Who should have statins 18 th March 2013. 0.40.60.811.21.4 Nonfatal MI CHD death Any major coronary event CABG PTCA Unspecified Any coronary revascularisation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
Advertisements

Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1544) Randomisation Avoid ACE inhibitors/ beta-blockers (n = 390) Tight BP control (n =
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) Colin Baigent, Martin Landray on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Disclosure: SHARP was.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
CVD risk estimation and prevention: An overview of SIGN 97.
The INSIGHT study - Reliable blood pressure control and additional benefits for hypertensive patients Anthony M Heagerty Department of Medicine Manchester.
The efFects of Pharmacological management of lipids in patients with CKD Andrew Monson FY1 18/9/14.
CVD prevention & management: a new approach for primary care Rod Jackson School of Population Health University of Auckland New Zealand.
On-Treatment LDL and CHD Events in Statin Trials 2 Adapted from Rosenson RS. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2004;9: LaRosa JC et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) 5804 patients aged 70–82.
IHS SDPI COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM CVD RISK REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE? HOW ARE WE DOING? HOW CAN WE DO BETTER? Karl Hammermeister,
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
 High density lipoproteins (HDL) protect against cardiovascular disease  A novel mechanism for raising HDL levels is to inhibit a protein known as CETP.
HYPERLIPIDAEMIA. 4S 4444 patients –Hx angina or MI –Cholesterol Simvastatin 20mg (10-40) vs. placebo FU 5 years  total cholesterol 25%;  LDL.
William B. Kannel, MD, FACC Former Director, Framingham Heart Study
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
Philip A Kalra Lead Nephrologist for ASTRAL, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK, On behalf of the ASTRAL TMC and collaborators UK MULTI-CENTRE TRIAL IN ATHEROSCLEROTIC.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge The Clinical Significance of LDL-Cholesterol: No Longer a Hypothesis? John J.P. Kastelein,
Plasma Homocysteine and Coronary Heart Disease David S. Rosenblatt, MD Department of Human Genetics McGill University.
Cholesterol Lowering and CV Risk: Meta-analyses. On-Treatment LDL and CHD Events in Statin Trials 2 Adapted from Rosenson RS. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Tailoring Intervention – Effectively Targeting the High-risk Population Cardiovascular Event Reduction in the Higher-Risk Primary Prevention Population.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
Over Time Additional Risk Factors Can Progress: Effect of Cholesterol and BP on CHD Risk in MRFIT Trial
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck.
Dr John Cox Diabetes in Primary Care Conference Cork
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Comparison of baseline characteristics in participants who subsequently had an incident cardiovascular event or new-onset diabetes in the Prospective.
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Cholesterol and blood pressure values at baseline and after 15 days of dark-chocolate and white-chocolate consumption Characteristic Dark chocolate before.
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Ratio of relative risks of heart disease and stroke associated with higher blood pressure, smoking, type I and II diabetes, and higher cholesterol in women.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
The results of the SHARP trial
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
Presentation transcript:

Who should have statins 18 th March 2013

Nonfatal MI CHD death Any major coronary event CABG PTCA Unspecified Any coronary revascularisation Ischaemic stroke Haemorrhagic stroke Unknown stroke Any stroke Any major vascular event 2310 (0.9%) 1242 (0.5%) 3380 (1.3%) 816 (0.3%) 601 (0.2%) 1686 (0.6%) 3103 (1.2%) 987 (0.4%) 188 (0.1%) 555 (0.2%) 1730 (0.7%) 7136 (2.8%) 3213 (1.2%) 1587 (0.6%) 4539 (1.7%) 1126 (0.4%) 775 (0.3%) 2165 (0.8%) 4066 (1.6%) 1225 (0.5%) 163 (0.1%) 629 (0.2%) 2017 (0.8%) 8934 (3.6%) 0.74 ( ) 0.80 ( ) 0.76 ( ) 0.76 ( ) 0.78 ( ) 0.76 ( ) 0.76 ( ) 0.80 ( ) 1.10 ( ) 0.88 ( ) 0.85 ( ) 0.79 ( ) No. of events (% pa) StatinControl Relative risk (CI) per mmol/L LDL-C reduction Statin betterControl better 99% or 95% CI STATIN VS CONTROL – Proportional effects on MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS per mmol/L LDL-C reduction

No. of patients (% pa) Statin/moreControl/less Statin/more better Control/less better Treated h ypertension: Yes No Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg):  140  140,< 160  160 Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg):  80  80,< 90  90 Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73m 2 ): < 60  60, < 90  90 HDL-C (mmol/L):  1.0 >1.0,  1.3  (3.7%) 4543 (2.7%) 5470 (3.2%) 3145 (3.0%) 2067 (3.6%) 4558 (3.5%) 3670 (3.0%) 2452 (3.0%) 2712 (4.1%) 6161 (3.2%) 1315 (2.5%) 5032 (4.0%) 3656 (3.1%) 2199 (2.4%) 7350 (4.5%) 5707 (3.5%) 6500 (3.8%) 4049 (3.9%) 2473 (4.5%) 5306 (4.2%) 4587 (3.8%) 3128 (3.9%) 3354 (5.1%) 7540 (4.0%) 1571 (3.0%) 6165 (5.0%) 4452 (3.9%) 2633 (2.9%) 0.80 ( ) 0.76 ( ) 0.80 ( ) 0.75 ( ) 0.79 ( ) 0.81 ( ) 0.77 ( ) 0.77 ( ) 0.77 ( ) 0.78 ( ) 0.77 ( ) 0.78 ( ) 0.77 ( ) 0.80 ( ) Relative risk (CI) per mmol/l LDL-C reduction Total (13.0%)13350 (15.8%)0.78 ( ) 99% or 95% CI Proportional effects on MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS per mmol/L LDL-C reduction, by baseline prognostic factors

Relative risk (CI) per mmol/L LDL-C reduction Statin/more better Control/less better Gastrointestinal Genitourinary Respiratory Female breast Haematological Melanoma Other/unknown Any 1166 (0.3%) 1596 (0.5%) 813 (0.2%) 267 (0.3%) 305 (0.1%) 159 (0.0%) 754 (0.2%) 5060 (1.4%) 1194 (0.3%) 1645 (0.5%) 814 (0.2%) 241 (0.3%) 291 (0.1%) 142 (0.0%) 737 (0.2%) 5064 (1.4%) 0.97 ( ) 0.97 ( ) 1.00 ( ) 1.07 ( ) 1.04 ( ) 1.14 ( ) 1.04 ( ) 1.00 ( ) 99% or 95% CI No. of first cancers (% pa) Statin/moreControl/less Proportional effects on SITE SPECIFIC CANCER per mmol/L LDL-C reduction

My brief Who should be on statins? – hypertensives – diabetics – IHD patient – peripheral vascular disease patients If yes, should they be treated irrespective of their cholesterol level or only if it's abnormal. Familial Hypercholesterolaemia. Diagnosis & treatment. Why do we measure total cholesterol in some groups of patients and Chol:HDL ratio in others. YES to all YES

Total Cholesterol or HDL:Chol ratio Ratio for risk assessment Total cholesterol for medicine management Framingham – men remaining IHD free in first 16 years of study

Literature Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews has 14 reviews on statins and vascular disease Medline (search on words in title) – Cholesterol AND heart 1257 – Statin AND coronary449 – Statin AND heart192 – Statin AND cholesterol309 Medline Reviews – Statin AND Systematic Review1230 – Statin AND Meta-analysis376