ECS Refresher Session PQA Form B Questions Clarifications Common Understanding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The No Child Left Behind Act and Title 1 Schools What Parents Should Know and Do.
Advertisements

Engaging Families for Student Growth
Monitoring Local GSRPs Linda Stachowiak Preschool Services Supervisor.
Module: IEPs Head Start Center for Inclusion
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
Omaha Public Schools Behavior Consultation Team Program Supporting Children with Challenging Behaviors Kylee Starmer – Behavior Consultant Omaha Public.
A Quality Rating System
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
Sumter School District Two Assistive Technology Lab Valeska Gioia – Assistive Technology Consultant, M.S. Sumter School District Two 5415 Oakland Drive.
Psychological Services Program Department Learning Services Created November 2011 London District Catholic School Board.
The DV Website and YOU! /
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultants Early Childhood Consultation Partnership® Funded and Supported by Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families.
The Why and How. Ask yourself these questions: 1.What do I do everyday to involve parents in their child’s learning experience? 2.In what ways are parents.
CESA 10 February,  Overview of the the legal requirements  Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) formerly known as No Child Left Behind.
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
NAEYC Accreditation Portfolios Night Sponsored by Maryland Community AEYC June 30, 2008 at the Montgomery County Child Care Resource and Referral Center.
7A Policies and Procedures. New School Schedule: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday Wednesday AMWednesday PM Period 1&6: electives Period 1: electivesPeriod.
PAC Powhatan Autism Collaboration Team. What we have done…. Team was formed in 2005 Team was formed in 2005 Members of team included: Members of team.
Roles and Permissions Webinar Thursday, May 8, 2014 Presenters: Cynthia Crowdus & Kayla Siler.
Illinois State Board of Education Innovation and Improvement Division January 13, 2010 An Introduction to the 21 st Century Community Learning Center Self.
Module 9: Program Planning and Development Child Development.
September 13, Title I is a federal program which provides financial assistance to Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and schools with high numbers.
User Management: Understanding Roles and Permissions for Schoolnet Schoolnet II Training – September 2014.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2007 Utah State Office of Education.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
WELCOME to the QSNY Portal Public School Self-Study 1.
Welcome to the NLSA Visiting Team for St. Budweiser Lutheran School.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Strength-Based Feedback and Goal-Setting Sessions.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Selecting & Evaluating Quality Child Care Presented by.
A View from the Front Row FGRBI’s Story and Plan for Next Year.
INGHAM GSRP ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING Agenda 9:00-9:15- Kia Middleton-Representative from Kaplan to provide breakfast, share new products, GSRP.
Assessment Night at Saguaro Infant Care and Preschool May 6, :30 p.m. Room #9.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Assistive Technology Interview By: Becca Crusselle.
Understanding the ARD Process Presented by: Daniel Garza Special Education Director.
For more course tutorials visit EDU 390 Entire Course For more course tutorials visit EDU 390 Week 1 Individual Assignment.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
Including Parents In Alaska Child Outcomes. Alaska Child Outcomes Development Summer 2005 – General Supervision Enhancement Grant (GSEG) Infant & Toddler.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Transition Planning A Resource Guide For Case Managers.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
WELCOME.
Understanding Your Child’s IEP
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
MTE 501Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
Head Start  Head Start was established in 1965 as part of President Johnson’s War on Poverty  It is the only early childhood program, then and.
MTE 501 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com.
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Adult and Community Learning Services (ACLS)
Union County Schools Title One Program
New Teacher or Position Training
Chapter Two Teaching Stories.
Clinical Teaching/ Student Teaching
ECS Refresher Session PQA Form B
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
PBIS in the Classroom: Structure Application
PQA Assessing Program Quality
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
ECH/416 METHODS OF TEACHING IN EARLY CHILDHOOD: MATHEMATICS The Latest Version// uopcourse.com
ECH 416 ECH416 ech 416 ech416 Entire Course // uopstudy.com
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

ECS Refresher Session PQA Form B Questions Clarifications Common Understanding

Steps for Completing PQA Form B See page ix Conduct interview with program director and/or other knowledgeable staff members. –Use clarifying questions (CQ) (to the right of indicators) –Check one box per row –Check N/A if the row pertains to infants and toddlers –Score each page based on rows with checked boxes

Clarifications/Suggestions V-A –Row 1 – your observations; parent handbook –Row 2 – could ask administrator and teachers –Row 3 – get specific examples V-B –Full representation – each classroom represented by at least 1 or 2 parents V-D –Look at newsletters –5 scores is daily exchange of notes or s

V-D –Rows 4 & 5 mark N/A V-E –Ask teachers and also watch and listen at arrival and dismissal times –Row 4: check parent handbook grievance policies V-F –Ask teachers about row 1 V-G –Look for evidence of parent input V-H –Ask about specifics on how referrals are made

V-I –Non-educational needs – food, heat, transportation, etc. –Look for actual library of pamplets, lists of service providers,etc. –Ask for specific examples for evidence V-J –Transition to another room could be moving from GSRP to ECSE –Ask how children transition from and to wrap around care –Row 5: 5 is more than one contact with K staff

VI-A –Ask for specifics about Directors degree and course work –Row 3 – bullet points must all be there for a 5 VI-B –Teacher degrees in ECE or another degree with course work in ECE – get specifics –Row 2: Assoc. teachers, 3 rd person and relief staff –Row 3: Young children means 0-5 VI-C –Row 2 – Is there a handbook for these personnel or agendas for specific ECE training

VI-D –Row 1: All teachers - lead, associate, and 3 rd person –Row 2: If there is no actual director, this row refers to anyone who directly supervises teachers –Support staff is as described in VI-C (not associates or 3 rd person or staff that actually work in the classroom with children) VI-E –In-service means that it is offered at their own agency OR offered through a collaborative agency like Oakland Schools or the Regional Resource Center

VI-E –Row 7 – ask for specifics as to how and when this reflection is done. VI-F –Observations can be by the director OR the ECS –Row 2: Ask about level of training in the curriculum by person evaluating staff –Row 3: Ask director about staff evaluation process VI-G –Row 1 & 2: Ask to see membership cards –Professional organizations: NAEYC, AARA, HighScope membership, etc. –Row 3: Ask teachers as well as director

VII-A –Ask about status of license (it might be provisional if there has been an infraction) VII-B –Rows 1 & 2 should be scored 5 (if not, we need to know about this) –Rows 3 & 4: Mark N/A –Row 5: Ask how many staff (leads, associates and 3 rd person) have left or been replaced since last year. Calculate based on entire staff (Example: 18 staff total; 6 are replacements from staff that left – 6 divided by 18=.33 33%)

VII-C –If you are including the staff in discussions about the PQA and asking them questions for Form B, then they are assessing the program. –This whole page refers to what you do as an ECS VII-D –Row 1: Ask to see a written plan –Row 2: Ask to see an enrollment package –Row 3: This does not apply to home visits –Row 4: Ask to see evidence of translated materials or accommodations

VII-E –You must be able to see and read the written policies referred to in each row VII-F –Observe these structures yourself. Ask about anything you can’t observe VII-G –Row 2: Ask if turnover might be related to pay –Row 3: Ask how teaching teams get daily team planning time, how much time, how often. If they don’t have daily time, ask if funding is the issue. –Row 4 & 5: Ask teachers, associates as well as director

1 Form B for all programs 1 Form B for a district, program or agency as long as the director manages all the classrooms Deadline to upload Form Bs – January 15, 2015 Please let Chris or Krista know if you experience challenges meeting this deadline