Jelena Pešić The Republic Institute for Social Protection Belgrade, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Foster families in Republic Macedonia Elka Todorova Ministry of Labor and Social Policy.
Advertisements

Mandates of Statutory Services and Case Management
Community based services for children at risk in Albania dAdA.
Micha LisaninSofia, Bulgaria, July Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labour and Social Policy Costing Methodology of Social Welfare in Child Protection.
Child Welfare Reform in Albania Marieta Zaçe Deputy Minister of Labor, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Albania Sofia 3-6 July 2007.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor and Social Policy GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROTOCOL ON CHILD PROTECTION FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT.
Roadmap for Future Reforms Serbia Ljiljana Lucic, State Secretary, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy Sofia, July 2007.
UNICEFs contribution to the reform Perspectives on child protection Dita Reichenberg, Regional Advisor, Child Protection, CEE/CIS.
Achievements and Challenges in De-institutionalization of Children below 3 years in Georgia Sofia 2012 Ministry of Labor Health and Social Affairs of Georgia.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
CHILDREN UNDER THREE YEARS IN FORMAL CARE IN CEE/CIS COUNTRIES THE BIG PICTURE IN THE REGION Presentation by Jean-Claude Legrand Senior Regional Advisor.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
[LOGO] CAMPAIGN FOR CHILDREN Our children are our future. Join our campaign to invest in our children and our future.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor, Employment, Veterans and Social Affairs Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor,
Government of Montenegro Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare ZERO PROJECT CONFERENCE 2015 VIENNA FEBRUARY 2015 INNOVATIVE POLICIES AND INNOVATIVE.
1 MINISTRY OF FAMILY AND SOCIAL POLICY OF TURKEY THE RIGHT OF CHILDREN TO LIVE IN A CARING AND SUPPORTIVE FAMILY ENVIRONMENT: EXAMPLES FROM CENTRAL AND.
Social Inclusion of Children with Disabilities – Russian Federation Joanna Rogers, UNICEF September 2011.
I NVESTING IN CHILDREN - EU INSTRUMENTS AND FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES Policy responses and reforms in Bulgaria to support children and families 31 October.
“PREVENTIVE MEASURES FOR REDUCING THE PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN IN INSTITUTIONAL CARE” REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Ministry of Social Policy and Youth.
THE RANGE OF PLACEMENTS An Overview of the California Foster Care System.
RE-DIRECTING RESOURCES AND STIMULATING DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES – THE CASE OF SERBIA.
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR, FAMILY AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR, FAMILY, SOCIAL AFFAIRS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES.
The introduction of social workers in the primary health care system and its impact on the reduction of baby abandonment in Kazakhstan 10 September 2014,
ETHICS AND DISABILITY Susan Fox Project Director Institute on Disability/UNH May 23, 2006.
Care Act Norfolk Older Peoples Strategic Partnership Board 18 June 2014 Janice Dane, Assistant Director Prevention and Transformation.
Child Care Systems Reforms In Eastern Europe and Central Asia Why we need to focus on children below three years Sofia conference November 2012 Jean-Claude.
HOW SOCIAL CHANGES AFFECT THE SOCIAL WORK IN BULGARIA National Development Agency, Berlin, International Conference, 15th May 2014 With financial support.
CHILD WELFARE REFORMS: HOW?
Key priorities, challenges and opportunities to advance the agenda for children in middle income countries of CIS, Eastern and Southern Europe Yuri Oksamitniy.
Social Services Administration of the Daugavpils City Council 2012.
1 DEPARTMENT FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL INSURANCE Department for Social Inclusion.
The Well-Being of Children in North Dakota Highlights from the North Dakota KIDS COUNT 2011 Fact Book 1 North Dakota KIDS COUNT.
Normative regulation at national and local level for Roma inclusion Primaria Orasului Cernavoda.
Social Services in Czech Republic David Urban. Social Services Since law of social services This law changed: –A) the method of payment for care.
Child Care Systems Reforms In Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Why we need to focus on children below three years October 2012 Jean-Claude Legrand Regional.
Department of Children and Families Autism Services Jan Nisenbaum Deputy Commissioner Clinical and Professional Services.
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR, FAMILY AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS LONG - TERM CARE INSURANCE THE CASE OF SLOVENIA November 2012.
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
Financing and planning of resources in the best interest of the child in the child care system Zhumazhan Zhukenov Chairperson of the Child Rights Protection.
 Low educational attainment  Lone parents  Unemployment  Family Breakdown  Loss of partner/spouse/parent/s  Addictions  Disability – physical and.
From de-institutionalization towards an inclusive society for all: Outcomes and challenges regarding the rights of children with intellectual disabilities.
Donor Coordination Forum 16 October, key challenges Poverty Social exclusion Functional gaps and system weaknesses in social services.
Child Care Subsidy: What Providers Should Know Presenter: Francie Ray Area Manager Audubon Child Care Assistance.
LOCAL SOCIAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN IN SERBIA Ivana Koprivica Tatjana Lazor Obradovic Rada Mitrovic Provincial Institute of Social Welfare Autonomous Province.
De-institutionalization & social inclusion Lessons learned, remaining challenges and steps to accelerate the reform in CEE/CIS.
Redistribution of Resources in the Process of De-institutionalization Halyna Postoliuk Director of “Hope & Homes for Children” in Ukraine Chisinau November.
Closing Institutions Romania’s case Infant Homes = 9,309 children 58 Infant Homes = 9,309 children 230 Children Homes = 35,165 children 230 Children.
Search wearelumos.org. Lumos model for deinstitutionalisation: improving the lives of marginalised children Forum on Investing in Young.
KATEŘINA ČAPUTOVÁ (SAD) Social system in the Czech Republic.
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar Corporate Parenting Seminar Tuesday 16 December 2008 Looked After Children and Young People: Corporate Parenting.
Family and Child Support Services Breakout Session 3 Building and Reforming Child Care Systems Bishkek, May 2009.
Investing in Children’s services - Improving outcomes across Europe 26 November 2015, Paris, ChildONEurope seminar esn-eu.org.
FOSTER CARE SERVICES Replicating Hope for Children Prepared by Wes Salsbury Foster Care Replication Committee.
Reform example: Micro- or mezzo level planning for de- institutionalization Viktor Yakzhik Head of the Department of Social and Educational Work of the.
Transition of Youth with Disabilities from School to Labour Market Ljubljana, This project has been funded with support from the European.
Athens Institute for Education and Research Social Sciences Research Division Research Unit of Sociology 8 th Annual International Conference on Sociology.
Safe Families Intro Personal Introduction Tangentyere Council Safe Families Model Strengths Weaknesses Lessons learned.
C4A-MD Program: transforming social care for persons with mental disabilities Ludmila Malcoci, PHD KHSIMA Executive Director Ministry of Labor, Social.
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health Knowledge for welfare and healthKyiv March 22, Round Table on Discussion of the Project.
1 Ministry of Social Protection, Family and Child 27 th September 2007.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 19 – Social Policy and Employment.
Recent development in Montenegro Non confirmed provisions of the modified t he European Social Charter Reference to the articles 7. and 30. Ministry of.
The reorganization of Centre for Social Welfare and Social Welfare Reform in Serbia Prof dr. Nevenka Zegarac Department of Social Work and Social Policy.
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR, FAMILY AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS LONG - TERM CARE INSURANCE THE CASE OF SLOVENIA November 2012.
SOCIAL PROTECTION AND INCLUSION IN KAZAKHSTAN 22 June 2016, Almaty.
Deinstitutionalization – “Still muddling, not yet through” Goals, Pitfalls, Learning, Challenges Radostina Paneva Andro Dadiani SOS Children`s Villages.
Danilo Vukovic Belgrade University
Viola Läänerand Head of Development Unit Child Protection Department
Component 1 Study Visit The Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, its responsibilities and subordinate authorities Pavel Janeček, Head of the International.
Presentation transcript:

Jelena Pešić The Republic Institute for Social Protection Belgrade, 2013

Basic facts about country EU membership candidate Total population – 7,120,666 Children – 17.6% Upper-middle income country facing considerable social cost of the economic crisis: Unemployment rate – 26% (2012), 50% among young people Poverty – increased from 2008 to 2010: General population - from 6.1 to 9.2% Children – 7.3 to 13.7% Number of families receiving social cash benefits is constantly rising KEY FACT > 8.8% population benefit from Social Welfare System

Key regulations Social Welfare Law – 2011 Family Law – 2005 Law on financial assistance to families with children – 2009

Mainstream of the reform Licensing of professionals and service providers introduced Service quality standardization established Plurality of service providers guaranteed Special-purpose funds introduced to support less developed municipalities Transformation of residential institutions and development of alternative models of family support Banning institutional placement for children age 0-3 Residential capacity of individual institutions limited up to 50 users Development of foster care Better and wider protection of abused and neglected children Social Welfare Law adopted in 2011.

Child care system CENTRAL LOCAL CASH BENEFITS: Social allowance Disability allowance Child allowance Maternity leave allowance Parental allowance STATUTORY SERVICES: Foster care Residential care One-of cash payments Preschool allowance for children from economically vulnerable families Community based services (Day care centers, Home care, Shelters, Supported housing, ) Counseling-therapeutic and social-educational services MULTISECTORAL APPROACHES

Social welfare/child care system 140 Social Work Centers Among 85 Institutions 19 residential care for children and youth : 11 residential care for children and youth, 5 residential care for children and youth with disabilities, 3 institutions for children and youth with behavioral problems 5 Regional centers for fostering and adoption Government Ministry LESP Republic Institute for Social Protection

Local social services Present in 137 (out of 175) local communities > 33 different types of local social services 15 types of services are intend to children and youth 9 types of services for adults and seniors and 9 types of services are equally used by all age groups of users, and those services are classified as services for family

Serbia Residential care for children and youth Residential care for children and youth with disabilities Institutions for children and youth with behavioral problems Regional centers for fostering and adopting

The main facts Number of children and youth in residential care decreased by 48% in 2000 – 2011 period Serbia is now among the countries with the lowest rate of institutionalization in Europe Out of the total number of children separated from their biological families around 80% are placed in foster care

Children and youth in formal care

Basic characteristics of residential care Majority of children and youth came from biological families (50%) and from other institutions(30%) - Dominant reason for accommodation are inadequate parental care (around 50%) - More then 20% leave institition for chlidren and youth able to live independetly - Around 20% are moved back in biological families - 19% moved to foster care families - Period of stay in institutions: 22% is 2 – 3 years, 14% stay 8 to 10 years - Half of the children are without contact with their families and close relatives - Children are placed in institutions far away from their families

Summary More than 170 services for children available at local level Services for children with disability in 65% of all municipalities – day care centers in 70 municipalities, home care in 37 municipalities… Community based services 4 institutions closed; remaining 19 are being downsized and transformed to provide new services (shelters, day- care centers, supported living, respite care, high-quality small group homes for children with complex disability) 70% of institutions have capacity for residential placement in line with the new law (less than 50 users) Residential institutions 5 Regional centers for fostering and adoption established and fully operational 3 new Centers planed for early 2014 More than foster families certified Fostering

Professional challenges Create and develop new and upgrade existing services for family support Remove adults (young adults) from institutions for children and youth and ensure adequate residental care Incerase number and territorial coverage of local social srevices for children and youth Develop cross-sector cooperation (Social welfare with Education system and Health care) Better knowledge on issues and needs of families at risk provided to general public Improve competence structure and increase total number of professionals working with children and families

Thank you Republic Institute for Social Protection Terazije 34, Belgrade