Pennsylvania Reading First Leadership Meeting A Pathway For Success Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida Center for Reading.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap International.
Leadership for Advancing Adolescent Literacy RESA-I 21 st Century Education Leadership Series October 21, 2008 Terry Reale, WVDE Coordinator Reading English.
Title I Directors Conference October 23-25, 2007 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV Reading the Fine Print Monitoring K-3 Reading Programs Presenter: Pat.
Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Pleasant Valley Parent Information Night. Connecticut Summit Message: We Have A Reading Problem In Connecticut Many entering K students do not have expected.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap National Association.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Early Literary Success: Effective Intervention for Kindergarten Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties Washington Education Research Association 22nd.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux,
Reading First and Interventions Stuart Greenberg Georgia Reading First Conference.
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Providing Leadership in Reading First Schools: Essential Elements Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida Center for Reading Research Miami Reading First Principals,
Pam Stewart, Commissioner SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN [ DRAFT ] Memorial Elementary School 851 E HICKORY ST Arcadia, FL
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Instructional Leadership Pennsylvania Reading First Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida State University and The Florida.
Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research Georgia March, 2004.
1. 2 K-3 Scientifically Research Based Comprehensive Reading Programs.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
What Is High Quality Reading Instruction?. High quality reading programs provide evidence of what each child CAN do and provide each teacher with the.
Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired (IESBVI)Conference October 8 th and 9 th, 2012 WELCOME!
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
The Urgent need to improve reading instruction and outcomes for our K-12 students Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida State University and Florida Center for.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Pennsylvania Department of Education, Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network RtII Overview Whitehall-Coplay Middle School May 18, 2011.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Early Reading First. The ultimate goal of Early Reading First is to close the achievement gap by preventing reading difficulties.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Effectively Implementing Standards and Research-Based Strategies with L EARNING -F OCUSED Effectively Implementing Standards and Research-Based Strategies.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
October 6, SubjectGrade Level(s)Benchmark Reading3-575% Math3-570% VA History470% Science570% Discontinued State Tests (As of Spring 2015) 3 rd.
CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.
Grimes Reading Institute A Road Map for School Leaders to Navigate the Land of Reading New York State Reading First and.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
The Significance Section Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
Social emotional learning
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Offered by The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading First Assessment “Catch Them Before They Fall”
Creating a School-Wide Literacy Plan Richmond Public Schools Assistant Principals Meeting September 28, 2011.
The State of the School’s Reading First Program Fall, 2005.
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (S/CDN) September 14, 2006 Albany Marriott Hotel Presented by: Jean C. Stevens Interim Deputy Commissioner New York.
Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida State University and
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Ready to Read Ready to Succeed
All readers by 3rd grade Guidance for the Use of Diagnostic
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Supplemental and Intervention Reading Programs
Success for All Foundation
Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of NJ
Presentation transcript:

Pennsylvania Reading First Leadership Meeting A Pathway For Success Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida Center for Reading Research Florida State University Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Stuart Greenberg March 31, 2004

Objective of Reading First (1)“To provide assistance to state educational agencies and local educational agencies in establishing reading programs for students in kindergarten through grade 3 that are based on scientifically based reading research to ensure that every student can read at grade level or above not later than the end of grade 3.” NCLB, 2001, Part B, Sec. 1201

Three Definitions of Schools A series of autonomous classrooms that are connected by a common parking lot. A place where the relatively young watch the relatively old work. A complex organization that is built upon relationships that require individuals to work interdependently.

The demands of phonologic, alphabetic, semantic, and syntactic systems of written language require a careful schedule and sequence of –prioritized objectives, –explicit strategies, and –scaffolds that support students’ initial learning and transfer of knowledge and skills to other contexts.

Teaching and learning that effectively moves children through the “learning to read” stage to the “reading to learn” stage are simply too important to leave to chance.

“The probability of remaining a poor reader at the end of fourth grade, given a child was a poor reader at the end of first grade, was the probability of remaining an average reader in fourth grade, given an average reading ability in first grade, was.87.” (Juel, 1988) Poor readers at the end of first grade are at very significant risk for long term academic difficulty. Poor readers at the end of first grade are likely to require intensive instructional support to reach third grade reading outcomes. Consequences of Falling Behind

Benchmark Goals ORF First Grade Middle of Year End of Year <8 At Risk <20 At Risk 8-20 Some Risk Some Risk >20 Low Risk >40 Low Risk

Benchmark Goals ORF Second Grade Beginning of Year Middle of Year End of Year <26 At Risk <52 At Risk <70 At Risk Some Risk Some Risk Some Risk >44 Low Risk >68 Low Risk >90 Low Risk

Benchmark Goals ORF Third Grade Beginning of Year Middle of Year End of Year <53 At Risk <67 At Risk <80 At Risk Some Risk Some Risk Some Risk >77 Low Risk >92 Low Risk >110 Low Risk

Schedule adequate time for reading instruction Support initial and ongoing professional development with curriculum and assessment Provide extra support through coaching Stay current with instructional research Provide the vision and plan to enable every child to become a robust reader Pathway To Success Lessons Learned

Scientifically Based Reading Research Report from the National Research Council 1998 In 1995, the U.S. Department of Education and the National Institutes of Health National Academy of Sciences

In 1997, United States Congress National Institute of Child Health and Human Development & U.S. Department of Education Report of the National Reading Panel

Available from: National Institute for Literacy

Schedule at least 90 minutes of uninterrupted reading instruction every day for all K-3 students. School Schedule

Initial and ongoing review of the school reading instructional schedule Process for the placement of incoming students LEA & SEA Principal Teacher Coach

Purchase instructional materials, including supplemental and intervention programs that are fully aligned with scientifically based reading research. Instructional Materials A core program is the “base” reading program designed to provide instruction on the essential areas of reading for the majority of students schoolwide. In general, the core program should enable 80% or more of students to attain schoolwide reading goals.

Professional Development Core 3-5 days Intensive Intervention 2-3 days Supplemental 1 1/2 to 2 days LEA & SEA Principal Teacher Coach

Develop and implement a well-organized reading assessment system that includes screening, diagnosis, formative assessments and summative assessments. Assessments Set expectations for progress

Assessments Help principals manage the instructional resources in their schools more effectively Help teachers plan instruction more effectively Help reading coaches provide better support to teachers LEA & SEA Principal Teacher Coach

Grouping for Instruction Part of each reading instructional period should be structured to permit the teacher to work with small, homogeneous groups of students specifically designed and based on assessment information.

Reading First as a delicate balancing act requiring not only scientific knowledge but also common sense and sensitive leadership Needs of many children for explicit and systematic instruction through the core SBRR program

Need for immediate intensive intervention to accelerate reading achievement with Reading First as a delicate balancing act requiring not only scientific knowledge but also common sense and sensitive leadership

Need for teachers to develop collaborative coaching relationships Reading First as a delicate balancing act requiring not only scientific knowledge but also common sense and sensitive leadership

Need for teachers to develop collaborative coaching relationships Need of the instructional leaders to provide coaching based upon ongoing data Reading First as a delicate balancing act requiring not only scientific knowledge but also common sense and sensitive leadership

Needs of many children for explicit and systematic instruction in alphabetics Reading First as a delicate balancing act requiring not only scientific knowledge but also common sense and sensitive leadership

Needs of many children for explicit and systematic instruction in alphabetics Need for expanded aligned reading and writing experiences that enhances student achievement Reading First as a delicate balancing act requiring not only scientific knowledge but also common sense and sensitive leadership

Reading Programs PLUS EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT LEADERSHIP SCIENTIFICALLY BASED READING RESEARCH

"We have not succeeded in answering all of your problems. The answers we have found only serve to raise a whole set of new questions. In some ways we feel we are as confused as ever, but we believe we are confused on a higher level and about more important things." Thank You