REGIONAL RED LISTS – THE BASE FOR RED LIST OF BARENTS REGION Olga Makarova, Natalia Polikarpova International workshop «Methods of assessment of status.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Multilateral Fund of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development – FEMCIDI Inter-American Committee of Education - CIE.
Advertisements

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species IUCN Red List Categories.
The Role of Citizens in Endangered Species Monitoring Rori Paloski Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Vietnam's Wildlife Trade Policy Review project. Vietnam’s WLT Policy Review project The wildlife trade policy review was undertaken within with.
USE OF RED DATA LIST IN SPECIES CONSERVATION: PRACTICAL EXAMPLES International workshop on the CONSERVATION STATUS ASSESSMENT OF ENDANGERED SPECIES IN.
The IUCN Red List categories Dr. Esko Hyvärinen Senior Environmental Adviser Ministry of the Environment, Finland Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, Russia,
1 “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” State Audit Office Nada Sekulovska Gorast.
The 2009 Red Data Book of the Komi Republic
AfDB - EBRD Joint conference in procurement reform in North Africa and SEMED Countries Marrakech 22 and 23 April 2013 Jordan Delegation 22-23/4/2013.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION (ICSTI) BUSINESS SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS.
KAREN E10-1 Endangered Species. Summary An endangered species is a population of organisms which is facing a high risk of becoming extinct because it.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MARINE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ”GRIGORE ANTIPA” CONSTANTA, ROMANIA PROJECT TITLE Improvement of the scientific background for assuring.
The Forum is hosted by the Kaliningrad State Technical University. The Forum is supported by the Kaliningrad regional division of the Lawyer Association.
Factors of Extinction Why are some species more or less prone to extinction?
10. Workshop ERFP Uppsala, June 4, 2005 Proposals for an ERFP contribution to FAO Regional consultation on SoW- AnGR Hermann Schulte-Coerne.
RAPID ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (RAP) Terrestrial Ecosystems Freshwater Ecosystems Marine Ecosystems.
Mette Løyche Wilkie Senior Forestry Officer Global Forest Resources Assessment FAO, Rome UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring forest resources for.
The experience of Tajikistan’s statisticians on the use of seasonal adjustment in statistical analysis Dushanbe – Astana – 2011 Abdulloev M. Nabiev I.
Animal Species Database of China JI, Li-Qiang Institute of Zoology, CAS Beijing, China CODATA, 2006, Beijing.
Country Summary for Ukraine (part 1) status for Roman Volosyanchuk, IUCN CPC.
Improving Coverage and Management Effectiveness of the Protected Area System in the Republic of Moldova Maria NAGORNII Head of the Analysis, Monitoring.
Media Projects Marija Gaćeša and Violeta Ćorić Belgrade, 1 st October Ministry of Finance.
1 RUSSIAN STRATEGY FOR CONSERVATION OF THE AMUR TIGER - A NATIONAL CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL TIGER RECOVERY PROGRAMME.
Conservation of Migratory Birds s amateur birders noticed decline in migratory songbirds, not as many seen in favorite birding spots over many years.
Optimal market access framework for taxi services to become a genuine part of the collective passenger transport chain: reforming the Russian taxi market.
Species At Risk Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Legislation - Update on Status Bill C-5 currently before the Senate Has been given 1st and 2nd readings Bill.
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
Transboundary Trust Space February 16, 2012 Ensuring trust in information exchange – proposal and approaches from Russia and CIS-states (RCC states) National.
Red Data Books: a tool for identifying and protecting natural areas of international importance Nikolay Sobolev 1, Liudmila Volkova 2 1 The Institute of.
Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS-STAT) On the implementation of the Project “ Program of personnel training.
Photo: Terhi Ryttäri HELCOM Red List of Species and Biotopes Progress of the project HELCOM RED LIST Fishes 28 February-1 March 2012 Project Coordinator.
Ministry of Economy, Energy and Tourism 1 OP Competitiveness Progress of Implementation 2010.
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency Nature Conservation Sector CBD.
1 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 1 ENPI/SEIS Consultation Meeting European Commission, Brussels, 11 November 2010 Current Situation and.
Legal Framework and Structure. Public Internal Financial Control Strategy ( ) focuses on three activities Institution of a Centralized Harmonization.
IRDTS 2008 – reasons for revision, revision process and recommendations of the 39 th session of the SC Workshop for African countries on the Implementation.
3th Regional Workshop: on Improving Risk Analysis for Movements of Live Aquatic Animals Zagreb, Croatia, January 2014 FAO Technical Cooperation Programme.
Organization of the assessment and general results Dr. Esko Hyvärinen Senior Environmental Adviser Ministry of the Environment, Finland Syktyvkar, Republic.
BARENTS EURO-ARCTIC COUNCIL WORKING GROUP ON ENVIRONMENT Russian Chairmanship Maria Dronova WGE Chair.
UNIMARC in Russia RUSMARC as national implementation of UNIMARC 3rd UNIMARC Users Group Meeting, Lyon, France, March 31, 2010 Olga Zhlobinskaya National.
Status and role of International Department (Slovak experience) MGSC Meeting Luxembourg 23 – 24 March 2012 SOSR.
© UPU 2012 – All rights reserved Annual Work Plan of Committee 1 International Bureau Bern, 24 April 2013 (CA C – Doc 7)
Agenda item 2.2 Progress on Target 1 Developments since CGBN of March 2012 CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 13 th meeting – 06/09/12.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Proposed Regional Medium-term Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Plan.
Protection assessment of Natura 2000 network areas in Poland – main problems Marzena Modrowska Krzysztof Suliński Ministry of the environment in Poland.
The construction of a crop wild relatives database for the UK Presentation for PGR-Forum Menorca, 21 April 2004 Maria Scholten, Nigel Maxted, Brian Ford-Lloyd,
1 Mette Lund & Paco Sánchez Biodiversity group Eionet Biodiversity NRC 5-7 Nov 2012 EUNIS web application.
Expert workshop on biodiversity indicators (3-5 June 2013 Tirana, Albania) Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Republic of Macedonia National.
Short overview of the legal framework of protected sites and status of existing ecological networks in Serbia.
Workshop on international standards, contemporary technologies and regional cooperation Noumea, New Caledonia, 4 – 8 February World Population.
Deputy Head of Federal Accreditation Service Sergey V. Migin Approximation of accreditation systems of European Union and Russia.
Presentations by local experts on some issues identified in the local finance analysis Issues identified in Municipalities of Shkodra, Lezha and Durrës.
Bernd Treichel, Senior Adviser NDPHS Secretariat 4th Meeting of the PH EG October 2007 WHO, Copenhagen, Denmark NDPHS - a partnership committed to.
THE NORTHERN BEAUTY: Barents visual arts in – Anne Ihalmo project manager University of Lapland.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Towards Kolarctic CBC Programme 2014 – Katja Sukuvaara.
Joint Seminar Brussels 2017.
Monitoring of sdgs indicators in the Russian federation
“The EUNIS habitat classification, governance and future developments”
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IUCN RED LIST OF ECOSYSTEMS
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
EUROPEAN HABITAT TYPES
University of Southern Denmark & Max Planck Society
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Existing BSAP follow up
SPECIALIST IN FINANCIAL MONITORING
Percent of species threatened with extinction in each primate family
Interconnection of good practices: from development to distribution
Presentation transcript:

REGIONAL RED LISTS – THE BASE FOR RED LIST OF BARENTS REGION Olga Makarova, Natalia Polikarpova International workshop «Methods of assessment of status f the threatened species for the Barents-region data books on IUCN-criteria», , Komi SC RAS, Syktyvkar Ministry of nature Resources and Environment of Russian Federation FSBI «State Nature Reserve Pasvik»

2 Red List of Barents Region This direction can not be regional, it has long since entered on international level. We must continue to work together for the conservation of wildlife of the North and the next step is to work on the project "The Red Book of the Barents region."

Uniform rules within the country and in framework of the international projects Unification procedures, instructions, creation of a single on-line database Preparation books and method. materials on national lang. and English Creating Coordination Center (consultations, scientific- method. accompanying., Including training) - to conduct some regional Red Books and shared Red List of BEAR

Deadlines Revision period for the regional RB in 10 years is short, if we will made the RB in the form in which it is now. Optimally - the creation of on-line databases, with updated by specialists, curators of groups, the presence of the Expert Council. The book in its present form may be published less frequently (eg, 1 every 15 years), or as reduced and more popular variant (1 time in 10 years). Database should be regularly updated, monitoring (expeditions), a re-assessment of species (every 2-3 years), the publication of the lists (automatic generation of reports on the website) - every 3-5 years as a legal document (including with possibility of publishing).

Management Coordination Centre Expert groups Training courses Cooperation between Ministries of Natural Resources (of region) and Coordination Centre of RL BEAR. FINANCE = include into Russian-Finnish- Norwegian cooperative programs, special regional programs on nature protection (or environment) etc.

Second edition of RB of the Murmansk region For the first time - the regional System of categories and criteria was developed (Система.., 2012; Поликарпова, Макарова, 2013; Положение.., 2014) Combinations of categories of RB RF and IUCN. System was included in the Regulations of RBMR on № 325-ПП (editing № 221-ПП/ ) Conservations measures was proposed for each category of status (set of measures).

The system of categories and criteria for the identification and classification of rare and endangered species of flora and fauna of the Murmansk region It is based on a standardized and unified system of IUCN categories and criteria, taking into account the regional component and the experience of its using in Russia (IUCN, 2001; Gardenfors, 2003; Guidelines.., 2003; Заварзин, Мучник, 2005; Ананьева и др., 2011). Correlation of IUCN categories and received in the Red Book of the Russian Federation was produced (2001, 2008) (Проект…, 2012). New system is consist from 6 categories of status. Murmansk region – is one of the first regions developed and applied such a regional system that meets international standards.

Category of status of flora and fauna listed in the Red Book of the Murmansk region 0 (RE – Regionally Extinct) – вероятно исчезнувшие в регионе; 1а (CR – Critically Endangered) – находящиеся в критическом состоянии, под непосредственной угрозой исчезновения; 1б (EN – Endangered) – находящиеся в опасном состоянии, под угрозой исчезновения; 2 (VU – Vulnerable) – уязвимые, в том числе сокращающиеся в численности; 3 (NT – Near Threatened) – редкие, находящиеся в состоянии, близком к угрожаемому; 4 (DD – Data Deficient) – имеющие неопределенный статус, по которым нет достаточных данных; 5 – имеющие особый статус. The system can be improved, refined, including for different groups of objects

The distribution of the species listed in the Red Book of the Murmansk region, by category of rarity (2014) Taxa group Number of species (sub- species) Category of rarity 01а1б2345 Грибы Лишайники Растения Водоросли3 111 Печеночники Мхи Сосудистые растения ANIMALS Mollusca1 1 Aranei3 21 Insecta Pisces1 1 Amphibia1 1 Replitia1 1 Aves Mammals TOTALLY

Number of animal species in RB MR (2014)

Problems Non-universality for using criteria, the inevitability of subjective evaluation in some cases. Ignorance by some specialists in RF regions about guidelines IUCN, the lack of or little experience with these methods. The obvious need for training to work with the methodology, discussion of problems that arise even “very-experienced” "evaluators". It is advisable to conduct training in each subject of the Russian Federation within the BEAR.

Preparation of the Red Book of the Barents cooperation and cooperation about monitoring of rare species Working Group on cooperation on protection of common Red List species in the Barents Region (RLSBR) Experts from Russia, Finland, Sweden and Norway The aim is to facilitate cooperation on conservation of Red List species in the Barents Region giving special attention to mammals and birds, and to consider and recommend possible measures on scientific research and monitoring for conservation of these species.

Pre-history In 2008 the first meeting of the representatives of Norway, Sweden, Finland, on which agreement was reached to develop a joint program on the harmonization of priority to conserve transboundary rare and endangered mammal species that are of common interest to these countries.

Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre

Available ‘Fact sheets’ - Artsdatabanken Scientific nameNorwegian (list) nameRussian (list) names Anser erythropus(x) Dverggås (x) Пискулька Melanitta fusca(x) Sjøorre (x) Обыкновенный турпан Gallinago media(x) Dobbeltbekkasin (x) Дупель Falco rusticolus(x) Jaktfalk (x) Кречет Bubo bubo(x) Hubro (x) Филин Bubo scandiaca(x) Snøugle (x) Белая сова Aquila chrysaetosKongeørn (x) Беркут Pandion haliaetus(x) Fiskeørn (x) Скопа Aythya marila(x) Bergand (x) (Морская чернеть) Mergus albellus(x) Lappfiskand (x) Луток Falco peregrinusVandrefalk (x) Сапсан Limosa limosa(x) Svarthalespove Eremophila alpestrisFjellerke (x) Рогатый жаворонок Strix nebulosa(x) Lappugle (x) Бородатая неясыть Polysticta stelleri(x) Stellerand (x) Сибирская гага Gavia adamsii(x) Gulnebblom (x) Белоклювая гагара Pagophila eburnea(x) Ismåke (x) Белая чайка BIRDS

Available ‘Fact sheets’ - Artsdatabanken Scientific nameNorwegian (list) nameRussian (list) names Gulo gulo(x) JervРосомаха Phoca vitulina(x) Steinkobbe(x) Обыкновенный тюлень, европейский подвид Canis lupus(x) UlvВолк Rangifer tarandusRein(x) Дикий северный олень Balaena mysticetus(x) Grønlandshval(x) Гренландский / полярный кит Monodon monoceros(x) Narhval(x) Нарвал-единорог Odobenus rosmarus(x) Hvalross(x) Морж атлантический Ursus maritimus(x) Isbjørn(x) Белый медведь MAMMALS

NatureGate – Species Information

Production of Fact Sheets Dynamic and Digital ? Traditional printed ?

Red List database of Trilateral Park Pasvik-Inari Present Name of speciesRed list statusFinlandNorw ay Russi a ScientificFinnishNorwegia n RussianInter natio nal Finlan d Norwa y Russi a Inari- Utsjoki Vätsä ri Sør- Varan ger Pasvi k valley PlantaeKasvit Растения Putkilokasvi t Сосудистые Botrychium lunariaketonoidanl ukko Гроздовник полулунный NT bioco ntrol XXх Botrychium multifidumahonoidanl ukko Høstmari nøkkel Гроздовник многораздельн ый NTVUENX Xх Callitriche hermaphroditica uposvesitäh ti Høstvassh år Болотник обоеполый LCVU XXХ Campanula rotundifolia ssp. gieseckiana lapinkissank ello Колокольчик круглолистный NT XX Х Carex arctogenatunturinupp isara ReinstarrОсока севернаяLCNTbioco ntrol XXXх Carex atratamustasaraSvartstarr NTLC X Carex cespitosamätässaraTuestarrОсока дернистая LCNT XXХ

Suggestions For VNIIprirody - to expand the methodology for assessment of the status, including IUCN criteria, elaborate on the mechanisms of preparation and conduct of such lists, because despite the recommendations regions have a lot of questions and challenges. Implement this extended methodology for applying it at the level of a mandatory instruction. Board of Experts (or СC) - to develop an action plan on cooperation in making RL BEAR, highlight expert groups (thematic, with a specialist from each region).

Cooperation scheme Ministrie s VNII prirody Coordinati on Centre of RL BEAR Scientific institutio ns, RAS, protecte d areas

Thanks for: Maria GavriloRussia Stanislav BelikovRussia Valery EfimovRussia Tuomo OllilaFinland Pertti KoskimiesFinland Tor Arne BjørnNorway Morten EkkerNorway Reidar HindrumNorway

Ministry of nature Resources and Environment of Russian Federation FSBI «State Nature Reserve Pasvik» Спасибо за внимание! Thank you for your attention! Мурманская область, Печенгский район, пос. Раякоски Тел./факс +7 (815-54) 50881, 52798, Http: //