Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Crisis Shelter Program GOALS To stabilize youth and families in crisis To develop stable living conditions for youth To engage families in the resolution.
Keeping Families and Children Housed: Emergency Prevention Rental Counseling to Prevent Homelessness A Community Based Prevention Program A Program of.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
1 C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Child.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
“Yes We Will”: From Placements to Permanency – The 2020 Vision Catalyst for CARE 9 th Annual Child Placement Conference November 12-14, 2008 Dr. Page Walley,
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Sacramento County Dependency Drug Court: Specialized Treatment and Recovery Services (STARS) Sandy Robinson, Director STARS Program Presented at Summer.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
Module 7 Promoting Family Engagement and Meaningful Involvement.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Safe & Equitable Foster Care Reduction in Multnomah County CCFC Commission Mtg Tuesday, Dec 8 th 2009.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
BRINGING COMMUNITY TOGETHER TO SUPPORT FAMILIES AND THEIR REUNIFICATION FAMILY REUNIFICATION TELECONFERENCE Strong Families Make a Strong Kansas.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
1 Concurrent Planning: Multiple Pathways to Permanence Version 2.0, 2010 Module A.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #2 Models and Levels of Care.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Subjects of Maltreatment Reports April 2011 through March 2012.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Return to Care: What are the Factors Involved.
Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II.
Permanency Planning From Day One. Every child is born with the beautiful potential to become wonderful human beings who experience love, joy, growth and.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
1. DFCS Performance Update Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council September 16, 2015.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Provincial Permanency Data Results for DFNAs and CFSAs Prepared by Service Analysis Branch May 27, 2009.
1 RBS Implementation Preparation Forum Wednesday  March 4, 2009 The RBS Evaluation: Reviewing the Basics.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
Child Welfare Permanency and Racial Equity Efforts in Illinois Angela Baron-Jeffrey Center for Child Welfare and Education Child Welfare Advisory Council.
Overview of Foster Care
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Lisa Litchfield| SSIS Worker Mentor Coordinator
Overview of Public Facing ODJFS Child Welfare Dashboards
Presentation transcript:

Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W. Gadsden  Satoko Marquet

Background Parent’s D&A addiction is:  The primary factor in Child Welfare (CW) involvement with Families.  The major reason for child’s out-of-home placement. Lancaster County Children and Youth Agency’s (CYA) two collaborative strategies:  Family Alternatives : Intensive case management  Lancaster Freedom Center : CYA in-house D&A counselors

Family Alternatives (FA) Program Collaborative program  CYA & other service providers Intensive case management provided by Gaudenzia, Inc.  Joint case planning, Advocacy, Training For families addressing D&A issues  Children removed from home & in care – Placement unit (PL)  Children are at risk of removal – Family Support unit (FS)

Family Alternatives Program Goal To provide intensive case management services to support families in addressing D&A issues in a timely manner and stabilize the level of crisis in the family unit in Lancaster County

Family Alternatives Program Objectives 1. Keep children in home 2. Achieve reunification 3. Reduce time in foster care 4. Access into D&A treatment 5. Retain clients in program 6. Reduce D&A use 7. Increase self-sufficiency

Indicators 1. Keep children in home: % of clients that were able to keep their children in their custody through FA case closure 2. Achieve reunification: # of clients that reunified with their children by completing the program 3. Reduce time in foster care: % of clients that reunified in less than 12 months from the date of their children’s most recent entry into foster care

Indicators 4. Access into D&A treatment: Average days from the FA program entry to a D&A treatment entry 5. Retain clients in the program: % of clients that complied and retained with the FA program 6. Reduce D&A use: % of clients that reduced their D&A use at discharge 7. Increase self-sufficiency: # of clients that maintained or obtained employment or housing after enrolling in the FA program

Data collection methods Client’s demographic information:  Provided from the FA database Client’s outcomes information:  Document review (FA monthly client status reports)

Family Alternatives Program Participants 113 parents (89 families) admitted to the FA program from 2012 – 2014.

1. Keep children in home More clients were able to keep their children in home through FA intervention.

2. Achieve Reunification Outcome data has not been collected on 12 clients still in service.

3. Reduce time in foster care Length of FA children's foster care stay is shorter than the state and national averages. Data source: Office of Children’s Bureau (2014). Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System

4. Access into D&A treatment Access time to D&A treatment was reduced from 70.8 days to 26.3.

5. Retain clients in the program Clients with children in home are more likely to be retained in the program.

6. Reduce D&A use More clients who entered FA in 2013 reduced D&A use than those in 2012.

7. Increase self-sufficiency A small percentage of clients were identified as being self-sufficient.

Lessons Learned It is best when building relationships with the data providers to meet them in person. Meeting in person is invaluable towards establishing trust. Going to the site enables one to better understand the nature of the service and clients so that when the numbers are gathered you can better assess their meanings.

Lessons Learned Recognize that it usually takes much longer to gather the data and to put the data into a meaningful and assessable form than you initially thought. Directors may not know how their data is stored. The director promised data would be provided in electronic formats; however, data is stored in many formats, including hand-written notes.

Ongoing Measuring Outcomes 8. Prevent child maltreatment # of child maltreatment incidents within 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after enrolling in the FA program 9. Prevent re-entries to foster care placement # of children re-entered foster care in less than 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after reunification 10. Timeliness of permanency # of children who achieved a finalized adoption or legal guardianship in <24 months from the most recent foster care placement

Questions? Contact: Satoko “Koko” Marquet

Questions? Contact Information Fawn Davies Program Manager Family Design Resources PO Box JPL Wick Dr Harrisburg, PA Satoko “Koko” Marquet Research specialist Family Design Resources PO Box JPL Wick Dr Harrisburg, PA