Kansas Assessment Program in USD 457 Presentation to SAC December 17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Curriculum Coordinators Meeting Kansas State Department of Education January 10, 2014.
Advertisements

KLFA Brad Neuenswander Deputy Commissioner, KSDE.
There will be no KAMM. If a student currently takes the Kansas Assessment of Modified Measures (KAMM) in reading and math, then the student’s.
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know … and Share with You.
Pat Roschewski, Ph.D. Director of Statewide Assessment
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Kansas State Board of Education July 9, 2013 Scott Smith Assessment Update: Policies and Procedures for 2014.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Brian Roget – Assistant Director Assessment Development and Construction Mathematics and Science Office of Curriculum and Assessment October 12, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
2015 Kansas Assessment Program in USD 457 Presentation to SAC December 16, 2014.
BADGER 3-8 EXAM : Wisconsin Smarter Assessment Updates & Resources 02/20/2015.
Kansas State Board of Education Brad Neuenswander & Tom Foster Kansas State Department of Education March, 2013.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
P.E.R.T. Postsecondary Education Readiness Test. TODAY’S PERT HANDOUT Evaluation Services copied only the pages that pertained to the actual administration.
State Assessment Results CCR = ACTE T E A E C A C T A.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Background Information Next Steps. 6tY.
Parent Training California Assessment for Student
Kansas State Assessment’s State Board of Education November 2013.
January 11, A few FAQS from districts regarding the 2013 pilot.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Where We Are, and Where We Are Headed Learning Forward Kansas April 9, 2014.
Kansas State Board of Education Brad Neuenswander & Tom Foster Kansas State Department of Education March, 2013.
NEW ASSESSMENT. NEW RESULTS SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT What do families need to know? (Insert School Name) (Insert Date) INSERT LOGO.
Alternate Assessment Transitions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.
EHS and EMS Presentation 11/12/10 With thanks to Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor, James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute.
Key System Features and Next Steps. Features: Computer Adaptive Testing Adaptive assessment provides measurement across the breadth of the Common Core.
Transition to Smarter Assessment January Why did Delaware need new academic standards?
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Kansas State Department of Education June 23, 2014.
Assessments  Fall of 2012 (Oct. 15-Nov. 2): A small-scale pilot (30 districts) of the Smarter Balanced Assessment items. Districts chosen by.
State Assessments ~Andover~ 2014 and Beyond. Future of Assessments State BOE Decision: Dec. 10, 2013 Did not approve the use of Smarter Balanced Assessments.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Overview of the Smarter Balanced Assessment System CTA Pre-Good.
Oxford Preparatory Academy Scholar Academy Parent Social Topic: Changes in State Testing May 4, 5, and 6, 2015.
Kansas: a State of Transition Brad Neuenswander Deputy Commissioner, KSDE Fall 2013.
Heather Click-Cuellar KSDE Science Consultant Kansas Science Update KSDE Fall Assessment Conference.
Smarter Balanced Field Test March 3, 2014 Sequim School District.
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Transtions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.
Ohio’s State Assessments: What do families need to know? November 2015.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Understanding the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Results Assessment Services.
Getting Ready for Smarter Balanced Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE Feb. 7, 2014.
State Board of Education Presentation Jeffrey Hauger, Ed.D. Peggy McDonald, Ed.D. Elizabeth Celentano, M.Ed. January 11, 2016 NEW JERSEY DYNAMIC LEARNING.
S MARTER B ALANCED (R EQUIRED FOR DTC S, STC S, AND S MARTER B ALANCED TA S )
Online Practice Tests Overview
Surf & Turf Collaborative Marianne Perie Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation University of Kansas A presentation at the National Conference on.
MontCAS CRT-Alternate (CRT-Alt) Spring 2011 Test Administrator Training Grades 3-8 and 10 in Reading and Math Grades 4, 8, and 10 in Science Presentation.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Fairfield Public Schools Elementary Presentation.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT PARA LOS NIÑOS APRIL 30, 2013 Transitioning to the Common Core.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Kansas Assessment Program
Assessment Information
Smarter Balanced Assessment
IMPORTANT Information for 3rd Grade Parents
Shasta County Curriculum Leads November 14, 2014 Mary Tribbey Senior Assessment Fellow Interim Assessments Welcome and thank you for your interest.
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
New Assessments and Accommodations
Presentation transcript:

Kansas Assessment Program in USD 457 Presentation to SAC December 17, 2013

 We are on the right track  Do not let assessment preparation derail implementation of KCCRS (CCSS), MTSS and our curriculum  Keep the focus on quality instruction Instruction is Key

 Transitional assessment  Old CETE assessments are gone (except Science)  With elimination of Smarter Balanced, transitional test will continue and then build on itself each year Assessments This Year

 Math  English Language Arts  Science  Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) replaces the alternate assessment  Alternate Science  KELPA  Note: KAMM has been retired Assessments to be Given

 Students who enroll after March 7 are not required to take the assessments.  Exceptions  Alternative Science exemption date is Dec. 31  KELPA does not have an exemption date Exemption Dates

 Students who arrived in the United States AFTER 3/8/2013 count for participation only  Must still take KELPA if ELL  Double check that entry dates in Skyward are correct Participation Only Dates

 English Language ArtsMarch 10 – April 25  Math March 10 – April 25  ScienceMarch 10 – April 25  Alternate ScienceDec. 31 – April 18  KELPAFeb. 3 – April 25  Dynamic Learning Maps  Feb 10 – 21 (note: this is a change)  March 17 – April 14  May 1 – 15  Note: May 2 is a hard close-no make-up date. We have an April 25 end date so we have time to clear up any problems before May 2 Testing Windows

 Access for teachers through  Sysops have already loaded the software on student computers  Those registered with the old system use as username and click “forgot password” to reset  I have uploaded all the names you sent to me  If there are more names, let me know ASAP KITE

 Building level staff print test tickets (with login and password information) to give to teachers  Follow normal building protocol for security of tickets  Distribute the test tickets to the students  Have the students open the KITE Client on their computer desktops Administering Tests on KITE

 Have the students click “Other Assessments” Administering Tests on KITE

 Instruct the students to enter the login information from their test ticket Administering Tests on KITE

 Instruct the students to click “TAKE A TEST” Administering Tests on KITE

 If you have a choice of environment (in the blue bar), show the students the correct one.  From the list, show the students the test they should take. Administering Tests on KITE

 Tell the students to click the Take Test button  Have the students read the test instructions along with teacher reading from manual (manual will be released in January)  When teacher finished reading instructions, students should click the green button to start the test.  Note: The green button may say either Next or Begin depending upon the settings of the test. Administering Tests on KITE

Specific Information on Assessments

 Testing Window: March 10 – April 25  Grades: 3-8, 11  Exemption Date: After 3/7/2014 but must take KELPA  Participation Only Date: After 3/8/2013  Delivery Method: KITE  Format: multiple choice, technology enhanced  Sections: 2 English Language Arts

 Testing Window: March 10 – April 25  Grades: 3-8, 11  Exemption Date: After 3/7/2014  Participation Only Date: After 3/8/2013  Delivery Method: KITE  Format: Multiple choice, technology enhanced  Sections: 2 Mathematics

 Testing Window: March 10 – April 25  Grades: 4, 7, 11  Exemption Date: After 3/7/2014  Participation Only Date: After 3/8/2013  Delivery Method: KITE  Format: Multiple choice  Sections: 2 Science

 Pilot assessment  USD 457 is not participating in the pilot Social Studies

 Testing Window:  Feb 10 – 21 (note the change in date)  March 17 – April 14  May 1 – 15  Grades: Same as content areas  Exemption Date: March 7, 2014  Participation Only Date: Same as content areas  Delivery Method: KITE  Format: Multiple choice, technology enhanced  Sections: 3 each session DLM

 Testing Window: Dec. 31– April 18  Grades: 4, 7, 11  Exemption Date: After 12/31/2013  Participation Only Date: After 3/8/2013  Delivery Method: Portfolio  Format: Portfolio assessment  Sections: Varies Alternative Science

 Testing Window: Feb. 3 – April 25  Grades: K-12  Exemption Date: None  Participation Only Date: None  Delivery Method: Paper/pencil  Format: Performance assessment, multiple choice  Sections: 4  Note: This is the last year for the KELPA in its current format. It will be a computerized new test next year. KELPA

 Required of all staff involved in testing  Training done at each building by ESC staff  Sign off required before testing  Kansas Assessment Fact Sheet: Appropriate testing Practices Ethics Training

 All accommodations used in previous years may still be used if documented in IEP, 504 or student assistance plans AND are part of regular instruction  There will be NO HUMAN READERS Accommodations

Now, a look to the future….

 2014Transition Assessment  2015Enhanced Transition Assessment  2016New Assessment (Further enhancements from ); High School students can select their assessment from approved assessments (right now none approved – the district may limit this option) Future of State Assessments

 Kansas students will not participate in the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) field tests in the spring of  All students in tested grades will take the CETE developed Transitional Assessment in Math and English Language Arts in the spring of  CETE will use the Transitional Assessment again in , with additional enhancements.  The newly developed CETE assessment will be available in the spring of What We Know

 Each year, CETE will continue to build upon this assessment to create a more robust system that measures Kansas College and Career Readiness standards.  The CETE developed assessment will be adaptive (stage-adaptive rather than item-adaptive), have technology enhanced items and constructed response questions. What We Know

 An item-adaptive assessment adjusts the level of difficulty of the questions presented to a student after each question.  A stage-adaptive assessment works on the same principle, but it does so with a series of questions rather than a single item. Instead of adjusting the difficulty after each question, the assessment will ask several questions and then adjust the level of the next series of questions based on how well the student does.  As a result, with both stage-adaptive and item-adaptive assessment, students’ assessments are individualized, theoretically resulting in a different set of assessment questions for each student. Stage-Adaptive

 The state board and KSDE believe that CETE will provide more Kansas educators with the opportunity to have a greater input into the test design and reporting formats.  Kansas will withdraw as a governing member from the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.  By having CETE develop the state assessments and not adopting SBAC, there appears to be a cost savings to the State of Kansas. What We Know

 Have all items linked to the CCSS/KCCRS  Deliver the test via computer, both desktop/laptop and iPads  Include technology-enhanced items, built using templates similar to those used for SBAC  Include only machine-scorable items;  Map every item to an SBAC assessment “claim,” which will be the unit for reporting subscores The CETE summative test does

 Contain items that have all been written to the SBAC “targets,” which represent the ways in which students may be expected to learn and demonstrate their knowledge – by integrating skills and concepts across standards, rather than by tapping only isolated skills within one standard;  Use the SBAC blueprint as a guideline for determining which standards to emphasize  Include multiple forms  Match the SBAC style guide with few exceptions; and  Merge SBAC allowable accommodations with the Kansas accommodations policy to provide further computer-based accommodations to students. The CETE summative test does

 Include an extended constructed-response prompt  Include any short constructed-response items  Contain any items linked to the speaking/listening strand in the CCSS  Incorporate any performance tasks that must be hand scored  Take longer than two hours to administer for most students; or  Follow computer-adaptive protocols The CETE summative test does not

 One of the biggest unknowns is whether the U.S. Department of Education will approve the new Kansas assessment plan. What happens if the U.S. Department of Education does not approve this proposal?  Will Regent institutions recognize this assessment (at a particular score), as demonstrating readiness for credit-bearing courses? What We Don’t Know

 With SBAC, there was an agreement with the Regents institutions that students meeting a pre-determined benchmark would not have to take remedial coursework and could enroll in credit-bearing courses. This was in addition to any college admissions requirements (e.g., ACT scores, GPA).  Politically, will this decision alleviate concerns (perceived or real) about who has access to and owns student data? What We Don’t Know

 We are on the right track  Do not let assessment preparation derail implementation of KCCRS (CCSS), MTSS and our curriculum  Keep the focus on instruction Reminder – Instruction is Key