Nelson, Ph.D.. What is an argument? An interpersonal dispute.
Business Law with UCC Applications,13e
Today’s Quote Use soft words and hard arguments English Proverb.
Judging British Parliamentary Debate
China Debate Education Network: Elements of Arguments: Linking Evidence to Claims.
China Debate Education Network Combining Arguments Coherently.
Writing to convince others of your opinion..  Decide on your purpose: What will you convince the readers to believe or to do?  Pre-write to discover.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for Leader of Opposition Note: Constructing arguments is not the only job of the First Opposition,
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Teaching IDEA Four-Team Debate: Refutation
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
Debate Basics: The Logical Argument. Argument An argument is a set of claims presented in a logical form. An argument attempts to persuade an audience.
1 Problem/Solution Proposals English 2010 Intermediate Writing.
Roles and Strategies for the First Government Team China Debate Education Network:
Goals: To understand the arguments for creating a State of Israel To be able to explain the events surrounding the creation of the State of Israel.
The Paragraph!! Powerpoint Templates.
Options Practice for Unit Assessment 2014 Paper Part E Question 3.
7 Themes. Chronological Reasoning 1. Historical Causation: relationships among multiple historical causes and effects, distinguishing between those that.
Elements of Debate Hence, for all practical purposes, the term proof means those items of evidence and reasoning which tend to make an audience agree with.
China Debate Education Network: Structure of Argument.
Chapter 12.  Implies that some action should take place  Suggests that there are sound reasons why it should A should do B because of C.
Debate Important Terms and Basic Definitions: CLAIMS.
debate is all about arguing between affirmative/government team and negative/opposition team upon a motion. Affirmative  support the motion Negative.
China Debate Education Network: Elements of Arguments: Evidence.
Explanations of evidence What should you do when considering evaluation in a explanation When will an explanation weaken its support for the conclusion.
Developing an Argument for Essays or Speeches TOULMIN SYSTEM.
China Debate Education Network: Elements of Arguments: Claims and Exceptions.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
The Warrant Making Connections.
A Good Argument Uses clear reasoning and reliable evidence to explain and support a point of view on a topic Uses constructive, positive strategies to.
Today is Thursday November 2, 2016
The Basics of Argumentation and the Toulmin Model
Persuasive Speechwriting
The Effects of Code Usage in Intercultural Communication
GRASP - Graduate Research Advanced Skills Program
What does it do? it should point toward the development or course of argument the reader can expect your argument to take Your 3 claims support this.
Writing an Argument Thesis Statement Organization.
Learning Target: I can develop effective claims and counterclaims.
The argumentative essay
Argumentation Strategies
Toulmin’s Argument Model
The argumentative essay
Principles of Argument
Four Step Refutation International Debate Education Association
Refutation International Debate Education Association
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
DO THIS NOW… Sit in assigned groups
Getting To Know Debate:
Presentation transcript:

China Debate Education Network: Constructing Arguments Presented by Li Yong, Guangxi University Chen Ying, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics Robert Trapp, Willamette University

Arguments and Argumentation Arguments are tools primarily used in debates Arguments use reasons to establish claims. Since all debaters will use arguments, general principles of constructing arguments are needed.

Elements of Arguments Claim: the main point or conclusion of an argument. Evidence: any information on which the claim rests. Evidence is information that supports the claim. Link: a link is a statement that creates a bridge between the evidence and the claim. Reservation: not present in all arguments, a reservation explains special circumstances when the claim should be set aside.

Structure of a Simple Argument a single piece of evidence leads to a single claim, following along a single link, and perhaps accompanied by a reservation.

Structure of a Simple Argument In this example, the evidence is actually a previous claim that the audience has been convinced to accept.

Structure of a Simple Argument

Argument with Linked Structure Consists of multiple pieces of evidence linked with one another.

Argument with Linked Structure

Argument with Independent Structure Several pieces of evidence independently support a claim

Argument with Independent Structure

General Principles for Argument Construction Consequences of action – Choosing the action that has the most (or best) positive consequences and the fewest negative consequences. Principles that guide actions – Evaluates actions based on the inherent rightness or wrongness of the act rather than on the positive or negative consequences of the action.

Consequences Claim: Israeli policy towards Palestinian citizens prevents terrorist attacks on Israel. Description:Israeli policy allows Palestinian houses to be destroyed if suspected terrorists are present. Relationship:A policy of destroying houses containing suspected terrorists prevents terrorist attacks on Israel. Evaluation:Terrorist attacks on Israel have killed thousands of Israeli citizens.

Principles Claim: Israeli policy towards its Palestinian citizens violates the principle of human rights. Description: Current Israeli policy allows Palestinian homes to be destroyed. Relationship:Allowing homes to be destroyed violates of the right to property. Evaluation:The right to property is a basic human right. The Israeli policy therefore violates the principle of human rights.