This session will begin with a discussion of strategies to ensure appropriate identification and interventions for ELLs as well as teacher resources. Strategies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
English as a Second Language Program at the Secondary Level Peg OGrady, Supervisor of Pupil Services.
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Understanding the English Proficiency Levels of ELLs Catawba County Schools
Haw Creek ESOL Program Ms. Kim Bolivar.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
ESL Program Evaluation Presented by: Allegheny Intermediate Unit K-12 ESL Department Title III Grant.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
ELL Program Radnor Township School District. The Koi Fish Story A favorite fish among many hobbyists is the Japanese carp, commonly known as the koi.
LPAC overview - Fall 2004 The Language Assessment Process in Texas  LPAC, Language Assessment Proficiency Committee  ARD is the Admissions, Review and.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Educating Students with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) and English Language Learners (ELL) Leonard Shurin, Curriculum and Staff Developer for IU8.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Daniel Boone Area School District English as a Second Language (ESL) Program.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Language Proficiency Assessment Committee
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Continuing dominance of “language of instruction” debate.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for English Language Learners (ELLs) Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau of Teaching Learning and.
Teacher Institute Day August 20, 2012 Lincoln Elementary School.
Copyright of PEN Connecting the Dots: The Evaluation Process, the Development of the IEP & Monitoring for Progress Parent Education Network 2107.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
PREPARED BY DR. HAROLD SMITH EDAD 5399 Bilingual/ESL Education.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Educational Leadership & ELLs Presented By: Reyna P. Hernandez Research and Policy Associate Latino Policy Forum
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
SIOP Overview Humble ISD Sara Smith-Frings. ELLs in Humble I.S.D. Fall 2001 ELL 1226 Fall 2002 ELL 1438 Fall 2003 ELL 1578 Fall 2004 ELL 1750 Fall 2005.
NC DPI WEBINAR APRIL 24, 2012 Title III Application
THE PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURES OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Chapter 2.
ESOL Program (English for Speakers of Other Languages) in Greenwood District Questions and Answers Updated July 2015.
Spotlight on Practice: The English Language Learner SES Spring 2010 And Special Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Collaboration of Interventions: ESL, RTI, and BBSST August 31, 2009.
Questions and Answers.  Gwd 50 has over 1,000 ESOL students; each school has ESOL students.  ESOL is a federal program under Title III legislation.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Directions: This is a Power Point presentation about ESL. The information is used for staff development and there is a short quiz at the end.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University September 24, 2015.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K–12 Overview Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division. Joanna.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
ELL 101 Stephanie Johnson, LPSD38 ELL Coordinator.
Identifying and Supporting English Learners with
Understanding the IEP Process
Please check, just in case…
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Week 3 The IEP Process.
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Dr. Jacqueline C. Ellis, NBCT November 7, 2017
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
ESL : 101 Jeopardy Vocabulary Language Acquisition
English Learners in NC schools (ESSA, Title III)
LIEPing to Excellence for ELs
August 5, 2015 – Proposal Level
Presentation transcript:

This session will begin with a discussion of strategies to ensure appropriate identification and interventions for ELLs as well as teacher resources. Strategies to ensure effective participation in the IEP team will be discussed as well as the role of the educator, ESL specialist, and parent. Finally, extensive resources will be shared regarding necessary and supplemental services for ELLs with Special Needs. Outreach Strategies for ELLs with Special Needs Jessica Mazzoli, Video Conference Patty Gieschen, CCIU Room 404

Identification See ESL Flow Chart HLS: Home Language Survey – Based on the responses to the home language survey (HLS), students must be assessed for potential placement in a program unless they meet the criteria outlined below. – LEAs must use the WIDA ACCESS PLACEMENT TEST (W- APT ), which is aligned to the required annual State ELP assessment, ACCESS for ELLs, to assess students for placement in language instructional programs for ELLs. – Instructional placement of ELLs must be age and grade appropriate. Additionally, ELLs must be given equal access to all educational programs, opportunities, and extra curricular activities in the same manner as for all students.

Identification See Characteristics of ELLs ER: Evaluation Report – Other information should indicate native language and ESL status – Parent input must be provided – Assessment information, input from teachers and service providers – Determining Factors Limited English proficiency. Provide evidence: A student cannot be found to have a disability if lack of achievement is due to limited English proficiency. In this section, provide an explanation that limited English proficiency has not been a factor in the student’s involvement and progress in the general education curriculum, even with appropriate support from a bilingual/ESL program. Deficiencies in English for second language learners are not related to intellectual ability. Those students whose English skills suggest that they would not be expected to achieve age and state- approved grade level standards should not be identified as students with disabilities. – Summary of Findings includes present proficiency level Gathered from ACCESS, W-APT and other assessment tools – SLD extended form Limited English proficiency Federal laws indicate that all students must be screened to determine if their primary language is other than English. If so, the student's proficiency in the English language (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) must be assessed by school personnel. Research has indicated that students who are English language learners (ELLs) take approximately two years to acquire basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS) and between five and seven years to acquire the cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP) that is required to function effectively in content subjects. Students who are in the process of learning English often will display academic deficiencies, especially if their education has been disrupted during an immigration experience. Similarly, ELLs may be particularly at risk for lack of instruction issues if interventions that address language issues have not been appropriately provided. Delays in the acquisition of academic skills that are the result of limited English proficiency are contraindications of SLD. Students must not be identified as eligible for special education when the cause for academic inadequacies is Limited English Proficiency.

Considerations See Considerations list SLD EXTENDED FORM: Annotations available from PATTAN – Federal laws indicate that all students must be screened to determine if their primary language is other than English. If so, the student's proficiency in the English language (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) must be assessed by school personnel. Research has indicated that students who are English language learners (ELLs) take approximately two years to acquire basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS) and between five and seven years to acquire the cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP) that is required to function effectively in content subjects. Students who are in the process of learning English often will display academic deficiencies, especially if their education has been disrupted during an immigration experience. Similarly, ELLs may be particularly at risk for lack of instruction issues if interventions that address language issues have not been appropriately provided. Delays in the acquisition of academic skills that are the result of limited English proficiency are contraindications of SLD. Students must not be identified as eligible for special education when the cause for academic inadequacies is Limited English Proficiency – Also includes cultural information See Cultural Differences Handout TURN AND TALK

Identification Service Delivery Model: – The LEA must support instructional planning and evaluation efforts between the ESL /Bilingual teachers and the content-area teachers by providing common planning time as appropriate. – Delivery can vary according to student need from direct service to consultative service to monitoring. – The academic program for an ELL with a disability must consider ESL just as it must consider any other general curriculum services available to non- disabled students. Programmatic decisions regarding ELLs with disabilities should be made by the IEP team with appropriate representation. It is not appropriate for an ELL with a disability to be denied access to general curriculum including an English language instructional program as defined above. Special education services do not replace an English language instructional program.

Interventions See Giving Directions SDI: Specially Designed Instruction – See list of considerations Accommodations – ACCESS guidelines School resources and personnel Out of school resources TURN AND TALK

Component Parts of LIEP Language Instruction Educational Program outlined by PDE Identification and placement Instructional model Planned instruction – ESL – Content areas Exit and monitoring Assessment and grading Parent communication and involvement Professional development Data reporting Funding

IEP TEAM ROLES ESL Specialist – Observations and assessments Parent – IEP meeting and meaning Interpreter/Translator – Format

IEP IEP Components: – Special Considerations – Present Levels of Performance – Participation in Assessments – Specially Designed Instruction – Supports for School Personnel – Other

RESOURCES See Jessica’s Handouts La Comunidad Hispana Project Salud Community Volunteers in Medicine Chester County MHIDD Chester County CYF PDE/PATTAN Guardianship in PA Migrant Education Lauren’s House Spanish Health Ministry Holcomb Behavioral Health