April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results

State Management Team Regional Implementation Team “District” Teams N ≈100 Schools Regional Implementation Team “District” Teams N ≈100 Schools Regional Implementation Team “District” Teams N ≈100 Schools Regional Implementation Team “District” Teams N ≈100 Schools SISEP Support State Transformation Specialists State Design Team

Cascading Logic Model Student outcomes (monthly data) TIFA (every teacher, every month) DCA (Districts 2-3X a year) RIT (SCA: 2X a year) SMT/STS (SCA: 2X a year)

Purpose of the SCA  Provide a State Management Team with a regular measure of the state capacity for implementation of evidence-based practices and other effective innovations  Provide a structured process for the development of a State Capacity Action Plan  Provide other State Education Agency (SEA) teams with information to monitor progress towards state capacity building goals  Support a common infrastructure for implementation of effective education for students

SCA Responders

Scoring key  All Scaling Capacity Items scored using the following format. Fully In Place 2 points - All dimensions of element adhered to and evidence available to support this rating Partially In Place1 point - Some dimensions of element adhered to and/or some dimensions attended to - Action Planning occurs with these elements Not in Place0 points -Element not adhered to -Action Planning occurs with these elements or teams may not be developmentally ready to implement this component

Total Score

Subscale Scores 47%0%

Sub-Subscale Scores

Next Step – Action Planning  Review Items with scores of 0 and 1  Identify several items for action planning that may be completed within the next 3 months  Look for Quick wins  Define the Action  Determine: »Who is responsible »When it will be accomplished »Progress monitoring schedule for problem solving

Get Connected! For more on Implementation Science

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature Implementation Science

Annie E. Casey Foundation (EBPs and Cultural Competence) William T. Grant Foundation (Implementation Literature Review) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Implementation Strategies Grants; National Implementation Awards) Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (Implementation Research) National Institute of Mental Health (Research And Training Grants) Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Program Development And Evaluation Grants) Office of Special Education Programs (Scaling up and Capacity Development Center) Administration for Children and Families (Child Welfare Leadership; Capacity Development Center) Duke Endowment (Child Welfare Reform) Thank You for Your Support

©Copyright Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase This content is licensed under Creative Commons license CC BY- NC-ND, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs. You are free to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work); Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes; No Derivative Works — You may not alter or transform this work. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.

Get Connected! Workgroups Active States CoP For more on Implementation Science