Systems of Care and Wraparound: S upporting Success for Children and Families at the State and Local Level 2011 Fall Conference for Administrators of Special.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Service Delivery Strategy for Colorados System of Care Draft July 11, 2012.
Advertisements

On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
Expanding & Sustaining Systems of Care: New Challenges and Opportunities Presentation Beaver County (PA) System of Care: Optimizing Resources, Education.
Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative COSA Conference Presenters: Erinn Kelley-Siel Mary Lou Johnson Larry Sullivan.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Eliminating Disparities In Children’s Mental Health: Improving Access in Rural Nebraska Beth Baxter, M..S. Regional Administrator Region 3 Behavioral Health.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
From the Balcony and On the Ground The Louisiana Balcony View March 4, 2014.
Nevada PEP. 2 A System of Care is a child-centered, family-focused plan of care in which the needs of the child and family dictate the types of services.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
Wraparound – A Team Based Approach. What is Wraparound? Evidence-based model for youth involved in multiple systems Facilitation of child and family teams.
1 THE SKILL BUILDING CURRICULUM Developed by: Sheila A. Pires Human Service Collaborative Washington, D.C. In partnership with: Katherine J. Lazear Research.
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
Children’s Mental Health System Change Initiative COSA Conference March 10, 2006 Bill Bouska Matthew Pearl Office of Mental Health & Addiction Services.
An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
Systems of Care Work for Education. Overview This customizable PowerPoint presentation was designed for use by States, communities, territories, and Tribal.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
2006 System of Care Start-up Webinar Series1 System of Care: From Vision to Infrastructure Sandy Keenan, Education Resource Specialist, Technical Assistance.
Preventing Family Crisis Finding the Assistance that your Family Needs.
The Role of Collaboration in Improving Children’s Mental Health Services Mary I. Armstrong, Ph.D. Presented at the 2007 National Association of Mental.
Overview of Systems of Care Susan Steckel, MSSW Early Connections Network Director Tennessee Department of Mental Health Tennessee Prevention Advisory.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
The Role of Community Resource Mapping in the Mental Health and Schools Together-NH Initiative New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions.
The Iowa Pediatric Integrated Health Home Program (PIHH) is for children and youth, 0 to 18 years old, who are Medicaid eligible and have a Severe Emotional.
Service/Support Array, Provider Network, Natural Helpers and Financing Track 1- Early Developmental Stages Michelle Zabel University of Maryland Carrie.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
One Community’s Partnership with Juvenile Justice Dawn Project 2004 Marion County, Indiana.
Making RBS Happen in the Bay Area Establishing a Regional Child and Family Reconnection Resource.
1 CMHI NEW COMMUNITIES TRAINING LATER DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES Marie Morilus-Black, LCSW-R Child and Youth Director District of Columbia Mental Health Authority.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
Innovation in Monroe County Jody Levison-Johnson Director Child & Family Service Quality & System Development Coordinated Care Services, Inc. Technical.
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Kansas Youth Vision Team: Serving Our Neediest Youth Atlanta, GA September, 2006.
High Fidelity Wraparound Pilot
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
THE KATIE A SETTLEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR CalSWEC Child Welfare Committee Mental Health Committee Oakland February, 2012.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Fostering Local and National Collaboration to Support Continuous Quality Improvement Angela Sheehan, ORC Macro Beth Dague, Project Director, Project Tapestry.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Only 3 work weeks left! Welcome to Unit 7!!. Preview of Upcoming Weeks Unit 7- Our last standard work week Unit 8-2 Final essays due Unit 9- Final paper.
King County Wraparound March 22, 2011 Connie Kragt, Parent Partner Candace Hunsucker, Coach/Program Manager.
System of Care-Overview Principles and Values. Coordinated System of Care Team An initiative of Governor Bobby Jindal Office of Juvenile Justice Department.
Children’s Policy Conference Keeping Kids Closer to Home Peter Selby, PhD -- February 24, 2016.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
1 Child and Family Teaming Module 2 The Child and Family Team Meeting: Preparation, Facilitation, and Follow-up.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
County Leadership Family Member Orientation. 2 System of Care is, first and foremost, a set of values and principles that provides an organizing framework.
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
ACT Comprehensive Assessment
Chautauqua Tapestry Family driven ~ Youth guided ~ Culturally sensitive Community based ~ Evidence-based.
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Beaver County Behavioral Health
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
AspireMN Member Meeting
Wraparound Oregon Designing a coordinated service system for children, youth and their families.
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presentation transcript:

Systems of Care and Wraparound: S upporting Success for Children and Families at the State and Local Level 2011 Fall Conference for Administrators of Special Education October 7, 2011 Presented by: Ermila Rodriguez, Oregon Family Support Network Bill Bouska, Oregon Health Authority/Addictions and Mental Health Division Terri Dickens, InterMountain ESD Matthew Pearl, Oregon Health Authority/Addictions and Mental Health Division

Goals today Define Systems of Care and Wraparound Learn how Systems of Care and Wraparound intersect Learn about Systems of Care and Wraparound implementation efforts at the state & local level through the Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative and at the local level through InterMountain ESD

Systems of Care (SOC) defined: The systems of care model is an organizational philosophy and framework that involves collaboration across agencies, families, and youth for the purpose of: improving services improving access to services expanding the array of coordinated, community-based services and supports …for children and youth with a serious emotional disorders and their families.

SOC Core Values: The systems of care philosophy is built upon core values 1. The core values of the system of care philosophy specify that the system of care: 1.Should be child centered and family focused, with the needs of the child and family dictating the types and mix of services provided. 2.Should be community based, with the locus of services as well as management and decision-making responsibility resting at the community level. 3.Should be culturally competent, with agencies, programs, and services that are responsive to the cultural, racial, and ethnic differences of the populations they serve.

Traditional/Categorical Care Child Welfare Juvenile Justice Education Mental Health Family

Coordinated/Collaborative Care Child Welfare Juvenile Justice Education Mental Health Family One Plan

System Reform Initiatives Pires, S. (2002). Building systems of care: A primer. Washington, D.C.: Human Service Collaborative.

National Results Education: Children and youth perform better academically and act-out less; families are more engaged; and educators benefit from additional resources, fewer disciplinary problems, improved academic performance, and improved coordination/collaboration with families, MH professionals, and other partners.

Education Results (cont.) Fewer Disciplinary Problems - expulsions fell by more than 19% - suspensions fell by about 36% - detentions fell by about 34% Improved Academic Performance - 35% participants improved academic performance after 6 months - 42% improved after 30 months

Education Results (cont.) Positive Impact on School Attendance - 38% said child’s school attendance improved following onset of treatment Positive Effect on Chance of Suspension or Expulsion - before treatment, 18.5% of children 6 and up had been expelled or suspended in previous 365 days; - after treatment, only 11% of same population was expelled or suspended following onset of treatment

Wraparound EducationChild WelfareMental Health Juvenile Justice Health Developmental Disabilities Residential Services Community Based Services Natural Supports Community Wraparound is a Systems of Care Planning Model Values & Principles Systems of Care

Wraparound Principles Team Based Natural Supports Collaboration Community Based Culturally Competent Individualized Strengths Based Unconditional Outcome Based Family Voice and Choice

Frontline Practice Shifts Orrego, M. E. & Lazear, K. J. (1998). EQUIPO: Working as Partners to Strengthen Our Community. University of South Florida: Tampa, FL

What Does a Wraparound Team Do? 1.Explore the family’s vision 2.Assess strengths and needs 3.Develop a team mission statement 4.Prioritize needs 5.Determine goals and outcomes 6.Select strategies to meet needs 7.Assign action steps 8.Create a crisis & safety plan 9.Implement action steps and track progress 10.Evaluate progress and revise strategies 11.Develop and implement a transition plan

Strengths and Needs Across Life Domains Psychological & Emotional Family & Relationships Home & A Place to live Social & Recreational Daily Living & Life Skills Substance Use & Addictions Educational & Vocational Legal Health & Medical Crisis & Safety Spiritual & Cultural Financial

Phases of Wraparound: What to Expect 1. Engagement & Team Preparation 2. Plan Development 3. Plan Implementation 4. Transition

Roles within a Wraparound Team System Partners, Providers, Other Team Members Facilitator/Care Coordinator Family /Parent Partner <> Youth Engagement Specialist Youth & Family

The Wraparound Team Roles and Responsibilities Family and Youth  The guiding voice in Wraparound. They inform the team of their unique strengths and needs, and insure that the planning process reflects their preferences, values and culture.

The Wraparound Team Roles and Responsibilities Wraparound Facilitators/ Care Coordinators  Coordinate the overall care planning, inclusive of short and long-term goals of family and youth for achieving stability and permanency in the community.

The Wraparound Team Roles and Responsibilities Family/Youth Support Partner  Someone who has ‘walked in the family’s/youth’s shoes’.  Ensure that the youth and family voice is heard and is central in the team process and in all aspects of Wraparound implementation.  Help youth and families understand and navigate the complex systems they are involved in.

Systems of Care in Oregon 2003: The Children’s Mental Health System Change Initiative (CSCI) Established state and local interagency infrastructure to support SOC Integrated the funding for high end services into the local or regional managed care environments Created a uniform process to assess level of need (Level of Service Intensity Determination) 2005: Intensive Community-Based Treatment & Support Services (ICTS) Established standards for care coordination and child & family team planning

Systems of Care in Oregon 2009 Statewide Wraparound Legislation House Bill 2144 passed the 2009 Legislative Session providing statutory direction for the Wraparound Initiative. DHS identified as the lead agency, among partner agencies including Department of Education, Oregon Youth Authority, Commission on Children and Families, and other appropriate agencies involved in the systems of care. Provides authority to combine resources into single funding pool, seek federal approval or waivers, and adopt rules. Phase 1 started in July 2010 to improve outcomes for children with high needs in the custody of child welfare by increasing access to care coordination and implementing wraparound to fidelity.

Washington County Rogue Valley Josephine County Jackson County Mid-Valley Linn County Marion County Polk County Tillamook County Yamhill County Three Project Demonstration Sites

Common Goals Safety Stabilization Support Improvement of symptoms and behaviors Success at school and in the community

Value Added with Wraparound Planning is informed by comprehensive knowledge of family and youth Brings more talent to the table Offers support and strategies not usually possible within one system Focus on creating conditions to sustain academic achievement and therapeutic progress in the community

Working together Greater engagement of family and natural supports Improved understanding of respective systems Increased success in the community Improved academic and family outcomes

Resources National Wraparound Initiative Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative