Fundamentals of Assessment Todd L. Green, Ph.D. Associate Professor Pharmacology, Physiology & Toxicology PIES Seminar 2-23-11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Challenge and Importance of Evaluating Residents and Fellows Debra Weinstein, M.D. PHS GME Coordinators Retreat March 25, 2011.
Advertisements

Introduction to Competency-Based Residency Education
Competencies, Milestones & EPAs: What Does It All Mean?
Goal Setting and Self Assessment: Teaching Lifelong Learning Skills Stacy Potts, MD Allison Hargreaves, MD.
Department of Graduate Medical Education (GME) Overview of the ACGME Core Competencies.
School of Nursing Reaccreditation November 9-11, 2009 Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) ensures the quality and integrity of baccalaureate,
Development of Competency Teaching and Assessment for the Subspecialty Fellowships of Internal Medicine: Infectious Diseases at Albert Einstein College.
OSU College of Medicine LeadServeInspire Curriculum.
Joan E. St. Onge, M.D. UMMSM At Holy Cross Hospital Internal Medicine Residency Faculty Development January 23, 2013 The Evaluation Toolkit.
FREDERIC W. HAFFERTY PH.D. PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE–DULUTH Professionalism, Best Evidence & Medical Education: A Cautionary.
ACGME Core Competencies New ACGME Duty Hours Standards ACGME Site Visit Residency Program July 26 Effective July 1, 2011.
GME Jeopardy. Compe 10 cies VISA issues ToolboxOversiteAlphabet Soup
Clinical Pharmacy Basma Y. Kentab MSc..
A new era of comprehensive review Written by: the ACGME.
Family Medicine Program By the end of this session, faculty will 1.Understand what is meant by competence and the competence trajectory expected during.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
What Health-Professionals Should Know About Research and Why They Should Know It Bill Galey Director of Graduate and Medical Education Programs Howard.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
PROFESSIONALISM EDUCATION: POSSIBLE COMPETENCIES Barbara Barzansky, PhD, MHPE LCME Co-Secretary APHC Conference May 3, 2013.
ACGME OUTCOME PROJECT : THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR’S ROLE Jim Kerwin, MD University of Arizona.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Evaluation: A Challenging Component of Teaching Darshana Shah, PhD. PIES
Continuity Clinics as Medical Home Hawaii Dyson Initiative Louise Iwaishi, MD March 5, 2005 Hawaii Dyson Initiative.
Kazakhstan Health Technology Transfer and Institutional Reform Project Clinical Teaching Post Graduate Medicine A Workshop Drs. Henry Averns and Lewis.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning: Where Assessment and Teaching Collide Kirk J. Armstrong, EdD, ATC Georgia College & State University Program.
The New ACGME Competencies for Internal Medicine.
Journal Club/September 24, Swing et al. Television and video game exposure and the development of attention problems. Pediatrics 2010;126:
Assessment tool OSCE AH Mehrparvar,MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
The Role of Culture in the Training of Health Care Professionals: A Multidisciplinary Panel Danny M. Takanishi, Jr., MD, FACS Professor and Chair Department.
Objective Structured Clinical Exam By Roslyn Joinvil Maimonides Medical Center Mentor: Dr. Lisa Altshuler Ibsen Vargas.
Accreditation in the higher education
Student assessment AH Mehrparvar,MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
Writing Narratives Based on ACGME Competencies. Narratives What Are They?  Written Evaluation of Student Performance Formative  Mid-Course Evaluation.
1 Ambulatory Pediatric Association Educational Guidelines for Pediatric Residency Tutorial 6 Source: Kittredge, D., Baldwin, C. D., Bar-on, M. E., Beach,
Meaningful Evaluation: Framework, Process, Impact Inis Jane Bardella, M.D., FAAFP Associate Dean for Faculty Development and Global Health Initiatives.
Developing an Assessment System B. Joyce, PhD 2006.
Definitions So what’s an “underrepresented” group?
Assessment Tools.
What is “Competency” in the New Millennium? Shirley Schlessinger, MD, FACP Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education University of Mississippi Medical.
Assessing Your Learner Lawrence R. Schiller, MD, FACG Digestive Health Associates of Texas Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas.
College of Veterinary Medicine UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT WITH CURRICULUM REVISION : HOW WILL WE KNOW IF WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED OUR GOALS?
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Student Learning Outcomes (Pharmacy) Susan S. S. Ho School of Pharmacy Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 September 2007.
Assessing Learners The Teaching Center Department of Pediatrics UNC School of Medicine The Teaching Center.
National Center for Physician Training in Addiction Medicine Core Competency Webinar Series   Core Competency: Practice-Based Learning and Improvement.
Objectives To review the key components of the Nursing Program. To understand the roles and responsibilities of the student, preceptor and faculty liaison.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
Educational Outcomes Service Group: Overview of Year One Lynne Tomasa, PhD May 15, 2003.
ACGME SIX CORE COMPETENCIES Minimum Program Requirements Language Approved by the ACGME, September 28, 1999 “The residency program must require its residents.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
Practice Based Learning and Improvement Stephen J. Kimatian MD Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics The Penn State, Milton S. Hershey Medical.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Competence by Design (CBD) Foundations of Assessment.
Henry M. Sondheimer, MD Association of American Medical Colleges 7 August 2013 A Common Taxonomy of Competency Domains for the Health Professions and Competencies.
1 Transforming Our Practices Transformed Our Teaching: Meeting ACGME Competencies with New Models of Care Katherine Miller, M.D. John Nagle, MPA U. Of.
FAIMER Assessing Teaching Excellence John Norcini, Ph.D.
College of Pharmacy Curriculum Overview Barbara Insley Crouch, PharmD, MSPH Chair, Curriculum Committee.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT (Undergraduate Medical Education)
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Curriculum Coordinator: Debra Backus Date of Presentation: 1/15/15
Gerald H. Sterling, Ph.D. Senior Associate Dean, Education
Site Visits and Clerkship Coordinators – Defining a Best Practice
Principles of assessment in the clinical setting
Presentation transcript:

Fundamentals of Assessment Todd L. Green, Ph.D. Associate Professor Pharmacology, Physiology & Toxicology PIES Seminar

Use of terms Assessments = Observations /measurements Evaluation = interpretations / conclusions

Uses of assessment Individual learner –Educational action: Feedback –Administrative action: Judgment on advancement Program –E.g., Sources of variance  Quality improvement –Accreditation

“Unit” of assessment Single interaction of student and content Series of encounters (observations by one teacher) Series of teachers (in a rotation) Series of teachers + exams (in a clerkship) Series of clerkship (in a department) Inter-clerkship (clinical year’s program)

PURPOSE (Why Assess) Meet goals and objectives? Were innovations successful? Determine program strengths and weaknesses –Unanticipated strengths and problems Growing interest in educational outcomes –“Residency programs should use outcome assessment in their evaluation of program educational effectiveness” 1 LCME, RRC require programmatic evaluation 1 1 Graduate Medical Education Directory,

PURPOSE (Why Assess) Competing goals of stakeholders –“Tension between delivering the service and ensuring time for reflection and learning” 2 Help obtain and/or justify resources for your program 2 Hayden, 2001

Goal Domains Standards Methods Data Evaluation & Interpretion Outcomes- based judgments Process: Assessment & Evaluation

What are stakeholders and who are they?

Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine Institutional Objectives Patient Care Students must be able to provide patient care that is compassionate, appropriate, and effective for the treatment of health problems and the promotion of health. Medical Knowledge Students must demonstrate knowledge of established and evolving biomedical, clinical, epidemiological and social-behavioral sciences, as well as the application of this knowledge to patient care. Practice-based Learning and Improvement Students must demonstrate the ability to investigate and evaluate their care of patients, to appraise and assimilate scientific evidence, and to continuously improve patient care based on constant self-evaluation and life-long learning.

Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine Institutional Objectives Interpersonal and Communication Skills Students must demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills that result in the effective exchange of information and collaboration with patients, their families, and health professionals. Professionalism Students must demonstrate a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities and an adherence to ethical principles. Systems-based Practice Students must demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care, as well as the ability to call effectively on other resources in the system to provide optimal health care.

Undergraduate Medical Education DURINGAFTER LogbooksSurveys HoursPlacing Graduates CritiquesSelf assessment Exit interviews Student portfolios Review of write-ups Site VisitWritten examsPerformance Evaluation Grades/narratives (4th year OSCE, mini-CEX) Attitudinal4th year medicine performance

Graduate Medical Education BEFOREDURING AFTER Self AssessmentLogsSurveys HoursPlacing Graduates Learner Critiques 360 Degree Evaluation Chart Review Exit interviews Attitudinal Written Exams Written ExamsWritten Exams Performance EvalPerformance EvalPerformance Eval GPADisciplinary Action NarrativesNarratives Research/Teaching Global Evaluation National Society Participation

StudentsFacultyCourses/Cler kships Overall Curriculum Who assesses? What is assessed? What methods are used? Who receives the assessment data collected? Who evaluates the assessment data collected? What decisions are made based on assessment data? Undergraduate Medical Education

StudentsFacultyCourses/Clerk ships Overall Curriculum Who assesses? FacultyStudents Faculty LCME What is assessed? KnowledgeTeachingCourse organization Course assessment data What methods are used? MCQSatisfaction survey USMLE Step I scores Who receives the assessment data collected? Course director Department chairCurriculum Committee Self-study committee Who evaluates the assessment data collected? Course director Department chairCurriculum Committee What decisions are made based on assessment data? GradePromotion Tenure Course changesCurriculum changes Undergraduate Medical Education

Graduate Medical Education ResidentsFacultyRotationsOverall Program Who assesses? What is assessed? What methods are used? Who receives the assessment data collected? Who evaluates the assessment data collected? What decisions are made based on assessment data?

Graduate Medical Education ResidentsFacultyRotationsOverall Program Who assesses? FacultyResidents Residency Review Committee What is assessed? Knowledge & Competencies Teaching Clinical productivity ComplaintsResident feedback What methods are used? MCQ Likert scales Satisfaction survey InformalResident interviews Competency Who receives the assessment data collected? Residency director Department chair Residency director Department chair Who evaluates the assessment data collected? Residency director & Faculty Department chair & Faculty Residency director Department chair What decisions are made based on assessment data? Remediation Promotion to next level Promotion Tenure Informal discussion with faculty recommending changes Accreditation

Pangaro HMI 07 Fairness Consistency Simplicity Principles of Assessment

Pangaro HMI 07 Principle 1 : Fairness to society : competence (P/F) to students : transparency and feedback to teachers : faculty development and protection

Principle 2 : Consistency Validity -Are you measuring what you want? Reliability - Inter-teacher and inter-clerkship: suitable for high- stakes decisions? Pangaro HMI 07

X X X X X X X X Reliable X X X X X X X X X X X Valid Reliability versus validity

Pangaro HMI 07 Principle 3: Simplicity How we frame the question? How we ask the question? How do we use the answer?

Pangaro HMI 07 Strategy Simplicity leads to acceptance and use Acceptance leads to consistency Consistency = fairness

Pangaro HMI 07 Framing the question simply What do we expect of learners (students)? How do we communicate this to them and to their teachers?

In order to get the information you need from an assessment and evaluate the results, you have to ask the right questions.

Pangaro HMI 07 Find the person nearest you. Person to the left is “A”. Person A: In 30 seconds tell the person nearest you what it takes to pass a course/clerkship you are familiar with. How is this assessed? Person B: In 30 seconds tell the person nearest you what it takes to get the highest grade in a course/clerkship you are familiar with. How is this assessed? Exercise

Discussion Based on the information you have: Are you able to determine your assessment system’s strengths and weaknesses? Can you determine whether the system has met the required levels of success for the purpose? Is it clear how your own program evaluation system will be assessed?