THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Advertisements

Grievances & Appeals CPAC Brown Bag 15 May 2001 Jim Baugh & Steve Rayle.
IER Workplace Issues 23 March Employment Act 2008 In force 6 April 2009 repealed Statutory Dispute Resolution Procedures Overview of main changes:
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD APPEAL GUIDE FOR FURLOUGHED EMPLOYEES PREPARED FOR NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES & INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD.
AFGE Education and Leadership Development Legal Rights of Union Reps  Fed’l Sector Labor Mgt Relations Act (FSLMRA)  “Weingarten Rights”  Mid-term.
ORD Managers’ Workshop and Division Directors’ Meeting “Working with Your Unions” Washington, DC November 6 th, 2008.
Shop Steward Training NINSC/AFGE. Introduction This course is designed to prepare you to represent members as an employee representative.
Unfair labor practices v. Grievances at FLRA, NLRB, and DC Perb
1 The Supervisor's Role in Labor Relations What is Labor Relations? All activities within a company that involve dealing with a union and its members.
1 Relationship between collective agreement/arbitration and law.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
Industrial Relations in Canada Presentation at the Government-to-Government Session and Seminar for an Exchange of Information on Topics of Freedom of.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
L abor R elations Module 5 N ational G uard T echnician P ersonnel M anagement C ourse.
To Arbitrate or Not to Arbitrate WINTER EXECUTIVE BOARD 2014.
THE DFEH DISPUTE RESOLUTION DIVISION
SITUATION OF MEDIATION IN LITHUANIA. FIRST STEPS TOWARDS MEDIATION  First initiatives to promote mediation came from the growing non-governmental sector.
Chapter Implementing Equal Employment Opportunity 3.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Developed by Susan Carle under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with.
Requests for Information The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
Per Anders Eriksson
Meetings The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
Post ─ Northwestern University: What’s Next? Union Elections 101 1A Faculty Athletics Representatives Sunday, September 21, 2014.
1 Lesson 6- 6: Labor Relations. 2 Learning Objectives After completion of this lesson, participants will be able to: Identify the rights and responsibilities.
Union Unfair Labor Practices The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND LABOR LAW
The Trusted Voice of San Diego Real Estate THE REALTOR® CODE OF ETHICS The Code of Ethics imposes duties above and in addition to those imposed by law.
Chapter 3 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Labor Law and Collective Bargaining Chapter 11. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Define –Collective bargaining –Bargaining in good.
Copyright 2007 © LRP Publications Impact and Implementation Bargaining – Chapter 5 Chapter 5 I&I Bargaining Disputes.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
CPL NE Regional Caucus: Working with the FLRA Regional Office.
Chapter 4.  Litigation: The process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit  Pretrial litigation process can be divided into:  Pleadings.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
1 FLRA/FSIP UPDATE: UNANSWERED QUESTIONS CONCERNING FSIP’S AUTHORITY UNDER THE STATUTE.
September, 2008AFGE FSED NSPS Bargaining Issues 1 AFGE NSPS Presents Bargaining Challenges.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Prepared for the National Association of Government Employees, NAGE, SEIU November 17, 2011 NOTES FROM THE FLRA WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE.
MGT 430 – 2015 Class 18 - Chapter 14 Collective Bargaining.
Orange County Building Safety / Consumer Fraud Unit Unlicensed Contracting Board of County Commissioners January 15, 2013.
Employment Act 2008 IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY STATUTORY TRAINING PROGRAM FLRA and the Filing of ULPs Jean M. Perata Deputy Regional Director FLRA, S.F. Region
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
NAF HR for SUPERVISORS. LABOR RELATIONS AR 215-3, Chapter 13.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
HN2100 Collective Agreement Administration With Paul Tilley Unit 7 Collective Agreement Clauses – Part 2.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Interference with Protected Rights The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
Discrimination The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
Unfair Labor Practices (ULPs) Developed by: Melissa Baumann – FSC Sec/Treas and John Obst - NFFE VP.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
PANELISTS ROB FISHER BRIAN MACDONOUGH MIKE BIRCH, MODERATOR Representing Clients Before the MCAD in Employment Discrimination Cases.
Federal Labor Relations Authority FLRA Information Resources 49 th NFFE National Convention October 2, 2012 Portland, Oregon Julia Akins Clark, General.
Miravite, Deborah Mae Pasion, Elen. Composition: 24  8 from workers’ organizations  8 from employers’ organizations  7 preferably from the incumbent.
Federal Labor Relations Authority Successfully Processing Your Unfair Labor Practice Charge 49 th NFFE National Convention October 2, 2012 Portland, Oregon.
Chapter 3 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Basic Supervisor’s Personnel Management Course
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY STATUTORY TRAINING PROGRAM
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE COMPLAINTS
Introduction to the FLRA
Panel Discussion on Hearings Case Management Projects
Presentation transcript:

THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE

PURPOSES OF THE STATUTE 5 U.S.C. § 7101 The Statute protects the right of employees to organize, bargain collectively, and participate through labor organizations of their own choosing in decisions which affect them. The Statute protects the right of employees to organize, bargain collectively, and participate through labor organizations of their own choosing in decisions which affect them. Congress found that labor organizations and collective bargaining in the civil service are in the public interest. Congress found that labor organizations and collective bargaining in the civil service are in the public interest. 2

Office of the General Counsel Julia Akins Clark Regional Offices -Atlanta -Boston -Chicago -Dallas -Denver -San Francisco -Washington, D.C. Authority Chair Carol Waller Pope Members Ernest DuBester Patrick Pizzella Office of Administrative Law Judges Federal Service Impasses Panel Chair Mary Jacksteit Members Martin Malin Barbara Franklin Edward Hartfield Don Wasserman [vacancy] Federal Labor Relations Authority 3

AUTHORITY Reviews decisions of Administrative Law Judges in unfair labor practice cases when exceptions are filed. Reviews decisions of Administrative Law Judges in unfair labor practice cases when exceptions are filed. Decides appeals of decisions of Regional Directors in representation cases. Decides appeals of decisions of Regional Directors in representation cases. Rules on exceptions to arbitrators’ awards. Rules on exceptions to arbitrators’ awards. Resolves negotiability disputes. Resolves negotiability disputes. 4

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Investigates unfair labor practice charges. Investigates unfair labor practice charges. Prosecutes unfair labor practice complaints. Prosecutes unfair labor practice complaints. Investigates and decides representation petitions on behalf of the Authority. [This training doesn’t cover “Rep” issues.] Investigates and decides representation petitions on behalf of the Authority. [This training doesn’t cover “Rep” issues.] Conducts elections to certify and decertify bargaining units. Conducts elections to certify and decertify bargaining units. Provides training on the Statute. Provides training on the Statute. 5

FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL Resolves bargaining impasses between agencies and unions when voluntary arrangements, including the services of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service are unsuccessful. “Impasse” is defined in FSIP’s Regulations as “that point in the negotiation of conditions of employment at which the parties are unable to reach agreement, notwithstanding their efforts to do so by direct negotiations and by the use of mediation or other voluntary arrangements for settlement.” 5 C.F.R. § (e). “Impasse” is defined in FSIP’s Regulations as “that point in the negotiation of conditions of employment at which the parties are unable to reach agreement, notwithstanding their efforts to do so by direct negotiations and by the use of mediation or other voluntary arrangements for settlement.” 5 C.F.R. § (e). 6

Unfair Labor Practice Charges 7

Who may file a charge? Any person (individual, labor organization, or agency) may file. 5 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(1) and Any person (individual, labor organization, or agency) may file. 5 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(1) and 5 C.F.R. § (a). Charges may be filed against agencies or activities. Charges may be filed against agencies or activities. FLRA Form 22 FLRA Form 22 Charges may be filed against labor organizations. Charges may be filed against labor organizations. FLRA Form 23 FLRA Form 23 8

Procedures for filing 5 C.F.R. § 2423 Charges may be filed in person, via mail, r by facsimile or by eFiling. § (c) Charges may be filed in person, via mail, r by facsimile or by eFiling. § (c) Charge must include a clear and concise statement of facts alleged to constitute an unfair labor practice. § (a)(5) Charge must include a clear and concise statement of facts alleged to constitute an unfair labor practice. § (a)(5) Duty to submit supporting evidence and list of potential witnesses. § (f) Duty to submit supporting evidence and list of potential witnesses. § (f) 9

Where to file charge Charge is filed with the Regional Director for the region in which the alleged ULP occurred. (See Charge is filed with the Regional Director for the region in which the alleged ULP occurred. (See If ULP occurred in more than one Region, charge may be filed with the Regional Director in either Region. If ULP occurred in more than one Region, charge may be filed with the Regional Director in either Region. § (a) § (a) 10

Contractual notification of intent to file requirements An agreement between a union and an activity which contains a requirement for pre-charge filing, notification or settlement efforts is enforceable. An agreement between a union and an activity which contains a requirement for pre-charge filing, notification or settlement efforts is enforceable. If the Region finds the charging party has not followed a required procedure, the charge is dismissed to allow for compliance with that required procedure. If the Region finds the charging party has not followed a required procedure, the charge is dismissed to allow for compliance with that required procedure. These agreements between an activity and a union do not limit an individual employee’s right to file. These agreements between an activity and a union do not limit an individual employee’s right to file. Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, 8 FLRA 394 (1982). Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, 8 FLRA 394 (1982). 11

Regional Office Investigation All parties are afforded an opportunity to present their evidence and views to the Regional Director. § (a) All parties are afforded an opportunity to present their evidence and views to the Regional Director. § (a) Investigation is to the extent the Regional Director deems necessary. § (a) Investigation is to the extent the Regional Director deems necessary. § (a) “All persons shall cooperate fully with the Regional Director in the investigation of the charges.” § (b) “All persons shall cooperate fully with the Regional Director in the investigation of the charges.” § (b) 12

Cooperation Includes Making relevant witnesses available to provide sworn/affirmed testimony Making relevant witnesses available to provide sworn/affirmed testimony Producing relevant documentary evidence Producing relevant documentary evidence Providing position statements Providing position statements 5 C.F.R. § (b)(1), (2), and (3) 13

Goals of the Investigation To determine the validity of the allegations of the charging party and whether an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116 has occurred. To determine the validity of the allegations of the charging party and whether an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116 has occurred. To provide for a reasonable opportunity for the charged party to rebut the charge. To provide for a reasonable opportunity for the charged party to rebut the charge. 14

Regional Director Decision Complaint Complaint If all or part of the charge establishes a violation of the Statute and the Regional Director determines to proceed, the Region issues and serves a complaint which sets time and place for hearing. 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(1), (2), and (3); 5 C.F.R. § (a)(4). If all or part of the charge establishes a violation of the Statute and the Regional Director determines to proceed, the Region issues and serves a complaint which sets time and place for hearing. 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(1), (2), and (3); 5 C.F.R. § (a)(4). Dismissal Dismissal If all or part of the charge does not establish a violation of the Statute, the Regional Director dismisses the charge or that part of the charge. 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(1); 5 C.F.R. § (b). If all or part of the charge does not establish a violation of the Statute, the Regional Director dismisses the charge or that part of the charge. 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(1); 5 C.F.R. § (b). Approve Withdrawal Approve Withdrawal Charging party may request to withdraw the charge. 5 C.F.R. § (a). Charging party may request to withdraw the charge. 5 C.F.R. § (a). 15

Appeal of Decision not to Issue Complaint Charging party may appeal a decision not to issue a complaint to the General Counsel. Charging party may appeal a decision not to issue a complaint to the General Counsel. Appeal must be filed within 25 days after service of the Regional Director’s decision. Appeal must be filed within 25 days after service of the Regional Director’s decision. 5 C.F.R. § (c) (appeal of a dismissal letter and grounds); see also 5 C.F.R. § 2429 subpart B (general filing requirements). 16

Appeal The General Counsel may grant an appeal when the appeal establishes at least one of the following grounds: The General Counsel may grant an appeal when the appeal establishes at least one of the following grounds: The decision did not consider material facts that would have resulted in issuance of complaint; The decision did not consider material facts that would have resulted in issuance of complaint; The decision is based on a finding of a material fact that is clearly erroneous; The decision is based on a finding of a material fact that is clearly erroneous; The decision is based on an incorrect statement of the applicable rule of law; The decision is based on an incorrect statement of the applicable rule of law; There is no Authority precedent on the legal issue in the case, or There is no Authority precedent on the legal issue in the case, or The manner in which the Region conducted the investigation has resulted in prejudicial error. The manner in which the Region conducted the investigation has resulted in prejudicial error. 5 C.F.R. § (e) 17

No Judicial review of decision to not issue complaint The General Counsel’s decision not to issue complaint on a ULP charge is not subject to judicial review. See Turgeon v. FLRA, 677 F.2d 937 (D.C. Cir. 1982). The General Counsel’s decision not to issue complaint on a ULP charge is not subject to judicial review. See Turgeon v. FLRA, 677 F.2d 937 (D.C. Cir. 1982). 18

Answer and Hearing If a complaint is issued, the respondent (charged party) shall have the right to file an answer to the original and any amended complaint and to attend and give testimony at the hearing. If a complaint is issued, the respondent (charged party) shall have the right to file an answer to the original and any amended complaint and to attend and give testimony at the hearing. 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(3) 19

Litigation 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(6) Complaints include Notice and date of Hearing, and filing date for respondent’s answer. Complaints include Notice and date of Hearing, and filing date for respondent’s answer. Hearings are conducted by an FLRA Administrative Law Judge. 5 CFR Ch. XIV, Part Hearings are conducted by an FLRA Administrative Law Judge. 5 CFR Ch. XIV, Part The OGC is the moving party in the litigation and bears the burden of proving all elements of the violation. The OGC is the moving party in the litigation and bears the burden of proving all elements of the violation. After the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, parties may file exceptions with the Authority. After the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, parties may file exceptions with the Authority. The Authority renders a decision on the record. The Authority renders a decision on the record. 20

Statutory basis for remedies 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(7) 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(7) (A) Cease and desist (A) Cease and desist (B) Renegotiate and apply retroactively (B) Renegotiate and apply retroactively (C) Reinstatement of employee with back pay under 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (C) Reinstatement of employee with back pay under 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (D) Other such actions as will carry out the purposes of the Statute (D) Other such actions as will carry out the purposes of the Statute 21

Purpose of Remedies Recreate the conditions prior to the unlawful act Recreate the conditions prior to the unlawful act Deter future violative conduct Deter future violative conduct Promote employee confidence in rights and procedures established by the Statute. Promote employee confidence in rights and procedures established by the Statute. See Fed. Bureau of Prisons, Wash., D.C., 55 FLRA 1250 (2000); U.S. DOJ, Bureau of Prisons, Stafford, Ariz., 35 FLRA 431 (1990). 22

Remedy Principles All remedies must: All remedies must: (A) Be consistent with other laws (B) Be reasonably necessary to effectively recreate conditions and relations with which the ULP interfered (C) Effectuate the polices of the Statute, including deterrence (D) Not be punitive F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Cheyenne, Wyo., 52 FLRA 149 (1996). 23

Common Reasons ULP Charges are Dismissed Timeliness Timeliness Insufficient evidence -- even if true, the allegations do not constitute a ULP under the Statute Insufficient evidence -- even if true, the allegations do not constitute a ULP under the Statute Lack of cooperation Lack of cooperation Incorrect forum Incorrect forum 5 U.S.C. § 7116(d) bar 5 U.S.C. § 7116(d) bar 24

Timeliness Statute of Limitations 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(4)(A) General rule General rule No complaint shall be issued on any unfair labor practice which occurred more than 6 months before the filing of the charge. No complaint shall be issued on any unfair labor practice which occurred more than 6 months before the filing of the charge. U.S. DHS, Border & Transp., Sec. Directorate, Bur. Of Customs & Border Protection, Wash., D.C., 60 FLRA 943 (2005). 25

Statute of Limitations Exception If the charging party was prevented from filing the charge within six months of the event by: If the charging party was prevented from filing the charge within six months of the event by: (1) a failure of a party to perform a duty owed, or (2) concealment prevented discovery, charging party may file within six months of learning of alleged violation. 5 U.S.C. § 7118(a)(4)(B) 26

Insufficient Evidence Before a determination is made that the facts underlying the unfair labor practice charge are meritorious, burden is on the charging party to produce: Before a determination is made that the facts underlying the unfair labor practice charge are meritorious, burden is on the charging party to produce: Witnesses Witnesses Documents Documents Facts to support the allegation Facts to support the allegation If the charging party’s evidence does not establish a violation of the Statute, then the charge will be dismissed. If the charging party’s evidence does not establish a violation of the Statute, then the charge will be dismissed. 27

Lack of Cooperation When the charging party is given the opportunity to present testimony, documents and facts, and fails to do so, the charge may be dismissed based on the charging party’s failure to cooperate in the investigation. When the charging party is given the opportunity to present testimony, documents and facts, and fails to do so, the charge may be dismissed based on the charging party’s failure to cooperate in the investigation. 28

Incorrect Forum FLRA is not MSPB FLRA is not MSPB When the factual predicate of the ULP and an MSPB appeal are the same, and the legal theory could be presented to MSPB, the Authority will decline to assert jurisdiction. When the factual predicate of the ULP and an MSPB appeal are the same, and the legal theory could be presented to MSPB, the Authority will decline to assert jurisdiction. Distinction may be made between personal and institutional nature of appeal Distinction may be made between personal and institutional nature of appeal SBA & Wildberger, 51 FLRA 413 (1995), aff’d 132 F.3d 784 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (adverse actions appealable to MSPB). SBA & Wildberger, 51 FLRA 413 (1995), aff’d 132 F.3d 784 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (adverse actions appealable to MSPB). The ULP process is not the proper forum to resolve contract disputes The ULP process is not the proper forum to resolve contract disputes FLRA is not EEOC, OSC, NLRB or DOL FLRA is not EEOC, OSC, NLRB or DOL Practice may be unfair, but not an unfair labor practice Practice may be unfair, but not an unfair labor practice 29

5 U.S.C. § 7116(d) bar § 7116(d) -Where an issue may be raised as either a grievance or a ULP, it cannot be raised in both forums. § 7116(d) -Where an issue may be raised as either a grievance or a ULP, it cannot be raised in both forums. Only one bite at the apple – the first bite. Only one bite at the apple – the first bite. Bar exists if parties, facts and legal theory are the same. Bar exists if parties, facts and legal theory are the same. See Dep’t of the Army, St. Louis, MO, 64 FLRA 140 (2009); Wildberger v. FLRA, 132 F.3d 784 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Dep’t of Labor, Wash., D.C., 59 FLRA 112 (2003); Census v. FLRA, 976 Fed 882 (4 th Cir. 1992);OLAM, S.W. Air Def. Sector, 51 FLRA 797 (1996); U.S. Dep’t of the Army, Army Finance & Accounting Ctr., Indianapolis, Ind., 38 FLRA 1345 (1991) 30