World Nuclear Association 38th Annual Symposium 11-13 September 2013, Central Hall Westminster, London Nuclear Operation and Radioactive Waste Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Implementation issues – the Governments perspective (DECC & NDA) Bruce Cairns & Matthew Clark 22 nd March 2011.
Advertisements

Overview of Environment Agency Decommissioning and Clean up programme – delivering Nuclear site restoration Peter Orr, decommissioning and clean up programme.
+ African Legal Support Facility Negotiations of natural resource contracts : Role of ALSF 2013 African Legal Support Facility Stephen Karangizi Director,
Aleš Zupan. Importance of R&D and innovation activities for competitiveness of regions and national economies Role of state against the role of individual.
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D1- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES  Why is the NPP decommissioning required / necessarily?  How.
New Nuclear Power Plant Project in Finland Veijo Ryhänen TVO Energy Conference Lisbon, 22 February 2006.
UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
Project Discovery Transmission Workstream, 4 March 2010 Ben Woodside.
Southwark’s New District Heating Network.
Nuclear Infrastructure Development Evaluation: Perspectives from the United States Dr. Marc A. Humphrey Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety and Security U.S.
Implications of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Where Do We Stand on Regulations?
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Nuclear program of Lithuania Dr. Vidas Paulikas, Radiation Protection Department VATESI Visaginas, 29 June 2009.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
Storage and disposal of mercury and mercury waste in Asia - Conclusions Sven Hagemann GRS.
Challenges in developing a Safety Case WG5. How to Develop a Safety Case SC can be a tool for providing information to stakeholders other than regulators.
Nuclear Energy in the 21 st Century BEIJING 2009 International Ministerial Conference April 2009.
Siemens sans siemens sans bold siemens sans italic siemens sans italic bold siemens sans black siemens black italic Siemens Building Technologies.
Märt Ots Estonian Competition Authority Baltic Electricity Market Fora Vilnius Latest developments in Estonia.
1 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energyeere.energy.gov Kathleen Hogan Deputy Assistant Secretary for EE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
1 MAIN ASSUMPTIONS  Federal Law “ON USE OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY”  Federal Law “ON RADIATION SAFETY OF THE POPULATION”  Law of Russian Federation “ON CONSERVATION.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Cecilia Tam International Energy Agency Martin Taylor Nuclear Energy Agency The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Energy Future Paris,
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Update on progress with development of DS459
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators Meeting Technical Cooperation Programme Supporting Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Member.
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
TRP Chapter Chapter 3.1 Regulatory approaches.
Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power
Current and future challenges in disposing of LLW – the LLWR perspective SAFESPUR WORKSHOP 29 April 2009 Presented By: Chuck Conway, Head of Consignor.
1 Mercury Storage Project Desiree M. Narvaez Mercury and other metals programme Chemicals Branch DTIE United Nations Environment Programme.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
The Management Strategy for the Bulgarian Part of the Black Sea and its Coastal Lakes Lyudmil Ikonomov Executive Director, Institute for Ecological Modernisation.
JRC Information Day – May 11, 2006, Bucharest 1 Valică GOREA President of Nuclear Agency GOVERNMENT of ROMANIA Romanian Nuclear Programme Medium and Long.
GIS Development in Romania Vlad Trusca Head of Climate Change Unit Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development “REC Workshop “Facilitating GIS:
BY: WALLACE M. MAYS W M MINING COMPANY. South Inkai under construction.
VUJE, a. s., Okružná 5, Trnava Strengthening the European Union Energy Security Prepared by Peter Líška (Slovak proposal) Brussels, 14th September.
National Quality Infrastructure TRTA3 Approach
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
1 Nuclear Energy Division MIT Report on the Future of Nuclear Power in the United-States : review and discussion Eric Proust Director, Industrial Affairs.
1 Key challenges and possible solutions Croatia 10 th REReP Task Force meeting November 27 th, 2007 Brussels, Belgium.
1 BULATOM - SUPPORT TO ENERGY POLICY OF GOVERNMENT OF ARMENIA SUPPORT TO ENERGY POLICY OF GOVERNMENT OF ARMENIA International Nuclear Forum Bulgarian Nuclear.
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Document Name 1 BF-PPT Document No. 25/11/ :24 EU Electricity Strategy Brian Fitzsimons ESB International Investments.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Ministry of Environment Environmental Protection Branch Solid Waste Management Strategy November 2015.
Working Group on Training: From Challenges to Opportunities Vienna, May With the financial support of:
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.2. Principles of radioactive waste management Basic technical management solutions: concentrate and contain, storage.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC Peter Lietava Division of Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management State Office for Nuclear.
International Atomic Energy Agency V. Nys Definition and practical application of demonstration of operational and long-term safety for predisposal RWM.
Welcome Carol Berrigan Nuclear Energy Institute July 13, 2015.
Georgy TAVADZE Chairman Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission (GNERC) Budapest, Hungary April 14, th Annual Meeting of the Energy Regulators.
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
Achieving the Internal Gas Market The view of gas suppliers
EUPAN Website Questionnaire Summary
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Circular Economy -Public Consultation – Results
Radwaste: status & way forward
Regulatory system in Hungary
Energy Transition in BNP Paribas Bank Polska SA
A Clean Planet for all A European strategic long term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy.
Presentation transcript:

World Nuclear Association 38th Annual Symposium September 2013, Central Hall Westminster, London Nuclear Operation and Radioactive Waste Management Zoltan J Kiss

Our nuclear operating experience has two priorities today (1)safety of the operation and (2)reliability of the supply This basic concept is proposed to be adjusted and extended by the priorities of (3) waste management. This concept is about more than (just) temporary treatment, accumulation and storage of radioactive waste at nuclear sites.

Waste management as principal function of nuclear operation means minimisation and reduction of all types of generated by operation, gaseous, liquid and solid radioactive waste of all activity levels ; management and full treatment. No more temporary solutions rather active radioactive waste management. Is this also the business interest of the entire nuclear industry, all together operators, waste experts and suppliers?

Operation with efficient waste management needs new approach Nuclear sites today: - long years of operation with accumulation of radioactive waste. - conditioning and waste treatment, final storage, repository and management are responsibility of others, different than operators. But nuclear industry cannot progress leaving wastes behind, without immediate and efficient management of generated nuclear waste, without responding in practice to the sensitive waste related concern of the society.

Nuclear industry has to meet the challenge There is no way to postpone the response, expecting solutions from the future and from decommissioning. Governments, nuclear operators, suppliers cannot leave this weak point without change. Nuclear industry cannot strengthen, cannot justify its future without sorting out the waste conflict. In the contrary, will lose its arguments, obvious results, benefits and positive impact to the economy as energy source

The change needs strategy This priority adjustment will raise plenty of technical, managerial, environmental and financial issues. The reason is simple: nuclear power plants have not been built up with the request of functioning as waste treatment facilities. The strategy needs:  argumentation of the concept, supported by the regulator  free competition with available technology and  ways of financing of the investment.

Careful approach technical, legal and commercial consequences Changes in the concept, the design and the construction of nuclear power plants. Update of regulatory documents but new built constructions shall be controlled by the same rules as the operating ones.  The existing competitive environment at the supply side needs time for being fully prepared without any damage in the competition!  Treatment and conditioning of radioactive waste, accumulated at nuclear sites can be posed as immediate task, subject to free competition.

Nuclear operation provides sufficient guaranties to financial institutions Priceless expertise Financing with no specific issues. Agreement with government might provide options for financing the upgrade by the use of decommissioning funds. Is the financing within the responsibility of nuclear operators more risky, less efficient and more complicated?

New perspectives without new nuclear power plants Helps the nuclear industry to progress and to mobilise priceless expertise and knowledge available Sites of nuclear operation will be driven and interested to upgrade and modify waste treatment technologies for meeting the new requirement for the benefit of the environment and all of us. The benefit will be twofold:  progress of the technology of nuclear operation,  stop the accumulation of radioactive waste at nuclear sites.

In summary  Nuclear industry cannot be divided into two parts as it has been today: operation and waste management Nuclear operators shall take care of nuclear waste.  The nuclear future needs renewal and change. This is as important as building of new operating capacities. Nuclear operation is with consequences, but those have been managed without compromise  Nuclear industry is the driving force of the economy. The progress of the nuclear industry means: Investments mobilise capacities, engagement of the design and the construction industry = = progress of the economy in whole.