Kansas Department of Transportation Becky Pepper Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Kansas Department of Transportation Contact: 785-296-8593.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
Advertisements

Federal Safety Funding for Local Governments Martin Andersen Local Government Section Manager February 19, 2010.
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Overview NYS Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council August 2, 2010 Albany, New York.
WalkSafe’s Approach : Five E’s Prevention Model Parent and community involvement Monroe County Public Schools Funded by SRTS infrastructure Dept of Public.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
County Wide Active Transportation Study (CWATS) Master Plan Active Communities Summit – October 3, 2011.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program February 18, 2014.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Safe Routes to School in the ATP Jeanie Ward-Waller Senior California Policy Manager Active Transportation Program Cycle 2 Caltrans District Workshops.
Safe Routes to School: An update on programs, practice and how public health is playing a role Nancy Pullen, MPH, Program Manager September 14, 2006.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
Mapping the Way to Success: the Arkansas Safe Routes to School Program.
Federal MAP-21 Programs 1 Module 7 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) National Historic Trails Workshop, October
Webinar: August 28, Transportation Alternatives Program Webinar: August 28, 2013 Introduction: Shari Schaftlein, Director, FHWA Office of Human.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) International Snowmobile Congress — June
City of Leawood Bicycle Friendly Community The Year in Review.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 2015 Call for Projects Workshop February 17, 2015 HCMPO Conference Room| Weslaco, TX.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program Department of Transportation and Development Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program The Application.
RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM MAUREEN NEIGHBORS, COMMUNITY SERVICES UNIT CHIEF CRYSTAL DAVIS, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS MANAGER.
. Efforts to Reduce Crashes on County Roads in Iowa.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
School-based projects from a Transportation Act program.
MDOT Office of Economic Development Michael B. Kapp, Administrator Grant Programs Overview Transportation Solutions for Vibrant Communities.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
Transportation Enhancements Application Workshop Welcome!! October 3 & 4, 2012.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Funding Opportunities Safe Routes to School program Approximately $1.5 million available per year Future funding is uncertain Held 5 application cycles.
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS (TE) PROGRAM. Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program What is the Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program? What is the Transportation.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School. Where it’s safe, get kids walking and biking Where it’s not safe, make it safe Safe Routes to School goals.
Transportation Programs. Habitat and Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Restoration Mitigation Wildlife Human Safety Crossings.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Action 2020 Training Local Context August 15, 2012.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING GIS TYLER MEYER, AICP 2015 AMPO Conference Clark County, NV October 2015.
Presentation title | Date. Who We Are Building a Healthier Heartland (BHH)  Super-coalition of local and national partners that promotes policy, systems.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program November 16, 2015.
Where is the Safe Routes to School program in Fairfax County?
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
This is a story of the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
Active Transportation Program California Transportation Commission Mitch Weiss 01/14/141.
2016 Active Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives & Criteria Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee March 2, 2016 meeting.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
TITLE PAGE: Project Title
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
Office of Greenways & Trails
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
Chris Metka 2017 Statewide Conference on Heritage ???
Grant Funding for Outdoor Recreation through DCR
MPO Board Presentation
Federal-aid Highway Program
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Kansas Department of Transportation Becky Pepper Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Kansas Department of Transportation Contact:

Surface Transportation Program What: Provides flexible funding that may be used for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus terminals. Who: Cities with population greater than 5,000 and less than 200,000 not in a Transportation Management Area (TMA) Likelihood: Allocation: Cities — distributed based on population Counties — distributed by special city county highway fund (set by statute) Match: 80/20 Eligible Costs: Construction and construction engineering Projects: Transportation Alternative eligible projects, recreational trails projects Contact: Sondra Clark Bureau of Local Projects

Highway Safety Improvement Program What: High Risk Rural Roads Program: Funding for safety improvements on rural major or minor collectors, and local roads Who: All counties Main Points: - Intended for rural roads with history of crashes -Crash rate need to be higher than state average OR -Potential to increase above state average -Could either be spot improvements or low-cost corridor upgrade Match: 90/10 or 100% for signage/striping/rumble strips Eligible Costs: Construction and construction engineering Project: Signage, straightening curves, shoulder improvements Opportunity: Competitive Contact: Ed Thornton Bureau of Local Projects

Highway Safety Improvement Program What: Roadway Lighting Pavement Marking Sign Replacement Who: State highway system only Main Points: Program managers select projects based on need Match: No match required Eligible Costs: Preliminary engineering, construction and construction engineering Contact: Brian Gower Bureau of Transportation Safety

Highway Safety Improvement Program What: Intersection Safety Who: Cities and counties Main Points: - Funding for all roads — state or off system -Project selection based on crash history Match: 90/10 Eligible Costs: Construction and construction engineering Projects:Roundabouts, left turn lanes, signal upgrades Opportunity:High Contact: Brian Gower Bureau of Transportation Safety and Technology

402 Safety Program What: Provides funds for education, enforcement and research programs designed to reduce traffic crashes, fatalities, injuries and property damage. Who: Cities, counties, non-profits Main Points: -Safety related activities such as traffic studies and safety training -Traffic Engineering Assistance Program (TEAP) –Identifies transportation improvement need--has helped in SRTS projects in the past Match: Encouraged but not required Projects: Education, enforcement and research — not construction Opportunity: Ongoing—first come first serve Contact: Chris BortzEd Thornton Bureau of Transportation Bureau of Local Projects Safety and Technology

Transportation Alternatives Program Combines these programs: ▫National Recreational Trails ▫Transportation Enhancement (TE) ▫Safe Routes to School (SRTS) KDOT will continue to administer projects separately Contact: TA and SRTS Becky Pepper NRTP Kathy Pritchett

Recreational Trails Program Administered by Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism Funding: ▫1.3million for FFY 2014 program Three categories for recreational trail or trail-related projects ▫Motorized ▫Non-motorized ▫Diversified Eligibility ▫Projects with the primary objective to provide an alternative transportation corridor will NOT be accepted. ▫Must be able to provide local match, administer the project through completion, and operate/maintain the site after completion Federal reimbursement program, with at least 20% local match required More Information: ▫ ▫Kathy or

Transportation Alternatives Federal funding for non-traditional transportation projects Relates to surface transportation Associated with 3 general categories ▫Historic ▫Scenic and environmental ▫Bicycle and pedestrian

Reimbursement program ▫Not a grant program Minimum 20% local match required ▫In-kind or donated labor and materials are not counted as part of the match Submitted by local governing entity ▫City or county  Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) support for projects within those regions Transportation Alternatives

Eligible costs ▫Construction ▫Construction engineering (inspection) Non-eligible costs ▫Right-of-way acquition ▫Utility relocation ▫Design Next funding opportunity ▫Fall 2015 ▫Total approximate funding — 11 million Transportation Alternatives

New Changes to the program ▫Activities no longer eligible:  Safety and educational activities  Visitor and welcome centers  Operation of historic transportation facilities  Transportation museums ▫Letting  Most projects will now be KDOT let and administered by Local Projects ▫Suballocation  WAMPO and MARC will receive funds to administer regional programs  Cities and counties within these boundaries will submit project applications to MPO not KDOT Transportation Alternatives

Application Tips ▫Planning  How did the project come about?  Is the project well thought-out?  Was community input gathered?  Does the project connect to other bicycle and pedestrian facilities (planned or existing)?  Is it a transportation project that connects to destinations?  Is the project accessible? Transportation Alternatives

Application Tips ▫Safety  Does the project meet engineering guidelines (AASTHO, MUTCD)  Will the project interact safely with the existing transportation network (motorized or nonmotorized) ▫Community Support  Has the community been informed of the project?  Does the community show support for the project? Transportation Alternatives

Federal program authorized through Federal Transportation Bill MAP-21 Provides funding for infrastructure and noninfrastructure activities Benefits children in grades K-8 More Information: Safe Routes to School

Encourage more children to walk and bike to school Make walking and bicycling safe ways to get to school Safe Routes to School

Elements of SRTS Programs Education Encouragement Enforcement Engineering Evaluation

PHASE 1 Creation of a SRTS Master Plan Looks at obstacles and solutions for all “5Es” Funding is used to hire a consultant, administer public participation, and develop the Plan This is not to develop engineering design plans SRTS-Funding Categories

PHASE 2 Construction of infrastructure, such as: Sidewalk Improvements Traffic Calming and speed reduction Improved crossings Signage Bicycle parking Traffic diversion improvements around the school SRTS-Funding Categories

Noninfrastructure-Related Projects Activities that promote walking and bicycling to school, such as: Public awareness campaigns Traffic education and enforcement Student education related to bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and/or the environment Funding for training, volunteers, and managers of Safe Routes to School programs SRTS-Funding Categories

SRTS-Project Locations Infrastructure projects ▫public funds must be spent on projects within the public right-of-way ▫Project must be located within two miles of school Noninfrastructure projects ▫Activities related to traffic education or enforcement must occur within two miles of the eligible school ▫Other eligible noninfrastructure activities do not have a location restriction

SRTS-Sponsoring Agent Governmental Agency School Districts Civic Organizations Governmental Agency Phase 1Phase 2 Each application must include a letter from the School District stating their support and co-sponsorship. Governmental Agency School Districts Civic Organizations Noninfrastructure

SRTS-MPO Support Projects within MPO areas must have a letter of support from MPO MPOs include :  Flint Hills Metropolitan Planning Organization  Lawrence-Douglas County Metropolitan Planning Organization  Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization  St. Joseph Area Transportation Study Organization

SRTS-Suballocation WAMPO and MARC will receive funds to administer regional programs ▫Distribution of TAP reserved for FFY 2014:  MARC — $1,197,492  WAMPO — $853,431 Cities and counties within these boundaries will submit project applications to MPO not KDOT

SRTS-Funding Reimbursement Program ▫locals will be reimbursed by the state for all eligible costs incurred Required Match ▫20% local match is now required Funding Maximums ▫Phase 1: $12,000 Maximum ▫Phase 2: $200,000 Maximum ▫Noninfrastructure projects: Case-by-case

SRTS- Eligible Costs Eligible Costs ▫Determined on case-by- case basis ▫Application should show clear connection between request and planning process Eligible Costs ▫Construction ▫Construction Engineering Ineligible costs ▫Design ▫Right-of-way acquition ▫Movement of Utilities Phase 1Phase 2

SRTS-Eligible Costs Eligible Costs ▫Determined on case-by- case basis ▫Funds cannot be used for reoccurring costs Noninfrastructure

SRTS-Program History Total Applications ReceivedFunded % Funded Phase % Phase %

▫Next SRTS application—SPRING 2014 ▫Available funding  Approximately $850,000 SRTS-Application

▫Phase 1 and Phase 2 projects:  Who was, or will be, involved in the planning process?  Is the project need illustrated through the current issues?  Is community support for the project illustrated? ▫Phase 2 projects:  Are all 5Es addressed  Were barriers identified?  Were solutions identified to address the barriers?  How were the solutions things identified and prioritized? SRTS-Application Tips

BCBSKS Foundation: Healthy Habits for Life Objective: help schools address childhood obesity Kansas Dept. Of Health and Environment: Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Program Objective: Physical activity and nutrition grants uction.html Other Funding Opportunities

Kansas Dept. of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism: o Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant o Recreational Trails Grant National Park Service: Active Trails Objective: Promote healthy living by getting people out and active on the trails Other Funding Opportunities

Sunflower Foundation: Sunflower Trails Grant Objective: Funding for walking and multiuse trails healthy_behaviors_prev-sunflower_trails.php United Health Ministry Objective: Advance health, healing, and wholeness throughout Kansas Other Funding Opportunities

Westar Energy Green Team Objective: Enhance and foster an understanding of the Kanas Environment. Built Environment and the Outdoors Summit Wichita, September Funding Roundtable Other Funding Opportunities