ExxonMobil BBS web tool Version June 2011

What has changed Alert Observations – Project number – Observation time – Unannounced Observations – Field verification and validation process Reports – Selection criteria – Stewardship reports for AO Validated, active users, AO’s and Questionable items AO DTR – Layout – Job description added as quality criteria Near miss – Layout – Actual versus planned closing date – OIMS system reference (ExxonMobil only) JSA DTR – Button added on 1 st level

What has changed – Alert Observations Project #: – Field added to cluster AO’s per project – Convention the apro number is to be used for Coteba/Artelia projects TBD for ABB programs

What has changed – Alert Observations Time: – Time plus AM/PM indication changed into 24 Hrs clock – Convention HH:MM format to be used

What has changed – Alert Observations Unannounced AO: – Field ( Yes/No) added to indicate if the AO was announced or not Unannounced means that the observer appears on site without giving a heads up or pre-notice to the persons observed – One should strive to maximize the number of unannounced visits

What has changed – Alert Observations Description of Task & Background Information / Work Conditions: – Importance of this field is raised and it is added on the AO DTR template as a separate item

What has changed – Alert Observations Questionable Item #: – Field protected from direct input – QI are picked up by the system from Page 2 of the AO Signature field has been eliminated

What has changed – Alert Observations Field verification and validation: – In the field follow up and Quality review of the recommendation that were implemented to confirm: Effectiveness and Sustainability over time – Should be performed 1-3 months after the confirmed implementation date Field Verification and Validation new

What has changed – Alert Observation DTR Page 2 Positive comments / Questionable items – Split into 2 sections Page 1 Job description – Added new Split

What has changed – Alert Observation DTR Field Verification and Validation process – No longer obsolete new Split

What has changed - Reports new

What has changed - Reports AO Count Report - Vendors working for >1 OSP – Selection of AO’s is now based on the OSP selected in the AO form when completing the AO – In the past the selection was based on default OSP, resulting in incorrect counts Test vendor has performed 124 AO’s for work ordered by OSP 1 and 6 for work ordered by OSP 2 Test Vendor Test Vendor OSP1 selected Test Vendor OSP2 selected

What has changed - Reports LPO Validated – Stewardship report to monitor the completion of the field verification and validation (V&V) Verification and validation takes place 1-3 months after the implementation Report is general indicator if verification is still required The AO list gives detail which AO’s need V&V

What has changed - Reports LPO Validated – continued The AO list gives detail which AO’s need V&V Vendors can order by clicking on the “Field Validation completed? “ column in the header

What has changed - Reports Questionable items per month and YTD – Stewardship report to monitor quality of AO process and indirect also the application of the deeper dive tools Test Vendor

What has changed - Reports Active users – Stewardship report to manage the User Base – Every vendor should have at least one user that has admin rights, if not, contact ABB or Coteba/Artelia enables that user to create new users and to change the status to inactive of users that are not longer participating

What has changed – JSA DTR “Add Default JSA DTR” button – Button added on first JSA DTR level to open blank JSA DTR template new

What has changed – Near Miss New layout of the Near miss / hazard identification form – more logical flow

What has changed – Near Miss Added reference to OIMS system (ExxonMobil only) Added “Actual Completion Date” versus “Expected Completion Date” new