Moving to Intellectual Disabilities in WI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Advertisements

Review of Criteria for the EAP Disability Category of Intellectual Impairment (II) 2009 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING.
The Role of the Learning Disability Clinical Psychologist Dr Alex Clark, Clinical Psychologist West Cornwall Community Learning Disability Team & Intensive.
Mild Mental Disability or MMD “ Mild Mental Disability” means that a child has: – cognitive functioning at least two (2) but no more than three (3) standard.
COGNITIVE DISABILITIES Definition and Eligibility Criteria August 2010.
Lessons Learned from AYP Decision Appeals Prepared for the American Educational Research Association Indiana Department of Education April 15, 2004.
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Intellectual Disabilities (InD) “Significantly sub-average general intellectual functioning, existing concurrently.
 Cognitive disability means: significantly sub-average intellectual functioning that exists concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior and that.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Spring 2007 Special Education Criteria Linda Thews Julie Toshner.
Assessment of Special Education Students
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
The Eligibility Determination Process Kathleen Murphy, Ph.D. Director of Eligibility Connecticut Department of Developmental Services 1.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Specific Learning Disabilities in Plain English Specific Learning Disabilities in Plain English Children with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have.
Assessment for ASD Programming November 2012IDEA Partnership1.
Assessment of Mental Retardation & Giftedness: Two End of the Normal Curve Lecture 12/1/04.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
1 Policy No Child Left Behind of 2001 HSP-C-005/State Board of Education –Annual Language Proficiency Assessment –No Exemptions –Same standard, Same content.
COGNITIVE DISABILITIES Definition and Eligibility Criteria Disproportionality Institute August 2007.
Moore County Schools Kindergarten Early Admission Flowchart Parent/Guardian expresses desire to pursue Early Kindergarten Admission. The NC State Board.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Eligibility ARC Chairperson Training 1. Special Education Cycle Interventions EligibilityIEPPlacementInstruction Annual Review InterventionsReferralEvaluation.
Testing Students with Disabilities Office of Assessment Update Suzanne Swaffield Anne Mruz November
Significant Developmental Delay. PI 11 Significant Developmental Delay Current Definition - In effect through June 30, 2015 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTAL.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
1. Suspicion of Disability = Obligation to seek informed parental consent to evaluate 2. Consideration of performance domains assures a “full and individual.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
SLD recommendation made; report submitted to Special Education Coordinator and Secretary.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
R. Dawson Griffin University of South Carolina EDEX 726 Spring 2012.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 6 and 8.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Promising Practices Part II. DD License Developmental Disabilities (DD) –Teacher licensure –K-12 –Broad range (mild through severe) Developmental Cognitive.
A Child with an Intellectual Disability ECEA Disability Category, Definition and Eligibility Criteria CDE Eligibility Training Slides March 2013.
Part C Eligibility (Part H). Eligibility Criteria: Children ages birth through two who are developmentally delayed or are at established risk for developmental.
Learners with Mental Retardation ED226 Fall 2010.
Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Language Disorders of Young Children
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Assessing Very Low-Achieving Children with Disabilities Using Large Scale Assessments Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Referral and Identification for Special Education: RTI Tier Three
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Verification Guidelines for Children with Visual Impairments
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
A Child with an Intellectual Disability and Eligibility Criteria
Introduction to Special Education
The Paralympics and Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities An Introduction to Eligibility and Classification.
Proposed Revision to Speech/Language Eligibility Criteria
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Presentation transcript:

Moving to Intellectual Disabilities in WI DPI Update 3/24/2015 Moving to Intellectual Disabilities in WI Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction May 6, 2015 WCASS Spring Conference WI DPI Early Childhood PST Meeting

Proposed New Intellectual Disabilities Rule  This proposed rule change adjusts the terminology, definition, and eligibility contained in PI 11.36 (1) to align with language used in federal law (Rosa’s Law, Pub. L. 111-256) and with the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities’ classification manual, Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports, 11th edition (2010). 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference

Proposed New Terminology Cognitive disability is changed to Intellectual Disability to reflect current terminology. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference

Proposed New Definition DPI Update 3/24/2015 Proposed New Definition Intellectual disability means significant limitations both in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social, and practical adaptive skills and manifested during the developmental period that adversely affects the child’s educational performance. Current Definition: Under PI 11.36 (1) COGNITIVE DISABILITY. (a) Cognitive disability means significantly subaverage intellectual functioning that exists concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior and that adversely affects educational performance. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference WI DPI Early Childhood PST Meeting

Proposed New Eligibility Criteria Intellectual Functioning Adaptive Behavior Educational Performance 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference

Proposed Intellectual Functioning DPI Update 3/24/2015 Proposed Intellectual Functioning The child has a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on at least one individually administered intelligence test which takes into account the child’s mode of communication and is developed to assess intellectual functioning using this mode. More than one intelligence test may be used to produce a comprehensive result. Current: The child has a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on at least one individually administered intelligence test developed to assess intellectual functioning. b. The child has a standard score between 1 and 2 standard deviations below the mean on at least one individually administered intelligence test, the child has been documented as having a cognitive disability in the past, and the child’s condition is expected to last indefinitely. Cognitive disabilities typically manifest before age 18. An etiology should be determined when possible, so that the IEP team can use this information for program planning. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference WI DPI Early Childhood PST Meeting

Proposed Adaptive Functioning DPI Update 3/24/2015 Proposed Adaptive Functioning The child has deficits significant limitations in adaptive behavior that are demonstrated by a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on standardized or nationally-normed measures, as measured by comprehensive, individual assessments that include interviews of the parents, tests, Current: The child has deficits in adaptive behavior as demonstrated by a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on standardized or nationally-normed measures, as measured by comprehensive, individual assessments that include interviews of the parents, tests, and observations of the child in adaptive behavior which are relevant to the child’s age, such as: a. Communication. b. Self-care. c. Home living skills. d. Social skills. e. Appropriate use of resources in the community. f. Self-direction. g. Health and safety. h. Applying academic skills in life. i. Leisure. j. Work. Proposed : The most recent AAMR Manual defines adaptive behavior as, “the collection of conceptual, social, and practical skills that have been learned by people in order to function in their daily lives” (Luckusson 2002, 41). The three skill areas are: Conceptual: Language (expressive and receptive), reading and writing, money concepts, and self-direction Social: Interpersonal, responsibility, self-esteem, gullibility (vulnerability to being tricked or manipulated), naiveté, ability to follow rules, ability to obey laws, ability to avoid victimization • Practical: Daily living activities (eating, mobility, toileting, dressing); Instrumental activities of daily living (meal preparation, housekeeping, using public transportation, taking medication, managing money, using the telephone); occupational skills; and maintaining safe environments The descriptions of the three broad areas of adaptive behavior are highly useful in communicating key features and important competencies. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference WI DPI Early Childhood PST Meeting

Proposed Adaptive Functioning and observations of the child in adaptive behavior which are relevant to the child’s age, including at least one of the following: am. Conceptual skills. bm. Social adaptive skills. cm. Practical adaptive skills. dm. An overall composite score on a standardized measure of conceptual, social, and practical skills. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference

Educational Performance DPI Update 3/24/2015 Educational Performance Ages 3 through 5 the child is age 3 through 5 and has a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on standardized or nationally-normed measures, as measured by comprehensive, individual assessments, in language development and communication, cognition, and general knowledge. Current: The child is age 3 through 5 and has a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on standardized or nationally-normed measures, as measured by comprehensive, individual assessments, in at least 2 of the following areas: academic readiness, comprehension of language or communication, or motor skills. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference WI DPI Early Childhood PST Meeting

Proposed Educational Performance DPI Update 3/24/2015 Proposed Educational Performance Ages 6 to 21 the child is age 6 through 21 and has a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on standardized or nationally-normed measures, as measured by comprehensive, individual assessments, in the following areas written language, reading, and mathematics. Current: The child is age 6 through 21 and has a standard score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mean on standardized or nationally-normed measures, as measured by comprehensive, individual assessments, in general information and at least 2 of the following areas: written language, reading, or mathematics. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference WI DPI Early Childhood PST Meeting

Proposed Education Performance A standardized development scale or a body of evidence including informal measures shall be used when it is determined that reliable and valid assessment results on the academic areas under subd. 3. a. or b. are not possible due to the student’s functioning level or age. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference

Proposed Reevaluations DPI Update 3/24/2015 Proposed Reevaluations Upon re-evaluation, a child who met initial identification criteria and continues to demonstrate a need for special education under s. PI 11.35 (2), including specially designed instruction, is a child with a disability under this section. 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference WI DPI Early Childhood PST Meeting

Submit Comments about Rules: Carl Bryan, Budget & Policy Analyst - Administrative Rules Coordinator Carl.Bryan@dpi.wi.gov (608) 267-9127 Comments for ID Rule – by April 13, 2015 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference

For more information – DPI Contacts Sandy Berndt sandra.berndt@dpi.wi.gov Molly Bever molly.bever@dpi.wi.gov or (608) 264-9557 Eva Kubinski eva.kubinski@dpi.wi.gov or (608)266-2899 5/6/2015 WCASS Spring 2015 Conference