Leadership for Powerful Instruction Central Office Transformation June 2, 2011 Sandy Austin Consultant, Center for Educational Leadership Mark Johnson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Advertisements

Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
CCSSM Implementation Plan: Improving Math Teaching at Scale Karen Prigodich, District Math Specialist Centennial School District, Portland North West Math.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Council of the Great City Schools Annual Fall Conference October 21, 2010 Developing and Measuring Principals’ Ability to Analyze Instruction and Lead.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Session Materials  Wiki
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
1 Collective Accountability To The Work “Learning Is The Work” -Michael Fullan.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Timberlane Regional School District
Scott Lowrey, Ed.D. (OISE/University of Toronto) CCEAM/CASEA 2014.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
OPEN HOUSE, SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 Newfane Elementary School.
1 What Are We Doing Here Anyway? Vision for our Work: Effective Science Learning Experiences Dave Weaver RMC Research Corp.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Principal Learning Teams S.I.M. May 1 st, 2013 Principal Learning Teams.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Broward Cadre Directors: Learning Through Practice.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building the Capacity of Principals to Lead the Improvement of Instruction A Presentation by the Charlotte.
Professional Learning Communities
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Central Office Transformation June 2, 2011 Sandy Austin Consultant, Center for Educational Leadership Mark Johnson Superintendent, Nooksack Valley School District (WA)

Leadership for Powerful Instruction 5 Dimensions of Central Office Transformation 1. Learning-focused partnerships with school principals 2. Assistance to the central office-principal partnerships 3. Reorganizing and reculturing each central office unit to support the partnerships and teaching & learning improvement 4. Stewardship of the overall central office transformation process 5. Evidence use throughout the central office to support continual improvement of work practices

Leadership for Powerful Instruction 4. Stewardship of the overall central office transformation process Stewardship: “the careful and responsible management of something entrusted to one’s care” Merriam-Webster Online, downloaded

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Definition: “ Theory of Action: An articulated rationale for WHY a particular set of actions or strategies are likely to lead to the outcomes you seek” Can be rooted in: Research Examples of good practice Evidence you collect about your own practice Intuition (but be careful about this….) Work from a Theory of Action

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Theory of Action: a rationale “A theory of action describes the beliefs that undergirds an organization’s strategy and links the strategy to the organization’s vision; a theory of action can be thought of as the storyline that makes a vision and strategy concrete. It is a hypothesis using an if-then statement to articulate what will be achieved and how, in the broadest sense, it will be achieved. The power of a theory of action is that the theory helps an organization be explicit about why it is doing something and how it expects that those actions will lead to improved student achievement.” Strategy In Action, Rachel Curtis and Elizabeth City

Leadership for Powerful Instruction One System’s Example We believe that … If we work as a cohesive system, and if we focus our work on the Instructional Core (teacher’s knowledge and skills, student engagement in their own learning and aligned challenging content), and if we design professional development that is collaborative and job embedded, and if we continuously improve our practice through cycles of inquiry and data analysis and if we, develop leadership at all levels, and if we effectively communicate to all stake holders across the system, then we will reach our mission of ensuring success for all students (defined as being college, career and citizenship ready)

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Given the definition and your current initiatives, what would you say is your district’s theory of action? If we ______________, and ____________, and______________, then we will ______.

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Story of Nooksack Valley School District (WA) 2009 District Demographics Native American7.6% Asian1.6% Black1.1% Hispanic25.2% White63.4% Free/Reduced Lunch55.2% Special Education19.0%

Leadership for Powerful Instruction An Example of Stewarding a Theory of Action Having a Teachable Point of View

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Mission as Moral Imperative Ensuring the success of all students Graduating all students college, career, and citizenship ready

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Nooksack Valley’s Theory of Action If we focus on Improvement of the instructional core as the key variable in improving student achievement Continuously improve adult practice through collaborative adult learning (the vehicle) Making this the systems number one responsibility and leadership imperative Then we will achieve our mission of Ensuring the success of all students (Graduating all students college, career, and citizenship ready)

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Development of the Theory of Action Experience o After aligning the curriculum and assessing performance, students were still not succeeding o Asked, “What else to we need to consider?” Studied the research, read as a central office team with our principals Asked, “What are districts doing where students are succeeding?” “What are the best practices”? Visited other sites Brought in outside consultants

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Ways to Gain Understanding of and Commitment to a District’s Theory of Action 1.Common readings that promote theory of action 2.Teacher leadership summits 3.Theory into guiding questions that forced action 4.Teachers leadership teams 5.Board learning

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Beginning the Work … Gaining Commitment by Doing the Work Answering the essential questions All agendas (lesson plans) focused on the theory of action All openings focused on the theory of action Developing structures that reinforced theory

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Recognition that a theory of action is not merely an exercise, but a critical component of improving student achievement and closing achievement gaps. Aligning strategies to the theory of action and monitoring student achievement.

Leadership for Powerful Instruction 1.Improving the Instructional Core Develop common vision of literacy and math instruction (teacher leaders, external expertise) Alignment of “work” to essential questions Literacy and Math Guides Units of Study District writing assessment, others Theory of Action In Action; one example

Leadership for Powerful Instruction 2.Collaborative Adult Learning Leadership teams (teacher leaders) External coaching/expertise (early on) PLC “training” Lesson Study Studio Classrooms Learning Walks (aka “rounds”) Theory of Action In Action; one example

Leadership for Powerful Instruction 3.System Responsibility/Leadership Imperative Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent directly involved in learning with staff Principal instructional learning and development Administrative team collaborative learning Time and resource allocation Supervision and coaching system shift Board understanding and commitment Theory of Action In Action; one example

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Instructional leadership standards - naming best practice Principal “expectations” - defined, co-shaped, and practiced Administrative team meetings – focus on learning and accountability Consultancies - learning from each other School “rounds”/1-1 visits (6 per school per year) Sharing “lesson plans” and observing each other Instructional rounds-learning walks to supervisory walks Principal Development: A Key Strategy

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Is the theory of action and theory in action working? What is the evidence?

Leadership for Powerful Instruction 4 of 5 schools received Washington State Achievement Award for “Overall Excellence” (top 5% of schools in state) – Student achievement – Comparison to peers – Graduation rate (The next most recognized school system in the state had 9 of 40 schools receive this award) A Bit of “Evidence”

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Above state averages (significantly in most cases) in every content area and every grade level on state assessments Numerous leadership and system recognitions 100% of teachers indicated their desire to stay in district (#1 reason—”collaborative adult learning culture) A Bit of “Evidence”

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Other Evidence

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Other Evidence

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Using the Data to Leverage the Theory of Action Where the data does not indicate improvement, then where do we need to adjust? Instruction ? Assessment ? Leadership ? Adult Learning ?

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Using a Theory of Action to Make Decisions Budgeting Grant applications

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Broken record - This is our theory of action! Run cover for principals (to a point) Be there-sponsor, participate, contribute, model learning/thinking, etc. Name what you believe in and value, then act like it (distributive leadership, with and through people, reciprocal relationships, etc.) Ensure the necessary conditions are in place (this is intense work-time, focus, energy) Sponsorship/Stewardship

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Expect push back (not necessarily negative) - ignore? - address head on? - address indirectly? - retreat? Look for break throughs/teachable moments Culture and beliefs will change only through action (not by talking about it). Sponsorship/Stewardship

Leadership for Powerful Instruction Considerations for Next Steps 1. Do you have a clearly articulated theory of action? 2. Is it understood by key stakeholders? 3. To what degree to these stakeholders have a commitment to this theory of action? 4. To what degree do your system’s initiatives match your theory of action?