CBIIT’s Roadmap: A Look Ahead Caterina E.M. Lasome, PhD, MBA, RN, CPHIMS Chief Operating Officer Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Perspective of Healthy People 2020 Penelope Slade-Sawyer, P.T., M.S.W. HHS Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 18 th Annual Healthy.
Advertisements

Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
UC BRAID: Co-creating and evaluating performance in a regional laboratory for conducting translational science UC BRAID Executive Committee: Steven Dubinett.
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
CUHP Cambridge University Health Partners (CUHP) unites a world-leading University and three high- performing NHS Foundation Trusts centred on the Cambridge.
Bringing Technology to the Rural Hospital Rural Telecon ‘07 October 17, 2007.
EVALUATION OVERVIEW: Key Questions and Roles Mary L. Fennell, Ph.D. (EOC Chair) Professor and Chair, Brown University June 19, 2007.
Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program Process & Outcome Evaluation Amanda Greene, PhD, MPH, RN Paul Young, MBA, MPH Natalie Stultz, MS NOVA Research.
July 3, 2015 New HIE Capabilities Enable Breakthroughs In Connected And Coordinated Care Delivery. January 8, 2015 Charissa Fotinos.
What is “Biomedical Informatics”?. Biomedical Informatics Biomedical informatics (BMI) is the interdisciplinary field that studies and pursues.
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
Institute of Cancer Research - Institut du cancer ICR’s Activities in Cancer Imaging.
Evaluation and Policy in Transforming Nursing
EVOLVING PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE LANDSCAPE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CANCER COMMUNICATION NCI Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch CPCRN.
MoHealthWINs MoHealthWINs Open Learning Initiative Co-Development Project October 31, 2013.
Working Plan of US-China Bilateral cooperation on biomedical data sharing.
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
1 Northern Ontario e-Health Information and Communication Technology Tactical Plan October 25, 2007.
Building a Roadmap for Research IT John Brussolo Research IT Program Director September 6, 2012 © 2012 The Regents of the University of Michigan.
The Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid: An Information Infrastructure for Healthcare and Life Sciences Amy Walker CEO and Healthcare IT Strategist Center.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
Overview: FY12 Strategic Communications Plan Meredith Fisher Director, Administration and Communication.
Milwaukee Consortium for Hmong Health Shannon Sparks, PI Beth R. Peterman, Program Manager Pang Vang, Project Coordinator Mayhoua Moua, Lay Health Educators.
Using the Open Metadata Registry (openMDR) to create Data Sharing Interfaces October 14 th, 2010 David Ervin & Rakesh Dhaval, Center for IT Innovations.
A Systems Approach: BIG Health Consortium™ “The world we have created today has problems which cannot be solved by thinking the way we thought when we.
Anticipated FY2016 Appropriations Agency$ Million NIH200 Cancer70 Cohort130 FDA10 Office of the Natl Coord. for Health IT (ONC) 5 TOTAL215 Mission: To.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium 2004 – 2005 Directions
ACCELERATING CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
West Virginia Clinical Translational Science Institute Links Scientists and Teachers Sara Hanks, Ann Chester, Summer Kuhn.
Margo Michaels, MPH Executive Director, ENACCT Co PI, Communities as Partners in Cancer Clinical Trials, R13-HS Panel on Use and Implementation of.
State and Regional Approaches to Improving Access to Services for Children and Youths with Epilepsy Technical Assistance Conference Call Sadie Silcott,
Facilitate Scientific Data Sharing by Sharing Informatics Tools and Standards Belinda Seto and James Luo National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
Christo van Niekerk, M.D. Senior Director, Clinical Development Pretoria, South Africa Innovating TB Treatment: Opportunities for Private Sector Engagement.
Wisconsin Genomics Initiative W isconsin M edical R esearch T riangle Wisconsin Medical Discovery Triangle.
The Importance of a Strategic Plan to Eliminate Health Disparities 2008 eHealth Conference June 9, 2008 Yvonne T. Maddox, PhD Deputy Director Eunice Kennedy.
© Lehman Associations, LLC 2013 Technology as Strategy™ Tom Lehman Lehman Associates, LLC Lehman Reports 2014 Technology Institute NYSAE April, 2014.
Sara Lovell, CPCS Education Coordinator Providence Alaska Medical Center.
The ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2, in continuity with the preceding ERA-NET TRANSCAN, aims at linking translational cancer research funding programmes in 15 Member.
Robert H. Wiltrout Director, CCR Director’s Address.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) November 2015 Stephen W. Wyatt, DMD, MPH Senior Associate Director Center for.
NIH and the Clinical Research Enterprise Third Annual Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003 Mary S. McCabe National Institute of Health.
The U. S. Health Care System Challenges, Opportunities and Solutions Fifth National HIPAA Summit Clinical Data Standards and the Creation of an Interconnected,
Health Information Technology Summit John Tooker, MD, MBA, FACP Executive Vice President/CEO American College of Physicians Washington, DC October 21,
The National Cancer Imaging Archive (NCIA) In Action: An Introduction for Users A Tool Demonstration from caBIG™ Carl Jaffe, MD NCI-Cancer Imaging Program.
May 2007 CTMS / Imaging Interoperability Scenarios March 2009.
Welcome to the caBIG Community! The cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG ® ) offers more than 120 open source tools, technologies and infrastructure.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
All Hands Meeting 2005 BIRN-CC: Building, Maintaining and Maturing a National Information Infrastructure to Enable and Advance Biomedical Research.
Biomedical Informatics and Health. What is “Biomedical Informatics”?
NURSING INFORMATICS IN U.S.A AND CANADA By: Ms. Gladys D. Papa, RN.
Canadian SNOMED CT Strategy October 2012 Draft. Content 1 Background Approach Current State Future State Considerations Action Plan.
Informatics for Scientific Data Bio-informatics and Medical Informatics Week 9 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information.
The opportunities and challenges of sharing genomics data with the pharmaceutical industry Shahid Hanif, Head of Health Data & Outcomes, ABPI DNA digest.
Semantic Web - caBIG Abstract: 21st century biomedical research is driven by massive amounts of data: automated technologies generate hundreds of.
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
NATIONAL outreach Network
Translational Research: Case of Istanbul University
Wales Cancer Partnership Conference 2016
Compensation Committee 2017 Goals – Updated
Bringing It All Together: The PCI Framework
Cardiovascular Diseases Faculty of Medicine Second Annual Retreat
GMHC Board of Directors November 14, 2016
Wisconsin Genomics Initiative
What is “Biomedical Informatics”?
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
What is “Biomedical Informatics”?
Trial Funding and Engagement: The NIH Sponsored CTSA Program
Presentation transcript:

CBIIT’s Roadmap: A Look Ahead Caterina E.M. Lasome, PhD, MBA, RN, CPHIMS Chief Operating Officer Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology

1 National Cancer Institute Mission: Coordinates the National Cancer Program, which conducts and supports research, training, health information dissemination, and other programs with respect to the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of cancer, rehabilitation from cancer, and the continuing care of cancer patients and the families of cancer patients

2  Mission: Interconnect the biomedical enterprise with an interoperable, standards-based framework that bridges research and care, driving and enabling 21 st century medicine in support of eliminating the burden of cancer.  Role: CBIIT catalyzes and organizes a biomedical ecosystem – comprised of connectivity, content and community -- that dynamically drives knowledge and improves health.  Vision: A learning health system in which ubiquitous information is appropriately accessed and utilized by all members of the biomedical enterprise to achieve pre-emptive, predictive, personalized and participatory medicine. CBIIT

3 21st Century Biomedical Paradigm: A “Learning Health System”  The diagram shows a person surrounded by a continuous cycle of targeted cancer care that includes a Bench and a Bedside category:  Pathology  Clinical Outcomes Data  Targeted Pharmaceuticals  Cancer Treatments  Leads to Bedside  Which then leads to Treatment and Care  Genetic Data  Surgical & Radiotherapeutic Technologies  Laboratory Data  Proteomic Data  Which then leads to Bench and the cycle repeats itself  Personalized, Predictive, Pre-emptive, Participatory…  Unifies discovery, clinical research, and clinical care (bench-bedside- back) into a seamless continuum  Accelerates the time from discovery to patient benefit  Enables a health care system, not disparate “sectors” or “silos”  Empowers consumers to manage their health over a lifetime  Results in improved clinical outcomes

4 Describing Complex Systems  From NCICB caBIG™ to CBIIT BIG Health: –More stakeholders  –More agendas  –More complexity  Multiple vertical levels of organization and horizontal processes which – in order to produce the system’s products- of-value for its stakeholders/user – cross vertical (interface) boundaries. (adapted from Ivar Jacobson) Experience in multiple domains has repeatedly shown that complexity is most effectively managed through layering and use of standards at the “interface boundaries.”

5 caBIG ® : A Growing Community…  More than 2300 individuals from 740+ institutions  56 NCI-designated Cancer Centers  16 NCI Community Cancer Centers  Attendees at 2009 caBIG ® Annual Meeting  Workspaces (18 Special Interest Groups)  Commercial Sector (15 licensed companies)  Four pictures of individuals attending the annual meetings and working at their workspaces

6 Expanding Partnerships*…  Abbott Laboratories  Astra Zeneca  Cardiff University (UK)  Center for the Development of Advanced Computing (CDAC – IN)  Centocor  Curie Institute (FR)  Dublin Institute of Technology (IR)  Drexel University  Eli Lily  Erasmus Medical Center (NL)  FDA  Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research (CH)  Genentech  Genesis R&D Inc (NZ)  Glaxo Smith Kline  Hiroshima University (JP)  Imperial College of London (UK)  INSERM (FR)  Medarex  Moscow State University (RU)  National University of Singapore (SG)  National Yang-Ming University (TW)  Ontario Cancer Institute (CA)  Pune University (IN)  Queensland University (AU)  Roche Holding AG (DE)  Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (JP)  Takeda  Tulane University  University of Crete (CR)  University of Edinburgh (UK) * Not a complete list

7 caBIG Community Organization  Shown are the caBIG(R) workspaces: –CTMS –ICR –TBPT –Imaging –VCD (E) –ARC (H) –DIS (C)  The ones that go up and down are cross- cutting: –VCD (E) –ARC (H) –DIS (C)

8 caBIG Community Organization  The Deployment community spans across all of the workspaces (CTMS, ICR, TBPT, Imaging, VCD (E), ARC (H), DIS (C)

9 CBIIT Development: Bringing Standards to the Community CBIIT consumes and develops conformant standards-based specifications to resolve business problems CBIIT validates the applicability of specifications via reference implementations CBIIT informs the commercial and open-source vendor communities of the “state of the art” by deploying/handing off its reference implementations. The diagram demonstrates how CBIIT brings standards to the community. They do so by: 1)Consuming and developing conformant standards-based specifications to resolve business problems 2)Validating the applicability of specifications via reference implementations 3)Informing the commercial and open-source vendor communities of the “state of the art” by deploying/handing off its reference implementations. 9

10 Oncology-Extended EHR (caEHR): A collaborative national effort  American Society of Clinical Oncologists (ASCO)  Initial evaluation of need (involving end-users)  Engagement of vendor community (30) utilizing unique case scenarios  Produced high-level requirements document as baseline  NCI Community Cancer Center Program (NCCCP)  Oncology EHR Laboratory  cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG ® ) – V2  Semantic infrastructure  Team in place, executing 3-month Release Cycles  Iterative/incremental releases over 18-months  Goals/deliverables aligned to meaningful use criteria  Business capability priority recommendations by stakeholders, but ultimately determined by the CBIIT Director  Document lessons learned and adjust processes as needed

11 Vision: A biomedical system that synergizes the capabilities of the entire community to realize the promise of personalized medicine Mission: The BIG Health Consortium™ is a collaboration among stakeholders in biomedicine, including government, academe, industry, non-profit, and consumers, who come together in a novel organizational framework to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of the personalized medicine paradigm. Strategy: Through a series of personalized medicine Projects, with an expanding number of collaborators, BIG Health will bootstrap a new approach in which clinical care, clinical research, and scientific discovery are linked. Ecosystem: The BIG Health Consortium™

12  A diverse biomedical ecosystem consists of categories: –Clinical Communities –Underwriters/Payors –Discovery Science –Information Technology  Within each category, there a components that link each category together to demonstrate a ecosystem. –Clinical Communities Researchers Care Deliverers Consumers/Patients –Underwriters/Payors Government Foundations Payers/Insurance Companies –Discovery Science Industry Academia –Information Technology Electronic Health Records Research Infrastructure A Diverse Biomedical Ecosystem Government Researchers Clinical Communities Discovery Science Information Technology Underwriters/Payors Care Deliverers Consumers/ Patients Foundations Payers / Insurance Companies Industry Academia Research Infrastructure Electronic Health Records

13 Working “Outside” the System: caBIG ® and the Love Army of Women Picture is of a group of women tagged with: ONE million women, research goal, revolutionary opportunity. Together we can prevent breast cancer. caBIG ® is partnering with the Love/Avon Army of Women to build the first online cohort of one million women, called the Health of Women (HOW) Study

14 AOW/caBIG ® Collaboration: Leveraging Web 2.0 for 21 st Century Research  Members of AOW invited to join the HOW study and respond to periodic secure online questionnaires concerning health history  Authorized researchers access data and design study protocols based on clinical profiles and data of potential research participants  Database enables “interactive” and “dynamic” process – as researchers conceive new projects and women add more health information, new theories can be generated and additional opportunities for participation arise

15 Lance Armstrong Foundation: Adolescent and Young Adult Biorepository Objectives  Build an infrastructure to support biospecimen collection, storage, and sharing among academic sites  Address patient privacy and intellectual property issues  Integrate into a centralized portal

16 CBIIT “BIG 3” Priorities for Enterprise-Level Interoperability –Our applications, data, and analytic services need the capacity to connect and meaningfully exchange information and coordinate behavior.

17 CBIIT “BIG 3” Priorities for Enterprise Security –Develop and implement a clear, integrated enterprise strategy and operational tactics that unify and integrate our approach to security.

18 CBIIT “BIG 3” Priorities for Deployment Support –Comprehensively support the requirements of the 21 st -century healthcare community, including On-going stakeholder identification and management; and Development of technology-independent specifications and reference implementations of software that provides clear benefit to that community.

19 Operational Imperatives for Success  Moving from historical silos to translational medicine continuum (i.e. value propositions, business case analyses) –Know funding priorities & follow the money  Documented improvement in patient and population outcomes (i.e. meaningful use, comparative effectiveness)  Leverage lessons learned from early successes –Modify approaches to meet new requirements Problem-focused vs discipline-focused Complexity is understood via the intersection of dimensions (aspects) and perspectives disciplines, roles, etc.)

20 Q & AQ & A