The Stages of Professional Development: A Resource for All Teachers Responsible for the Achievement of Students with Disabilities Online Professional Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PORTFOLIO.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Professional Teaching Portfolio First Name, Last Name Contact Information, .
Professional Teaching Portfolio
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
OSEP Leadership Mega Conference August 4, 2010 Recruiting and Retaining Personnel from Cradle to Career.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education.
Donald Kauchak and Paul Eggen
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
LEARNING DIFFERENCES - AGENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE Program Year A tool for identifying program improvement and professional development needs.
Looking at Teaching through the Lens of Standards Irv Richardson A Presentation to the 600s Sub-Committee July 22,2010 9:00 – 11:00.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
+ Welcome! Agenda: 5:00-5:30 Influences discussion 5:30-6:30 Review of last week’s discussion NBPTS standards 6:30-6:45 Break 6:45-7:00 NAEA Standards.
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #2 Navigating in the MD Online IEP System Navigating in the MD Online IEP System This document.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Ensuring that Special Education Students are Served by Highly Qualified Teachers Funded by the Office of Special.
2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Contemporary Issues September 8, Adjunct Professor Kristin P. O’Neil Office Hours: Scheduled on an individual.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
College of Education Graduate Programs
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #6 Forms and Meetings This document was developed and produced by the MSDE, Division of Special.
N. Katherine Standard’s Exit Portfolio
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Maryland IDEA Scorecard Data Driven Decision Making Nancy.
Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #9 Administrative Tasks This document was developed and produced by the MSDE, Division of Special.
Standards-Based Online Professional Development to Mentor and Retain Special Education Personnel Presented to Teacher Education Division of Council for.
Connection to Build Leadership: State Leadership Academies October 18, 2011 The Maryland Experience Martha J. Fields, Ed.D. Carol Ann Heath-Baglin, Ed.D.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Professional Teaching Portfolio
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #7
Mary T. Brownell, Director
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series– PD Activity #4
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #2
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

The Stages of Professional Development: A Resource for All Teachers Responsible for the Achievement of Students with Disabilities Online Professional Development to Help All Teachers Meet All Students’ Needs Presented at the Teacher Induction Program Leaders’ Meeting April 16, 2013 – Stevenson University Debi Gartland, Towson University Stacey Williams, University of Maryland, College Park DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES

 This document and its content was developed in collaboration with the Johns Hopkins University/Center for Technology in Education (JHU/CTE) and produced by the Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services, IDEA Part D Grant #H323A07003 (Maryland State Improvement Grant) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Education or any other federal agency and should not be regarded as such. The Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services receives funding from the Office of Special Education Programs, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education. This information is copyright free. Readers are encouraged to copy and share it, but please credit the Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services, Maryland State Department of Education.  In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), this document is available in alternative formats, upon request. Contact the Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services, Maryland State Department of Education at (410) or Fax (410) DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES

 How would you like to improve your knowledge and skills to positively impact teaching students with disabilities?  How will your improvement of knowledge and skills in teaching students with disabilities improve their achievement?

Purpose Helps teachers determine which stage best describes their professional development in meeting the needs of students with disabilities Features Reviewed at the national, state and local levels and evaluated by users Based on: Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Principles; and Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Standards Spans a career Not meant to be evaluative

Chief Council of State School Officers (CCSSO) Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Teacher Education Division(TED) of CEC National Association of Alternative Certification (NAAC) National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE)

 Special Education Mentoring Institute (SEMI)  Maryland Approved Alternative Preparation Program (MAAPP)  Institutes of Higher Education (IHE) Sharing Sessions  State Special Education Directors  Maryland School for the blind  Montgomery County Special Education Leadership Team

Teachers:  self-assess Standards based competencies  analyze results and identify Standards and Indicators upon which to focus professional development planning  monitor progress and update their Professional Development Plan and/or Professional Development Tracker

Professional Development Cycle

 The Model Standards for Licensing General and Special Education Teachers of Students with Disabilities: A Resource for State Dialogue* (May, 2001) from Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC)  The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Standards What Every Special Educator Must Know** (2003) were used in constructing the current Stages. * Not revised with new standards **Reorganized standards used in revision

1. Making Content Meaningful 2. Child Development and Learning Theory 3. Learning Styles and Diverse Learners 4. Instructional Strategies and Problem Solving 5. Motivation and Behavior 6. Communication to Foster Learning 7. Planning for Instruction 8. Assessment and Evaluation 9. Professional Growth and Reflection 10. Interpersonal Relationships

The Learner and Learning ◦ Learner Development ◦ Learning Differences ◦ Learning Environments Content Knowledge ◦ Content Knowledge ◦ Application of Content Instructional Practice Assessment Planning for Instruction Instructional Strategies Professional Responsibility Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Leadership and Collaboration

1. Foundations 2. Development and Characteristics of Learners 3. Individual Learning Differences 4. Instructional Strategies 5. Learning Environments and Interactions 6. Communication 7. Instructional Planning 8. Assessment 9. Professional and Ethical Practice 10. Collaboration

 Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences  Learning Environments  Curricular Content Knowledge  Assessments  Instructional Planning and Strategies  Professional Learning and Ethical Practice  Collaboration

Stage 1 The teacher has knowledge of the competency, but does not have or lacks experience in the demonstration of the competency. Stage 2 The teacher understands the competency, attempts to apply it, and accesses resources to enhance instruction of students with disabilities.

Stage 3 The teacher works with support to apply the competency with students with disabilities and begins to demonstrate self-initiated planning. Stage 4 The teacher works to apply the competency consistently across all environments accessed by students with disabilities and demonstrates self- initiated planning.

Stage 5 The teacher models the competency, makes adjustments upon reflection, and serves as a resource for others responsible for meeting the needs of students with disabilities.

 Paper and Pencil Format ◦ If you are using the Paper and Pencil format, you may access the following three Stages tools available at the MSDE website below. ◦ Utilization Guide ◦ Stages Document Overview ◦ Stages Self-Assessment Answer Sheet  Online Format o If you are using the online format, you may access Stages and complete it online from the website below.

Familiarize yourself with the Utilization Guide and Stages Overview. Identify Standards to self-assess, and complete the Self-Assessment Form for those targeted Standards. Analyze the results for each Standard, and determine areas in which you feel comfortable with your results and note those areas needing attention. If you have a mentor, the two of you can review your results together and discuss resources. Set timelines for completion and your next self-assessment.

Use the Maryland Professional Development Online Tracker (PDot). Review the online materials including the Utilization Guide. Identify standards to self assess, and complete the process online. Review the results. If you have a mentor, the two of you can review your results together and discuss resources. Set timelines for completion and scheduling your next self-assessment.

MARYLANDLEARNINGLINKS.ORG

Login Click to create an account Click here to send a message to Tech Support Share the tool through Facebook Sign In with your PDot account, or click below to create an account

Pin codes are not required, but you can associate multiple pins to your account

You can save your profile at any point; these fields are not required, but they are helpful for data analysis purposes

Two ways to navigate

You can begin a new assessment at any time, or you can continue one in progress or view results of a completed form. There’s no time limit for completing an assessment.

Click here to see the global scale for entire Stages… self assessment

Click any standard to see a comparative plotting of your ratings over time

You must enable sharing and create a unique password Give the unique URL and password to anyone who you want to have access to your profile and assessment results

Stages was currently revised using the following:  the new InTASC Standards and the reorganized CEC Preparation Standards  Common Core Curriculum and College and Career Readiness indicators and will be known as Stages 2013  Cross walk - Danielson’s Professional Development Principles and InTASC Standards Available 2013 Until then the current Stages remains available in both paper pencil and online formats

In thinking back, let’s review the question: How will the Stages document lead to improved teacher competency resulting in Increased achievement for students with disabilities?

 Allison Layland, Co-MSIG Director Chief, Programmatic Support and Technical Assistance Branch Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) Phone#: (410)  Karla Marty, Section Chief, Specialized Instruction, Programmatic Support and Technical Assistance Branch, Maryland State Department of Education Phone#: (410)  Roberta Strosnider, Consultant, MSDE Phone#: (301)