Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Advertisements

Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
SMART Goals.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1 March 2013.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Connecting the Common Core State Standards and TPEP 1.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Combining Multiple Measures Into a Summative Rating 1 Updated April 2014.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
Math Fellows Heather Dorsey. Purpose of the Fellows To be a part of and support a system that focuses on math making sense for all students. --Leadership.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Gathering Evidence 1 June 2013.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Applying Multiple Measures.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Session Materials  Wiki
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
CFN 201 High School Principals’ Meeting Thursday, September 27, :00 – 3:45 p.m.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
Promoting Perseverance in Mathematics Borough Instructional Leads for Mathematics Math Team Department of STEM December 3, 2015.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
1 Sample Introductory Rounds Session, Day 2. Learning Goals By the end of Day 2, we will:  Understand the elements of the instructional core  Be familiar.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Presentation transcript:

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation 1

Today, we’ll be working on educator goal setting. Please take a moment to reflect on your own professional and personal experiences with SMART goals. Which of these pieces of a SMART goal do you think presents the most challenges to enact? S = Specific and Strategic M =Measurable A =Action-Oriented R =Rigorous, Realistic, and Results-Focused (the 3 Rs) T =Timed and Tracked Place a sticky note on the chart you think represents the most challenging work of setting SMART goals. 2 Entry Task

3  Introductions  Logistics  Agenda  Connecting  Learning  Implementing  Reflecting  Wrap Up Welcome!

 Introduction to Educator Evaluation in Washington  Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation  Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance: An Introduction to Self-Assessment, Goal Setting, and Criterion Scoring  Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation  Conducting High-Quality Observations and Maximizing Rater Agreement  Providing High-Quality Feedback for Continuous Professional Growth and Development  Combining Multiple Measures into a Summative Rating 4 Modules

 Pausing  Paraphrasing  Posing Questions  Putting Ideas on the Table  Providing Data  Paying Attention to Self and Others  Presuming Positive Intentions  What Else? 5 Session Norms

Connecting Builds community, prepares the team for learning, and links to prior knowledge, other modules, and current work 6

Participants will know and be able to:  Support the articulation of goal setting as part of the educator evaluation process  Build connections back to past learning on multiple measures and self-assessment to support ongoing evaluation planning in alignment with the Washington State Criteria 7 Overview of Intended Participant Outcomes for Part C

 Part A described how using multiple measures strengthens a teacher evaluation system  Part B described how teacher self-assessment contributes to a comprehensive teacher evaluation system 8 Goal Setting Adds Another Piece to the Puzzle Goal setting is another piece, helping us move closer to enacting TPEP’s Core Principles and the new system

 Stand up and step away from your district team.  Take a minute to skim the left-hand side of page 3, then begin networking with other participants.  Your goals are to find someone who fits one of the criteria on the left side AND to have the chance to connect with fellow educators in the room today.  Have them sign their name on the right side for you, then search for another “connection.”  Each person may only sign your sheet once! 9 Find Someone Who…

 Each of the criteria on the left highlighted some the differences we are facing as we work through building our district’s system.  How many are using Danielson? Marzano? CEL 5Ds?  How many here teach a tested subject or grade level? Untested?  How many teach early childhood? Juniors and seniors?  The goal-setting process allows each educator to reflect on teaching work in his or her own context and begin to build a personal plan—to set goals and action plans that are meaningful… and SMART! 10 Connecting Debrief

Learning Understand best practices in goal setting 11

12 Preparing Teachers for Goal Setting Self-Assessment Step Step 1: Student Data Analysis Step 2: Instructional, Leadership, or Professional Practice Rating Goal Type Student Learning Goal Instructional, Leadership, or Professional Practice Goal A capital “G!” indicates that the guidance represents Washington State law. A lowercase “g” indicates that the guidance represents research-based best practice but is not mandated by law.

13 Instructional practice goal  Focused on improving specific instructional practices identified in the district framework Leadership practice goal  Focused on improving specific leadership practices identified in the district framework Understanding Goal Setting Professional practice goal  Focused on improving professional practices tied to district framework (e.g., seeking PD, collaborating with colleagues, etc.)

Connections to Be Made:  Rooted in Washington State Teacher Criteria  Aligned to the chosen district framework and informed by recommended best practices and tools within that framework  Coordinated with district, school, team, and grade-level goals 14 Understanding Goal Setting

15 Leadership Practice Goal Our school leadership team will research and become more familiar with proven strategies for improving the partnerships with community-based service organizations and effectively supporting teachers in integrating service learning opportunities in their classrooms. We will implement a minimum of four of the approaches or strategies by the end of the school year. As a result of our efforts, we will see at least 5 additional teachers using service learning opportunities in their classroom. Instructional Practice Goal Our ninth-grade team will research and become more familiar with strategies proven to help build sustainable and ongoing partnerships with service learning organizations in our community that are willing to be supportive and engaged with our students. We will implement a minimum of three of the approaches or strategies by the end of the school year. As a result of our efforts, we will see at least two partnership that represent either new, or significantly strengthened and improved, relationships with service learning organizations. Our students will experience more meaningful and coherent service learning experiences as a result. Examples (Handout, page 4)

Individually:  Read handout pages 5–7, “What Makes a Goal ‘S.M.A.R.T.’?”  Underline one phrase that you find most significant in the reading, that resonates with or pushes your thinking about goal setting. In a triad:  Share your phrases and discuss any insights about the reading and implications for your district’s goal setting work.  THEN: Return to page 4-5 in the handout and work together to respond to Part B: “What suggestions do you have for making the goals even SMARTer?” 16 What Makes Our Goals SMART?

Effective educator goal setting:  Connects back to self-assessment work and reinforces the process of using multiple measures  Includes a focus on student learning and professional practice  Is a process informed by the SMART goals framework, as well as the structures and tools from Danielson, Marzano, CEL, and AWSP  Coordinates the work of individual teachers and principals with teams, the school, and the district 17 Learning Wrap Up

Goal-setting a measure of educator performance:  How do you incorporate goal-setting as a source of evidence? Districts should consider two key questions:  1. How will the teacher or principal identify evidence to demonstrate achievement of or progress on goals?  2. How will you measure success of or progress towards achieving the goal using evidence?  One Approach: Evidence Collection 18 Learning Content II. Goal-Setting as a Measure

Goal-setting as measure of educator performance:  Review the “results-oriented path” you created in the last activity:  What sources of evidence could be used to assess the educator’s progress along that path? Make a list of at least 3 potential sources of evidence.  What evidence statements could you produce from your sources of evidence? 19 Learning Activity II. Goal-Setting as a Measure

Implementing Articulate and reflect on current practices around goal setting (self-assess) Begin to articulate next steps in moving effective goal setting forward (plan) 20

21 The Year-Long Evaluation Cycle Formal Observation Activities (2) Include Student Growth Goals/ Measures Additional Evidence Collecting Include Student Growth Measures Self-Assessment Annual Goal Setting Include Student Growth Goals Summative Scoring Include Student Growth Measures Compiling observational, multiple measures and student growth data Self-assessment against a rubric, goal setting with supervisor Preobservation conference, incl. goal setting, observation, postobservation conference Informal observations, discussions, artifact collection

 Work with your district team to complete the “Goal Setting in the Teacher Evaluation Process” template  Depending on your current work, focus at the school level or district level, or both levels, if meaningful  Column 1 may need to be completed when you have specific framework resources in hand  After self-assessing current work (Row 1), include your plans (Row 2), to help move goal setting forward  Might include learning more (e.g., “find out,” “talk to,” “gather”)  Might include action items (e.g., “convene,” “distribute,” “organize”) 22 Implementing Effective Goal Setting within the Evaluation Cycle

 Each team share two things to debrief our implementing tasks: 1. One current asset you will be building upon, as you move goal setting forward 2. One take-away from today’s work, that you want to incorporate into your future work with goal setting and teacher evaluation 23 Implementing Activity Debrief

Reflecting 24

 Team Reflection: What will you do to continue to get SMARTer, as you consider goal setting’s role in teacher and principal evaluation?  Take a few minutes and create at least two sticky notes for the Plus/Delta Chart on your way out.  Plus: What was a real “plus” in today’s session? What went well and should be repeated?  Delta: Where is there room for improvement and change? 25 Reflecting

 Next Session is Part D: Gathering Evidence  Homework Options  District: Layer in the resources and tools from your chosen framework to deepen the coherence around the goal-setting experiences you’re planning. Review district-level goals for SMARTness.  School or Teams: Prepare ways to bring student learning and professional practice goal-setting experiences to individual teachers and teams. Review district-level goals for SMARTness.  Individual: Conduct your own SMART goal-setting experience and reflect on the process to inform your understanding and contribution to scaling this work with others. 26 What’s Next?

Thank you! INSERT PRESENTER’S ADDRESS 27