+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
AEP Texas Energy Efficiency / Demand Response Programs Russell G. Bego, EE/DR Coordinator AEP Texas September 24, 2014.
Home Area Networks …Expect More Mohan Wanchoo Jasmine Systems, Inc.
| March 26, 2013 National Summit on Integrating Energy Efficiency & Smart Grid HEMS and Smart Meter Integration.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
SGIG Consumer Engagement Experience: The Sequel National Town Meeting on Demand Response & Smart Grid July 11 th, 2013 Shawn Enterline, Vermont Energy.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Central Vermont Public Service Recognized by Forbes as One of the Most Trustworthy Companies in America Introduction to CVPS Smart Grid Project:
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Overview of ARRA-Funded SGIG Consumer Behavior Studies Peter Cappers (LBNL) A National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid July 11, LBNL.
1 SMUD’s Small Business Summer Solutions Pilot: Behavioral response of small commercial customers to DR programs (with PCTs) Karen Herter, Ph.D. Associate.
SmartMeter Program Overview Jana Corey Director, Energy Information Network Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
Home Electricity Monitor. What is ? TED = The Energy Detective Home Electricity Monitor Installs in the breaker panel Displays real time electricity information.
Herbert E. Hirschfeld, P.E. and Joseph S. Lopes Applied Energy Group, Inc. Metering America 2005 April 13, 2005 Submetering Case Studies with Load Management.
What Drives the Response in Demand Response? Craig Boice Boice Dunham Group Metering, Billing, CRM/CIS America 2005 Las Vegas, Nevada April 13, 2005 BOICE.
Presentation Overview
Smart Metering in ERCOT: Implementation Update CCET Board of Directors Meeting August 3, 2011 Presented by Christine Wright, Competitive Markets Division.
BPA Pre-Pilot, Monmouth  14 homes with installed DHP, single zone, single compressor.  11 Monmouth, 2 Moses Lake, 1 Tacoma  Savings.
HOME ENERGY USAGE REPORTS: DOES INCREASED FEEDBACK LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT ENERGY REDUCTIONS AND REDUCED COSTS? NASUCA MID YEAR MEETING JUNE 25, 2012 Ricky.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
1 SmartMeter™ Delivering Customer Benefits Jana Corey Director, Policy Planning Integrated Demand-side Management Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Getting ready for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Paper by : Rajesh Nimare Presented by : Prashant Sharma.
TOU for Tenants: Pay for What and When you Use Electricity J. Lopes; AEIC Load Research Conference – Myrtle Beach, SC; July TOU for Tenants: Pay.
Future of Smart Metering Kansas Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Conference September 26, 2007.
Efficiency and Demand Response NARUC Washington, DC February 14, 2006 Steve Specker President & CEO.
Honey, I’m Home - How Are Electricity Prices for Tomorrow? Lawrence Kotewa Project Manager, Community Energy Cooperative April 13, 2005 Community Energy.
Energate: Leaders in Consumer Demand Response ENERGATE: AN ONTARIO CASE STUDY A fully integrated 2.0 Smart Grid… with Ontario Consumers.
Innovative approach to DSM through Open Access Jayant Deo MD & CEO, Indian Energy Exchange
© 2009 IBM Corporation Smart Grid Research Consortium Customer Operations Transformation Global E&U Industry January 2011.
Reshaping Utility/ Consumer Relationships MEC October 5, 2010 Pinehurst, NC Penni McLean-Conner.
Smart Grid Research Consortium November 9, DM Goals/Objectives User adoption & consumer engagement Prove consumer behavioral change Prove consumer.
Team Intelli-heat: Guilherme Aguiar, Sissi Du, Karan Goel, Marty Johnson, Soshi Kumamoto, Robert Murphy, Steven Near, Andrea Odle, Matt Staniszwski, David.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Policy Breakout Kevin, David, Chris, and Jay. What are the required policy shifts for more load shifting, renewables integration, and other LoCal goals?
March 25, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
EMV Results for online Energy Education Study conducted by Lei Wang, PhD October 2011.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Towards smart and energy efficient systems Vida Rozite The Role of Standardization for Smart Grids in Realizing Their Energy-Efficiency.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
The Power of Data October 2013 Abhay Gupta 1.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Leverage Smart Grid Technology into Tangible Results
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program Josh Schellenberg DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop.
1 BGE Smart Energy Pricing Program: Update to Maryland Public Service Commission April 23, 2008 Wayne Harbaugh VP – Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well

Presentation transcript:

+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment Workshop May 22, 2012

+ Smart Grid Elements 2

+ What does the “Smart Grid” do for customers? 1. Real-time Information Improves understanding of energy use 2. Time-based Incentives Accurately rewards energy management behaviors 3. End-use Automation (cost-effectiveness) Simplifies energy management by customer or utility 3

+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies Monitor energy use site or appliance Display electricity prices Estimate energy costs Notify customers of utility price or event signals Automate response to utility price or event signals Centralize customer control of appliance activity

+ 1. Real-time Information Customers want personalized information & advice Smart Meters = DATA TO UTILITY Improved customer service by bill, phone or Internet Customer load shapes  personalized recommendations Program EVs, spas, and pool pumps for off-peak Install more efficient AC unit Offer free site visits for outliers? Energy Displays = DATA TO CUSTOMERS Many potential applications Real-time household electricity use Customer-specific electricity pricing Bill calculators with “what-if” scenarios Event notification Via mobile app, PC, or thermostat display 5

+ Bill Comparison 6 Start Date7/12/2011End Date8/10/2011 Standard Rate: RSG Sherlock Holmes Billing Month: August221B Baker Street Account Number: Folsom, CA Summary Bill Comparison Critical Peak Days This Month Thursday, July 21, 2011Standard Bill$96.71 Thursday, July 28, 2011Summer Solutions Bill$77.42 Congratulations you saved 19.9% on your bill:$19.29 Plus you earned from Auto Temp Control:$8.00 Total savings this month:$27.29 Your Bill on Standard Rate Bill Component Monthly KWh Price per kWhCharges Base Usage700$0.1045$73.15 Base-Plus Usage88$0.1859$16.36 Electricity Use Subtotals788$0.1136$89.51 System Infrastructure Fixed Charge$7.20 Standard Rate Charges$96.71 Your Bill on Summer Solutions Rate Bill Component Monthly KWh Price per kWhCharges Off-Peak Base Usage700$0.0721$50.47 Off-Peak Base-Plus Usage46$0.1411$6.49 On Peak Usage38$0.27$10.26 Critical Peak Usage4$0.75$3.00 Electricity Use Subtotals788$0.0891$70.22 Summer Solutions Rate Charges788$77.42 Summer Solutions rate participants received a Bill Comparison Report, showing bill savings or losses compared to what they would have paid on the Standard rate

+ PC Energy Display 7

+ 8

+ Thermostat Energy Display 9 Screen with instantaneous kW and daily kWh Scroll through appliances one at a time for Appliance group Can be made default screen

+ 2. Time-Based Rates Rewards are directly proportional to actions TOU-CPP rates have been found to be particularly effective especially when paired with thermostatic automation Added benefit of daily peak load reduction (not shown here) 10 N = number of studies

+ 11 Example TOU-CPP Rate

+ 3. End-use Automation More cost-effective when paired with time-based rates Rate structure determines the technology Time-of-use rates  Programmable thermostats & timers Dynamic pricing  Communicating thermostats & switches Provide technology assistance and financing options Rebates where cost-effective Options to purchase, rent, or borrow technologies Assistance with installation and use Market determines technology form factors & features Standard protocols to enable plug and play technologies Ideally utilities recommend, customers choose 12

+ Putting it all together… Information + time-based rates + automation 13 Both energy and peak load savings on non-event days Significant load shed during events, with some pre-cooling and rebound Even a small percentage of participating customers (10-20%) could have a substantial effect on the system load shape

+ Information isn’t enough those with information only didn’t do much 14 Values in bold indicate a statistically significant difference from “Neither option” Statistically significant kW savings over ATC -3% -9% -10% -8% -8% -36% -53% -58% -8% -23% -24% “Neither option” = information only Peak and event load reductions greatest for Dynamic Rate

+ Information enhances savings but those without real-time information do well too 15

+ Studies Currently In Progress ARRA SGIG Consumer Behavior Studies 16

+ Thank you! Information in this presentation based on: 2008 Small Business Summer Solutions Study report 2010 Residential information & controls technology review 2010 Residential focus group summary 2011 Residential Summer Solutions Study report To download these and other reports visit: 17

+ 18 Contact info: Karen Herter Herter Energy Research Solutions