Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Land Use and Health Team Capital Area, Michigan Robert Glandon, Ph.D. Ingham County Health Dept. Mark Kieselbach, Director, Community Planning and Development,
Emergency Management Emergency Planning Emergency Preparedness Disaster Management Disaster Recovery Coordination Primary Functions.
WHAT IS A DRC?.
{ Kitsap County 2015 Budget December 1, Kitsap County Proposed 2015 Budget $339 Million.
Items in Blue are Appointed
High Water Mark Campaign Raising Community Awareness of Flood Risk NAFSMA 2013 Sally M. Ziolkowski Mitigation Division Director FEMA Region 9December 11,
> > > > Association of State Floodplain Managers.
Risk MAP and Discovery FEMA Region [#], [WATERSHED NAME] Watershed Discovery Meetings [DATE]
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Integrating Community Planning and Hazard Mitigation Planning Amanda Engstfeld FEMA Region X
WSHA Disaster Readiness Conference Wenatchee, Washington May 29, 2013.
Benefits and Costs of Mitigation Natural Hazards Workshop, 2004 Linda B. Bourque Southern California Injury Prevention Research Center, Center for Public.
Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.
Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.
Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.
Acting Assistant City Manager REFUSED 2/3/04 Assistant Director of Public Works INTERVIEWED 1/27/04 1 City Manager, Originally agreed Then REFUSED 1/30/04.
Livingston Parish Darrick Hesson, LEM Deputy Director.
Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation Track B Progress Report Project Management Committee Meeting, Washington, D.C. April 2, 2004.
FIRE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION State of Georgia BASIC FIRE FIGHTER TRAINING COURSE.
Chapter 13 Local Government in Texas.
Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security AN INTRODUCTION.
Coordination of Information and Resources Incident Command Post Incident Commander Incident- On Scene Response RESOURCES Executive Policy Group.
Mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards and their.
District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Unit 1 Community Capabilities
Local Government (City and County) Class Lecture.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FY07 BUDGET HEARING Mayor – Tammy de Weerd Council President – Shaun Wardle Council Vice President – Joe Borton Council – Keith Bird Council.
Mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards and their.
Indiana Shovel Ready Program Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs Indiana Economic Development Corporation.
Louisiana’s 2012 Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast Path Forward on Nonstructural Program Implementation CPRA Meeting - October 17, 2012.
HAZARD MITIGATION 101 Sandusky County Initial Planning Meeting March 11, 2014.
Inmates Here to Help 200 inmates sent from across the state sto help with debris cleanup 200 inmates sent from across the state sto help with debris cleanup.
Deputy Assistant Administrator Mitigation Directorate Michael Buckley FEMA’s Utilization of Tropical Forecasts and Products.
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
Overview of Flood Program April Doug Bellomo, Director Risk Analyses Division Mitigation Directorate, FEMA.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
NOAA’S National Weather Service Baltimore/Washington Weather Forecast Office (WFO) Weather-Ready Nation OPEN HOUSE September 22, 2012 Jim Lee Meteorologist-in-Charge.
City of New Orleans Financial Overview. City of New Orleans Budget Overview Revenue Expenditure (in millions) Operating Budget $620.
The Status of NFIP Reform and Floodplain Mapping Mayors’ Water Summit December 8, 2010.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Regional Emergency Plan Smoky Lake County. Smoky Lake County Distance is aprox 48miles x 36 miles Smoky Lake County has population of 2712 We have 4 hamlets,
Emergency Management Open House What Is Emergency Management? An inter-disciplinary field that focuses on saving lives, preserving the.
May 2010 SENIOR MANAGEMENT Board of Commissioners President / Chief Executive Officer Vice President Human Resources Executive Vice President / Chief Operating.
Boise River, Idaho: Many Agencies Working Towards One Version of the Truth Ellen Berggren, USACE Walla Walla District Idaho Silver Jackets USACE Flood.
Kitsap County ▪ Jefferson County ▪ City of Bremerton Naval Base Kitsap ▪ Naval Magazine Indian Island
0 FEMA Region 6 Floods: The Response and the Costs Bob Bennett Response Division FEMA Region 6.
Illinois Mobile Support Teams Incident Management Team and the Emergency Management Assistance Team.
Local Government chapter 14 By: Yave & Wiley. Local  Close to home, nearby; having to do with a city, county, town, village, or other small government.
NOAA National Weather Service Baltimore/Washington Weather Forecast Office "Building Community Awareness to Reduce Hazardous Weather Impacts” April 30,
Recommended Citizens Budget for 2016 Presented to Summit County Council December 28, 2015.
Establishing Accounts for the Government Emergency Telecommunications Service (GETS) and Wireless Priority Service (WPS) Updated 8/2/2013.
Janice Rahman Program Manager Metropolitan King County Council Law, Justice, Health and Human Services Committee May 14 th, 2013 HAZARD MITIGATION A Regional.
Kansas City Regional Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan Presented by the Office of Emergency Management.
FEMA Risk MAP City of Yakima – Lower Yakima Discovery Information Exchange Session May 9, 2016.
All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Susquehanna County Kick-Off Meeting April 28, 2016.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND CONDEMNATION OF HOMES Michael Desrochers, Director of Fire Safety, Department of Public Safety Shaun Gilpin, Housing Policy Specialist,
Response: Strategies to Counter SARS 4.Emergency Response System Develop Integrated infectious disease information system Establish Emergency Operation.
Citrus County Sheriff’s Office & Partners Citrus County Sheriff’s Office & Partners.
Executive order 19 Alabama Disaster recovery and resiliency taskforce
Redevelopment Authority of the County of Washington O
2018 Staffing Recommendation
Oklahoma Floodplain Managers Association
By: Jihad and Qyashiny Chapter 14.
State Homeland Security and Emergency Management
City of Shrewsbury, Missouri Municipal Organization
Significant Activities for 04/22/2019
Significant Activities for 05/07/2019
Presentation transcript:

Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone Interview Data Preliminary Analysis

Track B Progress - I Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part I Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part I

Track B Progress - II Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part II Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part II

Informant Participation Status

Informant Participation Status by Community # Individuals

Reasons Not Approached (n=21)

Informant Referrals by Community FAKE DATA

Total Number of Contacts Needed to Complete Interviews (Includes Telephone, Mail, Fax, )

Acting Assistant City Manager REFUSED 2/3/04 Assistant Director of Public Works INTERVIEWED 1/27/04 1 City Manager, Originally agreed Then REFUSED 1/30/04 1 Dir. Public Works INTERVIEWED 2/9/04 Chief Building Inspector REFUSED 2/5/04 Associate Civil Engineer INTERVIEWED 2/11/04 Senior Planner REFUSED 2/5/04 HAZMAT Program Coordinator INTERVIEWED 2/18/04 Fire Chief REFUSED 2/5/04 Emergency Operations REFUSED 2/9/04 Division Head of Water Facility INTERVIEWED 2/19/04 1 Index Informant 2 Independent Network Director, Community & Economic Development INTERVIEWED 3/12/04 2 Public Information Officer INTERVIEWED 3/12/04 2 Flow Chart of Interview Network in Hayward FEMA Deputy Publicity Dir. for Utilities Not Approached Cal State Hayward Not Approached

FEMA Director, County EMA Interviewed 1 3/1/04 wo 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Jefferson Co. County Commissioner Interviewed 1 3/4/04 mb Director, fh Land Development Interviewed 3/4/04 Land Development e Interviewed 2/24/04 Land Development pr Interviewed 2/17/04 Former City Planner, Consultant jl Interviewed 2/23/04 Admin. Assistant, County EMA dk Interviewed 2/24/04 City NFIP Not Approached er Director, Inspection Services Not Approached bm County GIS Manager Not Approached jh County Commissioner Refused 3/8/04 ss Dir., Local Land Trust Interviewed 3/4/04 j Fire Chief, City of Tarrant Not Approached bh Auburn University Not Approached gl USGS Not Approached jr Dir. of County Inspection Services Not Approached bm State Hazard Mitigation Officer Not Approached dp President, Local df Engineering Company Interviewed 3/10/04 Hydrologist, Local dh Engineering Company Interviewed 3/10/04 County EMA Not Approached mh County EMA Not Approached ak

FEMA 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Horry Co. Emergency Planner, County EMD Interviewed 1 2/18/04 TS Director, Emergency Services County Red Cross Chapter Interviewed 3/19/04 ka Meteorologist, Local Television Station Interviewed 3/1/04 ep Public Safety Director, County EMD Interviewed 2/25/04 pw Property Manager, County EMD Interviewed 3/2/04 tl Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Clemson University Interviewed 2/23/04 tr National Weather Service Not Approached TM Head Building Official, City of Conway Not Approached RB Fire Chief, County Fire Department Refused 3/8/04 ga Director, County Storm Water Management Not Approached TG

FEMA 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Freeport Grant Administrator, Public Works Interviewed 1 3/23/04 NS Floodplain Manager, Superintendent of Buildings, Mitigation Coordinator Interviewed 3/18/04 jm Manager, Public Works Interviewed 3/16/04 ld Village Trustee; Owner, Local Insurance Agency Interviewed 3/23/04 bw Business Owner, Local Marine Storage Interviewed 4/14/04 dg Coordinator, Emergency Management Team Interviewed 5/25/04 DR Director, Emergency Management Interviewed 4/21/04 RH Business Owner, Local Restaurant JC Refused 5/27/04 Village Trustee DM Refused 5/21/04 Village Engineer, Department of Public Works Not Approached RF

FEMA 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Tuscola County Drain sp Commissioner Interviewed 1 4/5/04 Engineer, Local Eng. Group Refused 4/6/04 rh Prog. Admin., Intercounty Drains Interviewed 5/25/04 kh Lieutenant, State Police Dept. Interviewed 4/5/04 hp Township Mgr., Tittabawassee Interviewed 4/1/04 bk Engineer, Local Company Interviewed 3/25/04 jw Flood Specialist, City of Vassar ww Interviewed 4/2/04 President, Local Business Not Approached al Environmental Engineer, State Dept. Environmental Quality Interviewed 5/24/04 bm Engineer, Local Eng. Group Interviewed 4/1/04 hc Preliminary Research Manager, City of Vassar Interviewed 1 3/25/04sa Director, Public Works City of Frankenmuth Interviewed 1 4/2/04 rb State Hazard Mitigation Officer ms Not Approached Local Construction Co. Interviewed 1 3/22/04 js Engineer, Canadian Company Not Approached gh

1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Jamestown City Engineer wk Interviewed 6/4/04 Consultant rp Interviewed 6/7/04 Local Red Cross Chapter Interviewed 6/18/04 bd Parks and Recreation dh Interviewed 6/30/04 State House of Reps. jk Interviewed 7/9/04 Weather Spotter Refused 6/4/04 jh Training Office, Fire Dept. Refused 6/8/04 jr City Fire Chief bg Interviewed 6/8/04 Police Chief Not Approached dd State Department of Emergency Management Not Approached lh City Administrator Interviewed 7/1/04 jf FEMA Mayor Interviewed 1 6/1/04 CK Director, State Dept. of Emergency Mgmt. Refused 7/6/04 df Asst. City Engineer Refused 7/6/04 lh President, Amateur Radio Association wt Interviewed 6/17/04 Local Cable Services rs Interviewed ??/??/04 County Emergency Manager Interviewed 6/21/04 jb

Interview Informant Job Titles (N=52) FAKE DATA

Informant Perceptions of Community Risk (N=52) FAKE DATA Very Low Very High

Percent of Informants who Believe the Community Has a Natural Hazard Mitigation Program (N=47) % Yes In your opinion, does the community have a natural hazard mitigation program?

Informants’ Knowledge of the Community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation Program (N=52) FAKE DATA Average Knowledge How much do you know about the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

Informants’ assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program? (Elected Officials) Insert Sample quotes. Insert Sample quotes. What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

Informants’ assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program? (Appointed Officials) Insert Sample quotes. Insert Sample quotes. What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

Informants’ assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program? (NGO/Partners) Insert Sample quotes. Insert Sample quotes. What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

How appropriate/effective do you consider these [natural hazard mitigation] efforts? (N=52) FAKE DATA

How does the community’s natural hazard mitigation program compare to natural hazard mitigation programs in other communities? (N=38)

Informants’ Perceptions of Benefits Provided by Mitigation Activities Which of the following benefits were provided by [this mitigation activity]?

Informants’ Perceptions of Primary Objectives/Benefits of Mitigation Activities What was the major objective of this activity?

Informants’ Perceptions Success Meeting Major Objectives with VS. without Mitigation Activities How would you rate the community’s success in meeting this [major] objective with/without this activity?

Spin-Offs: Total Number Mentioned Vs. Total Number Confirmed FAKE DATA # Spin-Offs