University Accreditation AQIP Update November 2, 2011 Christa Walck Associate Provost.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
AQIP ACTION PROJECTS AQIP Action Project Community Forum Mott Community College.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Presentation to Faculty Senate January 13, 2014 Partnering Academics and Community Engagement (PACE)
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September.
Enrollment Management Overview Faculty Senate Fall 2009.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
University Accreditation Open Forum April 7, 2011 Christa Walck Professor & Assistant Provost.
Tech-Talks AQIP: Improving the Diversity of the Faculty September 29, – 5pm.
EXCELLENCE AT CAROLINA SACS REAFFIRMATION PROCESS APRIL 2007 Making Critical Connections Quality Enhancement Plan Annual Report #1.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
DRAFTFall ’08 / Spring ’09 Undergoing significant revision and expansion. Strategic Plan Draft October 1, 2008 Fall ’08/Spring ’09 Undergoing significant.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
First Choice Graduate Programs First Choice Programs Consultation and Review Processes.
Human Capital Management Assessment Joe Burt Director, HRM March 31, 2004.
College of Basic and Applied Sciences Advising/Retention Report.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
April 26, 2012 ISPC Meeting INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION AT EMU.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Balanced Scorecard Update August 9, 2010 Carrie Ahern, Director of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
AQIP ACADEMIC QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Higher Learning Commission’s Program for Systematic Improvement and Continuing Accreditation.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Action Planning Assess, Plan and Perform Melissa Spears Business Advisory Services.
Academic Affairs Committee of the Radford University Board of Visitors Laura Jacobsen Faculty Senate President November 8, 2012.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
Convocation Week 2008 Strategic & Academic Action Planning Update.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
In existence since 1981, the Commission for Women identifies areas of concern to women employees and students of Penn State, and suggests changes in existing.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.
Strategies for building community among students, and the impact of those strategies on STEM retention. Discussion topics include strategies aimed at critical.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
May, 2010 Southeast Technical Institute, Sioux Falls, SD.
Purdue University Calumet Faculty Convocation Fall 05 Purdue University Calumet Faculty Convocation Fall 05 Academic Affairs Current Status and Goals for.
INTEGRATED STEM INITIATIVE ON THE SOUTH PLAINS NSF INNOVATION THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION AT TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY.
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
University of Minnesota Metrics Framework Working Document: 3/18/2010 Extraordinary Education – Recruit, educate, challenge, and graduate outstanding students.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity The University of Texas at El Paso April 2004 Evelyn Posey, Department of English Libby.
The road to excellence : Transforming undergraduate education at UF Board of Trustees June Daniel A. Wubah Office of Undergraduate Academic Affairs.
Pulaski Technical College Accreditation Overview November 19,
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
Presentation transcript:

University Accreditation AQIP Update November 2, 2011 Christa Walck Associate Provost

Criteria For Accreditation 1.Mission and Integrity 2.Preparing for the Future 3.Student Learning and Effective Teaching 4.Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge 5.Engagement and Service

AQIP Categories 1.Helping Students Learn 2.Accomplishing Other Distinctive Objectives 3.Understanding Students’ and other Stakeholders’ Needs 4.Valuing People 5.Leading and Communicating 6.Supporting Institutional Operations 7.Measuring Effectiveness 8.Planning Continuous Improvement 9.Building Collaborative Relationships

Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Action Projects – One-year cycle – 3 or more Action Projects – Annual updates Accreditation – Seven-year cycle – Check-up Visit – Reaffirmation of Accreditation Strategy – Four-year cycle – Systems Portfolio 2009 Systems Portfolio – Systems Appraisal Systems Appraisal – Strategy Forum

Michigan Tech AQIP Timeline Acceptance to AQIP May Initial Strategy Forum March Institutional Data Update April Start Action Projects June Action Project Updates Sept Feedback on Action Project Updates Oct Systems Portfolio Submission June Systems Appraisal Feedback & Summary Sept Strategy Forum March Quality Checkup Visit Reaffirmation of Accreditation

AQIP Quality Check-up Visit March 14-16, 2012 Evaluators: – Dr. Charles F. Harrington, II Provost & Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs University of North Carolina – Pembroke – Ms. Kathryn DeBoer Director of Institutional Research Minneapolis Community and Technical College

Completed Action Projects Title Michigan Tech Title AQIP Kickoff Date Expected Completion Date Status Improving the Diversity of the Faculty June 1, 2006Sept 18, 2008Completed Learning Space Enhancement Classroom and Facilities Upgrade Plan June 1, 2006Sept 24, 2008Completed Comprehensive University Space Inventory Process June 1, 2006Oct 3, 2008Completed Carbon NeutralCarbon Counting June 1, 2007Sept 14, 2010Completed Academic Advising Enhancement April 3, 2009April 2011Completed International Experience Improving the Processes Associated with International Experience April 6, 2009September 2011Completed

Active Action Projects Title Michigan Tech Title AQIP Kickoff Date Expected Completion Date Status Gender Diversity Increase Gender Diversity of Faculty & Students Sept 20, 2010Sept 20, 2012Active Professional Development Create a systematic employee development process October 12, 2010May 31, 2012Active Student Success Improving Undergraduate Student Success September 2011September 2012Active

AQIP Project: Academic Advising Academic Advising Council Assessment of Advising: – Requirements for graduation – Advising processes & delivery Advisor resources: – Expectations for Advisors Expectations for Advisors – Website, handbook, FAQs, resource map Website, handbook, FAQs, resource map – Training – Banner & Degree Audit Reporting System – Workshops - English as a Second Language

AQIP Project: International Experience Study Abroad 1.Faculty International Academic Coordinator – Marika Seigel, Assistant Professor (Humanities) – will implement a consistent process for faculty-led study abroad programs. 2.Departments whose faculty offer summer study abroad can now capture 2/3 of all tuition (in-state and out-of-state) for program expenses. 3.All programs which involve Michigan Tech students in international travel and study require standard documentation, insurance and a briefing.

AQIP Project: Increasing Gender Diversity of Faculty & Students Develop processes and practices that will increase the gender diversity of faculty and students. Goal 1: 35% of all students (graduate and undergraduate) at Michigan Tech will be women by 2020 Goal 2: Top 10 for number of engineering undergraduate degrees granted to women Goal 3: Exceed national average for women faculty and students in STEM disciplines

AQIP Project: Increasing Gender Diversity of Faculty & Students Five interrelated projects: 1.Communication campaign: Develop and communicate gender/diversity goals to all stakeholders.Communication campaign: Develop and communicate gender/diversity goals to all stakeholders. 2.Improve brand awareness of Michigan Tech among females in external environment. 3.Improve processes for recruiting and mentoring female faculty (NSF ADVANCE Grant)NSF ADVANCE Grant 4.Improve processes for recruiting female students. 5.Improve processes for advising and mentoring female students.

AQIP Project: Professional Development Develop, implement and continuously evaluate a system that supports and encourages professional development and provides all employees with opportunities to improve their knowledge, skills and abilities. 1.Core training for all supervisors - HR policies and procedures, recruiting and hiring, performance management, day-to-day supervision, legal issues, and continuous improvement. 2.Leadership Academy - transitioning from supervisor to leader and continuous improvement using lean principles; cohort of 20 supervisors.

NEW AQIP Project: Improving Student Success Assess undergraduate student success using metrics for student retention grade distribution graduation rate time to degree placement high impact practices  undergraduate research  study abroad

AQIP Project: Improving Student Success Review metrics and associated goals to determine whether we have achieved them. Benchmark with peer institutions and Michigan public universities to evaluate whether these goals are appropriate and consistent with our mission and learning goals. Identify systems, processes and practices which have a critical impact on student success Select two processes or practices for a follow-up Action Project to improve student success.

AQIP Project: Improving Student Success Outcome Measures Alignment of student success goals with university strategic plan. Meeting goals for student success metrics. Identification of two critical processes for improvement. Collaboration between Academic and Student Affairs.

Task Force on Blended and Technology-Rich Teaching/Learning Environment & Support Systems Articulate a clear vision and direction for teaching/learning environment and support systems at Michigan Tech. A successful environment for blended and technology-rich teaching/learning will serve students and faculty both on and off campus, expand educational delivery systems for distance learning, and provide Information Technology Services with the guidance it needs to acquire and support technology resources that serve teaching and learning.

Task Force on Blended and Technology-Rich Teaching/Learning Environment & Support Systems

Assessment of Student Learning AQIP Category 1 = Helping Students Learn University Student Learning Goals NSSE 2012 student survey - indirect measure College of Sciences & Arts – Developing program learning goals – Planning for spring 2012 assessment

THANK YOU! Provost webpage: Feel free to contact me and give me feedback on AQIP projects and assessment. Christa Walck