TEACHING EVALUATION CAN BE A ONE DISH MEAL Heather Campbell Brescia University College London, Ontario, Canada

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Speakers: Denise Chilton, Sandra Smele, Christine Wong May 1, 2013
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
BIG DAY IN EFFECTIVE OBSERVATION STRATEGIES ARK TANAKA & TARA SADEGHIAN OCTOBER 3, 2014 Navitas English.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
Powered by Faculty Learning Community Survey Monday, April 13, 2015.
Neil J. Anderson, Ph.D. Brigham Young University Provo, Utah U.S.A.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
The Planning and Assessment Cycle
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
CRICOS No.00213J Division of Technology Information and Learning Support Collaborating effectively – what do we really need? Sue Collins, Liaison Librarian,
Coaching Mentoring and Reflecting Effectively: Creating a Culture of Excellence Through Colleague Collaboration and Reflective Practice Helene Chan, Norman.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Process and Online Tool Updates Kim Simmons NCDPI Robert Sox NCDPI Lou Cicchinelli McREL October 17, 2012.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Collaboration – Session 2 CHALLENGE – EVALUATION – CREATIVITY – CLARITY – FOUNDATIONS – COLLABORATION.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
Teaching in teams: lessons from systematic review training NCRM Training the Trainers Event 4 th June 2007 Angela Harden and Karen Bird MRS Node EPPI Centre,
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Meetup/Discussion VLA Annual Conference Richmond, VA October 23, 2015 “Shall we march without our neighbours I trust not”: Defining the Roles and Goals.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Observation Training. Learning Objectives: 1.Review the elements of the observation process including: scheduling, pre-observation preparation, post-observation.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
PRACTICE TEACHING 2008/2009. EDUC # Observation & Practice Teaching Course = 2 hours class instruction and Practice Teaching weeks This course is a requirement.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
AMITY REGION # 5 COMPLEMENTARY OBSERVERS Dr. E. Marie McPadden Ms. Helly Potter Ms. Jen Bshara February 25,
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Applied Instruction Project Presentation Carolyn Vance-Hicks EDU605 Differentiated Instruction Professor Susan Shaw.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan For Associate’s Degree in Library Skills (Donna Roy)
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
FACULTY PEER OBSERVATION: PROVIDING AND BENEFITING FROM USEFUL FEEDBACK Lisa Perfetti Associate Dean for Faculty Development Whitman College
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
The Power of Supplemental Instruction (SI)
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Peer Observation and Review of Teaching
Jamie Hitchner Taneytown Elementary School Carroll County, Maryland
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Peer Consultation Program
Reflective Teaching Practices
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Teacher Evaluation Process
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Can I Get A Little Help Here?
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

TEACHING EVALUATION CAN BE A ONE DISH MEAL Heather Campbell Brescia University College London, Ontario, Canada

PRE-SESSION MEETING What is something you know you’d like to improve about your teaching? 1.Successfully complete my first conference presentation (yay!) 2.Don’t talk too fast 3.Don’t tell too many anecdotes: stick to the script (and manage my time!)

TODAY WE WILL.. Strategies for measuring teacher effectiveness Benefits of 360- style review Discussion: your contexts Use evaluation tools

THE BACKGROUND Our little library What the literature says Our goals

ABOUT BRESCIA

BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT Teaching expectations in role Lack of MLIS training Personal mentorship experience Performance Evaluation Needed

LITERATURE REVIEW

GOALS OF THE PROJECT Develop mentorship and training tool Measure teaching performance Flexible to varying needs Integrate with other assessments Not too time consuming

THE MODEL Observation Post- observation Performance Planning Pre- observation

PRE-OBSERVATION Initial Meeting Review performance goals from previous year / assessment plan Set future meeting dates and times Discuss context of observation class (e.g. discipline, student needs) (15 minutes) Pre-Observation Meeting Go through lesson plan and learning outcomes Identify instructor’s personal learning goals Adjust student or faculty evaluation as needed Contact faculty member (15-30 minutes)

OBSERVATION Observe lesson Peer evaluation using 3 rubrics Faculty feedback Student feedback Other student assessment* (60 minutes)

POST-OBSERVATION Prior to meeting Instructor to complete self- reflection form prior to meeting Mentor to complete all 3 rubrics and comments prior to meeting (15-30 minutes) Post observation meeting Debrief from observation lesson Review rubric results Review faculty and student feedback Discuss goals for the future Come to consensus (30-60 minutes)

PERFORMANCE PLANNING Summative Report Record of meetings Summary of feedback Recommended learning goals for following year Support/assistance needed (15 minutes) Performance Evaluation Summative report given to supervisor (At least) one learning goal added to performance plan for following year Mentor provides support (1 year)

TIMING Fall TermWinter Term Initial meetingAugust - SeptemberDecember - January Pre-observationSeptember - OctoberJanuary - February ObservationOctober - NovemberFebruary - March Post-observationWithin 2 weeks Summative reportDecemberApril Performance planningMay

TEACHING PERFORMANCE RUBRIC Please take a few moments to review the teaching performance rubric See me at the end of this presentation to look at the Plan Overview or Summative Report

THE RESULTS 3 cycles 5 librarians: 2 new grads 1 PhD 1 L.A years+

RESULTS OF THE PROJECT Develop mentorship and training tool Rooted in evidence-based practice Measure teaching performance Flexible to needs of year, instructor, context Not too time consuming! Use multiple types of assessment

ONE DISH MEAL?

BUILDING CAMARADERIE “We’re a teaching library” “Best feedback process I’ve ever gone through” “I was REALLY nervous… I don’t have formal training so was afraid about what I was bad at. I didn’t realize how many skills I actually have”

COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE 2 x B.Ed. 2 x ISW 4 x WILU Cool Teaching Ideas BFI Spring Perspectives on Teaching LOWG

FACULTY OUTREACH

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT “Train library teaching staff to be informed and up-to-date on information literacy and teaching in higher education”

INTEGRATION WITH ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING

CHALLENGES

FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES 1.New staff 2.Further integration with assessment of student learning 3.Teaching squares 4.Collaboration with Western campus or Teaching and Learning department 5.*NEW* Cognitive Apprenticeship model

LESSONS LEARNED Book the initial meeting New participants will be nervous Be flexible Use teaching language Develop rubrics together Learn how to give objective feedback

POST-OBSERVATION MEETING 1.What aspects of this session went well? 2.Were there parts of the session I should improve or change next time? 3.Overall, did I achieve my goals? 4.What strategies can I use to continue to improve my craft? 5.What resources are needed to ensure my success? My goals: Don’t talk too fast Stick to the script My strategies: Presenter view: slides marked “FAST” Practiced for colleagues Timing sticky note With a buffer!

QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION How can this model be applied to your context?

THANK YOU! Heather Campbell