Tobacco Control Interventions – Design Trade-Offs K. S. (Steve) Brown Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science Health Behaviour Research Group University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Postgraduate Course 7. Evidence-based management: Research designs.
Advertisements

Mywish K. Maredia Michigan State University
ROADMAP FOR THE FUTURE Developing the Maine Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan
CONCEPTS UNDERLYING STUDY DESIGN
Mental Fitness and Assessing Positive Mental Health in School Settings: Findings from Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick J. MacDonald, PhD; D. Murnaghan,
Mixed methods in health services research: Pitfalls and pragmatism Robyn McDermott Mixed Methods Seminar JCU October 2014.
Experiments. Types of experiments ‘so far’ Paired comparison Happy experiment watching Goon video Two independent groups Different treatments for each.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
WHY LARGE-SCALE RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS? David Myers Senior Vice President IES 2006 Research Conference David Myers Senior Vice President IES 2006 Research.
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods
Childhood Obesity Scenario: Quasi- Experiments and Natural Experiments Versus RCTs Steven Gortmaker, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health /Harvard Prevention.
Quantitative Research Deals with quantities and relationships between attributes (variables). Involves the collection and analysis of highly structured.
Biostatistics ~ Types of Studies. Research classifications Observational vs. Experimental Observational – researcher collects info on attributes or measurements.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Experimental Study.
Part 3 of 3 By: Danielle Davidov, PhD & Steve Davis, MSW, MPA INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH: SAMPLING & DESIGN.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Systematic reviews in the social sciences Sarah Whitehead, Cardiff Institute of Society and Health.
Quantitative Research Designs
Research Designs for Complex Community Interventions for Childhood Obesity Prevention Robert W. Jeffery, Ph.D. Division of Epidemiology University of Minnesota.
Evaluation Basics Purpose of Evaluation As adults and youth design and implement their evaluation, there are several important principles that will help.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Experiments and Observational Studies. Observational Studies In an observational study, researchers don’t assign choices; they simply observe them. look.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Implementing Adult Risk Factor Surveillance in Manitoba Case Studies ARFS Symposium January 26, 2011.
Evidence-based policymaking: Seeking to do more good than harm Helen Jones Professional Adviser.
دکتر خلیلی 1. Lucid the way to “ Research” And Follow an “ Evidence Based Medicine”
Delivering Robust Outcomes from Multinational Clinical Trials: Principles and Strategies Andreas Sashegyi, PhD Eli Lilly and Company.
PRESENTED AT RECONVENING BANGKOK: 2007 TO 2010-PROGRESS MADE AND LESSIONS LEARNED IN SCALING UP FP-MNCH BEST PRACTICES IN THE ASIA AND THE MIDDLE EAST.
Potential Alcohol Strategies March 20, 2008 Sheila Nesbitt.
UIC University of Illinois at Chicago RTC: Randomized Community Trial Community-Based Tobacco Control Program.
 2008 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Evaluating Mass Media Anti-Smoking Campaigns Marc Boulay, PhD Center for Communication Programs.
Intervention Studies - Cluster (Randomized) Trials Intervention at the cluster level - What are clusters? - Why intervene in clusters (rather than in individuals)?
Prevention of Alcohol Purchase and Use Among Adolescents Design Two: Staggered Entry of 10 Intervention Sites Harold D. Holder, Ph.D. Senior Scientist,
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 8 Clarifying Quantitative Research Designs.
1 Developing a Framework for an Early Intervention System of Care NECTAC/ ITCA Finance Seminar May 22, 2006.
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking.
Impact Evaluation “Randomized Evaluations” Jim Berry Asst. Professor of Economics Cornell University.
SOCW 671 # 8 Single Subject/System Designs Intro to Sampling.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation An Effective Youth School-based Surveillance Tool Steve Manske, Ed.D. Suzy Wong, M.Sc.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Social Ecological Models
PTP 661 EVIDENCE ABOUT INTERVENTIONS CRITICALLY APPRAISE THE QUALITY AND APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERVENTION RESEARCH STUDY Min Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Maine Learning Community: Day 2 Selecting Strategies and Implementation March 26, 2007 Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA) Northeast Center for Application.
1 Lecture 11: Cluster randomized and community trials Clusters, groups, communities Why allocate clusters vs individuals? Randomized vs nonrandomized designs.
Evaluation Research Dr. Guerette. Introduction Evaluation Research – Evaluation Research – The purpose is to evaluate the impact of policies The purpose.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
Shifting Social Climate of Tobacco Control in Mississippi, 2000 to 2004 Robert McMillen SSRC Social Science Research Center Mississippi State University.
Open Forum: Scaling Up and Sustaining Interventions Moderator: Carol O'Donnell, NCER
Outcomes Evaluation A good evaluation is …. –Useful to its audience –practical to implement –conducted ethically –technically accurate.
CHAPTER 1 THE FIELD OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, you should be able to: Offer a definition of social psychology.
Methodological Issues in Implantable Medical Device(IMDs) Studies Abdallah ABOUIHIA Senior Statistician, Medtronic.
LifeCIT Development and pilot evaluation of a web-supported programme of Constraint Induced Therapy following stroke (LifeCIT) Meagher C 1, Conlon A 2,
Introduction to General Epidemiology (2) By: Dr. Khalid El Tohami.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Welcome Clinical Trials October 11, 2016 Vernon M. Chinchilli, PhD
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Implementation Challenges of Wound Interdisciplinary Teams (WIT): A Community‐Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial.
Research in Social Work Practice Salem State University
Experiments and Observational Studies
Meta-analysis, systematic reviews and research syntheses
HOW TO ENGAGE COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN OUTCOME EVALUATION?
Presentation transcript:

Tobacco Control Interventions – Design Trade-Offs K. S. (Steve) Brown Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science Health Behaviour Research Group University of Waterloo

What is the Intervention? Comprehensive mix of policies and programs is thought to be most effective way to reduce tobacco use with youth (CDCP, 1999). Comprehensive mix of policies and programs is thought to be most effective way to reduce tobacco use with youth (CDCP, 1999). Some evidence that school-based programs work best in conjunction with other efforts (e.g. with media activities, by-laws or part of community-wide intervention). Some evidence that school-based programs work best in conjunction with other efforts (e.g. with media activities, by-laws or part of community-wide intervention). e.g. Florida state-wide intervention emphasized youth leadership in planning and implementing interventions in schools and communities. e.g. Florida state-wide intervention emphasized youth leadership in planning and implementing interventions in schools and communities.

Unlike Trials of Therapeutic Agents….. Many of the tenets of RCT’s do not carry over to community trials Many of the tenets of RCT’s do not carry over to community trials “Intervention” is more than just the agent (e.g. program or policy), but must include provider, setting and context “Intervention” is more than just the agent (e.g. program or policy), but must include provider, setting and context Hard – and not realistic – to try to control these factors (e.g. provider, setting, context) Hard – and not realistic – to try to control these factors (e.g. provider, setting, context)

Intervention Issues Multi-faceted mix of programs and policies Multi-faceted mix of programs and policies Interventions in many settings (schools, stores, media, political jurisdictions) Interventions in many settings (schools, stores, media, political jurisdictions) Interventions need “champion(s)” at the local level Interventions need “champion(s)” at the local level Communities need to be ready to intervene Communities need to be ready to intervene Sustainability of interventions after the research team leaves is an issue Sustainability of interventions after the research team leaves is an issue

Intervention Issues Randomized Trial – communities could pick from menu, but implement several activities simultaneously Randomized Trial – communities could pick from menu, but implement several activities simultaneously Communities must be ready to intervene in more than one area Communities must be ready to intervene in more than one area Hard to attribute “success” to individual components Hard to attribute “success” to individual components

Intervention Issues Multiple Baseline – interventions implemented one-at-a-time in different settings Multiple Baseline – interventions implemented one-at-a-time in different settings Might be more feasible to have communities tackle only one intervention Might be more feasible to have communities tackle only one intervention Assumes effects are additive – dangerous if interactions are present Assumes effects are additive – dangerous if interactions are present Some programs may not work in isolation but may act synergistically with other components Some programs may not work in isolation but may act synergistically with other components

Methodological Issues End-Points End-Points Measures of Smoking, Process variables Measures of Smoking, Process variables Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Blocking/Stratification Blocking/Stratification Randomization (?) Randomization (?) Blinding Blinding Duration of the study Duration of the study Longitudinal vs. Repeated Cross-Sectional Longitudinal vs. Repeated Cross-Sectional

Intermediate (Surrogate) End-Points Knowledge, beliefs, values, attitudes, intentions Experimentation Regular Smoking (Weekly Daily) Regular Smoking (Adult) Disease and Death

Process End - Points Process variables must be measured to assess intervention components Process variables must be measured to assess intervention components RCT Design assess process and smoking data simultaneously RCT Design assess process and smoking data simultaneously Multiple Baseline Design intervenes in stages. Not all communities need to measure both process and smoking data Multiple Baseline Design intervenes in stages. Not all communities need to measure both process and smoking data

Measures of Smoking, Process Variables Smoking measures depend on self-report Smoking measures depend on self-report Measures of process are essential to monitor community activity Measures of process are essential to monitor community activity Requires measurement of all facets of intervention (e.g. restrictions on sales, enforcement of by-laws, etc.) Requires measurement of all facets of intervention (e.g. restrictions on sales, enforcement of by-laws, etc.)

Measures of Setting and Context Factors Need to find reliable measurement systems for setting and contextual factors such as programs, policies and broader environmental variables Need to find reliable measurement systems for setting and contextual factors such as programs, policies and broader environmental variables Need commitment from communities to continually monitor Need commitment from communities to continually monitor Interesting analysis challenges with variables at level of student, school, community, and larger jurisdictions Interesting analysis challenges with variables at level of student, school, community, and larger jurisdictions

Inclusion/Exclusion Inclusion/exclusion criteria are based on community characteristics Inclusion/exclusion criteria are based on community characteristics Subjects are indirectly recruited Subjects are indirectly recruited Purpose of research/benefits of research not necessarily a priority for the community Purpose of research/benefits of research not necessarily a priority for the community Need willing champions in the communities and researchers willing to work in communities Need willing champions in the communities and researchers willing to work in communities

Blocking/Stratification Matched pairs RCT requires communities to be matched on characteristics related to outcome (e.g. adult smoking rates, SES, etc.) Matched pairs RCT requires communities to be matched on characteristics related to outcome (e.g. adult smoking rates, SES, etc.) Community pairs should include wide variation in expected outcome for generalizability. Community pairs should include wide variation in expected outcome for generalizability. Could include pairs in different countries Could include pairs in different countries

Blocking/Stratification Multiple Baseline design uses each community as its own control and corrects for secular effects with staggered start Multiple Baseline design uses each community as its own control and corrects for secular effects with staggered start Fewer communities in each set could limit generalizability Fewer communities in each set could limit generalizability Could choose communities in different countries Could choose communities in different countries

Randomization Typically at level of community Typically at level of community Allows for replication at the level of implementation Allows for replication at the level of implementation Realistic model of how the intervention would be delivered Realistic model of how the intervention would be delivered RCT does require communities to be willing to be randomized RCT does require communities to be willing to be randomized Multiple baseline could randomize within sets of communities to determine order of intervention Multiple baseline could randomize within sets of communities to determine order of intervention

Blinding “Control” groups are often “Usual Care” – i.e. not feasible to change normal practice for the control communities “Control” groups are often “Usual Care” – i.e. not feasible to change normal practice for the control communities Difficult to “blind” participants, impossible to “blind” providers Difficult to “blind” participants, impossible to “blind” providers Must recognize the “provider” effect Must recognize the “provider” effect Difficult to maintain control communities for long trials Difficult to maintain control communities for long trials Repeated Baseline gives promise of intervention soon to control communities Repeated Baseline gives promise of intervention soon to control communities

Duration of Study Early studies of elementary school based interventions showed differences to the end of Grade 8 that faded by the end of grade 12 without further intervention Early studies of elementary school based interventions showed differences to the end of Grade 8 that faded by the end of grade 12 without further intervention Secular trends can make research findings obsolete Secular trends can make research findings obsolete Important to study end points after the research team has left Important to study end points after the research team has left Need to marry research, evaluation and practice Need to marry research, evaluation and practice

Duration of the Study Multiple Baseline design requires multiple interventions in multiple communities followed by a comprehensive intervention in several communities to verify the results. Multiple Baseline design requires multiple interventions in multiple communities followed by a comprehensive intervention in several communities to verify the results. Some interventions may be of shorter duration depending on target (e.g. retailer program vs school-based curriculum). Some interventions may be of shorter duration depending on target (e.g. retailer program vs school-based curriculum).

Duration of Study RCT requires comprehensive interventions in study communities RCT requires comprehensive interventions in study communities For the same total time, the comprehensive intervention could be conducted for a longer time with the RCT For the same total time, the comprehensive intervention could be conducted for a longer time with the RCT Both designs require sufficient lead time to bring the communities “on board” Both designs require sufficient lead time to bring the communities “on board” Both designs require follow-up to assess sustainability Both designs require follow-up to assess sustainability

Longitudinal vs Cross-Sectional Data Both designs allow for either longitudinal data or repeated cross-sectional data on either individuals or process variables Both designs allow for either longitudinal data or repeated cross-sectional data on either individuals or process variables Repeated cross-sectional data could be available on adolescent smoking rates from existing surveys, but generally insufficient sample sizes would be obtained for smaller communities Repeated cross-sectional data could be available on adolescent smoking rates from existing surveys, but generally insufficient sample sizes would be obtained for smaller communities