VAPRO Bucuresti 30 Octombrie 2009 Theo Seip Contact Romania: Irina Zugravu

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUDGETING Training Unit 13.2 Principles and financial rules of mobility.
Advertisements

Planning and use of funding instruments
EU funds’ evaluation plan , Latvia
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 ANNUAL MEETING OF ISPA PARTNERS 2003 FROM ISPA TO COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS BRUSSELS,
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Typhaine Beaupérin, Senior Advisor DEBR meeting, Vilnius, 6 June 2013 Communicating smart regulation reforms to stakeholders.
Single Audit Strategy LATVIA. Audit System The Audit Authority functions are carried out by the Internal Audit Department of the Ministry of.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
INSTITUTIONAL MODELS FOR SCF PROGRAMMES IMPLEMENATION IN MEMBER STATES Viktoras Sirvydis, Lithuania CPMA.
LLP – Leonardo da Vinci Contact Seminar “A contact in Rome, an action in Europe” How to submit a correct and relevant Mobility project Parco Tirreno Suitehotel.
APL in processing industry: focus on assessments Sanne van Rijswijk, VAPRO-OVP.
“Lessons Learnt” workshop on 18 th June, Sofia Project Implementation Support Service Agreement (PISSA) TA BG BSF S6 - Capacity building István.
Managing authorities working with cities Regions for Economic Change 17 th February 2009 Peter Ramsden Pole Manager.
Scotland’s Environment Web LIFE Project LIFE10 ENV-UK Paula Brown Senior Project Manager – SEPA.
1 MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SOCIAL SOLIDARITY AND FAMILY ESF HEAD OF MISSION MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR SECTORAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
Simplified Cost Options. Organizational structure National Development Agency Internal Audit Cabinet Legal Affairs Communication HR Vice-president for.
Florin Banateanu October 2011 EU funds for private sector in Romania – opportunities and practical features.
Public funding of NGOs in Romania Budapest, Hungary November, 2010 Octavian Rusu, Legal adviser.
Financial management Management and control systems Training for Programme Operators March 2012.
“Implementation of the bottom-up approach under Axis 4. LEADER - Main conclusions and key elements from Extended report “ by Mr. Panayiotis PATRAS, ELARD.
M. Reimeris, The Ministry of Finance of Lithuania (Managing Authority)
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
CBI - Ministry of Foreign Affairs CBI Centre for the Promotion of Imports from developing countries.
The Issues of Budgetary Reform Unit 3. PFM Reform – Change Management Module 3.2. Preparing and managing a reform programme.
Croatian Experience with Management of EU Funds Nataša Mikuš, Deputy State Secretary Central Office for Development Strategy and Coordination of EU Funds.
Audit Authority and Auditors Group of “European Territorial Cooperation” Programmes for Lessons to be learnt from the INTERREG IIIB NWE Auditors.
The new EU cohesion policy ( ) EASPD Project Development Workshop May 10th – Sofia (BG) Jelle Reynaert – Policy Officer.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Danish experiences with Performance and Results Rikke Ginnerup, Ministry of Finance & Niels Refslund, Agency for Governmental Management Presentation to.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Sivu The Finnish LEADER model and reflections on the future Budapest, 12th Dec 2012 Petri Rinne
Information on first level control, national eligibility rules and national co–financing provisions for European Territorial Cooperation programmes in.
Struktūrfondu vadošā iestāde – Finanšu ministrija 1 1 Communication Strategy of EU Funds Sanda Rieksta Head of Information Division, Deputy Head.
Making the Most of the EU Funds for the Roma (MtM) Launched in 2009 by the Open Society Institute in Budapest. Launched in 2009 by the Open Society Institute.
Applying to EGF: Lithuania’s Experience Director of EU Structural Support Department Ministry of Social Security and Labour of the Republic of Lithuania.
Practical Information and Guidance to Applicants Green Industry Innovation Programme Romania July 2014 Practical Information and Guidance to Applicants.
1 December, 2004 Agency for Vocational Education Development Riga Support of ESF in Education and Continuing Training.
Vanguard meeting 18 July 2014 Ministry od Labour and Social Affairs.
Structural Funds Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 Technical Assistance Ilze Aleksandroviča Head of Control and Development Division EU Funds.
29 March 2011 Audit Authority Audit Department Ministry of Finance 1.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
EU Funds in Latvia Aleksandrs Antonovs Ministry of Finance Deputy director of Department of EU Funds December 4, 2006.
Click to edit Master title style 1 WINDING-UP DECLARATION Practical experience PORTUGAL Carlos Trigacheiro Inspecção-Geral de Finanças (IGF) General Inspection.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
TDCA DIALOGUE FACILITY Bridging Phase Guidelines & Criteria for Support DIRCO, 11 NOVEMBER 2015 Prepared by: Kurt Morais| Nov 2015 Letter of.
QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE OF THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (MIG) – 2005/06 AND 2006/07 FINANCIAL YEARS Presentation to the Select Committee On Finance.
1 Fraud indicators for ERDF, ESF and CF Leif HÖGNÄS, DG Regional Policy “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
BIMILACI 2007 THE CHALLENGE OF CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT Washington, May 11, 2007 Bayo Adeola FIDIC Executive Committee.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
European Structural and Investment Funds for railways in Poland November 2015 Wolfgang Munch, Deputy Head of Unit DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
1 SOUTH BALTIC CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME The Lead Beneficiary Principle by Małgorzat Skolmowska, Project Manager, JTS Lead Beneficiary.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority June 1, 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
Financial Implementation of the Assistance from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the EU Sylvia Indjova Head of Certifying Authority Director.
The BIG Meet, Hampden 1 December 2009 Grant management – what to expect.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
Partnership in the fight against poverty:
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN MALTA
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN CYPRUS
Contractual and Regulatory Framework
Presentation transcript:

VAPRO Bucuresti 30 Octombrie 2009 Theo Seip Contact Romania: Irina Zugravu

Key Facts and Figures VAPRO Services Consultancy HRD Learning materials Exams Training Subsidy consultancy Key Facts  Number of employees: 120  Annual turnover: € 15 million  Cooperation in international projects and consultancy jobs in South America, Africa, Middle East, Asia and all over Europe  Recognized by the Ministry of Education/the Ministry of Social Affairs & Employment and social partners

3 Subsidy consultancy Netherlands Involvement in ESF management and consultancy since beginning of the `90-s Approx 150 projects developed for 1500 companies Total project value: 300 mil euros Total value financed by the ESF 165 mil euros

4 Subsidy consultancy Romania Involvement in ESF management and consultancy since 2008, the opening of the ESF program Approx 50 projects developed for clients such as: companies, NGO-s, public institutions, universities, social partners Total project value approved: 63 mil lei/15 mil euro Total value financed by the ESF: 50,4 mil lei/ 12 mil euro

Project scheme Preparation phase Final payment Feasibility Project preparation Application Contract Implemen- tation Reimburse- ment claims Implementation phase Final report claim

6 Problems in feasibility phase, project preparation and application phase Overload of key areas, guides and regulations Companies have problems to relate the key activities in the guidelines to their own activities and make a match Consultation with IB/MA in this phase is nearly impossible, so no feedback on quality of projects in this stage Formats and rules are being changed during the project plan Very detailed project plan is required but cannot be very realistic and causes problems in implementation There is no calendar for the Opening/closing of calls for proposals so that beneficiaries cannot make a strategy in advance

Problems in project contracting/implementation phase Romanian ESF legislation is not in line with EU legislation, which causes problems during these phases No clear set of rules, or changing set of rules => moving target for beneficiaries Lack of knowledge and communication at IB/MA: no guidance for Beneficiaries. Romanian rules are very difficult to interpret and follow for international partners. Assessment of reimbursements by IB/MA takes a lot of time => cash flow problems The authorities creates rules that cannot be put into practice =>delays The procurement procedures are stricter than EU requires =>delays

General observations and conclusions Low absorption in the first years is common for every new member state, however, there are some specific threats in Romania: ESF- structure still is week compared to other member states: – cooperation between public and private parties within the framework of ESF still has to be developed – cooperation between employment and employees organizations in sectoral committees is fragile Fear for fraud and tendency to over regulate in Romania, which causes: – excessive bureaucracy – double control systems (audit by auditor and double check by MA) – Too strict procurement procedures Focus is mainly on allocating the available funds, but should now be on actually spending the money (utilization rate)

9 Prevention of problems The beneficiary should anticipate! Before starting project: Get informed about administrative requirements Set-up internal management and control procedures During project: Monitoring of project is essential to be able to identify and fix administrative flaws in time Involvement of an independent project auditor

10 Lessons learnt Administrative requirements and interpretations are very strict, but also multi interpretable Requirements and interpretations can change over time Therefore: discussions and issues on e.g. eligibility of costs Good contacts with MA/IB necessary Involvement of independent project auditor is advised Monitoring of project progress by MA/IB or project auditor is vital Good management and control procedures administrative organisation and internal control structure is vital

 Questions?