Education in America, 2001-2014 Is the American Education System Leaving Children Behind?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting it Together ….Student + Teacher Standards = ?
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind A New Era in Education.
THE PROS AND CONS OF NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND
Consensus Questions.  The Education Study scope is broad and includes the following areas under the role of the federal government in public education.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act Ben, Eric & Shawn.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Copyright © 2007 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Special Education Teacher Certification and Highly Qualified Requirements.
Educational Policies Present Zachary Schrage.
Social and Economic Inequalities: Education
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
George W. Bush Provides public school choice and services for students in failing schools as early as the fall of Integrate scientifically based.
STANDARDS: A quick glance back in time. ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT TITLE I: FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR LOW INCOME SCHOOLS TITLE II: LIBRARY RESOURCES,
The persons whose photographs are depicted in the slides are professional models. They have no relation to the issues discussed. Any characters they are.
Welcome Community Leaders. Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council San Mateo County “The Big Lift”
Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council San Mateo County “The Big Lift”
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Competition and Education Policy The Role of Vouchers and the No Child Left Behind Act.
No Child Left Behind Teacher Qualification. NCLB: Three Main Parts All teachers to meet new federal standards –New hires to meet standards now –Existing.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Norm-Referenced and Criterion- Referenced Assessments A Historical view from 1900 to the Present.
Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Special Education Cooperatives Transition Role Group Meeting September 14, 2010 Johnny Collett Division of Learning Services.
Current Issues. Vocabulary No Child Left Behind (NCLB)Curriculum AccountabilitySilent Epidemic Standardized TestMagnet School Charter SchoolCapitalism.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS By: Brooke Brewer
The Federal Government
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
EQ: HOW ARE WE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AS EDUCATORS? N O CHILD L EFT B EHIND {NCLB}
Benchmarking for Success: Ensuring U.S. Students Receive a World-Class Education Presentation to the North Carolina Accountability Conference February.
Common Core Standards By Holly Blankenship What is the Common Core? Newly revised academic state standards for school districts Formed by: National Governors.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Final Review Day 2: Education in America. Problems with American Education -Currently 68% of students in high school will graduate -Dropping out of high.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
September 2013 THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS & THE NEW STATE TESTS: ADVANCING COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS IN NYC.
NCLBNCLB No Child Left Behind (take notes, please)
WHY ARE WE TAKING SO MANY TESTS? Education Reform and the Modern Accountability Movement Wayne Zhang.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
BY Taylor, Kristen and Bridget.  Developed by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief of State School Officers.
Education in America Mr. Patten & Ms. Dennis Participation in Government.
Why America is Failing. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 changed America’s approach to education by focusing on accountability. Schools and teachers.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
EDU 4245 Class 5: Achievement Gap (cont) and Diagnostic Assessments.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Types of Statewide Assessments Currently Used in Grades 3-8.
No Child Left Behind A New Era in Education
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Education and Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Education in America, Is the American Education System Leaving Children Behind?

Essential Questions What is the current status of public education in America? Is our public education system teaching all children? What are the main challenges with public education? What are some possible solutions? How do we compare with other countries? What is globalization?

American Public Schools: Is it That Bad? National drop-out rate is 7% (2012) Massachusetts drop-out rate is 2.2% (2013) Framingham’s drop-out rate is 2.4% (2013) National high school graduation rate is 80% MA graduation rate is 85% (2013) Framingham’s is 83% (2013) Race and socio-economics are important factors in determining success in high school

How many high school graduates go to college? According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 65.9% of 2013 high school graduates were enrolled in colleges or universities in September 2013.

What are the main issues plaguing our educational system?

No Child Left Behind Act, 2001 George W. Bush’s education reform NCLB Increased the federal government’s role in guaranteeing quality education for all children NCLB supports standards based educational reform Increased the accountability of schools

More on NCLB Based on the idea that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals can improve individual outcomes in education. Requires states to develop assessments in basic skills to be given to all students in certain grades Requires all students to be “proficient” or higher by 2014 NCLB does NOT state a national achievement standard  all states set their own standards and assessments.

What does NCLB really mean? Students must take standardized tests. Schools had to show “adequate yearly progress” (AYP). – If schools did not show AYP for 2 consecutive years, they were labeled as “in need of improvement” – Students could request transfer to other schools in the district – Other corrective measures were in place for schools that continually failed to meet AYP.

PROS of NCLB Accountability Results annually reported to parents Standards for teacher qualification Emphasis on reading, writing, math Measures educational status and growth by ethnicity and works to close achievement gap Schools need to provide quality education for often- underserved groups (ex. Students with disabilities, low income students, minority students)

CONS of NCLB Under-funded federal mandates Teachers “teach to the test” Each state creates their own assessments– Do all the state tests have the same level of difficulty? Sets high standards for teachers NCLB faults schools and curriculum for student failure, but critics claim that there are additional factors to blame… – Class size, school facilities, hunger and homelessness, lack of health care

The Move to Common Core What does this video clip tell you about the Common Core State Standards? – What are they? – Why were they created? – What are the goals of Common Core? From the Council of the Great City Schools

Common Core: Where did they come from? State standards developed by governors and state commissioners of education from 48 states, 2 territories, and the District of Columbia Collaboration at the state level from teachers and administrators Designed to better prepare students for life after high school (college or the work force) Standards are for K-12 math, K-12 English language arts and 6-12 literacy in history, science, technology

Common Core Compare favorably with international standards Adopted by all states but Minnesota, Nebraska, Indiana, Virginia, Texas, Oklahoma and Alaska (originally passed in OK and IN, but repealed) Also adopted by DC and four American territories (Guam, American Samoa, US Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands) Developed in 2009, released in 2010, supposed to be implemented school year.

PROS of Common Core National standards to prepare kids for post-high school Increased rigor in the classroom prepares students for post-high school On par with other countries Consistency from state to state. More accurate state comparisons Common assessments from state to state– states share financial burden of test development Helps students develop higher level thinking skills

CONS of Common Core Difficult transition to Common Core for students, teachers, administrators Might push teachers out of profession Younger students need to learn skills sooner and faster than before (increased importance of pre-K) No equivalency tests for students with special needs Watered down standards for some states Need for new textbooks Need for new technology for online assessments High stakes testing What about science and social studies?

How does the US compare? International rankings based on comparison with other OECD countries (34 countries) – OECD = Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development About 500, year olds took the PISA test– focuses on math, but also has sections on science and literacy Test given every 3 years How did the US fair?

US test results BUT… US ranks 5 th in spending/student

What countries are doing things right? (2012 results)

What does Finland do right? Same curriculum for all students nation-wide Compulsory schooling doesn’t start until kids are 7 Comprehensive pre-school program focusing on socialization, not academics Light homework loads Almost no standardized tests Students aren’t given grades until high school  there are no student rankings Schools provide students with food, counseling, medical care

There’s more… Teaching is highly competitive All teachers required to have a Master’s Degree (government pays for degree) Teachers’ status is on par with doctors and lawyers Students separated into academic or vocational track in last 3 years of education Greater school funding in middle school years (most danger for kids dropping out)

Globalization Globalization refers to the increasingly global relationships of culture, people and economic activity Trade/exchange of goods and services Circulation of ideas, language, and popular culture Globalization contributes to economic growth in developed and non-developed countries

Globalization and Education American students compete for college admissions and employment against American students AND International students Where’s our main competition? India and China!

How do we ensure more effective schools for our children ? What are the solutions? Charter schools Home schooling Raise standards Get rid of poor teachers Higher standards for teachers