The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.K.Stefanides March 07, The Muon Spectrometer of the ATLAS detector: progress report on construction and physics studies at the University of Athens.
Advertisements

Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
ATLAS LHCC 28/11/00 A. Henriques/CERN 1 H8 : Pixel, SCT, TRT, Tiles, LAr em barrel, Muons SPS H6: EMEC, HEC, FCAL, Background studies GIF: Muons (MDT,
Muon Data Quality and Performance A. Belloni - G. Zevi Della Porta for the ATLAS Harvard Group DOE Site Visit
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
D. Peterson, Muon Spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS, presentation to LEPP 19-Nov  spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS Our charge: Survivability Resolution.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Neutron Background Simulation Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall They get captured by nuclei, emitting a photon Compton scattering.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Muon System and Physics Performance Ludovico Pontecorvo CERN-INFN.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG Introduction The Detector Choices Simulation The structure and detector design The Expected performance Schedule.
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
LHC Upgrade: Evaluation of monitored drift tubes inclusion into the ATLAS level 1 muon end cap trigger ICEPP, KEK A Katarina Bendtz, Takayuki Kamiya, Tatsuo.
Muon Software Tutorial Rick Wilkinson Caltech. The Basics Q: Is there a Muon class? A : No. A muon is just a RecTrack, the same class as the Tracker uses.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
14/11/2007CERN - Muon Week1 Detector Description status and plans Laurent Chevalier Dapnia – Saclay Stefania Spagnolo Univ. del Salento and INFN Lecce.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Calorimeter Assisted Track Finder Tracking Infrastructure Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University Linear Collider Workshop 2007 May 30 – June 3, 2007.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
Studying the efficiency and the space resolution of resistive strips MicroMegas Marco Villa – CERN MAMMA meeting Tuesday, 13 th December 2011 CERN, Geneva.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
A Level-2 trigger algorithm for the identification of muons in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alessandro Di Mattia on behalf of the Atlas TDAQ group Computing.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
The ATLAS detector … … is composed of cylindrical layers: Tracking detector: Pixel, SCT, TRT (Solenoid magnetic field) Calorimeter: Liquid Argon, Tile.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Calibration
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Presentation transcript:

The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion are outlined GEANT4 MUON DIGITIZATION IN THE ATHENA FRAMEWORK ATLAS Detector and its Simulation The Muon Spectrometer Simulation Muon Digitization The Muon Spectrometer is a large and complex system relying on several detector technologies The Full Simulation of the ATLAS Detector consists of a collection of independent modules, developed separately by the different subdetectors, to be loaded on demand as separate libraries: Inner Detector -Tile and Electromagnetic Calorimeters - Magnet System - Muon Spectrometer Here, only the detailed implementation of the first step of the MuonDigitization, where the detector simulation output (Muon Hits) is “digitized” into Muon Digits, is described Contribution n. 87 International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics, February 13-17, 2006 – TIFR, Mumbai, India 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2 MPI fur Physik, 3 CERN, 4 Pavia University and INFN, 5 Shinishu University, 6 NIKHEF Muon Spectrometer EM Calorimeter Solenoid ForwardCalorimeter EndcapToroid Barrel Toroid Inner Detector HadronicCalorimeter Shielding The ATLAS experiment, one of the biggest and most complex ever designed, requires a detailed and flexible simulation, developed in an Object-Oriented environment, to cope with design optimization, fast navigation and tracking Precision Chambers Monitored Drift Tube chambers (MDTs) in the barrel and in the endcap regions - Cathode Strip Chambers (CSCs) in the innermost ring of the endcap stations Trigger Chambers Resistive Plate Chambers (RPCs) in the barrel region - Thin Gap Chambers (TGCs) in the endcap region The Muon Digitization is the simulation of the Raw Data Objects (RDOs), or the electronic output, of the Muon Spectrometer. It has been re-written to run within the ATHENA framework and to interface with the Geant4 Muon Spectrometer Detector Simulation. The code is in the ATLAS cvs repository under offline/MuonSpectrometer/MuonDigitization ATLAS Offline DataFlow The Muon Digitization process consists of two steps: 1. the output of the Muon Simulation, referred to as Muon Hits, is converted to Muon Digits, i.e. intermediate objects that can be fed into the reconstruction 2. the Muon Digits are converted into RDOs, the transient representation of the raw data byte stream. This step is realized by means of ATHENA Converters, which take into account cabling and readout From Muon Hits to Muon Digits OfflineIDs, Muon Digits and Raw Data Objects RDOs for the four Muon technologies MuonDigits 1. are defined by the reconstruction group 2. resemble the detector output 3. are converted in RDOs before undergoing permanent writing (POOL persistification) Digitization Validation General method: compare known (‘true’) track position with associated digit position and study residual distributions. Many problems has been found and fixed, thanks to this validation procedure (e.g., wrong ID’s in BOF RPC chambers, memory leaks in RDO converters) Single Muon Technology Digitization RTT (RunTime Test) is running every nightly build on the digitization algorithms to perform a DigitValidation MDT Digitization CSC Digitization RPC Digitization TGC Digitization The MDT Digitization consists of several steps 1. conversion from drift radius to drift time 2. calculation of the time structure of the event drift time (+ ADC charge) + time of flight + bunch time relative to the current bunch + propagation delay of the signal with respect to the tube readout side + dead time 3. trigger match for the digits 4. conversion of total time into TDC counts The RPC Digitization 1.calculates the propagation time of each electronic signal along the strip, from the Rpc Hit position information 2.computes the global time of the digit, adding the propagation time to the time of flight 3.perform the cluster size simulation Inefficiencies plus the digits with a wrong position w.r.t. the muon trajectory. This clearly spotted regions with problems The TGC Digitization, is done independently 1. for hits along the R coordinate 2. for hits along the phi coordinate Wire gangs in R direction readout Strips in phi direction readout The TGC Digitization simulates the following detector responses: 1. multi hits due to tracks passing several wire gangs 2. intrinsic time response, signal propagation along wires and strips 3. detector efficiency (sensitivity) of wire gangs and strips 1. Multi Hits by a single track 2. Time response 1. Charge simulation In addition to handling hits coming from a single bunch crossing, the MuonDigitization is also able to treat piled-up collisions. Before undergoing the conversion to Muon Digits, hits from several bunch crossing are overlaid taking into account the globalTime of the hit plus the bunch crossing time w.r.t the main crossing. The pile-up model can also handle the cavern background  cavern background and minimum bias hits are merged together to the signal hits at the digitization level Pile up with minimum bias and cavern background events 3. Trigger match 1. Cluster size simulation Cluster simulation: When a particle generates an avalanche in an RPC, one of more strips can be fired Probability to have a cluster of size = 1 as a function of the impact point along the strip Cluster spread distributions for clusters of size 3 and 4 – experimental distributions are used to decide the size of the cluster Scatter plot of ratio of signals from neighboring strips as a function of the position of the avalanche Simulated time response distribution as a function of the incident track angle Simulation of the signal firing two neighboring strips Simulation of an MDT chamber with two RPCs Simulation of the RPC internal structure MuonHits and Simulation Identifiers for the four Muon technologies K. A. Assamagan 1, N. Ch. Benekos 2, A. Di Simone 3, D. Rebuzzi 4, Y. Hasegawa 5, N. Van Eldik 6 1. Dead time calculation The ATLAS Simulation runs into ATHENA, the ATLAS computing frame Simulation of the inert materials in ATLAS The simulation of muon events requires a very careful description of the active detectors and their functionalities in full details, with a precision description of the passive materials (toroids, shields, etc.) present in the muon region 2. Time response CSC amplifier signal shape Residuals for X and Y strips Single Hit Resolution (no noise) CSC Reconstruction efficiency versus eta for 100 GeV single muons Eta and phi positions of muons not producing any RPC digits. Inefficiencies are located in regions not instrumented with RPCs Digits coming from hits in the masked window are marked "masked“ and will have TDC and ADC counts set to 0 Hits in the matching window will produce normal digits If an hit lies outside of both windows no Digit is created For a given tube the hits are sorted on time From the first hit the deadtime is set (default = 700ns) No additional hits if their time is smaller than the deadtime If a hit with t > deadtime is found the deadtime is reset The CSC Digitization simulates the charge distribution on the CSC cathode strip, identifying strip numbers and orientations. This occurs in different steps: 1. Charge calculation on a strip together with the strip OID 2. Simulation of the raw data, i.e. the output of the electronics Avalanche production in the CSC gas