_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Web-based Community Approach to Model Evaluation using AMET Saravanan Arunachalam 1, Nathan Rice 2 and Pradeepa Vennam 1 1 Institute for the Environment.
Advertisements

Georgia Chapter of the Air & Waste Management Association Annual Conference: Improved Air Quality Modeling for Predicting the Impacts of Controlled Forest.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division, Applied Modeling Research Branch October 8, 2008.
Model Performance Evaluation Data Base and Software - Application to CENRAP Betty K. Pun, Shu-Yun Chen, Kristen Lohman, Christian Seigneur PM Model Performance.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
CMAS Conference, October 16 – 18, 2006 The work presented here was performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with partial.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
Model Performance Evaluation Database and Software Betty K. Pun, Kristen Lohman, Shu-Yun Chen, and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Presentation at.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
PM Model Performance in Southern California Using UAMAERO-LT Joseph Cassmassi Senior Meteorologist SCAQMD February 11, 2004.
Photochemical Modeling For Regulatory Applications Jim Boylan – GA EPD Praveen Amar – NESCAUM CMAS Users Forum Meeting October 14, 2010.
Regional Modeling of The Atmospheric Fate and Transport of Benzene and Diesel Particles with CMAQ Christian Seigneur, Betty Pun Kristen Lohman, and Shiang-Yuh.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Development and Application of Parallel Plume-in-Grid Models Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Christian Seigneur AER, San.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence Matthew Woody and Saravanan Arunachalam Institute.
Evaluation of 2002 Multi-pollutant Platform: Air Toxics, Mercury, Ozone, and Particulate Matter US EPA / OAQPS / AQAD / AQMG Sharon Phillips, Kai Wang,
AN EVALUATION OF THE ETA-CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL AS PART OF NOAA’S NATIONAL PROGRAM CMAQ AIRNOW AIRNOW Brian Eder* Daiwen Kang * Ken Schere* Ken.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
NPS Source Attribution Modeling Deterministic Models Dispersion or deterministic models Receptor Models Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Patterns Back Trajectory.
Modeling & Monitoring / Data Analysis Joint Session RPO National Workgroup Meeting December 3, 2002, 1:00 - 3:00 Crown Plaza, Dallas, TX.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
Nancy J. Brown, LBNL Kick-off of the CEC Seasonal Modeling Study Sacramento, August A Seasonal Perspective on Regional Air Quality in Central California.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
CMAQ Programs and Options
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Development and Evaluation of a Hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian Modeling Approach Beata Czader, Peter Percell, Daewon Byun, Yunsoo Choi University of Houston.
Presentation transcript:

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 1 Advanced CMAQ Concepts l Plume in Grid l Process Analysis l Model Performance Evaluation and QA Procedures

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 2 Plume in Grid (PinG) (1) l Subgrid scale treatment of major emitting point sources (MEPSE) l For more realistic treatment of dynamic and chemical processes impacting elevated point sources l CMAQ currently has one implementation of a PinG treatment l CMAQ PinG consists of a Plume Dynamics Model (PDM) and a Lagrangian reactive plume model l Capable of both gas-phase and aerosol treatment

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 3 Plume in Grid (PinG) (2) l The PDM is a stand-alone preprocessor that simulates plume rise, horizontal and vertical growth, dispersion, and transport at sub-grid scales l The PDM controls the interaction between the plumes and the parent grid l The Lagrangian plume model is internal to the CCTM and simulates the chemistry within the plumes themselves l Intended for grid resolutions of km l Both physical and chemical criteria for plume handover to parent grid

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 4 Plume in Grid (PinG) (3) Emissions Meteorology PDM CCTM PinG Adapted from: Gillani and Godowitch (1999), Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 CMAQ Modeling System, EPA/600/R-99/030, pp

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 5 Plume in Grid (PinG) (4) l CMAQ implementation requires compiling the CCTM with the PinG option invoked and running the PDM preprocessor to prepare special emissions inputs l Two CCTM compiler options for PinG – ping_noop: No PinG treatment – ping_smvgear: PinG with internal Gear chemistry solver l Emissions requirements: 2-d MEPSE file that defines which sources to receive PinG treatment – SMOKE instrumented to create CMAQ-ready MEPSE files

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 6 Plume in Grid (PinG) (5) l The PDM uses a MEPSE file and meteorology inputs to create a CCTM input file l Build and execute the PDM similar to the other CMAQ preprocessors (e.g. ICON, BCON) l CCTM compiled with the PinG option will look for the additional PDM and MEPSE input files during execution l Additional CCTM PinG output includes an unmerged/active plume netCDF file l Post-processing utility to overlay the active plumes onto the parent grid without chemical coupling

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 7 Process Analysis (PA) (1) l Eulerian grid models are based on partial differential equations that define the time-rate of change in species concentrations due to chemical and physical processes l PA is a configuration system within Eulerian models that provides quantitative information about the impacts of individual processes on the cumulative chemical concentrations l PA is an optional feature of CMAQ that provides insight into the reasons for a model’s predictions

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 8 Process Analysis (PA) (2) l Two classes of PA – Integrated reaction rates (IRR) – Integrated process rates (IPR) l PA is useful for – Identifying sources of error – Interpreting model results – Determining the important characteristics of chemical mechanisms (IRR) – Determining the important characteristics of different implementations of physical processes (IPR) – IPR quantifies the contribution of each source and sink process for a particular species at the end of each time step

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 9 Process Analysis (PA) (3) l CMAQ implementation requires compiling the CCTM with PA include files generated by the PROCAN preprocessor l PA include files specify – IRR or IPR – Chemical species or groups to collect PA information about l A PROCAN configuration file defines the contents of the include files l A PROCAN run script uses information in the configuration file and calls the executable to create the include files

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 10 Process Analysis (PA) (4) PROCAN CCTM PA PA_CMN PA_CTL PA_DAT Include Files pa.inp Configuration File

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 11

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 12 Process Analysis (PA) (7) l IRR quantifies the mass throughput of a particular reaction within a chemical mechanism l IRR can diagnose mechanistic and kinetic problems within the chemistry model l IRR can reveal NO x vs. VOC sensitivity regimes l IRR generally more difficult to interpret than IPR

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 13 Model Performance Evaluation (MPE) l Question why a model is doing what it is doing l What are the inherent uncertainties and how do they impact the model results l Qualitative and quantitative evaluation l Diagnostic versus operational evaluation l Comparisons against observations l Evaluate at different temporal and spatial scales l Categorical model evaluation (used for Forecasting) – Contingency Table, False Alarm Rate, Skill Scores, CSI, etc.

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 14 Quantitative vs Qualitative l Qualitative model evaluation targets intuitive features in results – Effects of urban areas – Boundary layer effects – Effects of large point sources and highways – Diurnal phenomena l Quantitative evaluation provides statistical evidence for model performance – Daily, seasonal, annual comparisons with observed data – At coarse grids, compare observations with the concentrations in the model grid cell in which the monitor is located – At fine grids, compare observations with the concentrations in a matrix of cells surrounding the cell in which the monitor is located

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 15 Problems/Issues l Modeling scales have grown tremendously both spatially and temporally – Datasets becoming larger – Need to process and digest voluminous amount of information l Heterogeneous nature of observational datasets – Vary by network, by quality, by format, by frequency l Measurement or model artifacts – What is modeled is not always measured – Need adjustments before comparisons l Problem of incommensurability – Comparing point measurement with volume average

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 16 Observational Databases l AIRS (hourly) (~4000) l IMPROVE (every 3 rd day) (~160) l CASTNET (hourly, weekly) (123) l NADP (weekly) (over 200) l EPA Supersites (sub-hourly) (8) l EPA STN (hourly) (215) l PAMS (hourly) (~130) l AERONET l Special field campaigns – e.g. AIRMAP, ASACA, BRAVO, CCOS, CRPAQS, NARSTO, SEARCH, SOS, TXAQS, etc. – Aircraft Data l Remote Sensing Data (AURA, MODIS, etc.)

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 17 Operational Evaluation (mostly quantitative) l Compute suite of statistical measures of performance – Peak Prediction Accuracy, Bias metrics (MB, MNB, NMB, FB), Error metrics (RMSE, FE, GE, MGE, NMGE), etc. – “Goodness-of-fit” measures (based on correlation coefficients and their variations) – Various temporal scales l Time-series analyses – Hourly, weekly, monthly l Grid (tile) plots l Scatter plots l Pie-charts

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 18 Diagnostic Evaluation (qualitative and quantitative) l Compute various ratios – Metrics different for each problem being diagnosed / studied O 3 /NO z,,H 2 O 2 /HNO 3 for NO x versus VOC limitation NO z /NO y for chemical aging PM species ratios such as NH 3 /NH x, NO 3 /(total nitrate) for gas- particle partitioning, NH 4 /SO 4, NH 4 /NO 3, etc. Others? l Innovative Techniques – Empirical Orthogonal Functions – Principal Component Analyses – Process Analyses – Source Apportionment (available for Carbon and Sulfur) – Decoupled-direct method (DDM) – Others?

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 19 Analyses Tools for MPE l sitecmp to prepare obs-model pairs – Part of CMAQ Distribution l PAVE – l I/O API Utilities – l netCDF Operators – l NCAR Command-line Language – l Python I/O API Tools – portal/Members/azubrow/ioapiTools/index_html portal/Members/azubrow/ioapiTools/index_html l Atmospheric Model Evaluation Tool (AMET) – Under development at EPA

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 20 4-km 36-km 12-km MPE Example 1 Grid Resolution Variability

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 21 MPE Example 2 Spatial Variability of Peak Predictions

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 22 MPE Example 3 Wind and Obs Overlay

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 23 MPE Example 4 Scatter Plot Analyses l Regression analyses present model results across multiple observation points or time periods O3O3 SO 4

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 24 MPE Example 5 Time Series Analyses

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 25 MPE Example 6 Attainment Demonstration for O 3

_______________________________________________________________Advanced CMAQ Concepts ___________________________________________________Community Modeling and Analysis System 26 MPE Example 7 Forecast Model Evaluation