What is Mathematical Conjecture? Arash Rastegar Sharif University of Technology Arash Rastegar Sharif University of Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Psychology of Theorization in Mathematics and Physics Arash Rastegar Sharif University of Technology Arash Rastegar Sharif University of Technology.
P.M van Hiele Mathematics Learning Theorist Rebecca Bonk Math 610 Fall 2009.
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
THE INSTRUCTION Highly Effective Services, Inc
An Anthropological Approach to Curriculum Arash Rastegar Sharif University of Technology Ministry of Science and Technology Arash Rastegar Sharif University.
Effective Math Questioning
Designing a Continuum of Learning to Assess Mathematical Practice NCSM April, 2011.
Proof Points Key ideas when proving mathematical ideas.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 02/07/12
Correlating Go Math & Standards for Mathematical Practices
Science and Engineering Practices
California Mathematics Council WORKING WITH PARENTS AND FAMILIES TO SUPPORT THE COMMONCORE MATH STANDARDS.
Modeling of interactions between physics and mathematics
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Journaling in Math: Relevant? Useful? presented by Donna McLeish to Rockville Elementary School Teachers January 18, 2005.
Skills of GEOMETRIC THINKING in undergraduate level Arash Rastegar Assistant Professor Sharif University of Technology.
AOK. D6 Journal (5 th entry) TWE can imagination be objective if it is derived in the mind? If it is always subjective can it lead to knowledge?
Phone: cell: Agenda Creating our Learning Community & Norms Setting Personal Goals and Identifying Themes Visualization through.
Arash Rastegar Department of Mathematical Sciences Sharif University of Technology.
Mathematical Processes. 2 What We are Learning Today Mathematical Processes What are they? How do we teach through these processes? How do students learn.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Defining general and subject specific language competences for mainstream education The Norwegian Framework for Basic Skills Jorunn Berntzen, Strasbourg,
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Arash Rastegar Department of Math. Sciences Sharif University of Technology Arash Rastegar Department of Math. Sciences Sharif University of Technology.
Problem Definition Chapter 7. Chapter Objectives Learn: –The 8 steps of experienced problem solvers –How to collect and analyze information and data.
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Vacaville USD October 30, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
Enrichment Seminar #3 “Creative Thinking” – Part B Dr. Kelly Cohen July 21, 2009.
When presented with a problem, I can make a plan, carry out my plan, and evaluate its success. BEFORE… EXPLAIN the problem to myself. Have I solved a problem.
Common Core and the Arts Connections, Collaborations and Myths.
California Mathematics Council WORKING WITH PARENTS AND FAMILIES TO SUPPORT THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2004 University of Pittsburgh 1 Principles of Learning: Accountable Talk SM Accountability to the Learning Community.
CONCEPTUALIZING AND ACTUALIZING THE NEW CURRICULUM Peter Liljedahl.
Chapter 3 Critically reviewing the literature
Literacy and Numeracy Benchmarks Prepared by SAPDC Learning Facilitator Team.
Responsible Curious Self-directed Challenges the teacher Sees school as an opportunity Critical thinkers Risk takers Hard working Reflective Self awareness.
Vacaville USD October 28, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
A Vision. Connected Confident Lifelong Learners Actively Involved our young people will be …
BC Curriculum Revisions 1968 → what 1976 → what 1984 → what + how 1994 → what + how 2003 → what + how 2008 → what + how 2015 → how + what.
1Computer Sciences Department. Book: INTRODUCTION TO THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION, SECOND EDITION, by: MICHAEL SIPSER Reference 3Computer Sciences Department.
Geometry The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought.
THE NEW CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic.
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math Wednesday, February 8th- 4pm EST Mathematical Habits of Mind in the Practices: Problem Solving & Attending to.
MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic to explore, make connections,
How to structure good history writing Always put an introduction which explains what you are going to talk about. Always put a conclusion which summarises.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
WRITING UP FYP REPORT Prabakaran Poopalan Maizatul Zolkapli March 2009.
Writing a Classical Argument
“Puzzle in a minute”.
Vacaville USD December 8, 2014
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 02/08/17
The Road Less Travelled
Strategies for Success
10 Stages Of the Engineering Design Process
Why do Research? Chapter 1.
Chapter 3 Critically reviewing the literature
Interpreting Your Learning Style
Maths Workshops at Smallberry Green Primary School
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
Presentation transcript:

What is Mathematical Conjecture? Arash Rastegar Sharif University of Technology Arash Rastegar Sharif University of Technology

Advices to a problem solver 1) Writing neat and clean 2) Writing down the summary of arguments 3) Clarifying the logical structure 4) Drawing big and clean figures 5) Recording the process of thinking 6) Deleting irrelevant remarks and explanations 7) Writing down side results 8) Putting down the full proof after finishing the arguments 9) Notifying important steps in form of lemmas 10) Considering the mind of reader 1) Writing neat and clean 2) Writing down the summary of arguments 3) Clarifying the logical structure 4) Drawing big and clean figures 5) Recording the process of thinking 6) Deleting irrelevant remarks and explanations 7) Writing down side results 8) Putting down the full proof after finishing the arguments 9) Notifying important steps in form of lemmas 10) Considering the mind of reader

Decisions to be made 11) Where to start 12) Listing different strategies to attack the problem 13) Mathematical modeling in different frameworks 14) Using symbols or avoiding symbols 15) Deciding what not to think about 16) Organizing the process of coming to a solution 17) How to put down the proof 11) Where to start 12) Listing different strategies to attack the problem 13) Mathematical modeling in different frameworks 14) Using symbols or avoiding symbols 15) Deciding what not to think about 16) Organizing the process of coming to a solution 17) How to put down the proof

Habits to find 18) Tasting the problem 19) Gaining personal view towards the problem 20) Talking to oneself 21) Considering all the cases 22) Checking special cases 23) Performing a few steps mentally 24) Thinking simple 18) Tasting the problem 19) Gaining personal view towards the problem 20) Talking to oneself 21) Considering all the cases 22) Checking special cases 23) Performing a few steps mentally 24) Thinking simple

Personality of good problem solvers 25) Patience 26) Divergent thinking 27) Criticizing conjectures 28) Looking for equivalent formulations 29) Fluency in working with ideas and concepts 30) Looking for simpler models 25) Patience 26) Divergent thinking 27) Criticizing conjectures 28) Looking for equivalent formulations 29) Fluency in working with ideas and concepts 30) Looking for simpler models

Intuition 31) Geometric imagination 32) Recognizing simple from difficult 33) Decomposition and reduction to simpler problems 34) Jumps of the mind 35) Estimating how much progress has been made 36) Finding the trivial propositions quickly 37) Formulating good conjectures 38) Being creative and directed in constructions 39) Understanding an idea independent of the context 40) Imagination and intuition come before arguments & computations 31) Geometric imagination 32) Recognizing simple from difficult 33) Decomposition and reduction to simpler problems 34) Jumps of the mind 35) Estimating how much progress has been made 36) Finding the trivial propositions quickly 37) Formulating good conjectures 38) Being creative and directed in constructions 39) Understanding an idea independent of the context 40) Imagination and intuition come before arguments & computations

Conjecture for problem solvers Guess the logical structure behind the problem Guess important steps of the proof Guess different strategies to attack the problem Guess the process of coming to a solution Guess mathematical models in different frameworks Guess important special cases Guess equivalent formulations Guess reductions to simpler problems Guess the logical structure behind the problem Guess important steps of the proof Guess different strategies to attack the problem Guess the process of coming to a solution Guess mathematical models in different frameworks Guess important special cases Guess equivalent formulations Guess reductions to simpler problems

The role of arguments in making assumptions Arguments test assumptions Arguments generalize assumptions to wider scopes There are natural barriers to generalization of assumptions revealed by arguments. Sometimes one can not unite two given theories. Arguments do surgery on assumptions in order to repair implications. Surgery and repair performed by arguments could lead to unification of assumptions. Strength and weakness of assumptions are assessed by fluency and naturality of implications. Arguments test assumptions Arguments generalize assumptions to wider scopes There are natural barriers to generalization of assumptions revealed by arguments. Sometimes one can not unite two given theories. Arguments do surgery on assumptions in order to repair implications. Surgery and repair performed by arguments could lead to unification of assumptions. Strength and weakness of assumptions are assessed by fluency and naturality of implications.

The role of arguments in development of theories Arguments test theories Arguments generalize theories to wider scopes. By generalization one can unite the realms of two theories. Recognition of relations between assumptions via arguments usually leads to unification of theories. Recognition of relations between theories via arguments forms a paradigm. One is interested to find relations between two theories for the further development of mathematics. Arguments test theories Arguments generalize theories to wider scopes. By generalization one can unite the realms of two theories. Recognition of relations between assumptions via arguments usually leads to unification of theories. Recognition of relations between theories via arguments forms a paradigm. One is interested to find relations between two theories for the further development of mathematics.

The role of arguments in search for the truth Truth in mathematics is understood by analogies. which are revealed by arguments. In mathematics one compares two or three theories and find dictionaries between them in order to look for background truth. In mathematics concepts are just a model of the truth. So arguments discuss relations between the models of truth. Truth in mathematics is understood by analogies. which are revealed by arguments. In mathematics one compares two or three theories and find dictionaries between them in order to look for background truth. In mathematics concepts are just a model of the truth. So arguments discuss relations between the models of truth.

The role of conjectures in making assumptions Nice conjectures approve assumptions Nice conjectures generalize assumptions to wider scopes There are natural barriers to generalization of assumptions revealed by conjectures. Sometimes one can not unite two given theories. Conjectures do surgery on assumptions in order to repair implications. Surgery and repair performed by conjectures could lead to unification of assumptions. Strength and weakness of assumptions are assessed by fluency and naturality of conjectures. Nice conjectures approve assumptions Nice conjectures generalize assumptions to wider scopes There are natural barriers to generalization of assumptions revealed by conjectures. Sometimes one can not unite two given theories. Conjectures do surgery on assumptions in order to repair implications. Surgery and repair performed by conjectures could lead to unification of assumptions. Strength and weakness of assumptions are assessed by fluency and naturality of conjectures.

The role of conjectures in development of theories Nice conjectures approve theories Nice conjectures generalize theories to wider scopes. By generalization one can unite the realms of two theories. Recognition of relations between assumptions via nice conjectures usually leads to unification of theories. Recognition of relations between theories via conjectures forms a paradigm. One is interested to find relations between two theories for the further development of mathematics. Nice conjectures approve theories Nice conjectures generalize theories to wider scopes. By generalization one can unite the realms of two theories. Recognition of relations between assumptions via nice conjectures usually leads to unification of theories. Recognition of relations between theories via conjectures forms a paradigm. One is interested to find relations between two theories for the further development of mathematics.

The role of conjectures in search for the truth Truth in mathematics is understood by analogies, which are revealed by nice conjectures. In mathematics one compares two or three theories and find dictionaries between them in order to look for background truth. In mathematics concepts are just a model of the truth. So conjectures discuss relations between the models of truth. Truth in mathematics is understood by analogies, which are revealed by nice conjectures. In mathematics one compares two or three theories and find dictionaries between them in order to look for background truth. In mathematics concepts are just a model of the truth. So conjectures discuss relations between the models of truth.

Theoriticians and problem solvers are pairs Role of father Theoritician: Provides ideas and intuitions and perspectives. Management of relations with other theories and other assumptions and provides the global perspectives. Determines how to generalize. Furnishes the soul. Role of father Theoritician: Provides ideas and intuitions and perspectives. Management of relations with other theories and other assumptions and provides the global perspectives. Determines how to generalize. Furnishes the soul. Role of mother problem solver: Provides appropriate formulation and language. Management of internal relations between sub- theories and provides the local perspectives. Determines how to specialize. Furnishes the body. Role of mother problem solver: Provides appropriate formulation and language. Management of internal relations between sub- theories and provides the local perspectives. Determines how to specialize. Furnishes the body.

Fruit of theoretician-problem solver marriage Looking for background truth. Understanding the relations between models of truth. Approving theories. Generalizing theories to wider scopes. Uniting the realms of two theories. Recognition of similarities leads to unification of theories. Recognition of relations between theories via conjectures and theorems forms a paradigm. One is interested to find relations between two theories for the further development of mathematics. Looking for background truth. Understanding the relations between models of truth. Approving theories. Generalizing theories to wider scopes. Uniting the realms of two theories. Recognition of similarities leads to unification of theories. Recognition of relations between theories via conjectures and theorems forms a paradigm. One is interested to find relations between two theories for the further development of mathematics.

Conjecture for theoreticians Conjectures connect paradigms. Every theorem was some day in form of a conjecture. Conjectures give insight, the same way that arguments do. Conjectures and arguments belong to different realms of abstraction. Conjectures are drived by intuition the same way that arguments are in need of intuition. Conjectures are hypothetical theorems in a more abstract realm of knowledge. Arguments are conjectural pathways to the truth. Conjectures connect paradigms. Every theorem was some day in form of a conjecture. Conjectures give insight, the same way that arguments do. Conjectures and arguments belong to different realms of abstraction. Conjectures are drived by intuition the same way that arguments are in need of intuition. Conjectures are hypothetical theorems in a more abstract realm of knowledge. Arguments are conjectural pathways to the truth.

Conjecture and argument are pairs The role of father conjectures Conjectures lead. Conjecturing is an act of vision. We conjecture in light of intuition. Conjectures show the connections. Conjecture are visual. Conjectures provide the soul. The role of father conjectures Conjectures lead. Conjecturing is an act of vision. We conjecture in light of intuition. Conjectures show the connections. Conjecture are visual. Conjectures provide the soul. The role of mother arguments Arguments follow. Arguing is an act of wisdom. We argue in light of logical understanding. Arguments build the connections. Arguments are verbal. Arguments provide the body. The role of mother arguments Arguments follow. Arguing is an act of wisdom. We argue in light of logical understanding. Arguments build the connections. Arguments are verbal. Arguments provide the body.

Fruit of conjecture-argument marriage Conjectures and arguments develop mathematics. Conjectures and arguments develop science. Conjectures and arguments develop the realm of thought. Conjectures and arguments reveal the truth. Conjectures and arguments hide behind the truth. Conjectures and arguments show us the path to perfection. Conjectures and arguments form the life of wisdom. Conjectures and arguments develop mathematics. Conjectures and arguments develop science. Conjectures and arguments develop the realm of thought. Conjectures and arguments reveal the truth. Conjectures and arguments hide behind the truth. Conjectures and arguments show us the path to perfection. Conjectures and arguments form the life of wisdom.

Intuition and logic are pairs The role of father intuition. Intuition incarnates in logic. Intuition goes up to truth. Intuition is timeless. Intuition provides the soul. The role of father intuition. Intuition incarnates in logic. Intuition goes up to truth. Intuition is timeless. Intuition provides the soul. The role of mother logic. Logic incarnates in thought. Logic goes up to intuition. Logic is governed by time. Logic provides the body. The role of mother logic. Logic incarnates in thought. Logic goes up to intuition. Logic is governed by time. Logic provides the body.

Fruit of intuition-logic marriage Intuition and logic develop wisdom. Intuition and logic develop knowledge. Intuition and logic develop mind. Intuition and logic reveal the truth. Intuition and logic hide behind the truth. Intuition and logic show us the path to perfection. Intuition and logic form the highest possible indirect knowledge. Intuition and logic develop wisdom. Intuition and logic develop knowledge. Intuition and logic develop mind. Intuition and logic reveal the truth. Intuition and logic hide behind the truth. Intuition and logic show us the path to perfection. Intuition and logic form the highest possible indirect knowledge.