THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prepared by the Alabama Department of Transportation MAY 2, 2014 State of Alabama Transportation Infrastructure Funding.
Advertisements

Prepared by the Alabama Department of Transportation State of Alabama Transportation Infrastructure Funding.
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
Presented by: Jerri Bohard, ODOT Transportation Development Division Administrator Paul Mather, ODOT Highway Division Administrator Travis Brouwer, ODOT.
TRE ANNUAL MEETING Grant Levi, NDDOT Director November 26,
Senate Committee on Transportation, Technology and Legislative Affairs House Committee on Public Transportation Thursday, July 18, 2013.
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION August 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Local Highway Technical Assistance Council Joint Senate and House Transportation Committees January
Your Roads The Future, Some History, and Alternatives For Wasco County April 23, 2013.
The Cost of Status Quo Governor’s Task Force on Modernizing Transportation Funding in Idaho December 2, 2009 Presented by Idaho’s Metropolitan Planning.
Fuel Tax Revenue Revenue Drivers  Miles Driven (VMT)  Fuel Efficiency.
Highway Improvement Program Funding Status With ARRA Rhode Island Department of Transportation April 8, 2010.
Twenty-Fourth Annual Alabama Asphalt Pavement Conference MARCH 11, 2014 ALDOT HIGHWAY FUNDING UPDATE.
PROPOSITION 1 AND SELECTED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS IN TARRANT COUNTY SOUTHEAST TARRANT TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP OCTOBER 8, 2014.
Office of Project Development Department of Highways Retreat June 12, 2008.
Highway Funding 2009 and Beyond: The States’ Perspective AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley Pacific Northwest Waterways Association Washington, D.C.
TPO Board. 25-Year Planning Horizon Update LRTP every 5 years Identify needed major improvements Determine those that are “cost feasible” (i.e., highest.
COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Transportation Funding Challenges Jason Segedy, Director Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study May 2010.
Association of Indiana Counties Community Forum Indiana Road and Highway Funding Neal Carboneau Research Manager Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
A M O T I A A N N U A L M E E T I N G 2 3 S E P T E M B E R N A S H V I L L E, T N 1 A View from the State DOTs Joung H. Lee Associate Director.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Mike Bowen FHWA – Kansas Division Fall TOPICS Trust Fund Status Reauthorization/Funding Every Day Counts III Performance Management Rulemaking.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
Asset Management Cindy VanDyke Office of Planning Georgia Department of Transportation.
MML Capital Conference MML Capital Conference Director Kirk T. Steudle, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation March 4, 2009.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
Prepared for Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in cooperation with K.T. Analytics November 16, 2005 Status.
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
Finance and Infrastructure Subcommittee Financing Recommendations.
INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Steve Baumann Financial Specialist (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike.
A Cross-State Comparison of Arkansas's Highway Financing and Infrastructure Quality.
Dane County Department of Public Works, Highway & Transportation Jerry Mandli, P.E. Commissioner/ Director.
Iowa in Motion  Iowa’s Plan Process  Phased Approach Part  -current conditions -issues -elements.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
HIGHWAY TRUST FUND. HOW ARE PUBLIC PROJECTS FUNDED? General Fund Generated by general revenues Bonds Usually by referenda User Fees Pay as you go.
Colbert County Budget Solutions John Bedford, P.E. County Engineer 2012 ACEA Convention.
Action 2020 Training Local Context August 15, 2012.
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.
MEC’S BLUEPRINT MISSISSIPPI LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION/ INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)
HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION FUNDING. Highway Transportation Funding Federal and State Revenue has been flat since 2005, not including the one time stimulus.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
Financial Resources Overview February 11, Outlook 2040 LRTP Update Goals & ObjectivesNeedsAssessment DataForecastsFinancialResources CostFeasiblePlan.
John Angiulli Interim Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Citizen Academy October 9 & 16, 2012.
Presentation to the Washington Transportation Commission March 16, 2010 Washington State Association of County Engineers.
Division of Budgets January 25, 2012 Budget and Allocation Capacity Update Presented to the California Transportation Commission Tab 13.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.
In Numbers Strength COLORADO TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
Facing Funding and Weather Challenges: Impact of Weather Events on Treatment Selection and Pavement Condition PPRA Fall Meeting 2014 November 17-19, Baltimore,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
Presentation transcript:

THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014

ESTIMATED STATE FUNDS 2015$ 484,574,000 ESTIMATED FEDERAL FUNDS 2015$ 732,263,000 TOTAL $1,216,837,000 ALDOT HIGHWAY REVENUE PROJECTION

ProgramYears Average Funding ($ Millions) Range of Funding ($ Millions ) ISTEA $283$240 - $368 TEA $560$463 - $618 SAFETEA-LU $731$697 - $788 MAP $737$733 - $741 HISTORICAL FEDERAL FUNDING LEVELS

Without Stimulus $$ TOTAL STATE AND FEDERAL HIGHWAY REVENUE

CONSTRUCTION COSTS TRENDS

STATE OF ALABAMA TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING $588 million 1991 New Diversion

ALDOT 2015 PROPOSED FUNDING ALLOCATION

ALLOCATION OF FUNDS State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Administrative Office of the Courts $ 35,000,000 Department of Public Safety $ 28,500,000 Department of Revenue $ 4,900,000 State Personnel Department $ 1,375,000 State Park Maintenance $ 500,000 Industrial Access Apportionment $ 11,000,000 County Engineers Salary Support $ 6,500,000 Captive County Insurance $ 125,000 Total $ 87,900,000

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 Large Urban Areas $ 35,652,000 Small Urban Areas $ 13,292,000 Counties (Including Off-System Bridge) $ 35,711,000 CMAQ – Birmingham Area $ 10,903,000 Transportation Alternatives $ 15,279,000 Metropolitan Planning $ 2,910,000 ATRIP/GARVEE/RAMP Payment $ 93,500,000 Total $ 207,247,000

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Supports the 50 District, Division and Regional Offices in the performance of routine maintenance including pothole patching, sign, signals and marking maintenance, debris removal, guardrail repair, etc….

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Based on resurfacing all of the interstate on a 12 year cycle. This requires 84 miles of interstate to be resurfaced each year.

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Bridge Replacement$ 80,000,000 $80 m replaces about 40 bridges each year. ALDOT has been able to maintain bridges on the state system at a reasonable state of repair, however, there are 5,745 bridges on the state system.

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Bridge Replacement$ 80,000,000 Resurfacing$ 260,000,000 Based on resurfacing all non-interstate state routes on a 12 year cycle. This requires that 850 miles be resurfaced each year.

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Bridge Replacement$ 80,000,000 Resurfacing$ 260,000,000 Capacity/System Enhancement/APD$ 90,000,000 Capacity/System Enhancement projects are new roads and projects to add lanes to existing roads or some other type of enhancement beyond maintaining the status quo, such as new interchanges, intersection improvements, access management and ITS strategies, etc….

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Bridge Replacement$ 80,000,000 Resurfacing$ 260,000,000 Capacity/System Enhancement/APD$ 90,000,000 Unplanned Needs$ 10,000,000 Unplanned needs may includes assistance to local governments, incentives to recruit industry or other unanticipated expenditure.

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Bridge Replacement$ 80,000,000 Resurfacing$ 260,000,000 Capacity/System Enhancement/APD$ 90,000,000 Unplanned Needs $ 10,000,000 Obligation Limitation$ 15,000,000 ALDOT is not given authority to spend all of the federal allocation given to the state. While the federal allocation for the year is $732m, ALDOT is typically only allowed to obligate about $717m.

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Bridge Replacement$ 80,000,000 Resurfacing$ 260,000,000 Capacity/System Enhancement/APD$ 90,000,000 Unplanned Needs $ 10,000,000 Obligation Limitation$ 15,000,000 Equipment/Land & Building$ 11,000,000

State Funds to Others$ 87,900,000 Federal Funds to Others$ 207,247,000 ALDOT Overhead$ 70,350,000 Routine/Emergency Maintenance$ 165,500,000 Safety$ 49,840,000 Interstate Maintenance$ 170,000,000 Bridge Replacement$ 80,000,000 Resurfacing$ 260,000,000 Capacity/System Enhancement/APD$ 90,000,000 Unplanned Needs$ 10,000,000 Obligation Limitation$ 15,000,000 Equipment/Land & Building$ 11,000,000 Total Program$1, 216,837,000

FUNDING ALLOCATION

SOLVENCY OF THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY TRUST FUND ? Expenditures > Receipts

HIGHWAY TRUST FUND SOLUTIONS 1. Increase the gasoline tax or other fee 2. Continue to transfer $ from general fund account 3. Cut spending - live within your means 4. Devolution (or partial devolution)

WHAT WILL EFFECT FUNDING IN THE FUTURE?

Future Fuel Economy Standards

VEHICLE FUEL EFFICIENCY

WHAT DO WE DRIVE? 1994 Honda Accord, #2 Top Seller 21/27 mpg city/hwy 2013 Honda Accord, #4 Top Seller 27/36 mpg city/hwy

WHAT DID WE SPEND? If you drove 12,000 miles – ½ city, ½ hwy You consumed 508 gallons of gas If you drove 12,000 miles – ½ city, ½ hwy You consumed 389 gallons of gas You paid $185 in gasoline tax You paid $142 in gasoline tax

VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL

1.Don’t expect the Federal Government to increase federal funding for highways. 2.Don’t be surprised if the Federal Government provides less money. 3.It will not be immediate, but over time expect less revenue due to vehicle fuel efficiency. 4.Expect a move toward a mileage based fee. 5.P3’s will have limited application. 6.Any revenue increases will most likely be done at the state or local level.