Building Tertiary Systems of Support Terry Bigby, Ed.D. Material adapted from Illinois PBIS & Tim Lewis, Ph.D., University of Missouri- Columbia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
Advertisements

May 2008 Ensuring Success for Students with or at-risk of Emotional/Behavioral and other Disabilities through School-wide PBIS: The IL PBIS Tertiary Demonstration.
SWPBIS and the Changing Role of the Clinician
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Positive Behavioral Supports (PBS) A REVIEW OF THREE READINGS ON THE TOPIC.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Building School-Based Systems to Support Small Group/ Targeted Interventions for At-risk Students Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on.
Skill Building for Small Group / Targeted Interventions Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Social Skill Instruction as Tier II Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Functional Assessment & Positive Behavior Support Plans
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Positive Behavior Support System Lovell Elementary School.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Creating a Positive Environment: P ositive B ehavioral I nterventions & S upports Carol Frodge Former Principal, Edmonds School District PBIS Trainer Fierce.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Tier 3 Systems for Sustainable Success WI RtI Center WI PBIS Network Rachel Saladis.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Practical and Effective Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner University of Oregon TA-Center on.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Supporting Students At Tier 3 September 20, 2012 Amy McCart, Ph.D. University of Kansas Moving Beyond the Model Demonstration: Overview of one of the projects.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Impacting Students with Autism through All 3 Tiers of PBIS Bob Putnam May Institute National Autism Center Kathy Gould Illinois Autism Training and Technical.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Scaling & Sustaining Evidence-Based Practices Glen Dunlap, Steve Goodman, Tim Lewis, Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS OSEP Project Directors’
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Tier 2/3 Matching Support to Function of Behavior
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Presentation transcript:

Building Tertiary Systems of Support Terry Bigby, Ed.D. Material adapted from Illinois PBIS & Tim Lewis, Ph.D., University of Missouri- Columbia

Building Tertiary Systems of Support Tertiary Interventions Specialized Specialized Individualized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior

Effective 3-Tiered Academic & Behavioral Systems for All Kids Universal core curriculum/evidence-based instruction and supports for all students Universal screening to determine which students are not meeting benchmarks Targeted instruction and support that goes beyond what all students receive Progress monitoring Intensive and individualized instruction and support for students who are still not making progress Decision points throughout/data-based decision making

What is Tertiary Prevention? Tertiary Prevention involves a process of functional behavioral assessment (FBA) and a support plan comprised of individualized, assessment-based intervention strategies, including a wide range of options such as: (1) guidance or instruction for the student to use new skills as a replacement for problem behaviors, (2) some rearrangement of the antecedent environment so that problems can be prevented and desirable behaviors can be encouraged, and (3) procedures for monitoring, evaluating, and reassessing of the plan as necessary.

Why Should We Build Tertiary Systems? When universals are not sufficient to impact behavior When universals are not sufficient to impact behavior When students display chronic patterns When students display chronic patterns When concerns arise regarding students’ academic or social behavior When concerns arise regarding students’ academic or social behavior

The SHIFT From factors “outside” our control to factors of academic or behavioral “Instruction” From “What’s wrong with this child?” to “What supports does this child need in order to be successful?” From “child focus” to “a comprehensive system approach”

Tertiary Systems Prerequisites Universals must be well established and in-place Effective school-wide or universal system of positive behavior support Local behavioral competence Faculty agreement to support all students Regular leadership team-based review & problem solving Discipline/behavior incident data management system District start-up resources Function-based approach

What is function based support? Foundations in behavioral theory, applied behavior analysis, & pbs Attention to environmental context Emphasis on “purpose” or function of behavior Focus on teaching behaviors Attention to implementers (adult behaviors) & redesign of teaching & learning environments.

Functions Pos ReinfNeg Reinf

Behavior Support Elements Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Intervention & Support Plan Fidelity of Implementation Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle *Team *Specialist *Problem & alternative behaviors *Hypothesis statement *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Implementation support & data plan *Technical adequacy *Sustainability plan

Big Ideas   Understand interaction between behavior and the teaching environment Behavior is functionally related to the teaching environment Build Positive Behavior Support Plans that teach pro-social “replacement” behaviors Create environments to support the use of pro- social behaviors Around individual student need / self-management Classroom School-wide

Continuum of Support for Secondary-Tertiary Level Systems Group interventions (BEP, social or academic skills groups, tutor/homework clubs, etc) Group Intervention with a unique feature for an individual student, (BEP individualized into a Check & Connect; mentoring/tutoring, etc.) Simple Individualized Function Based Behavior Support Plan for a student focused on one specific behavior (simple FBA/BIP- one behavior; curriculum adjustment; schedule or other environmental adjustments, etc) Complex Function-based Behavior Support Plan across settings (i.e.: FBA/BIP home and school and/or community) Wraparound: More complex and comprehensive plan that address multiple life domain issues across home, school and community (i.e. basic needs, MH treatment, as well as behavior/academic interventions) multiple behaviors

Positive Behavior Support Adapted from George Sugai, 1996 © Terrance M. Scott, 2001 Universal School-Wide Data Collection and Analyses School-Wide Prevention Systems (rules, routines, arrangements) TargetedIntensive Analyze Student Data Interviews, Questionnaires, etc. Observations and ABC Analysis Multi-Disciplinary Assessment & Analysis Simple Student Interventions Group Interventions Complex Individualized Interventions Team-Based Wraparound Interventions Intervention Assessment

Starting Points Universals firmly in place Data used consistently in team meetings Data decision rules to identify students who need individual supports Inventory of existing practices Create more efficient systems to capitalize on current practices Plan for creation of new practices based on student need Apply basic logic of SW-PBS throughout (Data, Systems, Practices) Equal attention to practices (student support) and systems (adult support)

Why Invest in Universal Systems of Support First? We can’t “make” students learn or behave We can create environments to increase the likelihood students learn and behave Environments that increase the likelihood are guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity across all learning environments

Building A Tertiary System Systems Efficient, effective team meetings Tools for targeted interventions, FBA, BSP Defined role for specialists in school (e.g., SPSY, counselors) Data Measure outcomes Measure Process Practices Multiple ways to identify a student Continuum of interventions Link between academics and social behavior support Monitor outcomes

Tertiary Tier: Systems Systems 1. Team based problem solving District, all 3 tiers On-going training for team members Access to technical assistance 2. Data-based decision making system 3. Sustainability focus Redefining roles, district-level data review, etc. 4. Systematic Screening Beyond ODR’s IL PBIS Network

Tertiary Tier: Data Data Data used for engagement and action planning with team Data tools are strengths/needs based Multiple perspectives and settings captured in data Show small increments of change at team meetings IL PBIS Network

Tertiary Tier: Practices Multiple ways to identify a student Routine review of individual student data Efficient teacher referral system Parent referral Screening tools (e.g. SSBD) Look for those students who are often “under the radar”... Students who change addresses frequently Temporary or seasonal farmers or workers in the community Homeless students Students in foster care or juvenile service homes Continuum of interventions Link between academics and social behavior support

Plan for Integrity of Implementation Teaching Teaching Coaching and feedback Coaching and feedback Scripts for adults to follow Scripts for adults to follow Data Collection Data Collection Follow-up support meetings Follow-up support meetings Follow up data evaluation Follow up data evaluation

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM of SWPBS Tertiary Prevention Wraparound School-based MH Function-based support Secondary Prevention Check in/out First Steps Targeted SS Group Primary Prevention SWPBS General social skills Character education Audit 1.Identify existing efforts by tier 2.Specify outcome for each effort 3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness 4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes 5.Establish decision rules (RtI)